Ammer, Christian

[["cris.virtual.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","0000-0001-8126-5307"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","0000-0002-4235-0135"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","0000-0003-4131-9424"],["cris.virtual.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.department","Fakultät für Forstwissenschaften und Waldökologie"],["cris.virtual.department","Präsidium"],["cris.virtual.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.department","Abteilung Waldbau und Waldökologie der gemäßigten Zonen"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","86db7e4a-1f3e-4e70-86da-445899f11b26"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","2301d346-4dea-4aa5-a716-15beccf00827"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","6f61c9e1-5566-4dc3-b7d1-67ee37efa6ee"],["cris.virtualsource.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.department","86db7e4a-1f3e-4e70-86da-445899f11b26"],["cris.virtualsource.department","2301d346-4dea-4aa5-a716-15beccf00827"],["cris.virtualsource.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.department","6f61c9e1-5566-4dc3-b7d1-67ee37efa6ee"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1684"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Sensors"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","19"],["dc.contributor.author","Willim, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Stiers, Melissa"],["dc.contributor.author","Annighöfer, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Ehbrecht, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Kabal, Myroslav"],["dc.contributor.author","Stillhard, Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Seidel, Dominik"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:47:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:47:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Research Foundation"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/s19071684"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1424-8220"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/78731"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","1424-8220"],["dc.rights","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Assessing Understory Complexity in Beech-dominated Forests (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Central Europe—From Managed to Primary Forests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","23"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature Conservation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","64"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","50"],["dc.contributor.author","Pham, Van Vien"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Annighöfer, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrichs, Steffi"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-11-01T10:17:31Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-11-01T10:17:31Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.abstract","Plant species diversity and composition play crucial roles in many ecosystem services and are largely influenced by environmental conditions, as well as natural and/or anthropogenic disturbances. However, our knowledge of the drivers of plant species diversity and composition in the limestone forests of Vietnam, a hotspot of biodiversity, is limited. To fill this knowledge gap, we surveyed plant species in the Cat Ba National Park (CBNP), located on a limestone archipelago. We hypothesised that: (1) topography, accessibility and spatial isolation drive the diversity and composition of plant communities in the CBNP and that (2) isolated areas contribute to high floristic regional diversity by supporting unique species assemblages. We expected high tree species diversity within the tropical limestone forests of the CBNP, but also that: (3) the abundance of non-tree species negatively affects tree regeneration diversity and abundance. Data were obtained from 90 random sample plots (500 m\r\n 2\r\n ) and 450 sub-sample plots (25 m\r\n 2\r\n ) in three areas of the CBNP. We differentiated four different plant species communities and found a total of 302 species belonging to 112 families. Tree species contributed 50% to total species richness. The distribution of different plant communities in the CBNP was driven mainly by topography; that is, the percentage of rock surface and slope and concomitant differences in soil depth. Contrary to our expectations, isolated areas did not contribute greatly to the CBNP’s plant species diversity. It seems that isolated areas and, as in our case, rough topography, may act as natural barriers to seed dispersal, creating an environmental filter for tree species. Across the CBNP, there was no effect of non-tree species on tree species regeneration, but regeneration patterns differed between communities. In species-rich communities growing under favourable site conditions (e.g. low rock surface and slope), greater coverage by non-tree species had an increasingly negative effect on tree species richness and abundance in the regeneration layer. The opposite was observed in communities growing under harsh site conditions. We conclude that plant species diversity in the CBNP is high, particularly in easily accessible lowland areas where tree species contribute greatly to biodiversity. However, here, non-tree species can even restrict tree regeneration."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3897/natureconservation.50.86490"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/116829"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-605"],["dc.relation.eissn","1314-3301"],["dc.relation.issn","1314-6947"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.title","Plant species diversity and composition in limestone forests of the Vietnamese Cat Ba National Park"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","144"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Insect Conservation and Diversity"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","148"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.author","Seibold, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Hothorn, Torsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Simons, Nadja K."],["dc.contributor.author","Blüthgen, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambarlı, Didem"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauhus, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Habel, Jan C."],["dc.contributor.author","Penone, Caterina"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst‐Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:30:04Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:30:04Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Reports of major losses in insect biodiversity have stimulated an increasing interest in temporal population changes. Existing datasets are often limited to a small number of study sites, few points in time, a narrow range of land‐use intensities and only some taxonomic groups, or they lack standardised sampling. While new monitoring programs have been initiated, they still cover rather short time periods. Daskalova et al. 2021 (Insect Conservation and Diversity, 14, 1‐18) argue that temporal trends of insect populations derived from short time series are biased towards extreme trends, while their own analysis of an assembly of shorter‐ and longer‐term time series does not support an overall insect decline. With respect to the results of Seibold et al. 2019 (Nature, 574, 671–674) based on a 10‐year multi‐site time series, they claim that the analysis suffers from not accounting for temporal pseudoreplication. Here, we explain why the criticism of missing statistical rigour in the analysis of Seibold et al. (2019) is not warranted. Models that include ‘year’ as random effect, as suggested by Daskalova et al. (2021), fail to detect non‐linear trends and assume that consecutive years are independent samples which is questionable for insect time‐series data. We agree with Daskalova et al. (2021) that the assembly and analysis of larger datasets is urgently needed, but it will take time until such datasets are available. Thus, short‐term datasets are highly valuable, should be extended and analysed continually to provide a more detailed understanding of insect population changes under the influence of global change, and to trigger immediate conservation actions."],["dc.description.sponsorship","ProjektDEAL"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/icad.12467"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/83090"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.publisher","John Wiley \\u0026 Sons, Ltd."],["dc.relation.eissn","1752-4598"],["dc.relation.issn","1752-458X"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made."],["dc.title","Insights from regional and short‐term biodiversity monitoring datasets are valuable: a reply to Daskalova et al . 2021"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Forest Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","130"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Balandier, P."],["dc.contributor.author","Bentsen, N. S."],["dc.contributor.author","Coll, L."],["dc.contributor.author","Löf, M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:47:17Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:47:17Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10342-010-0452-6"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146711"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/5985"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/4505"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1612-4669"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Forest vegetation management under debate: an introduction"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","690"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in Plant Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Annighöfer, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Seidel, Dominik"],["dc.contributor.author","Mölder, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:51:57Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:51:57Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Tree saplings are exposed to a competitive growth environment in which resources are limited and the ability to adapt determines general vitality and specific growth performance. In this study we analyzed the aboveground spatial neighborhood of oak [Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) saplings growing in Germany, by using hemispherical photography and terrestrial laser scanning as proxy for the competitive pressure saplings were exposed to. The hemispherical images were used to analyze the light availability and the three-dimensional (3D) point clouds from the laser scanning were used to assess the space and forest structure around the saplings. The aim was to increase the precision with which the biomass allocation, growth, and morphology of the saplings could be predicted by including more detailed information of their environment. The predictive strength of the models was especially increased through direct neighborhood variables (e.g., relative space filling), next to the light availability being the most important predictor variable. The biomass allocation patterns within the more light demanding oak were strongly driven by the space availability around the saplings. Diameter and height growth variables of both species reacted significantly to changes in light availability, and partly also to the neighborhood variables. The leaf morphology [as leaf-area ratio (LAR)] was also driven by light availability and decreased with increasing light availability. However, the branch morphology (as mean branch weight) could not be explained for oak and the model outcome for beech was hard to interpret. The results could show that individuals of the same species perform differently under constant light conditions but differing neighborhoods. Assessing the neighborhood of trees with highly precise measurement devices, like terrestrial laser scanners, proved to be useful. However, the primary response to a dense neighborhood seemed to be coping with a reduction of the lateral light availability aboveground, rather than responding to an increase of competition belowground. The results suggest continuing efforts to increase the precision with which plant environments can be described through innovative and efficient methods, like terrestrial laser scanning."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/fpls.2019.00690"],["dc.identifier.pmid","31191589"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16245"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/60048"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","570"],["dc.title","Advanced Aboveground Spatial Analysis as Proxy for the Competitive Environment Affecting Sapling Development"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","171"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Forest Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","183"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","136"],["dc.contributor.author","Dirnberger, Gerald"],["dc.contributor.author","Sterba, Hubert"],["dc.contributor.author","Condés, Sonia"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Annighöfer, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Avdagić, Admir"],["dc.contributor.author","Bielak, Kamil"],["dc.contributor.author","Brazaitis, Gediminas"],["dc.contributor.author","Coll, Lluís"],["dc.contributor.author","Heym, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Hurt, Václav"],["dc.contributor.author","Kurylyak, Viktor"],["dc.contributor.author","Motta, Renzo"],["dc.contributor.author","Pach, Maciej"],["dc.contributor.author","Ponette, Quentin"],["dc.contributor.author","Ruiz-Peinado, Ricardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Skrzyszewski, Jerzy"],["dc.contributor.author","Šrámek, Vít"],["dc.contributor.author","Streel, Géraud de"],["dc.contributor.author","Svoboda, Miroslav"],["dc.contributor.author","Zlatanov, Tzvetan"],["dc.contributor.author","Pretzsch, Hans"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:47:20Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:47:20Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) dominate many of the European forest stands. Also, mixtures of European beech and Scots pine more or less occur over all European countries, but have been scarcely investigated. The area occupied by each species is of high relevance, especially for growth evaluation and comparison of different species in mixed and monospecific stands. Thus, we studied different methods to describe species proportions and their definition as proportion by area. 25 triplets consisting of mixed and monospecific stands were established across Europe ranging from Lithuania to Spain in northern to southern direction and from Bulgaria to Belgium in eastern to western direction. On stand level, the conclusive method for estimating the species proportion as a fraction of the stand area relates the observed density (tree number or basal area) to its potential. This stand-level estimation makes use of the potential from comparable neighboring monospecific stands or from maximum density lines derived from other data, e.g. forest inventories or permanent observations plots. At tree level, the fraction of the stand area occupied by a species can be derived from the proportions of their crown projection area or of their leaf area. The estimates of the potentials obtained from neighboring monospecific stands, especially in older stands, were poorer than those from the maximum density line depending on the Martonne aridity index. Therefore, the stand-level method in combination with the Martonne aridity index for potential densities can be highly recommended. The species’ proportions estimated with this method are best approximated by the proportions of the species’ leaf areas. In forest practice, the most commonly applied method is an ocular estimation of the proportions by crown projection area. Even though the proportions of pine were calculated here by measuring crown projection areas in the field, we found this method to underestimate the proportion by 25% compared to the stand-level approach."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10342-016-1017-0"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146735"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14360"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/4531"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1612-4669"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Species proportions by area in mixtures of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","New Forests"],["dc.contributor.author","Rebola-Lichtenberg, Jessica"],["dc.contributor.author","Streit, Juliane"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Seidel, Dominik"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:32:08Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:32:08Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.description.abstract","Short rotation coppices play an important role in providing biomass for energetic use. Mixing fast-growing tree species in short rotation coppices may show complementarity effects and increased yield. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of species interaction in mixed short rotation coppices with fast-growing Populus spp.-hybrids and the N-fixing Robinia pseudoacacia. Four different Populus-hybrids (AF2, Fritzi Pauley, Hybride 275 and Max 1), planted alternately in pure and mixed stands with R. pseudoacacia were used for the analysis. Height and root collar diameter were measured once a year, over a period of four years (2014–2017). Additionally, in the third year, aboveground competition was surveyed with a terrestrial laser scanner and root biomass was analyzed to assess belowground competition. Soil nitrogen was also determined in order to verify enrichment properties of mixtures compared to pure stands. Populus-hybrids’ stem volume showed no significant differences between stand types in the first year after planting. In the second and third year, however, two Populus-hybrids (AF2 and Max 1) had a higher stem volume increment of up to 3.8 times than stem volume increment in pure stands. This may be related to the fact that soil nitrogen was 39% higher in the mixtures than in pure stands. However, in the 4th year after stand establishment, R. pseudoacacia’s crowns were so massive and broad, that this species was far more competitive than the Populus-hybrids. With the exception of P. ‘Fritzi Pauley’, which showed no significant differences between stand types, growth rates reversed for the other three Populus-hybrids. AF2, Max 1 and Hybride 275 showed up to 75% lower stem volume increment in mixtures compared to pure stands. We assume that, in spite of the initially observed facilitation between the species, the competition exerted by R. pseudoacacia started dominating after 4 years and began to surpass the benefits of facilitation."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s11056-020-09813-2"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/83820"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1573-5095"],["dc.relation.haserratum","/handle/2/83295"],["dc.relation.issn","0169-4286"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.title","From facilitation to competition: the effect of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) on the growth performance of four poplar-hybrids (Populus spp.) in mixed short rotation coppice"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in Forests and Global Change"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","5"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Lange, Felix; 1Gruppe für Ökologische Gutachten GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Ammer, Christian; 3Silviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Leitinger, Georg; 2Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Seliger, Alexander; 3Silviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Zerbe, Stefan; 4Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy"],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Leitinger, Georg"],["dc.contributor.author","Seliger, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Zerbe, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-04-01T10:00:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-04-01T10:00:53Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.date.updated","2022-09-04T23:50:04Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Worldwide, forestry must face several challenges during the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. The decline of biodiversity and ecosystem services, ongoing deforestation, climate change, and biological invasions must be mitigated with forest restoration and by applying sustainable forest management. Experiences with the integration of non-native tree species into forest management in many parts of the world show benefits but also trade-offs regarding sustainability. In Central Europe, Douglas fir [ Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco], originating from Northern America, has been introduced by forestry and managed for more than one and a half centuries. Growth characteristics, drought tolerance, and timber quality are major reasons which make this tree species attractive for forestry and wood industry. Whether Douglas fir might be invasive with potential trade-offs regarding biodiversity, uncontrolled regeneration, and spread is not yet fully understood and controversially debated. We investigated the regeneration of Douglas fir in the Spessart mountains, a vast woodland in south-western Germany which has a considerable cover of anthropogenic coniferous afforestations. We sampled the regeneration of Douglas fir by differentiating height growth classes in various forest-stand types, taking the distance from mature mother trees, abiotic site conditions (e.g., water balance and soil properties), light supply, forest-stand characteristics, ground vegetation, and browsing pressure into account. Also integrating the individual regeneration of the accompanying tree species, we applied multivariate analyses. Most of our investigated variables did not show a significant correlation with Douglas fir regeneration. However, results point to a positive relationship of spontaneous Douglas fir regeneration at moist and light sites as well as in close distance to potential seed trees. The analysis of the current invasion potential did not reveal a major risk under the given site conditions in the study area."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/ffgc.2022.844580"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/105537"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-530"],["dc.relation.eissn","2624-893X"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Is Douglas Fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco] Invasive in Central Europe? A Case Study From South-West Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","105"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Forests"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Gradel, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Ganbaatar, Batsaikhan"],["dc.contributor.author","Nadaldorj, Ochirrragchaa"],["dc.contributor.author","Dovdondemberel, Batdorj"],["dc.contributor.author","Wagner, Sven"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:47:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:47:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/f8040105"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146741"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14529"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/4538"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","1999-4907"],["dc.relation.issn","1999-4907"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","On the Effect of Thinning on Tree Growth and Stand Structure of White Birch (Betula platyphylla Sukaczev) and Siberian Larch (Larix sibirica Ledeb.) in Mongolia"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","S1470160X22001637"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","108692"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecological Indicators"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","136"],["dc.contributor.author","Zeller, Laura"],["dc.contributor.author","Baumann, Charlotte"],["dc.contributor.author","Gonin, Pierre"],["dc.contributor.author","Heidrich, Lea"],["dc.contributor.author","Keye, Constanze"],["dc.contributor.author","Konrad, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Larrieu, Laurent"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Sennhenn-Reulen, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-04-01T10:00:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-04-01T10:00:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.abstract","Effects of forest management on forest biodiversity have received increasing attention in both research and forestry practice. Despite advances in technology, monitoring of biodiversity remains time and cost-intensive and requires specific taxonomic expertise. In forest management, however, there is increasing interest and need to integrate biodiversity monitoring into forest inventories efficiently to estimate the potential effects of forest management on biodiversity. Forest management systems can differ greatly depending on management goals and the intensity and frequency of the applied silvicultural interventions. To identify management effects on biodiversity, an estimation of biodiversity using forest structural attributes may be a reasonable approach. Forest structure can – compared to conventional species-based monitoring - easily be captured during forest inventories and does not require specific taxonomic expertise. The IBP (Index of Biodiversity Potential) is a composite index aiming to provide practitioners with an efficient tool for estimating biodiversity at the local level. We recorded the IBP on 147 plots in three regions of Germany, where detailed biodiversity monitoring had been conducted. This study quantified the relationship between changes in the IBP scores and changes in species richness for 13 taxonomic groups. To determine this, we analyzed estimated relationships between the IBP and species richness using a count regression model. We found positive estimated relationships with species richness of birds, fungi, true bugs, lichens, and moths in at least 3 of 5 examined forest types. However, for spiders, bats, carabids, necrophagous and saproxylic beetles, either no relationship with the IBP or estimated relationships with only one forest type were found. Changes in scores for the IBP’s factors number of vertical layers, large living trees, tree-related microhabitats, and proportion of gaps correlated with changes in the measured species richness in many cases. Even though the IBP is generally not adequate to predict actual presence or precise number of species, it can be utilized to depict a forest stand’s potential in terms of species richness. Due to its easy and time-efficient application, it could be a useful proxy used in combination with species-based monitoring approaches."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108692"],["dc.identifier.pii","S1470160X22001637"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/105563"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-530"],["dc.relation.issn","1470-160X"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","Index of biodiversity potential (IBP) versus direct species monitoring in temperate forests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]