Wanger, Thomas Cherico

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","53"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Conservation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","59"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","151"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Wanger, Thomas C."],["dc.contributor.author","Jackson, Louise"],["dc.contributor.author","Motzke, Iris"],["dc.contributor.author","Perfecto, Ivette"],["dc.contributor.author","Vandermeer, John"],["dc.contributor.author","Whitbread, Anthony Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:46Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:46Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Under the current scenario of rapid human population increase, achieving efficient and productive agricultural land use while conserving biodiversity is a global challenge. There is an ongoing debate whether land for nature and for production should be segregated (land sparing) or integrated on the same land (land sharing, wildlife-friendly farming). While recent studies argue for agricultural intensification in a land sparing approach, we suggest here that it fails to account for real-world complexity. We argue that agriculture practiced under smallholder farmer-dominated landscapes and not large-scale farming, is currently the backbone of global food security in the developing world. Furthermore, contemporary food usage is inefficient with one third wasted and a further third used inefficiently to feed livestock and that conventional intensification causes often overlooked environmental costs. A major argument for wildlife friendly farming and agroecological intensification is that crucial ecosystem services are provided by “planned” and “associated” biodiversity, whereas the land sparing concept implies that biodiversity in agroecosystems is functionally negligible. However, loss of biological control can result in dramatic increases of pest densities, pollinator services affect a third of global human food supply, and inappropriate agricultural management can lead to environmental degradation. Hence, the true value of functional biodiversity on the farm is often inadequately acknowledged or understood, while conventional intensification tends to disrupt beneficial functions of biodiversity. In conclusion, linking agricultural intensification with biodiversity conservation and hunger reduction requires well-informed regional and targeted solutions, something which the land sparing vs sharing debate has failed to achieve so far."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149901"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6611"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","0006-3207"],["dc.title","Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","593"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6056"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","596"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","334"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Bawa, Kamal S."],["dc.contributor.author","Brussaard, L."],["dc.contributor.author","Chappell, M. J."],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Daily, G. C."],["dc.contributor.author","Dorrough, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Hartel, T."],["dc.contributor.author","Jackson, L. E."],["dc.contributor.author","Klein, Alexandra-Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Kremen, Claire"],["dc.contributor.author","Kuemmerle, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindenmayer, David B."],["dc.contributor.author","Mooney, H. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Perfecto, Ivette"],["dc.contributor.author","Philpott, Stacy M."],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Vandermeer, John"],["dc.contributor.author","Wanger, Thomas C."],["dc.contributor.author","von Wehrden, H."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1126/science.334.6056.593-a"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150059"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6784"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","0036-8075"],["dc.title","Conservation: Limits of Land Sparing"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","619"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Applied Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","629"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","48"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Bhagwat, Shonil A."],["dc.contributor.author","Buchori, Damayanti"],["dc.contributor.author","Faust, Heiko"],["dc.contributor.author","Hertel, Dietrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Hölscher, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Juhrbandt, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Kessler, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Perfecto, Ivette"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherber, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Schroth, Götz"],["dc.contributor.author","Veldkamp, Edzo"],["dc.contributor.author","Wanger, Thomas C."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:53Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","1. Agricultural intensification reduces ecological resilience of land-use systems, whereas paradoxically, environmental change and climate extremes require a higher response capacity than ever. Adaptation strategies to environmental change include maintenance of shade trees in tropical agroforestry, but conversion of shaded to unshaded systems is common practice to increase short-term yield.2. In this paper, we review the short-term and long-term ecological benefits of shade trees in coffee Coffea arabica, C. canephora and cacao Theobroma cacao agroforestry and emphasize the poorly understood, multifunctional role of shade trees for farmers and conservation alike.3. Both coffee and cacao are tropical understorey plants. Shade trees in agroforestry enhance functional biodiversity, carbon sequestration, soil fertility, drought resistance as well as weed and biological pest control. However, shade is needed for young cacao trees only and is less important in older cacao plantations. This changing response to shade regime with cacao plantation age often results in a transient role for shade and associated biodiversity in agroforestry.4. Abandonment of old, unshaded cacao in favour of planting young cacao in new, thinned forest sites can be named ‘short-term cacao boom-and-bust cycle’, which counteracts tropical forest conservation. In a ‘long-term cacao boom-and-bust cycle’, cacao boom can be followed by cacao bust due to unmanageable pest and pathogen levels (e.g. in Brazil and Malaysia). Higher pest densities can result from physiological stress in unshaded cacao and from the larger cacao area planted. Risk-averse farmers avoid long-term vulnerability of their agroforestry systems by keeping shade as an insurance against insect pest outbreaks, whereas yield-maximizing farmers reduce shade and aim at short-term monetary benefits.5. Synthesis and applications. Sustainable agroforestry management needs to conserve or create a diverse layer of multi-purpose shade trees that can be pruned rather than removed when crops mature. Incentives from payment-for-ecosystem services and certification schemes encourage farmers to keep high to medium shade tree cover. Reducing pesticide spraying protects functional agrobiodiversity such as antagonists of pests and diseases, pollinating midges determining cacao yields and pollinating bees enhancing coffee yield. In a landscape perspective, natural forest alongside agroforestry allows noncrop-crop spillover of a diversity of functionally important organisms. Knowledge transfer between farmers, agronomists and ecologists in a participatory approach helps to encourage a shade management regime that balances economic and ecological needs and provides a ‘diversified food-and-cash crop’ livelihood strategy."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01939.x"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150127"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6857"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-8901"],["dc.subject","agricultural intensification; Arabica and Robusta coffee; boom-and-bust cycles; cacao yield; ecological-economic trade-offs; ecological resilience; functional biodiversity; household vulnerability"],["dc.title","Multifunctional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes - a review"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","795"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Conservation Biology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","802"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","24"],["dc.contributor.author","Wanger, Thomas C."],["dc.contributor.author","Iskandar, Djoko T."],["dc.contributor.author","Motzke, Iris"],["dc.contributor.author","Brook, Barry W."],["dc.contributor.author","Sodhi, Navjot S."],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Little is known about the effects of anthropogenic land-use change on the amphibians and reptiles of the biodiverse tropical forests of Southeast Asia. We studied a land-use modification gradient stretching from primary forest, secondary forest, natural-shade cacao agroforest, planted-shade cacao agroforest to open areas in central Sulawesi, Indonesia. We determined species richness, abundance, turnover, and community composition in all habitat types and related these to environmental correlates, such as canopy heterogeneity and thickness of leaf litter. Amphibian species richness decreased systematically along the land-use modification gradient, but reptile richness and abundance peaked in natural-shade cacao agroforests. Species richness and abundance patterns across the disturbance gradient were best explained by canopy cover and leaf-litter thickness in amphibians and by canopy heterogeneity and cover in reptiles. Amphibians were more severely affected by forest disturbance in Sulawesi than reptiles. Heterogeneous canopy cover and thick leaf litter should be maintained in cacao plantations to facilitate the conservation value for both groups. For long-term and sustainable use of plantations, pruned shade trees should be permanently kept to allow rejuvenation of cacao and, thus, to prevent repeated forest encroachment."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01434.x"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149948"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6661"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","0888-8892"],["dc.subject","amphibians; Bayesian modeling; cacao agroforestry; Indonesia; land-use change; reptiles; Southeast Asia"],["dc.title","Effects of Land-Use Change on Community Composition of Tropical Amphibians and Reptiles in Sulawesi, Indonesia"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","690"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1706"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","694"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","278"],["dc.contributor.author","Wanger, Thomas C."],["dc.contributor.author","Wielgoss, Arno C."],["dc.contributor.author","Motzke, Iris"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Brook, Barry W."],["dc.contributor.author","Sodhi, Navjot S."],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:12Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:12Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Interactions between native diversity and invasive species can be more complex than is currently understood. Invasive ant species often substantially reduce diversity in the native ants diversity that act as natural control agents for pest insects. In Indonesia (on the island of Sulawesi), the third largest cacao producer worldwide, we show that a predatory endemic toad (Ingerophrynus celebensis) controls invasive ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes) abundance, and positively affects native ant diversity. We call this the invasive-naivety effect (an opposite of enemy release), whereby alien species may not harbour anti-predatory defences against a novel native predator. A positive effect of the toads on native ants may facilitate their predation on insect vectors of cacao diseases. Hence, toads may increase crop yield, but further research is needed on this aspect. Ironically, amphibians are globally the most threatened vertebrate class and are strongly impacted by the conversion of rainforest to cacao plantations in Sulawesi. It is, therefore, crucial to manage cacao plantations to maintain these endemic toads, as they may provide critical ecosystem services, such as invasion resistance and preservation of native insect diversity."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1098/rspb.2010.1512"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149846"],["dc.identifier.pmid","20826488"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6549"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0962-8452"],["dc.title","Endemic predators, invasive prey and native diversity"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","823"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Applied Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","832"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","46"],["dc.contributor.author","Wanger, Thomas C."],["dc.contributor.author","Saro, Akbar"],["dc.contributor.author","Iskandar, Djoko T."],["dc.contributor.author","Brook, Barry W."],["dc.contributor.author","Sodhi, Navjot S."],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01663.x"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150033"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6756"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-8901"],["dc.title","Conservation value of cacao agroforestry for amphibians and reptiles in South-East Asia: combining correlative models with follow-up field experiments"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","8311"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","20"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","8316"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","108"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Barkmann, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Juhrbandt, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Kessler, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Wanger, Thomas Cherico"],["dc.contributor.author","Anshary, Alam"],["dc.contributor.author","Buchori, Damayanti"],["dc.contributor.author","Cicuzza, Daniele"],["dc.contributor.author","Darras, Kevin"],["dc.contributor.author","Putra, Dadang Dwi"],["dc.contributor.author","Erasmi, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Pitopang, Ramadhanil"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Carsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Christian H."],["dc.contributor.author","Seidel, Dominik"],["dc.contributor.author","Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Stenchly, Kathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Vidal, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Weist, Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Wielgoss, Arno Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:44Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-05-11T13:18:51Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:44Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-05-11T13:18:51Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Local and landscape-scale agricultural intensification is a major driver of global biodiversity loss. Controversially discussed solutions include wildlife-friendly farming or combining high-intensity farming with land-sparing for nature. Here, we integrate biodiversity and crop productivity data for smallholder cacao in Indonesia to exemplify for tropical agroforests that there is little relationship between yield and biodiversity under current management, opening substantial opportunities for wildlife-friendly management. Species richness of trees, fungi, invertebrates, and vertebrates did not decrease with yield. Moderate shade, adequate labor, and input level can be combined with a complex habitat structure to provide high biodiversity as well as high yields. Although livelihood impacts are held up as a major obstacle for wildlife-friendly farming in the tropics, our results suggest that in some situations, agroforests can be designed to optimize both biodiversity and crop production benefits without adding pressure to convert natural habitat to farmland."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1073/pnas.1016799108"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150093"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8611"],["dc.identifier.scopus","2-s2.0-79957762227"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6823"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/65024"],["dc.identifier.url","http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79957762227&partnerID=MN8TOARS"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.eissn","1091-6490"],["dc.relation.issn","0027-8424"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Combining high biodiversity with high yields in tropical agroforests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2375"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Conservation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","2384"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","143"],["dc.contributor.author","Sodhi, Navjot S."],["dc.contributor.author","Koh, Lian Pin"],["dc.contributor.author","Clements, Reuben"],["dc.contributor.author","Wanger, Thomas C."],["dc.contributor.author","Hill, Jane K."],["dc.contributor.author","Hamer, Keith C."],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Posa, Mary Rose C."],["dc.contributor.author","Lee, Tien Ming"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:51Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:51Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.029"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149929"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6640"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","0006-3207"],["dc.title","Conserving Southeast Asian forest biodiversity in human-modified landscapes"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","15"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","71"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Abrahamczyk, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Adams, Marc-Oliver"],["dc.contributor.author","Anshary, Alam"],["dc.contributor.author","Ariyanti, Nunik"],["dc.contributor.author","Betz, Lydia"],["dc.contributor.author","Buchori, Damayanti"],["dc.contributor.author","Cicuzza, Daniele"],["dc.contributor.author","Darras, Kevin"],["dc.contributor.author","Putra, Dadang Dwi"],["dc.contributor.author","Fiala, Brigitte"],["dc.contributor.author","Gradstein, S. Robbert"],["dc.contributor.author","Kessler, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Klein, Alexandra-Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Pitopang, Ramadhanil"],["dc.contributor.author","Sahari, Bandung"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherber, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Christian H."],["dc.contributor.author","Sporn, Simone G."],["dc.contributor.author","Stenchly, Kathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Tjitrosoedirdjo, Sri Sudarmiyati"],["dc.contributor.author","Wanger, Thomas Cherico"],["dc.contributor.author","Weist, Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Wielgoss, Arno"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.editor","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.editor","Leuschner, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.editor","Veldkamp, Edzo"],["dc.contributor.editor","Faust, Heiko"],["dc.contributor.editor","Guhardja, Edi"],["dc.contributor.editor","Bidin, Arifuddin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","The need to capture primary production in order to sustain and improve economic livelihoods has lead to increasing conversion of natural habitat and intensification of agricultural practices in many parts of the world including most tropical regions. Understanding how these processes affect ecosystems and their functioning, in particular in the high-diversity ecosystems of the tropics, has become a key issue in ecological research. In this chapter, our focus is on the agriculture-forest landscapes of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, an island widely known for its endemic yet still poorly known flora and fauna. The rise of the region to one of the largest cacao producing areas in the world is at the core of recent land-use change and intensification processes. Covering plants (trees, rattan palms, herbs, bryophytes) and several invertebrate (ants, dung beetles, cacao insect herbivores, fruit-feeding butterflies, parasitic Hymenoptera, spiders) and vertebrate groups (amphibians, birds, murids, reptiles), we give an in-depth overview of the determinants of biodiversity in cacao landscapes, including both management and landscape-scale variables into our analyses. Results show that shaded agroforests host a rich community of species. By adopting a large-scale study design we showed that proximity of natural forest is a key predictor for species richness of plants, invertebrates and vertebrates alike. Endemics and forest specialists benefit most from indigenous shade tree cover and proximity to natural forest. Importantly, several functionally important groups such as insectivorous and seed-dispersing birds benefit from tall shade trees, shade tree diversity and proximity to forest edge, while parasitoid diversity is greatest close to natural forests. Available data on the effects of landuse change in cacao landscape of Central Sulawesi is increasing. Change in landscape configuration and management practices are being clearly reflected in the composition of species communities, with likely impacts on ecosystem services such as pest control and pollination. More knowledge is needed especially in terms of species interactions and ecosystem functioning, but also on how existing knowledge can contribute to effective conservation in human-dominated landscapes outside protected areas."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/978-3-642-00493-3_2"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150103"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6834"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.publisher.place","Berlin, Heidelberg"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-3-642-00492-6"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Tropical Rainforests and Agroforests under Global Change: Ecological and Socio-economic Valuations"],["dc.relation.issn","1863-5520"],["dc.title","Biodiversity patterns and trophic interactions in human-dominated tropical landscapes in Sulawesi (Indonesia): plants, arthropods and vertebrates"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]