Pawelzik, Elke

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","13"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Sustainability"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Pointke, Marcel; 1Division of Quality of Plant Products, Department of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany; epawelz@gwdg.de"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Albrecht, Elke Herta; 2Division of Ecology of Livestock Production, Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany; elkeherta.albrecht@uni-goettingen.de (E.H.A.); katrin.geburt@uni-goettingen.de (K.G.); mgerken@gwdg.de (M.G.)"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Geburt, Katrin; 2Division of Ecology of Livestock Production, Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany; elkeherta.albrecht@uni-goettingen.de (E.H.A.); katrin.geburt@uni-goettingen.de (K.G.); mgerken@gwdg.de (M.G.)"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Gerken, Martina; 2Division of Ecology of Livestock Production, Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany; elkeherta.albrecht@uni-goettingen.de (E.H.A.); katrin.geburt@uni-goettingen.de (K.G.); mgerken@gwdg.de (M.G.)"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Traulsen, Imke; 3Division Livestock Systems, Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany; imke.traulsen@uni-goettingen.de"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Pawelzik, Elke; 1Division of Quality of Plant Products, Department of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany; epawelz@gwdg.de"],["dc.contributor.author","Pointke, Marcel"],["dc.contributor.author","Albrecht, Elke Herta"],["dc.contributor.author","Geburt, Katrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerken, Martina"],["dc.contributor.author","Traulsen, Imke"],["dc.contributor.author","Pawelzik, Elke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-07-11T06:54:09Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-07-11T06:54:09Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022-06-30"],["dc.date.updated","2022-07-08T13:18:20Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Consumers are becoming increasingly interested in reducing the consumption of animal-based foods for health, sustainability, and ethical reasons. The food industry is developing products from plant-based ingredients that mimic animal-based foods’ nutritional and sensory characteristics. In this study, the focus is on plant-based milk alternatives (PBMAs). A potential problem with plant-based diets is the deficiency of important micronutrients, such as vitamin B12, B2, and calcium. Therefore, an analysis of micronutrients in PBMAs was conducted to assess their nutritional value. The second main focus was on the sensory description of the PBMAs, done by a trained panel, and instrumental assessment to characterize the sensory attributes. Almond drinks met the daily micronutrient requirements the least, while soy drinks came closest to cow’s milk in macro- and micronutrients. The experimentally determined electronic tongue and volatile compound results confirmed the sensory panel’s evaluations and could therefore be used as a method for easy and effective assessments of PBMAs. The PBMAs evaluated in this study could not completely replace cow’s milk’s nutritional and sensory properties. They are products in their own product group and must be evaluated accordingly. Given the variety of products, consumers should experiment and make their decisions regarding the substitution of cow’s milk."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Volkswagenstif-tung"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Ministry for Science and Culture of Lower Saxony"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/su14137996"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/112428"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","2071-1050"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.title","A Comparative Analysis of Plant-Based Milk Alternatives Part 1: Composition, Sensory, and Nutritional Value"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","14"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Sustainability"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Geburt, Katrin; 1Division of Ecology of Livestock Production, Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany; katrin.geburt@uni-goettingen.de (K.G.); elkeherta.albrecht@uni-goettingen.de (E.H.A.); mgerken@gwdg.de (M.G.)"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Albrecht, Elke Herta; 1Division of Ecology of Livestock Production, Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany; katrin.geburt@uni-goettingen.de (K.G.); elkeherta.albrecht@uni-goettingen.de (E.H.A.); mgerken@gwdg.de (M.G.)"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Pointke, Marcel; 2Division of Quality of Plant Products, Department of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany; marcel.pointke@uni-goettingen.de (M.P.); epawelz@gwdg.de (E.P.)"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Pawelzik, Elke; 2Division of Quality of Plant Products, Department of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany; marcel.pointke@uni-goettingen.de (M.P.); epawelz@gwdg.de (E.P.)"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Gerken, Martina; 1Division of Ecology of Livestock Production, Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany; katrin.geburt@uni-goettingen.de (K.G.); elkeherta.albrecht@uni-goettingen.de (E.H.A.); mgerken@gwdg.de (M.G.)"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Traulsen, Imke; 3Division Livestock Systems, Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.author","Geburt, Katrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Albrecht, Elke Herta"],["dc.contributor.author","Pointke, Marcel"],["dc.contributor.author","Pawelzik, Elke"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerken, Martina"],["dc.contributor.author","Traulsen, Imke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-08-04T08:24:13Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-08-04T08:24:13Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022-07-09"],["dc.date.updated","2022-08-03T15:20:10Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Human food production is the largest cause of global environmental changes. Environmental benefits could be achieved by replacing diets with a high amount of animal-sourced foods with more plant-based foods, due to their smaller environmental impacts. The objective of this study was to assess the environmental impacts of the three most common plant-based milk alternatives (PBMAs)—oat, soy, and almond drink—in comparison with conventional and organic cow milk. Life cycle assessments (LCA) were calculated by the ReCiPe 2016 midpoint method, in addition to the single issue methods “Ecosystem damage potential” and “Water scarcity index”. PBMAs achieved lower impact values in almost all 12 of the calculated impact categories, with oat drink and the organic soy drink being the most environmentally friendly. However, when LCA results were expressed per energy and by the protein content of the beverages, the ranking of the beverages, in terms of their environmental impacts, changed greatly, and the results of PBMAs approached those of milk, particularly with regard to the protein index. The study highlights the importance of considering a broader range of impact categories when comparing the impacts of PBMAs and milk."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Volkswagenstiftung"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Ministry for Science and Culture of Lower Saxony"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/su14148424"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/112623"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","2071-1050"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.title","A Comparative Analysis of Plant-Based Milk Alternatives Part 2: Environmental Impacts"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2339"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","15"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Foods"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Pointke, Marcel; 1Division of Quality of Plant Products, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Ohlau, Marlene; 2Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, University of Goettingen, 37073 Goettingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Risius, Antje; 2Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, University of Goettingen, 37073 Goettingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Pawelzik, Elke; 1Division of Quality of Plant Products, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.author","Pointke, Marcel"],["dc.contributor.author","Ohlau, Marlene"],["dc.contributor.author","Risius, Antje"],["dc.contributor.author","Pawelzik, Elke"],["dc.contributor.editor","McSweeney, Matthew"],["dc.contributor.editor","Duizer, Lisa M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-09-01T09:51:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-09-01T09:51:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.date.updated","2022-11-11T13:14:58Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Consumer acceptance and product development of sustainable, healthy, and tasty plant-based alternative products (PBAPs) are closely interlinked. However, information on consumer perceptions of the sensory profile of plant-based meat, cheese, and milk remains scarce. The study aimed to investigate German consumers’ (1) sensory evaluation of PBAPs and (2) consumers´ motivations and knowledge underlying the purchase of such products. This was analyzed in relation to different dietary styles of consumers (omnivore, flexitarian, vegetarian, vegan). A sample of 159 adults completed two tasks: first, a sensory test in which participants tasted and rated three different PBAPs in two consecutive sessions, and second, a questionnaire on consumption behavior, motivation, and knowledge. Results show few differences between nutrition styles in sensory evaluation of individual product attributes. However, overall liking was rated significantly higher by vegans than by omnivores. All dietary styles reported animal welfare and environmental aspects as the main motivations for consuming PBAPs. Most participants acknowledged that meat and cheese alternatives are highly processed foods and not a fad but are not automatically healthier or more environmentally friendly than their animal-based counterparts. Future research should focus on emerging product segments such as plant-based cheeses to better understand how consumers evaluate PBAPs."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/foods11152339"],["dc.identifier.pii","foods11152339"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/113899"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-597"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","2304-8158"],["dc.rights","Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)."],["dc.title","Plant-Based Only: Investigating Consumers’ Sensory Perception, Motivation, and Knowledge of Different Plant-Based Alternative Products on the Market"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]