Ambos, Kai

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","833"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","876"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Review of the Red Cross"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","858"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","91"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambos, Kai"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:21:30Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:21:30Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Genocide is a crime with a double mental element, i.e. a general intent as to the underlying acts, and an ulterior intent with regard to the ultimate aim of the destruction of the group. The prevailing view in the case-law interprets the respective 'intent to destroy requirement as a special or specific intent (dolus specialis) stressing its volitional or purpose-based tendency. While this view has been followed for a long time in legal doctrine without further ado, it has recently been challenged by knowledge- and structure-based approaches, which have not received sufficient attention. A historical, literal, systematic and teleological interpretation of the 'intent to destroy' requirement, taking into account the particular structure of the genocide offence and the meaning of 'intent' in comparative law, reveals that the traditional view can no longer be maintained. It should be replaced by a combined structure- and knowledge-based approach that distinguishes according to the status and role of the (low-, mid- and top-level) perpetrators. Thus, the purpose-based intent should be upheld only with regard to the top- and mid-level perpetrators, whereas for the low-level perpetrators knowledge of the genocidal context should suffice. Lastly, this new approach requires a fresh look at the 'intent to destroy' requirement in cases of participation in genocide."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1017/S1816383110000056"],["dc.identifier.isi","000278419400009"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/55785"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Cambridge Univ Press"],["dc.relation.issn","1816-3831"],["dc.title","What does 'intent to destroy' in genocide mean?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","689"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of International Criminal Justice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","700"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","18"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambos, Kai"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:24:14Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:24:14Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/jicj/mqaa019"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/81215"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1478-1395"],["dc.relation.issn","1478-1387"],["dc.title","The ECCC’s Contribution to Substantive ICL"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","495"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Conflict & Security Law"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","504"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambos, Kai"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:19:19Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:19:19Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/jcsl/krw010"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1467-7962"],["dc.identifier.issn","1467-7954"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/75201"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Individual Criminal Responsibility for Cyber Aggression"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","ngw024"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Human Rights Law Review"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambos, Kai"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:19:15Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:19:15Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/hrlr/ngw024"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1744-1021"],["dc.identifier.issn","1461-7781"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/75181"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","The Crime of Genocide and the Principle of Legality under Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","589"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Criminal Law Forum"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","628"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","28"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambos, Kai"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:11:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:11:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10609-017-9334-7"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1572-9850"],["dc.identifier.issn","1046-8374"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/71084"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Review Essay: Liberal Criminal Theory"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","225"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Criminal Law Forum"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","259"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambos, Kai"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-17T12:16:31Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-17T12:16:31Z"],["dc.date.issued","2003"],["dc.description.abstract","Cherif Bassiouni’s second revised edition of Crimes Against Humanity in International Criminal Law gives a comprehensive legal and historical analysis of crimes against humanity covering its emergence in positive international criminal law, its legal development and its theoretical foundations. The book is not limited to crimes against humanity but also refers to and analyses various – related or unrelated – problems of current international criminal law. Thus, the reviewer is invited if not provoked to deal with the state of international criminal law in general, dedicating to the opus magnum not only a review but a more profound review essay."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1023/B:CRIL.0000037067.63289.a6"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61702"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","1046-8374"],["dc.title","Current Issues in International Criminal Law"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","219"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of International Criminal Justice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","229"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","12"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambos, Kai"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:40:26Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:40:26Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/jicj/mqu022"],["dc.identifier.isi","000339957900004"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/33507"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Oxford Univ Press"],["dc.relation.issn","1478-1395"],["dc.relation.issn","1478-1387"],["dc.title","A Workshop, a Symposium and the Katanga Trial Judgment of 7 March 2014"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","715"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Leiden Journal of International Law"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","726"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambos, Kai"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:21:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:21:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued its third confirmation decision against Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo,(1) the former president of the rebel Mouvement de Liberation du Congo (MLC) and commander in chief of its military wing, the Armee de Liberation du Congo (ALC).(2) The decision is, in principle, to be welcomed, since it constitutes a further consolidation of the ICC case law and breaks new ground in some important areas, for example the law of crimes against humanity (Art. 7 of the ICC Statute(3))(4) and command responsibility (Art. 28).(5) From an outsider's perspective it also seems that the Chamber, on the basis of the available (disclosed) evidence, took the right decision when it changed the Prosecutor's liability from (co-)perpetration (Art. 25(3)(a)) to command responsibility. Yet there are some fine legal-technical points where the Chamber did not dig deep enough, incurred conceptual errors, or drew some illogical conclusions. These issues shall be discussed briefly here, not in a destructive spirit but to contribute constructively to the improvement of the future case law."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1017/S0922156509990185"],["dc.identifier.isi","000275914500004"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/55820"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Cambridge Univ Press"],["dc.relation.issn","0922-1565"],["dc.title","Critical Issues in the Bemba Confirmation Decision"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1105"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of International Criminal Justice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1116"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","16"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambos, Kai"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:19:20Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:19:20Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/jicj/mqy061"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1478-1395"],["dc.identifier.issn","1478-1387"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/75206"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Deceased Persons as Protected Persons Within the Meaning of International Humanitarian Law"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","789"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of International Criminal Justice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","812"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambos, Kai"],["dc.contributor.author","Njikam, Ousman"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:20:09Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:20:09Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","The Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL, 'Special Court') has issued its fourth and last judgment at the trial stage against Charles Ghankay Taylor, the former President of Liberia. Taylor's individual criminal responsibility was found to have been established pursuant to Article 6(1) SCSL Statute, particularly for aiding and abetting the rebels of the Revolutionary United Front and the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council in the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Sierra Leone and participating in planning rebel attacks between December 1998 and February 1999. In order for an accused to be convicted pursuant to a certain mode of liability, a trial chamber ought to ensure that the requisite actus reus and mens rea are established beyond any reasonable doubt on the basis of the evidence before it. An analysis of the Taylor Judgment does not satisfy the outside observer that the Chamber indeed complied with these requirements. This is true for both the conviction for aiding and abetting and for planning. This article provides a summary of the case against Taylor, in particular the relevant findings of the Trial Chamber. A critical analysis of these findings follows."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/jicj/mqt042"],["dc.identifier.isi","000328084100006"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/28812"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Oxford Univ Press"],["dc.relation.issn","1478-1395"],["dc.relation.issn","1478-1387"],["dc.title","Charles Taylor's Criminal Responsibility"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]