Hansen, Solveig Lena

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","161"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Bioethics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","172"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig Lena"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfaller, Larissa"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:25:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:25:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Given the need for organs, public organizations use social marketing strategies to increase the number of donors. Their campaigns employ a variety of moral appeals. However, their effects on audiences are unclear. We identified 14 campaigns in Germany from over the last 20 years. Our approach combined a multimodal analysis of categorized posters with a qualitative analysis of responses, collected in interviews or focus groups, of 53 persons who were either skeptical or undecided about organ donation. The combined analyses revealed that the posters failed to motivate laypersons in general to donate, and were even less effective on skeptical or undecided individuals. We explain this in terms of the types of moral messages found on posters and the limits of such social marketing strategies. Furthermore, we discuss certain ethical aspects of organ donation campaigns pertaining to communicating norms and trust in public institutions."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/bioe.12774"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/81638"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1467-8519"],["dc.relation.issn","0269-9702"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made."],["dc.title","Critical analysis of communication strategies in public health promotion: An empirical‐ethical study on organ donation in Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1327"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Sociology of Health & Illness"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1346"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","40"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfaller, Larissa"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig L."],["dc.contributor.author","Adloff, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-10-24T11:14:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-10-24T11:14:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","In Germany, as well as in other countries, organ shortages are usually explained by a relative unwillingness to donate among a population which is assumed to be caused by a lack of information and mistrust of the system. As we can see in the data of our qualitative research (focus groups and interviews), lack of information or mistrust are not the only reasons for people to be reluctant to agree to the donation of their organs after death. In fact we can identify four positions: (1) information deficit; (2) mistrust; (3) no killing; and (4) bodily integrity. The first and second are the two prominent explanations in the public discourse about low donation rates. The third and the fourth instead have neither been adequately articulated nor been discussed as a proper argument. Therefore, by means of sociology of critique, we discuss their contribution to the discourse as comprehensible reasons for reluctance and present them as credible positions of criticism: These two positions illuminate fundamental and universal values of the inviolability of the person and human dignity. Thus, both positions are consistent and morally justifiable and should be addressed with sensitivity."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/1467-9566.12775"],["dc.identifier.pmid","29956337"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/62523"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","1467-9566"],["dc.relation.issn","0141-9889"],["dc.title","'Saying no to organ donation': an empirical typology of reluctance and rejection"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1020"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Health Communication"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1034"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","33"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig L."],["dc.contributor.author","Eisner, Marthe I."],["dc.contributor.author","Pfaller, Larissa"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:14:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:14:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/10410236.2017.1331187"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1532-7027"],["dc.identifier.issn","1041-0236"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/74689"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","“Are You In or Are You Out?!” Moral Appeals to the Public in Organ Donation Poster Campaigns: A Multimodal and Ethical Analysis"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]