Risius, Antje

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2440"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Sustainability"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","13"],["dc.contributor.author","Escobedo del Bosque, Cynthia I."],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Risius, Antje"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:27:51Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:27:51Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/su13052440"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/82428"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","2071-1050"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.title","Who Wants Chicken? Uncovering Consumer Preferences for Produce of Alternative Chicken Product Methods"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in Animal Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","2"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Escobedo del Bosque, Cynthia I.; Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Risius, Antje; Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Spiller, Achim; Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Busch, Gesa; Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.author","Escobedo del Bosque, Cynthia I."],["dc.contributor.author","Risius, Antje"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Busch, Gesa"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-05-13T06:33:32Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-05-13T06:33:32Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.date.updated","2022-09-06T01:02:23Z"],["dc.description.abstract","As poultry production and consumption have increased in the last decade, so have consumers' concerns about intensified production methods and the impacts they have on animal welfare. At the same time, poultry consumption has increased and enjoys great popularity. Also, a shift in consumers' consumption behavior can be observed as nowadays most consumers purchase chicken cuts, especially breast filets, rather than whole animals, mostly due to convenience and taste. Although consumer concerns have increased, market shares of alternative poultry products, i.e., those that are produced under higher standards compared to conventional products, remain comparably low. One of the main reasons are the large differences in prices. The higher prices for alternative chicken products such as organic result partly from increased production costs on farm level. Besides, consumer preferences for chicken cuts intensify cost differences. While alternative chicken breasts (e.g., organically produced) might be valued by some consumers, other cuts such as wings or thighs are not and are therefore sent into the conventional market. In these cases, the breasts need to remunerate all additional costs. Analyzing consumers' concerns about production methods and learning about consumers' obstacles to buy whole chickens might offer farmers greater possibilities to succeed in alternative markets. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to gain insights into consumers' chicken consumption behaviors, how consumers imagine an ideal chicken farm and whether they would be willing to purchase a whole chicken from this ideal farm. Three focus group discussions (total n = 30) with German consumers were held online in June 2020. The results show that participants associate the ideal chicken farm with four main characteristics: good husbandry system, positive economic impact for the farmer, high transparency, and proximate location of the farm in the same geographical region. However, willingness to purchase a whole chicken, even from the ideal farm, remains low due to mainly convenience reasons and daily routines."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/fanim.2021.682477"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/107851"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","2673-6225"],["dc.relation.issn","2673-6225"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Consumers' Opinions and Expectations of an “Ideal Chicken Farm” and Their Willingness to Purchase a Whole Chicken From This Farm"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in Sustainability"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","2"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Schulze, Maureen; University of Goettingen, Department for Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Spiller, Achim; University of Goettingen, Department for Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Risius, Antje; University of Goettingen, Department for Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Maureen"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Risius, Antje"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-06-14T11:38:48Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-06-14T11:38:48Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.date.updated","2022-09-03T21:56:33Z"],["dc.description.abstract","While modern food retailing is characterized by high price pressure and low-quality differentiation resulting in a limited supply of sustainably produced alternative food products, cooperative retailing structures offer additional synergies in terms of logistics and operations that hold great potential to support the expansion of sustainable produce. Many retailers in Germany are organized in cooperatives of sufficient size to generate large-scale effects while still allowing individual retailers to pursue independent business structures. Cooperatives targeted to elaborate on collectivity operate a business. In economic terms this means that scale effects are used to elaborate and help single business. In the food sector cooperative structures in Germany provide a substantial impact in food delivery and provision, especially fresh foods are very sensitive and need fast circulation. Sourcing sustainable, local and regional foods are often produced (or rather crafted) in small scale entities. This paper asks the question of how and whether cooperative marketing structures help to deliver and use scale effects of larger entities, while still collaboratively encouraging food marketing. Accordingly, this paper reports on an investigation of the main challenges faced by members of a large-scale cooperative in retailing sustainably produced products and the motives of these retailers in choosing whether or not to sell such products. Taking the case of grass-fed beef sold by retailers within a large German cooperative, the study reveals that some of the obstacles to selling this sustainable product are comparable to challenges typically encountered in other retailing channels beyond cooperative structures. However, we also find that the flexibility of the cooperative structure enables individual retailers to bring their intrinsic motivation into (sustainable) action in the marketplace while taking advantage of the support offered by the cooperative in terms of marketing and consultation, etc. This analysis confirms that personal motivation within this cooperative structure is a strong determinant for individual retailers to pursue different pathways for the marketing and sale of sustainably produced food."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/frsus.2021.675588"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/111187"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","2673-4524"],["dc.relation.issn","2673-4524"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung Marketing für Lebensmittel und Agrarprodukte"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Co-ops 2.0: Alternative Retail Strategies to Support a Sustainable Transition in Food Retailing"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","5275"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Sustainability"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","13"],["dc.contributor.author","Mehlhose, Clara"],["dc.contributor.author","Risius, Antje"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-06-01T09:42:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-06-01T09:42:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Against the background of rising societal interest for sustainable food and nutrition choices, food labels have gained importance in providing important information to consumers. However, little is known about how the differences between quality frames in labels are evaluated and how priming might serve as an anchor for label perception. This study aims to observe the neural reaction of this in the context of differently framed food labels for products of animal origin, claiming the presence or absence of an additional quality aspect and under the impulse of emotional priming. In an explorative setup, we measured the neural prefrontal cortex activity of 26 participants with the neuroimaging technology fNIRS. An idyllic prime and a prime related to a label claiming an additional product quality led to increased neural activity in the OFC and dlPFC. Shedding light on what elements are of importance to identify products that meet consumers’ requirements in terms of quality aspects, this could indicate that the prime stressed the meaning of the label. This strengthens the argument to positively phrase and anchor frames regarding quality attributions as opposed to negative declarations. It further demonstrates the ability of fNIRS to capture processing through labels and primes in the context of consumer behavior."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/su13095275"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/85327"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-425"],["dc.relation.eissn","2071-1050"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.title","Assessing Label Frames and Emotional Primes in the Context of Animal Rearing—Response of an Explorative fNIRS Study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","3903"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nutrients"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","12"],["dc.contributor.author","Mehlhose, Clara"],["dc.contributor.author","Risius, Antje"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:23:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:23:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/nu12123903"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17802"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/80925"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","2072-6643"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Signs of Warning: Do Health Warning Messages on Sweets Affect the Neural Prefrontal Cortex Activity?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2339"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","15"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Foods"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Pointke, Marcel; 1Division of Quality of Plant Products, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Ohlau, Marlene; 2Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, University of Goettingen, 37073 Goettingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Risius, Antje; 2Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, University of Goettingen, 37073 Goettingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Pawelzik, Elke; 1Division of Quality of Plant Products, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.author","Pointke, Marcel"],["dc.contributor.author","Ohlau, Marlene"],["dc.contributor.author","Risius, Antje"],["dc.contributor.author","Pawelzik, Elke"],["dc.contributor.editor","McSweeney, Matthew"],["dc.contributor.editor","Duizer, Lisa M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-09-01T09:51:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-09-01T09:51:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.date.updated","2022-11-11T13:14:58Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Consumer acceptance and product development of sustainable, healthy, and tasty plant-based alternative products (PBAPs) are closely interlinked. However, information on consumer perceptions of the sensory profile of plant-based meat, cheese, and milk remains scarce. The study aimed to investigate German consumers’ (1) sensory evaluation of PBAPs and (2) consumers´ motivations and knowledge underlying the purchase of such products. This was analyzed in relation to different dietary styles of consumers (omnivore, flexitarian, vegetarian, vegan). A sample of 159 adults completed two tasks: first, a sensory test in which participants tasted and rated three different PBAPs in two consecutive sessions, and second, a questionnaire on consumption behavior, motivation, and knowledge. Results show few differences between nutrition styles in sensory evaluation of individual product attributes. However, overall liking was rated significantly higher by vegans than by omnivores. All dietary styles reported animal welfare and environmental aspects as the main motivations for consuming PBAPs. Most participants acknowledged that meat and cheese alternatives are highly processed foods and not a fad but are not automatically healthier or more environmentally friendly than their animal-based counterparts. Future research should focus on emerging product segments such as plant-based cheeses to better understand how consumers evaluate PBAPs."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/foods11152339"],["dc.identifier.pii","foods11152339"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/113899"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-597"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","2304-8158"],["dc.rights","Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)."],["dc.title","Plant-Based Only: Investigating Consumers’ Sensory Perception, Motivation, and Knowledge of Different Plant-Based Alternative Products on the Market"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","904"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Foods"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Mehlhose, Clara"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmitt, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Risius, Antje"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-06-01T09:42:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-06-01T09:42:35Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Informative food labels are one way to increase nutritional awareness in society and can essentially help individuals maintain balanced dietary practices. Nonetheless, making food labels ‘informative’, in the sense of applicability, is not always easy. Physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) food labeling is one approach to achieve this goal. Yet, it is neither understood how consumers perceive PACE labels, nor how effective they are in regards to healthy food choices. Moreover, it is of interest to assess the perception of real products in close-to-realistic environments. Therefore, this study examined a simulated purchase situation and consumers’ visual attention on PACE labels—on 20 different real snack products with varying health values. In a laboratory-shopping environment, the gaze behaviors of 91 consumers were examined with a head-mounted eye-tracker. In regards to perception, it was elucidated that every participant noticed at least one PACE label. On average 1.39 PACE label fixations on different products were counted with a mean fixation duration of 0.55 s and a mean time to first fixation of 22.46 s. On average, 22.9% of the participants viewed the PACE labels at least once, but the intensity and duration varied greatly between the different products; ’healthier products’ attracted more visual attention than ‘unhealthier products’. In regards to health choice, it became obvious that the choices observed were rather healthy and PACE labels attracted attention. This may have been especially true for participants with little involvement in physical activity and health behavior, which may have been the main target group. Hence, catchy, communicable PACE labels, as well as balanced product offerings may facilitate more healthy food choices. The real-world laboratory setting offered valuable insights, which should be followed-up on."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/foods10040904"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/85291"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-425"],["dc.relation.eissn","2304-8158"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.title","PACE Labels on Healthy and Unhealthy Snack Products in a Laboratory Shopping Setting: Perception, Visual Attention, and Product Choice"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]