Schultze-Gerlach, Thomas

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","101633"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychology of sport and exercise"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","48"],["dc.contributor.author","Hüffmeier, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Stern, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-11-10T12:44:59Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-11-10T12:44:59Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101633"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/68669"],["dc.relation.issn","1469-0292"],["dc.title","When mistakes affecting one’s own group result in compensation: Evidence of a compensatory own goal effect"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e00246-17"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","11"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Virology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","91"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Hensen, Luca"],["dc.contributor.author","Matrosovich, Tatyana"],["dc.contributor.author","Bergmann, Janina"],["dc.contributor.author","Winkler, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Peteranderl, Christin"],["dc.contributor.author","Klenk, Hans-Dieter"],["dc.contributor.author","Weber, Friedemann"],["dc.contributor.author","Herold, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Pöhlmann, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.editor","Dermody, Terence S."],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-10-06T13:25:32Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-10-06T13:25:32Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","ABSTRACT\n The replication and pathogenicity of influenza A viruses (IAVs) critically depend on their ability to tolerate the antiviral interferon (IFN) response. To determine a potential role for the IAV hemagglutinin (HA) in viral sensitivity to IFN, we studied the restriction of IAV infection in IFN-β-treated human epithelial cells by using 2:6 recombinant IAVs that shared six gene segments of A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 virus (PR8) and contained HAs and neuraminidases of representative avian, human, and zoonotic H5N1 and H7N9 viruses. In A549 and Calu-3 cells, viruses displaying a higher pH optimum of HA-mediated membrane fusion, H5N1-PR8 and H7N9-PR8, were less sensitive to the IFN-induced antiviral state than their counterparts with HAs from duck and human viruses, which fused at a lower pH. The association between a high pH optimum of fusion and reduced IFN sensitivity was confirmed by using HA point mutants of A/Hong Kong/1/1968-PR8 that differed solely by their fusion properties. Furthermore, similar effects of the viral fusion pH on IFN sensitivity were observed in experiments with (i) primary human type II alveolar epithelial cells and differentiated cultures of human airway epithelial cells, (ii) nonrecombinant zoonotic and pandemic IAVs, and (iii) preparations of IFN-α and IFN-λ1. A higher pH of membrane fusion and reduced sensitivity to IFN correlated with lower restriction of the viruses in MDCK cells stably expressing the IFN-inducible transmembrane proteins IFITM2 and IFITM3, which are known to inhibit viral fusion. Our results reveal that the pH optimum of HA-driven membrane fusion of IAVs is a determinant of their sensitivity to IFN and IFITM proteins.\n \n IMPORTANCE\n The IFN system constitutes an important innate defense against viral infection. Substantial information is available on how IAVs avoid detection by sensors of the IFN system and disable IFN signaling pathways. Much less is known about the ability of IAVs to tolerate the antiviral activity of IFN-induced cellular proteins. The IFN-induced proteins of the IFITM family block IAV entry into target cells and can restrict viral spread and pathogenicity. Here we show for the first time that the sensitivity of IAVs to the IFN-induced antiviral state and IFITM2 and IFITM3 proteins depends on the pH value at which the viral HA undergoes a conformational transition and mediates membrane fusion. Our data imply that the high pH optimum of membrane fusion typical of zoonotic IAVs of gallinaceous poultry, such as H5N1 and H7N9, may contribute to their enhanced virulence in humans."],["dc.description.sponsorship"," European Commission Seventh Framework Programme https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000780"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001659"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001659"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001659"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Leibniz-Gemeinschaft https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001664"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1128/JVI.00246-17"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/114863"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-602"],["dc.relation.eissn","1098-5514"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-538X"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Deutsches Primatenzentrum"],["dc.rights.uri","https://journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license"],["dc.title","pH Optimum of Hemagglutinin-Mediated Membrane Fusion Determines Sensitivity of Influenza A Viruses to the Interferon-Induced Antiviral State and IFITMs"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","705"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Organizational Behavior"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","721"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Haeusser, Jan Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulz-Hardt, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Tomaschek, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Mojzisch, Andreas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:38:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:38:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","People frequently have to work in high repetitive jobs. Previous research has focused exclusively on the effects of task repetitiveness on well-being, while neglecting effects on work performance. In the present study, we aimed to fill this void by conducting two workplace simulations with experimental manipulations of task repetitiveness. Participants worked for about 5hours at either a computer workstation, compiling computer hardware packages according to customer requests (Experiment 1, N=160), or at an assembly line, piecing together equipment sets for furniture (Experiment 2, N=213). Both experiments provide consistent evidence that high repetitiveness has a detrimental effect on well-being, whereas work performance increases under conditions of high repetitiveness. On a practical level, our study hence shows that high task repetitiveness is a double-edged sword for both employees and organizations. On a conceptual level, our findings emphasize the necessity to account for both mental strain and work performance when examining the effects of task repetitiveness. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/job.1920"],["dc.identifier.isi","000337636000007"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/33089"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","1099-1379"],["dc.relation.issn","0894-3796"],["dc.title","Experimental evidence for the effects of task repetitiveness on mental strain and objective work performance"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Reinhard, Selina K."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-02-22T11:17:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-02-22T11:17:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Although empirical research has investigated what we ideally seek in a romantic partner for decades, the crucial question of whether ideal partner preferences actually guide our mating decisions in real life has remained largely unanswered. One reason for this is the lack of designs that assess individuals' ideal partner preferences before entering a relationship and then follow up on them over an extended period. In the Göttingen Mate Choice Study (GMCS), a preregistered, large-scale online study, we used such a naturalistic prospective design. We investigated partner preferences across 4 preference domains in a large sample of predominantly heterosexual singles (N = 763, aged 18-40 years) and tracked these individuals across a period of 5 months upon a possible transition into romantic relationships. Attesting to their predictive validity, partner preferences prospectively predicted the characteristics of later partners. This was equally true for both sexes, except for vitality-attractiveness where men's preferences were more predictive of their later partners' standing on this dimension than women's. Self-perceived mate value did not moderate the preference-partner characteristics relations. Preferences proved to be relatively stable across the 5 months interval, yet were less stable for those who entered a relationship. Subgroup analyses using a newly developed indicator of preference adjustment toward (vs. away from) partner characteristics revealed that participants adjusted their preferences downward when partners fell short of initial preferences, but showed no consistent adjustment when partners exceeded them. Results and implications are discussed against the background of ongoing controversies in mate choice and romantic relationship research. (PsycINFO Database Record"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/pspp0000170"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28921999"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/12430"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.eissn","1939-1315"],["dc.title","Predictive Validity and Adjustment of Ideal Partner Preferences Across the Transition Into Romantic Relationships"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","170"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","183"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","64"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Mojzisch, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulz-Hardt, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:24:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:24:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Research in the judge-advisor-paradigm suggests that advice is generally utilized less than it should be according to its quality. In a series of four experiments, we challenge this widely held assumption. We hypothesize that when advice quality is low, the opposite phenomenon, namely overutilization of advice, occurs. We further assume that this overutilization effect is the result of anchoring: advice serves as an anchor, thus causing an adjustment toward even useless advice. The data of our four experiments support these hypotheses. Judges systematically adjusted their estimates toward advice that we introduced to them as being useless, and this effect was stable after controlling for intentional utilization of this advice. Furthermore, we demonstrate that anchoring-based adjustment toward advice is independent of advice quality. Our findings enhance our understanding of the processes involved in advice taking and identify a potential threat to judgment accuracy arising from an inability to discount useless advice."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1027/1618-3169/a000361"],["dc.identifier.isi","000404038800003"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28633625"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42575"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Hogrefe & Huber Publishers"],["dc.relation.issn","2190-5142"],["dc.relation.issn","1618-3169"],["dc.title","On the Inability to Ignore Useless Advice A Case for Anchoring in the Judge-Advisor-System"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","204"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","219"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11454"],["dc.contributor.author","Unakafov, Anton M."],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze-Gerlach, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Kagan, Igor"],["dc.contributor.author","Moeller, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Gail, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Treue, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Eule, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolf, Fred"],["dc.contributor.editor","Kaufmann, P."],["dc.contributor.editor","Castillo, P."],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-30T07:45:17Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-30T07:45:17Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","A Transparent game is a game-theoretic setting that takes action visibility into account. In each round, depending on the relative timing of their actions, players have a certain probability to see their partner’s choice before making their own decision. This probability is determined by the level of transparency. At the two extremes, a game with zero transparency is equivalent to the classical simultaneous game, and a game with maximal transparency corresponds to a sequential game. Despite the prevalence of intermediate transparency in many everyday interactions such scenarios have not been sufficiently studied. Here we consider a transparent iterated Prisoner’s dilemma (iPD) and use evolutionary simulations to investigate how and why the success of various strategies changes with the level of transparency. We demonstrate that non-zero transparency greatly reduces the set of successful memory-one strategies compared to the simultaneous iPD. For low and moderate transparency the classical “Win - Stay, Lose - Shift” (WSLS) strategy is the only evolutionary successful strategy. For high transparency all strategies are evolutionary unstable in the sense that they can be easily counteracted, and, finally, for maximal transparency a novel “Leader-Follower” strategy outperforms WSLS. Our results provide a partial explanation for the fact that the strategies proposed for the simultaneous iPD are rarely observed in nature, where high levels of transparency are common."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/978-3-030-16692-2_14"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/62176"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.publisher.place","hm"],["dc.relation.crisseries","Lecture Notes in Computer Science"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-3-030-16691-5"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-3-030-16692-2"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Applications of Evolutionary Computation. Applications of Evolutionary Computation."],["dc.relation.ispartofseries","Lecture Notes in Computer Science;"],["dc.relation.issn","0302-9743"],["dc.relation.issn","1611-3349"],["dc.title","Evolutionary Successful Strategies in a Transparent iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","144"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Judgment and Decision Making"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","171"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Rakotoarisoa, Anne-Fernandine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulz-Hardt, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:00:11Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:00:11Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Six experiments investigated how the distance between one's initial opinion and advice relates to advice utilization. Going beyond previous research, we relate advice distance to both relative adjustments and absolute adjustments towards the advice, and we also investigate a second mode of advice utilization, namely confidence shifts due to social validation. Whereas previous research suggests that advice is weighted less the more it differs from one's initial opinion, we consistently find evidence of a curvilinear pattern. Advice is weighted less when advice distance is low and when it is high. This is in particular because individuals are much more likely to retain their initial opinions in the light of near advice. Also, absolute opinion adjustments towards the advice increases in a monotone fashion as advice distance increases. This finding is in contrast to the predictions of the theoretical framework previous studies on advice distance are based on, social judgment theory. Instead, they data are more in line with a simple stimulus-response model suggesting that absolute adjustments towards the advice increase with advice distance but-potentially-with diminished sensitivity. Finally, our data show that advice can be utilized even when it receives zero weight during belief revision. The closer advice was to the initial opinions, the more it served as a means for social validation, increasing decision-makers' confidence in the accuracy of their final opinions. Thus, our findings suggest that advice utilization is a more complex function of advice distance than previously assumed."],["dc.identifier.isi","000351862400003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/37747"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Soc Judgment & Decision Making"],["dc.relation.issn","1930-2975"],["dc.title","Effects of distance between initial estimates and advice on advice utilization"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.contributor.author","Drewes, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, T."],["dc.contributor.author","Schulz-Hardt, S."],["dc.contributor.editor","Frey, D."],["dc.contributor.editor","Bierhoff, H.-W."],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-11-10T12:44:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-11-10T12:44:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/68667"],["dc.publisher","Hogrefe"],["dc.publisher.place","Göttingen"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Sozialpsychologie. Interaktion und Gruppe"],["dc.title","Leistung in Gruppen"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","265"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Judgment and Decision Making"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","276"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Bednarik, P."],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-11-10T12:55:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-11-10T12:55:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/68678"],["dc.title","The effectiveness of improper weighting in advice taking"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","102199"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Economic Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","75"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Huber, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Kirchler, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Mojzisch, Andreas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-04-02T14:16:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-04-02T14:16:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.joep.2019.102199"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/63548"],["dc.relation.issn","0167-4870"],["dc.title","Replications in economic psychology and behavioral economics"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]