Wedi, Edris

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","41"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Journal of Implant Dentistry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Stünkel, Robert"],["dc.contributor.author","Zeller, Alexander-Nicolai"],["dc.contributor.author","Bohne, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Böhrnsen, Florian"],["dc.contributor.author","Wedi, Edris"],["dc.contributor.author","Raschke, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Kauffmann, Philipp"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-10-10T06:18:06Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-10-10T06:18:06Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022-10-06"],["dc.date.updated","2022-10-09T03:11:11Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract\r\n \r\n Background\r\n Nowadays, 3D planning and static for dynamic aids play an increasing role in oral rehabilitation of the masticatory apparatus with dental implants. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of implant placement using a 3D-printed drilling guide and an intraoral real-time dynamic navigation system.\r\n \r\n \r\n Methods\r\n A total of 60 implants were placed on 12 partially edentulous lower jaw models. 30 were placed with pilot drilling guides, the other half with dynamic navigation (DENACAM®). In addition, implant placement in interdental gaps and free-end situations were investigated. Accuracy was assessed by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).\r\n \r\n \r\n Results\r\n Both systems achieved clinically acceptable results, yet more accurate results regarding the offset of implant base and tip in several spatial dimensions were achieved using drilling guides (each p < 0.05). With regard to angulation, real-time navigation was more precise (p = 0.0016). Its inaccuracy was 3°; the template-guided systems was 4.6°. Median horizontal deviation was 0.52 mm at base and 0.75 mm at tip using DENACAM®. When using the pilot drill guide, horizontal deviation was 0.34 mm in the median and at the tip by 0.59 mm. Regarding angulation, it was found that the closer the drill hole was to the system's marker, the better navigation performed. The template did not show this trend (p = 0.0043; and p = 0.0022).\r\n \r\n \r\n Conclusion\r\n Considering the limitations of an in vitro study, dynamic navigation can be used be a tool for reliable and accurate implantation. However, further clinical studies need to follow in order to provide an evidence-based recommendation for use in vivo."],["dc.identifier.citation","International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2022 Oct 06;8(1):41"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s40729-022-00430-6"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/116164"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.holder","The Author(s)"],["dc.subject","Dental implants"],["dc.subject","Guided surgery"],["dc.subject","Stereotactic surgery"],["dc.subject","Referencing"],["dc.subject","Intraoral real-time navigation"],["dc.subject","Static templates"],["dc.subject","Implant accuracy"],["dc.title","Accuracy of intraoral real-time navigation versus static, CAD/CAM-manufactured pilot drilling guides in dental implant surgery: an in vitro study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","103"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Endoscopy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","108"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","51"],["dc.contributor.author","Wedi, Edris"],["dc.contributor.author","Orlandini, Beatrice"],["dc.contributor.author","Gromski, Mark"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Carlo Felix Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Tchoumak, Irina"],["dc.contributor.author","Boucher, Stephanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Ellenrieder, Volker"],["dc.contributor.author","Hochberger, Jürgen"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:45:07Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:45:07Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","The full-thickness resection device (FTRD) is a novel endoscopic device approved for the resection of colorectal lesions. This case-series describes the device and its use in high-risk patients with colorectal lesions and provides an overview of the potential indications in recently published data. Between December 2014 and September 2015, 3 patients underwent endoscopic full thickness resection using the FTRD for colorectal lesions: 1 case for a T1 adenocarcinoma in the region of a surgical anastomosis after recto-sigmoidectomy, 1 case for a non-lifting colonic adenoma with low-grade dysplasia in an 89-year old patient and 1 for a recurrent adenoma with high-grade dysplasia in a young patient with ulcerative rectocolitis who was under immunosuppression after renal transplantation. Both technical and clinical success rates were achieved in all cases. The size of removed lesions ranged from 9 to 30 mm. Overall, the most frequent indication in the literature has been for lifting or non-lifting adenoma, submucosal tumors, neuroendocrin tumors, incomplete endoscopic resection (R1) or T1 carcinoma. Colorectal FTRD is a feasible technique for the treatment of colorectal lesions and represents a minimally invasive alternative for either surgical or conventional endoscopic resection strategies."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.5946/ce.2017.093"],["dc.identifier.pmid","29397654"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15033"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59159"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","2234-2400"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Full-Thickness Resection Device for Complex Colorectal Lesions in High-Risk Patients as a Last-Resort Endoscopic Treatment: Initial Clinical Experience and Review of the Current Literature."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Gastroenterology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","20"],["dc.contributor.author","Sportes, A."],["dc.contributor.author","CFM, Jung"],["dc.contributor.author","Gromski, M. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Koehler, P."],["dc.contributor.author","Seif Amir Hosseini, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Kauffmann, P."],["dc.contributor.author","Ellenrieder, V."],["dc.contributor.author","Wedi, E."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:25:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:25:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s12876-020-01344-6"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17395"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/81573"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.eissn","1471-230X"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Novel modified endoscopic mucosal resection of large GI lesions (> 20 mm) using an external additional working channel (AWC) may improve R0 resection rate: initial clinical experience"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]