Lehrstuhl für Bürgerliches Recht, Wettbewerbs- und Immaterialgüterrecht, Medien- und Informationsrecht

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","814"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","821"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiebe, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Schur, Nico"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:19:20Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:19:20Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/jiplp/jpz119"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1747-1540"],["dc.identifier.issn","1747-1532"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/75207"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Protection of trade secrets in a data-driven, networked environment – Is the update already out-dated?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","JURA - Juristische Ausbildung"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","37"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Wiebe, Andreas;"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Kreutz, Oliver;"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiebe, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Kreutz, Oliver"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-11-28T10:31:14Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-11-28T10:31:14Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015-11-20"],["dc.date.updated","2022-11-27T10:13:48Z"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/117480"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DeepGreen Import"],["dc.publisher","De Gruyter"],["dc.relation.eissn","1612-7021"],["dc.relation.issn","0170-1452"],["dc.title","Blended Learning in der juristischen Vorlesung"],["dc.title.subtitle","– Zugleich ein Bericht über ein Pilotprojekt in Göttingen"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","89"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","JIPITEC Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","96"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiebe, Andreas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-10T08:14:03Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-10T08:14:03Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","This article reviews Article 6 of the Software Directive and discusses the need for a revision. Beyond clarification of the scope of the very limited provision on reverse engineering, it seems that the introduction of the clause into copyright was unfortunate. The indirect protection of ideas by prohibiting reverse engineering is foreign to the copyright concept. Permitting reverse engineering altogether would promote research and development and further other goals like ICT security. Innovation would not be retarded, which is the reason why US trade secret law permits reverse engineering based also on economic arguments. The notions of compatibility Article 6 tries to address are better dealt with by Competition Law, which was demonstrated by the Microsoft Decision of the European Court in 2007."],["dc.identifier.fs","586284"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8659"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61419"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","2190-3387"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Juristische Fakultät"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","340"],["dc.title","Interoperabilität von Software : Art. 6 der Computerprogramm-Richtlinie aus heutiger Sicht"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]