Hamm, Ulrich

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Berichte über Landwirtschaft"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","93"],["dc.contributor.author","Bruemmer, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Hamm, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Marggraf, Rainer"],["dc.contributor.author","Moeller, Detlev"],["dc.contributor.author","Musshoff, Oliver"],["dc.contributor.author","Qaim, Matin"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Theuvsen, Ludwig"],["dc.contributor.author","von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Wollni, Meike"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:53:50Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:53:50Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","In 2014, the annual conference of the German Society of Economic and Social Sciences in Agriculture was jointly organized by the University of Gottingen and the University of Kas-sel. Against the background of various challenges faced by agriculture, the conference ad-dressed the question of recent theories and methods available and how they may benefit agricultural economics and social sciences research. The present article provides an overview of the conference program and summarizes the most important results and discussions. The conference started with two pre-conference activities which dealt with animal welfare and gravity models in international agricultural trade. The plenary session addressed the overall topic of the conference, i.e., new methods and challenges relevant for economic and social sciences in agriculture. During the conference, 36 submitted papers and 28 poster presentations provided insight into the overall topic from different perspectives. Also, state-of-the-art and future perspectives of evolutionary approaches in agricultural economics and social sciences as well as the most recent Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform were discussed in two self-organized sessions. Finally, a panel discussion at the end of the conference gave representatives from politics and science the opportunity to discuss the situation of agricultural research situated between methodological excellence and public perceptions. Most of the contributions summarized in this article are published in the conference proceedings (\"Schriften der Gesellschaft fur Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.\", Volume 50). We conclude that, in 2014, the Annual Conference of the German Society of Economic and Social Sciences in Agriculture again attracted much attention and provided convincing results and discussions. It impressively illustrated the extent to which new theories and methods are already being applied in agricultural economics and social sciences research today. The numerous discussions also revealed that this is a very dynamic field and that interesting developments can be expected in the future. Emphasis shall be put on understanding the many challenges which agriculture faces and on pointing out potential solutions or future perspectives. After all, a core objective of the economic and social sciences of agriculture is to not only do methodologically excellent work but to also address the manifold expectations of society."],["dc.identifier.isi","000359075800004"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/36415"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","2196-5099"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung"],["dc.title","New Theories and Methods in Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences Report on the 54th Annual Conference of the German Society of Economic and Social Sciences in Agriculture from September 17 to 19, 2014"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","20"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","27"],["dc.contributor.author","Zander, Katrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Risius, Antje"],["dc.contributor.author","Feucht, Yvonne"],["dc.contributor.author","Janssen, Meike"],["dc.contributor.author","Hamm, Ulrich"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:15:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:15:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/10498850.2017.1390028"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1547-0636"],["dc.identifier.issn","1049-8850"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/74699"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Sustainable Aquaculture Products: Implications of Consumer Awareness and of Consumer Preferences for Promising Market Communication in Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Berichte über Landwirtschaft - Zeitschrift für Agrarpolitik und Landwirtschaft"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","23"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","93"],["dc.contributor.author","Brümmer, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Hamm, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Marggraf, Rainer"],["dc.contributor.author","Möller, Detlev"],["dc.contributor.author","Musshoff, Oliver"],["dc.contributor.author","Qaim, Matin"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Theuvsen, Ludwig"],["dc.contributor.author","Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan von"],["dc.contributor.author","Wollni, Meike"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-01-16T11:20:59Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-01-16T11:20:59Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Die Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V. wurde 2014 gemeinsam von der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen und der Universität Kassel ausgerichtet. Vor dem Hintergrund vielfältiger Herausforderungen für die Agrarwirtschaft, widmete sich die Tagung der Frage, welche neuen Theorien und Methoden den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaus zur Verfügung stehen und welchen Nutzen sie für die agrarökonomische Forschung bieten. Der vorliegende Artikel gibt einen Überblick über das Programm der Tagung und subsumiert die wichtigsten Ergebnisse. Zu Beginn der Jahrestagung fanden zwei Prä-Konferenz-Aktivitäten statt, die sich mit dem Thema Tierwohl zwischen Markt und Moral und mit Gravity-Modellen im internationalen Agrarhandel beschäftigten. Die anschließende Plenarveranstaltung widmete sich dem allgemeinen Oberthema der Konferenz, also den neuen Methoden und Herausforderungen, die für die Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaus von Bedeutung sind. In 36 Arbeitsgruppenvorträgen und 28 Posterpräsentationen wurde das Oberthema der Tagung aus verschiedenen Perspektiven beleuchtet. Zwei selbstorganisierte Arbeitsgruppen lieferten außerdem Beiträge zu evolutorischen Ansätzen in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaus und zur Reform der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik (GAP). In der Podiumsdiskussion, die den Abschluss der Jahrestagung bildete, diskutierten Vertreter aus Politik und Wissenschaft über die Situation der Agrarforschung zwischen methodischer Exzellenz und gesellschaftlicher Wahrnehmung. Ein Tagungsband, der die Mehrzahl der in diesem Artikel zusammengefassten Beiträge enthält, wird als Band 50 der \"Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.\" veröffentlicht. Zusammenfassend lässt sich sagen, dass sich die GEWISOLA-Tagung auch 2014 wieder großer Beliebtheit erfreute und mit interessanten Ergebnissen und Diskussionen überzeugte. Die Tagung hat eindrücklich gezeigt, zu welch großem Ausmaß neue Theorien und Methoden bereits heute in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues angewendet werden. In den vielfältigen Diskussionen wurde aber auch deutlich, dass es sich um ein sehr dynamisches Feld handelt, wo in Zukunft weitere interessante Entwicklungen zu erwarten sind. Dabei steht im Mittelpunkt, die Vielzahl von Herausforderungen, denen sich die Agrarwirtschaft gegenüber sieht, besser zu verstehen und Lösungsansätze oder zukünftige Perspektiven aufzuzeigen. Nicht zuletzt ist es ein Kernanliegen der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues, nicht nur methodisch exzellente Arbeit zu leisten, sondern darüber hinaus auch die vielfältigen Ansprüche der Gesellschaft zu berücksichtigen."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.12767/buel.v93i2.76"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/11661"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung"],["dc.title","Neue Theorien und Methoden in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaus"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.contributor.author","Feindt, Peter H."],["dc.contributor.author","Bahrs, Enno"],["dc.contributor.author","Engels, Eve-Marie"],["dc.contributor.author","Hamm, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Herdegen, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Schröder, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Wätzold, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolters, Volkmar"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-06-13T11:48:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-06-13T11:48:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/57964"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","fcwi"],["dc.publisher","Wissenschaftlicher Beirat für Biodiversität und Genetische Ressourcen beim Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft"],["dc.publisher.place","Bonn"],["dc.title","Für eine Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik, die konsequent zum Erhalt der biologischen Vielfalt beiträgt"],["dc.title.subtitle","Stellungnahme des Wissenschaftlichen Beirats für Biodiversität und Genetische Ressourcen beim Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft"],["dc.type","report"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","246"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Appetite"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","254"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","113"],["dc.contributor.author","Risius, Antje"],["dc.contributor.author","Janssen, Meike"],["dc.contributor.author","Hamm, Ulrich"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:23:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:23:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Fish from aquaculture is becoming more important for human consumption. Sustainable aquaculture procedures were developed as an alternative to overcome the negative environmental impacts of conventional aquaculture procedures and wild fisheries. The objective of this contribution is to determine what consumers expect from sustainable aquaculture and whether they prefer sustainable aquaculture products. A combination of qualitative research methods, with think aloud protocols and in-depth interviews, as well as quantitative methods, using choice experiments and face-to-face interviews, was applied. Data was collected in three different cities of Germany. Results revealed that sustainable aquaculture was associated with natural, traditional, local, and small scale production systems with high animal welfare standards. Overall, participants paid a lot of attention to the declaration of origin; in particular fish products from Germany and Denmark were preferred along with local products. Frequently used sustainability claims for aquaculture products were mostly criticized as being imprecise by the participants of the qualitative study; even though two claims tested in the choice experiments had a significant positive impact on the choice of purchase. Similarly, existing aquaculture-specific labels for certified sustainable aquaculture had an impact on the buying decision, but were not well recognized and even less trusted. Overall, consumers had a positive attitude towards sustainable aquaculture. However, communication measures and labelling schemes should be improved to increase consumer acceptance and make a decisive impact on consumers' buying behavior. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) [11NA040]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.021"],["dc.identifier.isi","000400218300030"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28223237"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42485"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Academic Press Ltd- Elsevier Science Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1095-8304"],["dc.relation.issn","0195-6663"],["dc.title","Consumer preferences for sustainable aquaculture products: Evidence from in-depth interviews, think aloud protocols and choice experiments"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Meat Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","14"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","124"],["dc.contributor.author","Risius, Antje"],["dc.contributor.author","Hamm, Ulrich"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-06-01T10:49:46Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-06-01T10:49:46Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.10.008"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/86409"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-425"],["dc.relation.issn","0309-1740"],["dc.title","The effect of information on beef husbandry systems on consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]