Ferlian, Olga

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","108730"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Soil Biology and Biochemistry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","171"],["dc.contributor.author","Ferlian, Olga"],["dc.contributor.author","Cesarz, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Lochner, Alfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Potapov, Anton"],["dc.contributor.author","Thouvenot, Lise"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-07-01T07:34:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-07-01T07:34:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108730"],["dc.identifier.pii","S0038071722001870"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/111984"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-581"],["dc.relation.issn","0038-0717"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","Earthworm invasion shifts trophic niches of ground-dwelling invertebrates in a North American forest"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1042"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature Ecology & Evolution"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1043"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","2"],["dc.contributor.author","Cameron, Erin K."],["dc.contributor.author","Martins, Inês S."],["dc.contributor.author","Lavelle, Patrick"],["dc.contributor.author","Mathieu, Jérôme"],["dc.contributor.author","Tedersoo, Leho"],["dc.contributor.author","Gottschall, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Guerra, Carlos A."],["dc.contributor.author","Hines, Jes"],["dc.contributor.author","Patoine, Guillaume"],["dc.contributor.author","Siebert, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Winter, Marten"],["dc.contributor.author","Cesarz, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Ferlian, Olga"],["dc.contributor.author","Fierer, Noah"],["dc.contributor.author","Kreft, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Lovejoy, Thomas E."],["dc.contributor.author","Montanarella, Luca"],["dc.contributor.author","Orgiazzi, Alberto"],["dc.contributor.author","Pereira, Henrique M."],["dc.contributor.author","Phillips, Helen R. P."],["dc.contributor.author","Settele, Josef"],["dc.contributor.author","Wall, Diana H."],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:09:55Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:09:55Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41559-018-0573-8"],["dc.identifier.eissn","2397-334X"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/73801"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Global gaps in soil biodiversity data"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1192"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Oikos"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1198"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","123"],["dc.contributor.author","Guenther, Babett"],["dc.contributor.author","Rall, Bjoern Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Ferlian, Olga"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheu, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Eitzinger, Bernhard"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:34:37Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:34:37Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Predation is an important ecological factor driving animal population structures, community assemblages and consequently ecosystem stability and biodiversity. Many environmental factors influence direction and intensity of predation, suggesting that trophic linkages between animals vary between different habitats. This in consequence has particular relevance in anthropogenically altered habitats such as managed forests, where disturbance regime, tree composition and stand age may change the natural food web structure. We investigated how prey consumption of three common centipede predators (Lithobius spp., Chilopoda), representing two body sizes varies between four differently managed forest types in two regions across Germany. We hypothesized that prey preference of these generalist predators is independent of forest type but rather driven by habitat structure, prey abundance and predator body size. Applying specific PCR assays to test for DNA of three abundant prey groups, i.e. Collembola, Diptera and Lumbricidae, in the predators' guts, we tracked trophic interactions. The results showed that management type indeed has no influence on centipede prey consumption but depth of litter layer and soil pH. Trophic interactions varied between the two sampled forests regions mainly due to changes in the detection of Lumbricidae and Diptera. Also, effect of litter layer and prey abundance significantly differed between the smaller L. crassipes and the larger L. mutabilis, indicating a body size effect. The results complement food web analyses using fatty acids and stable isotopes by elucidating trophic interactions in soil in unprecedented detail."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00868.x"],["dc.identifier.isi","000342754100005"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/32211"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","1600-0706"],["dc.relation.issn","0030-1299"],["dc.title","Variations in prey consumption of centipede predators in forest soils as indicated by molecular gut content analysis"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","22"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Soil Biology and Biochemistry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","30"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","77"],["dc.contributor.author","Ferlian, Olga"],["dc.contributor.author","Cesarz, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Marhan, Sven"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheu, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:34:57Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:34:57Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","One of the challenges in soil ecology is to determine which organisms utilise stable forms of carbon in soil. Recent studies have indicated that endogeic earthworms are able to mobilise such stable carbon compounds. However, it remains unclear which particular compounds of stabilised carbon in soil are utilised by earthworms. Furthermore, current knowledge on ecological groups and food resources of earthworms is mainly based on direct observations, hence only reflecting what was ingested but not what was actually assimilated. We analysed seven earthworm species in beech and spruce forests and the associated litter, earthworm middens and soils, and employed compound-specific C-13 stable isotope analysis of fatty acids (FAs) to identify the origins of carbon resources of the earthworms. To relate food resources to carbon compounds of different stability, we analysed C-13 signatures of FAs of different particle size fractions. FA delta C-13 profiles of epigeic and endogeic earthworm species indicated assimilation of recently-fixed and recalcitrant carbon resources, respectively, whereas anecic earthworms assimilated a mixture of resources of different stability. Utilisation of carbon resources did not differ between beech and spruce forests. Endogeic species were associated with neutral lipids of soil particle size fractions with delta C-13 signatures of the bacterial marker a15:0 in earthworms resembling those of the clay fraction. This suggests that they assimilated carbon associated with small particle size fractions attached to clay humus complexes. The results showed that earthworms of different ecological groups utilise carbon pools of different origin and stability. As indicated by neutral lipids of bacterial origin, physically-stabilised organic matter appears to contribute to the nutrition of endogeic earthworms in forest systems. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","DFG Priority Program [1374]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.06.002"],["dc.identifier.isi","000341556600003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/32285"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Pergamon-elsevier Science Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0038-0717"],["dc.title","Carbon food resources of earthworms of different ecological groups as indicated by C-13 compound-specific stable isotope analysis"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","248"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Soil Biology and Biochemistry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","257"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","91"],["dc.contributor.author","Pollierer, Melanie M."],["dc.contributor.author","Ferlian, Olga"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheu, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:48:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:48:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Microorganisms form the basis of soil food webs and represent key control points of carbon cycling and sequestration. Virtually all central European forests are managed and land-use regimes likely impact microbial abundance and community composition. Consequently, knowledge on how land-use intensity and abiotic variables, such as pH, C-to-N ratios, moisture regimes and concomitantly different stress levels, affect microbial communities is needed. We investigated phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) profiles of leaf litter and soil from four forest types differing in foliage, age and management intensity, replicated in three regions across Germany. To account for temporal variation, samples were taken twice in the same season, but with an interval of three years. Total microbial biomass and microbial community composition differed between years, presumably due to between year variations in weather conditions. The litter layer was more prone to effects of drying, with a reduction of almost 30% of total PLFAs in the drier year. In soil effects of weather conditions depended on soil type and therefore differed between regions, with microorganisms in the sandy soils of the Schorfheide being more susceptible to water-stress, as evidenced by a ten-fold increase of the stress indicator cy/pre ratio in the drier year. Despite temporal variations in microbial biomass and community composition, the balance between the fungal and bacterial energy channel, as measured by fungal-to-bacterial ratios, remained rather constant in particular in soil. While total microbial biomass did not differ between forest types, microbial community composition differed significantly between beech and coniferous forests. Despite more acidic conditions, the fungal energy channel was less pronounced in leaf litter of coniferous forests than in broad-leaved forests, whereas the proportion of bacterial fatty acids was the highest in coniferous forests. Increasing management intensity presumably fosters the bacterial energy channel in the exposed litter layer. Supporting this assumption coniferous forests featured significantly higher values of the stress indicators cy/pre and SAT/MONO ratio. Bacterial community structure and biomass closely correlated with pH, with particular PLFAs dominating at high and low pH, respectively, indicating pH-specific microbial communities. In contrast, fungal abundance in leaf litter was correlated with C-to-N ratio. The results suggest that leaf litter and soil need to be considered separately when investigating changes in microbial community composition, since susceptibility of microorganisms to environmental stressors differs markedly between these layers. This, and repeated sampling events, may be particularly important when investigating subtle effects such as those related to climate change. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.08.035"],["dc.identifier.isi","000364502900027"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/35358"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Pergamon-elsevier Science Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0038-0717"],["dc.title","Temporal dynamics and variation with forest type of phospholipid fatty acids in litter and soil of temperate forests across regions"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","68"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Environmental and Experimental Botany"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","69"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","152"],["dc.contributor.author","Grossman, Jake J."],["dc.contributor.author","Vanhellemont, Margot"],["dc.contributor.author","Barsoum, Nadia"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauhus, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Bruelheide, Helge"],["dc.contributor.author","Castagneyrol, Bastien"],["dc.contributor.author","Cavender-Bares, Jeannine"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Ferlian, Olga"],["dc.contributor.author","Gravel, Dominique"],["dc.contributor.author","Hector, Andy"],["dc.contributor.author","Jactel, Hervé"],["dc.contributor.author","Kreft, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Mereu, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Messier, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Muys, Bart"],["dc.contributor.author","Nock, Charles"],["dc.contributor.author","Paquette, Alain"],["dc.contributor.author","Parker, John"],["dc.contributor.author","Perring, Michael P."],["dc.contributor.author","Ponette, Quentin"],["dc.contributor.author","Reich, Peter B."],["dc.contributor.author","Schuldt, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Staab, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Weih, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Zemp, Delphine Clara"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer-Lorenzen, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Verheyen, Kris"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-03-13T14:06:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-03-13T14:06:35Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","Despite considerable research demonstrating that biodiversity increases productivity in forests and regulates herbivory and pathogen damage, there remain gaps in our understanding of the shape, magnitude, and generality of these biodiversity-ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships. Here, we review findings from TreeDivNet, a global network of 25 tree diversity experiments, on relationships between levels of biodiversity and (a) tree growth and survival and (b) damage to trees from pests and pathogens. Tree diversity often improved the survival and above- and belowground growth of young trees. The mechanistic bases of the diversity effects on tree growth and survival include both selection effects (i.e., an increasing impact of particular species in more species-rich communities) and complementary effects (e.g. related to resource differentiation and facilitation). Plant traits and abiotic stressors may mediate these relationships. Studies of the responses of invertebrate and vertebrate herbivory and pathogen damage have demonstrated that trees in more diverse experimental plots may experience more, less, or similar damage compared to conspecific trees in less diverse plots. Documented mechanisms producing these patterns include changes in concentration, frequency, and apparency of hosts; herbivore and pathogen diet breadth; the spatial scale of interactions; and herbivore and pathogen regulation by natural enemies. Our review of findings from TreeDivNet indicates that tree diversity experiments are extending BEF research across systems and scales, complementing previous BEF work in grasslands by providing opportunities to use remote sensing and spectral approaches to study BEF dynamics, integrate belowground and aboveground approaches, and trace the consequences of tree physiology for ecosystem functioning. This extension of BEF research into tree-dominated systems is improving ecologists’ capacity to understand the mechanistic bases behind BEF relationships. Tree diversity experiments also present opportunities for novel research. Since experimental tree diversity plantations enable measurements at tree, neighbourhood and plot level, they allow for explicit consideration of temporal and spatial scales in BEF dynamics. Presently, most TreeDivNet experiments have run for less than ten years. Given the longevity of trees, exciting results on BEF relationships are expected in the future."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.12.015"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/13007"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation","SFB 990: Ökologische und sozioökonomische Funktionen tropischer Tieflandregenwald-Transformationssysteme (Sumatra, Indonesien)"],["dc.relation","SFB 990 | B | B11: Biodiversitäts-Anreicherung in Ölpalmen-Plantagen: Pflanzliche Sukzession und Integration"],["dc.subject.gro","sfb990_reviews"],["dc.title","Synthesis and future research directions linking tree diversity to growth, survival, and damage in a global network of tree diversity experiments"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Advances in Ecological Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","54"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","61"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Schielzeth, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Barnes, Andrew D."],["dc.contributor.author","Barry, Kathryn"],["dc.contributor.author","Bonn, Aletta"],["dc.contributor.author","Brose, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Bruelheide, Helge"],["dc.contributor.author","Buchmann, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Ebeling, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Ferlian, Olga"],["dc.contributor.author","Freschet, Grégoire T."],["dc.contributor.author","Giling, Darren P."],["dc.contributor.author","Hättenschwiler, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hillebrand, Helmut"],["dc.contributor.author","Hines, Jes"],["dc.contributor.author","Isbell, Forest"],["dc.contributor.author","Koller-France, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","König-Ries, Birgitta"],["dc.contributor.author","de Kroon, Hans"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Sebastian T."],["dc.contributor.author","Milcu, Alexandru"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Nock, Charles A."],["dc.contributor.author","Petermann, Jana S."],["dc.contributor.author","Roscher, Christiane"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherber, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer-Lorenzen, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmid, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Schnitzer, Stefan A."],["dc.contributor.author","Schuldt, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Türke, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","van Dam, Nicole M."],["dc.contributor.author","van der Plas, Fons"],["dc.contributor.author","Vogel, Anja"],["dc.contributor.author","Wagg, Cameron"],["dc.contributor.author","Wardle, David A."],["dc.contributor.author","Weigelt, Alexandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Wirth, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Jochum, Malte"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-08-21T07:05:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-08-21T07:05:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Concern about the functional consequences of unprecedented loss in biodiversity has prompted biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) research to become one of the most active fields of ecological research in the past 25 years. Hundreds of experiments have manipulated biodiversity as an independent variable and found compelling support that the functioning of ecosystems increases with the diversity of their ecological communities. This research has also identified some of the mechanisms underlying BEF relationships, some context-dependencies of the strength of relationships, as well as implications for various ecosystem services that humankind depends upon. In this chapter, we argue that a multitrophic perspective of biotic interactions in random and non-random biodiversity change scenarios is key to advance future BEF research and to address some of its most important remaining challenges. We discuss that the study and the quantification of multitrophic interactions in space and time facilitates scaling up from small-scale biodiversity manipulations and ecosystem function assessments to management-relevant spatial scales across ecosystem boundaries. We specifically consider multitrophic conceptual frameworks to understand and predict the context-dependency of BEF relationships. Moreover, we highlight the importance of the eco-evolutionary underpinnings of multitrophic BEF relationships. We outline that FAIR data (meeting the standards of findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability) and reproducible processing will be key to advance this field of research by making it more integrative. Finally, we show how these BEF insights may be implemented for ecosystem management, society, and policy. Given that human well-being critically depends on the multiple services provided by diverse, multitrophic communities, integrating the approaches of evolutionary ecology, community ecology, and ecosystem ecology in future BEF research will be key to refine conservation targets and develop sustainable management strategies."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/bs.aecr.2019.06.001"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/62392"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","0065-2504"],["dc.title","A multitrophic perspective on biodiversity–ecosystem functioning research"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Oikos"],["dc.contributor.author","Jochum, Malte"],["dc.contributor.author","Ferlian, Olga"],["dc.contributor.author","Thakur, Madhav P."],["dc.contributor.author","Ciobanu, Marcel"],["dc.contributor.author","Klarner, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Salamon, Jörg‐Alfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Frelich, Lee E."],["dc.contributor.author","Johnson, Edward A."],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:28:15Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:28:15Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/oik.07867"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/82554"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1600-0706"],["dc.relation.issn","0030-1299"],["dc.title","Earthworm invasion causes declines across soil fauna size classes and biodiversity facets in northern North American forests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","33"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Soil Biology and Biochemistry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","42"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","52"],["dc.contributor.author","Ferlian, Olga"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheu, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Pollierer, Melanie M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:07:02Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:07:02Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Fatty acid (FA) analysis investigates changes in the relative contribution of prey from major energy channels in decomposer food webs for predator nutrition. Adopting this approach we investigated whether the trophic niche of centipedes, as major invertebrate predators in forest soil food webs, changes with maturation, season or forest age. Generally, each of the four centipede species studied differed significantly in their FA composition suggesting trophic niche differentiation. FA profiles differed more strongly in the two geophilomorph (Strigamia acuminata and Geophilus ribauti) than in the two lithobiomorph species (Lithobius crassipes and Lithobius mutabilis) suggesting that in particular the former feed on markedly different prey. FA profiles changed during post-embryonic development in each of the four centipede species. Differences were most pronounced in the two lithobiomorph species shifting to predominantly fungal feeding prey. Further, FA profiles varied with season indicating that centipedes exploit more prey out of the bacterial channel in autumn. FA profiles of centipedes varied little with forest age suggesting that soil food webs are remarkably invariant across different forest ecosystems. The results indicate that FA composition of second order consumers closely reflects changes in diet of prey species and composition of basal resources. The study proved FA profiles as powerful tool to gain insight into critical characteristics of soil food web stability, i.e., compartmentalisation and the relative importance and variability of energy channels. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","DFG [1374]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.018"],["dc.identifier.isi","000305660900005"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/25697"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Pergamon-elsevier Science Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0038-0717"],["dc.title","Trophic interactions in centipedes (Chilopoda, Myriapoda) as indicated by fatty acid patterns: Variations with life stage, forest age and season"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","511"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Animal Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","520"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","86"],["dc.contributor.author","Birkhofer, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Diekoetter, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Drees, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Ferlian, Olga"],["dc.contributor.author","Maraun, Mark"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheu, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Wolters, Volkmar"],["dc.contributor.author","Wurst, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Zaitsev, Andrey S."],["dc.contributor.author","Smith, Henrik G."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:24:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:24:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Along with the global decline of species richness goes a loss of ecological traits. Associated biotic homogenization of animal communities and narrowing of trait diversity threaten ecosystem functioning and human well-being. High management intensity is regarded as an important ecological filter, eliminating species that lack suitable adaptations. Below-ground arthropods are assumed to be less sensitive to such effects than above-ground arthropods. Here, we compared the impact of management intensity between (grassland vs. forest) and within land-use types (local management intensity) on the trait diversity and composition in below- and above-ground arthropod communities. We used data on 722 arthropod species living above-ground (Auchenorrhyncha and Heteroptera), primarily in soil (Chilopoda and Oribatida) or at the interface (Araneae and Carabidae). Our results show that trait diversity of arthropod communities is not primarily reduced by intense local land use, but is rather affected by differences between land-use types. Communities of Auchenorrhyncha and Chilopoda had significantly lower trait diversity in grassland habitats as compared to forests. Carabidae showed the opposite pattern with higher trait diversity in grasslands. Grasslands had a lower proportion of large Auchenorrhyncha and Carabidae individuals, whereas Chilopoda and Heteroptera individuals were larger in grasslands. Body size decreased with land-use intensity across taxa, but only in grasslands. The proportion of individuals with low mobility declined with land-use intensity in Araneae and Auchenorrhyncha, but increased in Chilopoda and grassland Heteroptera. The proportion of carnivorous individuals increased with land-use intensity in Heteroptera in forests and in Oribatida and Carabidae in grasslands. Our results suggest that gradients in management intensity across land-use types will not generally reduce trait diversity in multiple taxa, but will exert strong trait filtering within individual taxa. The observed patterns for trait filtering in individual taxa are not related to major classifications into above- and below-ground species. Instead, ecologically different taxa resembled each other in their trait diversity and compositional responses to land-use differences. These previously undescribed patterns offer an opportunity to develop management strategies for the conservation of trait diversity across taxonomic groups in permanent grassland and forest habitats."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/1365-2656.12641"],["dc.identifier.isi","000398826400011"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28118484"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42711"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Wiley"],["dc.relation.issn","1365-2656"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-8790"],["dc.title","Land-use type and intensity differentially filter traits in above- and below-ground arthropod communities"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]