Schultze-Gerlach, Thomas

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","705"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Organizational Behavior"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","721"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Haeusser, Jan Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulz-Hardt, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Tomaschek, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Mojzisch, Andreas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:38:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:38:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","People frequently have to work in high repetitive jobs. Previous research has focused exclusively on the effects of task repetitiveness on well-being, while neglecting effects on work performance. In the present study, we aimed to fill this void by conducting two workplace simulations with experimental manipulations of task repetitiveness. Participants worked for about 5hours at either a computer workstation, compiling computer hardware packages according to customer requests (Experiment 1, N=160), or at an assembly line, piecing together equipment sets for furniture (Experiment 2, N=213). Both experiments provide consistent evidence that high repetitiveness has a detrimental effect on well-being, whereas work performance increases under conditions of high repetitiveness. On a practical level, our study hence shows that high task repetitiveness is a double-edged sword for both employees and organizations. On a conceptual level, our findings emphasize the necessity to account for both mental strain and work performance when examining the effects of task repetitiveness. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/job.1920"],["dc.identifier.isi","000337636000007"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/33089"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","1099-1379"],["dc.relation.issn","0894-3796"],["dc.title","Experimental evidence for the effects of task repetitiveness on mental strain and objective work performance"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","170"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","183"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","64"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Mojzisch, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulz-Hardt, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:24:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:24:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Research in the judge-advisor-paradigm suggests that advice is generally utilized less than it should be according to its quality. In a series of four experiments, we challenge this widely held assumption. We hypothesize that when advice quality is low, the opposite phenomenon, namely overutilization of advice, occurs. We further assume that this overutilization effect is the result of anchoring: advice serves as an anchor, thus causing an adjustment toward even useless advice. The data of our four experiments support these hypotheses. Judges systematically adjusted their estimates toward advice that we introduced to them as being useless, and this effect was stable after controlling for intentional utilization of this advice. Furthermore, we demonstrate that anchoring-based adjustment toward advice is independent of advice quality. Our findings enhance our understanding of the processes involved in advice taking and identify a potential threat to judgment accuracy arising from an inability to discount useless advice."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1027/1618-3169/a000361"],["dc.identifier.isi","000404038800003"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28633625"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42575"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Hogrefe & Huber Publishers"],["dc.relation.issn","2190-5142"],["dc.relation.issn","1618-3169"],["dc.title","On the Inability to Ignore Useless Advice A Case for Anchoring in the Judge-Advisor-System"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1371"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychological Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1372"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","24"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Mojzisch, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulz-Hardt, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:53Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1177/0956797612472206"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151527"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/10809"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8333"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.publisher","SAGE Publications"],["dc.relation.issn","0956-7976"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Groups Weight Outside Information Less Than Individuals Do Because They Should"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","102199"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Economic Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","75"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Huber, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Kirchler, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Mojzisch, Andreas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-04-02T14:16:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-04-02T14:16:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.joep.2019.102199"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/63548"],["dc.relation.issn","0167-4870"],["dc.title","Replications in economic psychology and behavioral economics"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e159"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Behavioral and Brain Sciences"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","39"],["dc.contributor.author","Mojzisch, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Hüffmeier, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulz-Hardt, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T15:22:17Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T15:22:17Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Notwithstanding the appeal of the \"one size fits all\" approach that Baumeister et al. propose, we argue that there is no panacea for improving group performance. The concept of \"differentiation of selves\" constitutes an umbrella term for similar seeming but actually different constructs. Even the same type of \"differentiation of selves\" can be beneficial for some and harmful for other tasks."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1017/S0140525X15001478"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1469-1825"],["dc.identifier.isi","000389602500068"],["dc.identifier.issn","0140-525X"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28355798"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/73342"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Cambridge Univ Press"],["dc.relation.issn","1469-1825"],["dc.relation.issn","0140-525X"],["dc.title","Differentiation of selves: Differentiating a fuzzy concept"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.subtype","letter_note"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","24"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","36"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","118"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Mojzisch, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulz-Hardt, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","One prominent finding in research on group judgment is that groups often outperform the average of their members’ individual judgments. Previous research attributed this finding to groups weighting their more competent members more strongly (differential weighting explanation). We postulate an alternative explanation, namely that groups outperform individuals due to group-to-individual (G–I) transfer, which denotes group members becoming more accurate individually during group interaction. In Experiment 1, we demonstrate that individual accuracy in an estimation task strongly increases due to interaction, leading to high accuracy at the group level. Experiment 2 replicates this finding and shows that G–I transfer can be enhanced by expertise feedback. In both experiments, when controlling for G–I transfer during group interaction, group judgments were not better than the average model. The findings imply that previously observed superior performance by groups compared to individuals may have been due to G–I transfer and not necessarily due to differential weighting."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.12.006"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151524"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8330"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","0749-5978"],["dc.title","Why groups perform better than individuals at quantitative judgment tasks: Group-to-individual transfer as an alternative to differential weighting"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","189"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Social Neuroscience"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","202"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Schilbach, Leonhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Eickhoff, Simon B."],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Mojzisch, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Vogeley, Kai"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:25:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:25:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Considering advice from others is a pervasive element of human social life. We used the judge-advisor paradigm to investigate the neural correlates of advice evaluation and advice integration by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging. Our results demonstrate that evaluating advice recruits the mentalizing network, brain regions activated when people think about others' mental states. Important activation differences exist, however, depending upon the perceived competence of the advisor. Consistently, additional analyses demonstrate that integrating others' advice, i.e., how much participants actually adjust their initial estimate, correlates with neural activity in the centromedial amygdala in the case of a competent and with activity in visual cortex in the case of an incompetent advisor. Taken together, our findings, therefore, demonstrate that advice evaluation and integration rely on dissociable neural mechanisms and that significant differences exist depending upon the advisor's reputation, which suggests different modes of processing advice depending upon the perceived competence of the advisor."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/17470919.2013.775967"],["dc.identifier.isi","000317270700001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23485131"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/30111"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Psychology Press"],["dc.relation.issn","1747-0919"],["dc.title","To you I am listening: Perceived competence of advisors influences judgment and decision-making via recruitment of the amygdala"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","699"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Cognitive Therapy and Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","711"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","41"],["dc.contributor.author","Hofheinz, Christine"],["dc.contributor.author","Germar, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Michalak, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Mojzisch, Andreas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:11:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:11:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10608-017-9848-7"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1573-2819"],["dc.identifier.issn","0147-5916"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/71082"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Are Depressed People More or Less Susceptible to Informational Social Influence?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","134"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Personnel Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","145"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","13"],["dc.contributor.author","Mojzisch, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Krumm, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:45:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:45:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","A growing body of research shows that individual differences in working memory capacity play a pivotal role for a large number of higher order cognitive tasks. Surprisingly, however, the impact of individual differences in working memory capacity on group performance has received little attention. In this conceptual article, we focus on three typical group tasks (group idea generation, group decision making, group judgment) and, for each task, provide an analysis of how individual differences in working memory capacity might affect group performance. Our key idea is that group interaction is a cognitively demanding task as group members have to continuously monitor the ongoing conversation, hold their ideas in memory, integrate the information put forth by others, and update their mental representations accordingly. Therefore, individual differences in working memory capacity are presumed to have a profound impact on how people process information during group interaction."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1027/1866-5888/a000111"],["dc.identifier.isi","000342961900003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/34704"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Hogrefe & Huber Publishers"],["dc.relation.issn","2190-5150"],["dc.relation.issn","1866-5888"],["dc.title","Do High Working Memory Groups Perform Better? A Conceptual Approach Linking Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity to Group Performance"],["dc.type","review"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3-4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Journal of Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","43"],["dc.contributor.author","Tomaschek, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Mojzisch, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulz-Hardt, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Richter, Peter"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:14:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:14:35Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.format.extent","339"],["dc.identifier.isi","000259264304045"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/54161"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Psychology Press"],["dc.publisher.place","Hove"],["dc.relation.issn","0020-7594"],["dc.title","Being fed up: The impact of task repetitiveness on mental satiation and cardiovascular reactivity"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]