Deppe, Arvid Sönke

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.seriesnr","Version 6.0"],["dc.contributor.author","Fenner, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Scholze, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Beucke, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Steinke, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Deinzer, Gernot"],["dc.contributor.author","Klotz-Berendes, Bruno"],["dc.contributor.author","Braun, Kim"],["dc.contributor.author","Arning, Ursula"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolf, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Vierkant, Paul"],["dc.contributor.author","Schirrwagen, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Summann, Friedrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Voigt, Michaela"],["dc.contributor.author","Walger, Nadine"],["dc.contributor.author","Blumtritt, Ute"],["dc.contributor.author","Bove, Karolin"],["dc.contributor.author","Deppe, Arvid"],["dc.contributor.author","Weimar, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Pampel, Heinz"],["dc.contributor.author","Severiens, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Uwe"],["dc.contributor.author","Meinecke, Isabella"],["dc.contributor.author","Tullney, Marco"],["dc.contributor.editorcorporation","DINI AG Elektronisches Publizieren (E-Pub)"],["dc.creator.author","Uwe Müller"],["dc.creator.author","Arvid Deppe"],["dc.creator.author","Daniel Beucke"],["dc.creator.author","Bruno Klotz-Berendes"],["dc.creator.author","Karolin Bove"],["dc.creator.author","Gernot Deinzer"],["dc.creator.author","Isabella Meinecke"],["dc.creator.author","Nadine Walger"],["dc.creator.author","Marco Tullney"],["dc.creator.author","Tobias Steinke"],["dc.creator.author","Kim Braun"],["dc.creator.author","Stefan Wolf"],["dc.creator.author","Frank Scholze"],["dc.creator.author","Ute Blumtritt"],["dc.creator.author","Ursula Arning"],["dc.creator.author","Alexander Weimar"],["dc.creator.author","Heinz Pampel"],["dc.creator.author","Martin Fenner"],["dc.creator.author","Paul Vierkant"],["dc.creator.author","Friedrich Summann"],["dc.creator.author","Michaela Voigt"],["dc.creator.author","Jochen Schirrwagen"],["dc.creator.author","Thomas Severiens"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-01-07T11:59:57Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-01-07T11:59:57Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Das Publikationswesen ist ein wesentlicher Stützpfeiler des wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisfortschritts und der Wissenschaft insgesamt. Zu seinen Kennzeichen gehören a. die Organisation einer effektiven Kommunikation zwischen Forschenden (zwischen Autor innen und allen potenziellen Rezipient innen, d. h. die Sicherstellung einer adäquaten Verbreitung), b. ein hohes Maß an Vertrauenswürdigkeit, das den Nutzenden des Publikationswesens (d.h. den Forschenden) vermittelt wird (z.B. in Bezug auf das Prioritätsrecht, die Wahrung des Urheberrechts sowie die Authentizität und die inhaltliche Qualität wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten), sowie c. Nachhaltigkeit und Nachprüfbarkeit (dauerhafte Zitierbarkeit und langfristige Verfügbarkeit, Nachvollziehbarkeit von einzelnen Schritten auf dem Weg zur Veröffentlichung). Mit dem vorliegenden Kriterienkatalog werden diese allgemeinen Erwartungen an das wissenschaftliche Publizieren in konkrete Mindestanforderungen übersetzt, die an Open-Access-Publikationsdienste zu stellen sind."],["dc.format.extent","96"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.18452/20545"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16388"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/62777"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","Deutsche initiative für Netzwerkinformation e. V."],["dc.publisher.place","Göttingen"],["dc.relation","open"],["dc.relation.crisseries","DINI Schriften"],["dc.relation.ispartofseries","DINI Schriften 3-de;Version 6.0"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","DINI-Zertifikat für Open-Access-Publikationsdienste 2019"],["dc.type","book"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","142"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","146"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Deppe, Arvid"],["dc.contributor.author","Gottschling, Maxie"],["dc.contributor.author","Rodrigues, Eloy"],["dc.contributor.author","Shearer, Kathleen"],["dc.contributor.editor","Loizides, Fernando"],["dc.contributor.editor","Schmidt, Birgit"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-11-22T14:31:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-11-22T14:31:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Over the past few years, the Confederation of Open Access Repositories (COAR) has established the initiative “Aligning Repository Networks” in order to foster global repository interoperability and align policies and practices internationally. This paper outlines several activities to align major repository networks across the globe strategically, technically and on the service level."],["dc.format.extent","142-146"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-142"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/13351"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/93388"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","IOS Press"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC 3.0"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0"],["dc.subject","Repositories; interoperability; harmonization; standards"],["dc.subject.ddc","020"],["dc.title","Stepping Up Towards Greater Alignment of Repository Networks"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","unknown"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e0189311"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PloS one"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","12"],["dc.contributor.author","Ross-Hellauer, Tony"],["dc.contributor.author","Deppe, Arvid"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.editor","Wicherts, J. M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-12-15T14:25:50Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-12-15T14:25:50Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Open peer review (OPR) is a cornerstone of the emergent Open Science agenda. Yet to date no large-scale survey of attitudes towards OPR amongst academic editors, authors, reviewers and publishers has been undertaken. This paper presents the findings of an online survey, conducted for the OpenAIRE2020 project during September and October 2016, that sought to bridge this information gap in order to aid the development of appropriate OPR approaches by providing evidence about attitudes towards and levels of experience with OPR. The results of this cross-disciplinary survey, which received 3,062 full responses, show the majority (60.3%) of respondents to be believe that OPR as a general concept should be mainstream scholarly practice (although attitudes to individual traits varied, and open identities peer review was not generally favoured). Respondents were also in favour of other areas of Open Science, like Open Access (88.2%) and Open Data (80.3%). Among respondents we observed high levels of experience with OPR, with three out of four (76.2%) reporting having taken part in an OPR process as author, reviewer or editor. There were also high levels of support for most of the traits of OPR, particularly open interaction, open reports and final-version commenting. Respondents were against opening reviewer identities to authors, however, with more than half believing it would make peer review worse. Overall satisfaction with the peer review system used by scholarly journals seems to strongly vary across disciplines. Taken together, these findings are very encouraging for OPR's prospects for moving mainstream but indicate that due care must be taken to avoid a \"one-size fits all\" solution and to tailor such systems to differing (especially disciplinary) contexts. OPR is an evolving phenomenon and hence future studies are to be encouraged, especially to further explore differences between disciplines and monitor the evolution of attitudes."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1371/journal.pone.0189311"],["dc.identifier.pmid","29236721"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14985"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/11499"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.eissn","1932-6203"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Deppe, Arvid"],["dc.contributor.author","Bordier, Julien"],["dc.contributor.author","Ross-Hellauer, Tony"],["dc.contributor.editor","Loizides, Fernando"],["dc.contributor.editor","Schmidt, Birgit"],["dc.date.accessioned","2016-06-10T10:43:58Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-10-27T13:19:41Z"],["dc.date.available","2016-06-10T10:43:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-10-27T13:19:41Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Openness in peer review is no longer a terra incognita. However, there remains a need for further experimentation and careful evaluation of its advantages and disadvantages in practice. OpenAIRE, the European digital infrastructure for Open Scholarship, offers a unique environment for such experiments. This paper describes the design and early results of three such experiments, which are currently under development in close collaboration with selected publishing and repository communities."],["dc.format.extent","91-98"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-91"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/13349"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/91904"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC 3.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0"],["dc.title","Peer Review on the Move from Closed to Open"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","unknown"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","20"],["dc.contributor.author","Deppe, Arvid"],["dc.contributor.author","Beucke, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.editor","Söllner, Konstanze"],["dc.contributor.editor","Mittermaier, Bernhard"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-01-13T14:26:54Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-01-13T14:26:54Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.5281/zenodo.802638"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/11645"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","De Gruyter Saur"],["dc.publisher.place","Berlin"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-3-11-049203-3"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Praxishandbuch Open Access"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen"],["dc.title","Ursprünge und Entwicklung von Open Access"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"],["local.message.claim","2019-05-02T07:30:27.802+0000|||rp114234|||submit_approve|||dc_contributor_author|||Test"]]