Dormann, Carsten F.

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecology Letters"],["dc.contributor.author","Martin, Emily A."],["dc.contributor.author","Dainese, Matteo"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Báldi, András"],["dc.contributor.author","Bommarco, Riccardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Gagić, Vesna"],["dc.contributor.author","Garratt, Michael P. D."],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó"],["dc.contributor.author","Marini, Lorenzo"],["dc.contributor.author","Potts, Simon G."],["dc.contributor.author","Smith, Henrik G."],["dc.contributor.author","Al Hassan, Diab"],["dc.contributor.author","Albrecht, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Andersson, Georg K. S."],["dc.contributor.author","Asís, Josep D."],["dc.contributor.author","Aviron, Stéphanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Balzan, Mario V."],["dc.contributor.author","Baños‐Picón, Laura"],["dc.contributor.author","Bartomeus, Ignasi"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Burel, Francoise"],["dc.contributor.author","Caballero‐López, Berta"],["dc.contributor.author","Concepción, Elena D."],["dc.contributor.author","Coudrain, Valérie"],["dc.contributor.author","Dänhardt, Juliana"],["dc.contributor.author","Díaz, Mario"],["dc.contributor.author","Diekötter, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Dormann, Carsten F."],["dc.contributor.author","Duflot, Rémi"],["dc.contributor.author","Entling, Martin H."],["dc.contributor.author","Farwig, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Frank, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Garibaldi, Lucas A."],["dc.contributor.author","Hermann, John"],["dc.contributor.author","Herzog, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Inclán, Diego"],["dc.contributor.author","Jacot, Katja"],["dc.contributor.author","Jauker, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Jeanneret, Philippe"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser, Marina"],["dc.contributor.author","Krauß, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Le Féon, Violette"],["dc.contributor.author","Marshall, Jon"],["dc.contributor.author","Moonen, Anna‐Camilla"],["dc.contributor.author","Moreno, Gerardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Riedinger, Verena"],["dc.contributor.author","Rundlöf, Maj"],["dc.contributor.author","Rusch, Adrien"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheper, Jeroen"],["dc.contributor.author","Schneider, Gudrun"],["dc.contributor.author","Schüepp, Christof"],["dc.contributor.author","Stutz, Sonja"],["dc.contributor.author","Sutter, Louis"],["dc.contributor.author","Tamburini, Giovanni"],["dc.contributor.author","Thies, Carsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Tormos, José"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Tschumi, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Uzman, Deniz"],["dc.contributor.author","Wagner, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Zubair‐Anjum, Muhammad"],["dc.contributor.author","Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf"],["dc.contributor.editor","Scherber, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-23T07:13:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-23T07:13:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Managing agricultural landscapes to support biodiversity and ecosystem services is a key aim of a sustainable agriculture. However, how the spatial arrangement of crop fields and other habitats in landscapes impacts arthropods and their functions is poorly known. Synthesising data from 49 studies (1515 landscapes) across Europe, we examined effects of landscape composition (% habitats) and configuration (edge density) on arthropods in fields and their margins, pest control, pollination and yields. Configuration effects interacted with the proportions of crop and non-crop habitats, and species' dietary, dispersal and overwintering traits led to contrasting responses to landscape variables. Overall, however, in landscapes with high edge density, 70% of pollinator and 44% of natural enemy species reached highest abundances and pollination and pest control improved 1.7-and 1.4-fold respectively. Arable-dominated landscapes with high edge densities achieved high yields. This suggests that enhancing edge density in European agroecosystems can promote functional biodiversity and yield-enhancing ecosystem services."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/ele.13265"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61862"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","1461-023X"],["dc.relation.issn","1461-0248"],["dc.title","The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","477"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Oecologia"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","484"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","172"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Dormann, Carsten F."],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:41Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:41Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Although agricultural habitats can provide enormous amounts of food resources for pollinator species, links between agricultural and (semi-)natural habitats through dispersal and foraging movements have hardly been studied. In 67 study sites, we assessed the interactions between mass-flowering oilseed rape fields and semi-natural grasslands at different spatial scales, and their effects on the number of brood cells of a solitary cavity-nesting bee. The probability that the bee Osmia bicornis colonized trap nests in oilseed rape fields increased from 12 to 59 % when grassland was nearby, compared to fields isolated from grassland. In grasslands, the number of brood cells of O. bicornis in trap nests was 55 % higher when adjacent to oilseed rape compared to isolated grasslands. The percentage of oilseed rape pollen in the larval food was higher in oilseed rape fields and grasslands adjacent to oilseed rape than in isolated grasslands. In both oilseed rape fields and grasslands, the number of brood cells was positively correlated with the percentage of oilseed rape pollen in the larval food. We show that mass-flowering agricultural habitats--even when they are intensively managed--can strongly enhance the abundance of a solitary bee species nesting in nearby semi-natural habitats. Our results suggest that positive effects of agricultural habitats have been underestimated and might be very common (at least) for generalist species in landscapes consisting of a mixture of agricultural and semi-natural habitats. These effects might also have--so far overlooked--implications for interspecific competition and mutualistic interactions in semi-natural habitats."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00442-012-2515-5"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149865"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23114428"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/10507"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6571"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","0029-8549"],["dc.rights","CC BY 3.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"],["dc.subject","Canola; Oilseed rape; Pollen; Spillover; Trap nests"],["dc.title","Mass-flowering crops enhance wild bee abundance"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1925"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","20"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Current Biology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1931"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.contributor.author","Schleuning, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Fründ, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Klein, Alexandra-Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Abrahamczyk, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Alarcón, Ruben"],["dc.contributor.author","Albrecht, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Andersson, Georg K. S."],["dc.contributor.author","Bazarian, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Böhning-Gaese, Katrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Bommarco, Riccardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Dalsgaard, Bo"],["dc.contributor.author","Dehling, D. Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Gotlieb, Ariella"],["dc.contributor.author","Hagen, Melanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Hickler, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser-Bunbury, Christopher N."],["dc.contributor.author","Kreft, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Morris, Rebecca J."],["dc.contributor.author","Sandel, Brody"],["dc.contributor.author","Sutherland, William J."],["dc.contributor.author","Svenning, Jens-Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Watts, Stella"],["dc.contributor.author","Weiner, Christiane N."],["dc.contributor.author","Werner, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Williams, Nigel M."],["dc.contributor.author","Winqvist, Camilla"],["dc.contributor.author","Dormann, Carsten F."],["dc.contributor.author","Blüthgen, Nico"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:45:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:45:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Species-rich tropical communities are expected to be more specialized than their temperate counterparts [1, 2, 3]. Several studies have reported increasing biotic specialization toward the tropics [4, 5, 6, 7], whereas others have not found latitudinal trends once accounting for sampling bias [8, 9] or differences in plant diversity [10, 11]. Thus, the direction of the latitudinal specialization gradient remains contentious. With an unprecedented global data set, we investigated how biotic specialization between plants and animal pollinators or seed dispersers is associated with latitude, past and contemporary climate, and plant diversity. We show that in contrast to expectation, biotic specialization of mutualistic networks is significantly lower at tropical than at temperate latitudes. Specialization was more closely related to contemporary climate than to past climate stability, suggesting that current conditions have a stronger effect on biotic specialization than historical community stability. Biotic specialization decreased with increasing local and regional plant diversity. This suggests that high specialization of mutualistic interactions is a response of pollinators and seed dispersers to low plant diversity. This could explain why the latitudinal specialization gradient is reversed relative to the latitudinal diversity gradient. Low mutualistic network specialization in the tropics suggests higher tolerance against extinctions in tropical than in temperate communities."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.015"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149122"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/5772"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Kreft Crossref Import"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","0960-9822"],["dc.title","Specialization of Mutualistic Interaction Networks Decreases toward Tropical Latitudes"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","433"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Oecologia"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","441"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","166"],["dc.contributor.author","Gladbach, David J."],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherber, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Thies, Carsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Dormann, Carsten F."],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00442-010-1870-3"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149992"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21153737"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6630"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6711"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","0029-8549"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Crop–noncrop spillover: arable fields affect trophic interactions on wild plants in surrounding habitats"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1816"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Conservation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1825"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","144"],["dc.contributor.author","Krewenka, Kristin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Dormann, Carsten F."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:54Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:54Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Habitat loss and fragmentation in agricultural landscapes lead to severe declines of abundance and richness of many insect species in the remaining isolated semi-natural habitats. We analysed possible barrier effects of large hedges and corridor effects of narrow grass strips that were hypothesized to affect foraging and dispersal of hymenopterans. We selected calcareous grasslands in the vicinity of Göttingen (Germany), which harbour high Hymenoptera diversity and are starting points for foraging and dispersal in the landscape. We installed pan traps to sample bees (i) on the grasslands; (ii) on grassland edges behind adjacent hedges (potential barriers) and without hedges; (iii) on grass strips in 100 m distance to the grassland, which were connected or unconnected to the grassland; and (iv) unconnected (isolated) grass strips in 300 m and 750 m distance to test for corridor and isolation effects on abundance and species richness of foraging wild bees. Additionally we provided trap nests for bees, wasps and their parasitoids on the grasslands and the strips. Species abundance and richness declined with increasing isolation from grasslands for foraging solitary bees, trap-nesting bees, wasps and parasitoids, but not for foraging bumblebees. Hedges did not confine movement of foraging bees. We found no mitigating effects of (100 m) corridor strips on any of the observed groups. We conclude that conservation of semi-natural habitats as sources of bee and wasp diversity is important and that grass strips act as sinks rather than corridors when high quality patches are nearby."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.biocon.2011.03.014"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149952"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6666"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","0006-3207"],["dc.subject","Grass strips; Hedges; Corridors; Bees; Wasps; Agricultural landscape"],["dc.title","Landscape elements as potential barriers and corridors for bees, wasps and parasitoids"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2042"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","2054"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","94"],["dc.contributor.author","Fründ, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Dormann, Carsten F."],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:04Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:04Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1890/12-1620.1"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149845"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6548"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","0012-9658"],["dc.title","Bee diversity effects on pollination depend on functional complementarity and niche shifts"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","3444"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1723"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","3451"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","278"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Dormann, Carsten F."],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:48Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:48Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1098/rspb.2011.0268"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149982"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21471115"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8612"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6700"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","0962-8452"],["dc.rights","CC BY 3.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"],["dc.title","Expansion of mass-flowering crops leads to transient pollinator dilution and reduced wild plant pollination"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","34"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","43"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","146"],["dc.contributor.author","Blitzer, Eleanor J."],["dc.contributor.author","Dormann, Carsten F."],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Klein, Alexandra-Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Land-use intensification has led to a landscape mosaic that juxtaposes human-managed and natural areas. In such human-dominated and heterogeneous landscapes, spillover across habitat types, especially in systems that differ in resource availability, may be an important ecological process structuring communities. While there is much evidence for spillover from natural habitats to managed areas, little attention has been given to flow in the opposite direction. This paper synthesizes studies published to date from five functionally important trophic groups, herbivores, pathogens, pollinators, predators, and seed dispersers, and discusses evidence for spillover from managed to natural systems in all five groups. For each of the five focal groups, studies in the natural to managed direction are common, often with multiple review articles on each subject which document dozens of examples. In contrast, the number of studies which examine movement in the managed to natural direction is generally less than five studies per trophic group. These findings suggest that spillover in the managed to natural direction has been largely underestimated. As habitat modification continues, resulting in increasingly fragmented landscapes, the likelihood and size of any spillover effect will only increase."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.agee.2011.09.005"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149849"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6552"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","0167-8809"],["dc.subject","Edge effects; Herbivory; Mosaic landscapes; Pollination; Seed dispersal"],["dc.title","Spillover of functionally important organisms between managed and natural habitats"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1389"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","11"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecology Letters"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1399"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","17"],["dc.contributor.author","Carvalheiro, Luísa Gigante"],["dc.contributor.author","Biesmeijer, Jacobus Christiaan"],["dc.contributor.author","Benadi, Gita"],["dc.contributor.author","Fründ, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Stang, Martina"],["dc.contributor.author","Bartomeus, Ignasi"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser-Bunbury, Christopher N."],["dc.contributor.author","Baude, Mathilde"],["dc.contributor.author","Gomes, Sofia I. F."],["dc.contributor.author","Merckx, Vincent"],["dc.contributor.author","Baldock, Katherine C. R."],["dc.contributor.author","Bennett, Andrew T. D."],["dc.contributor.author","Boada, Ruth"],["dc.contributor.author","Bommarco, Riccardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Cartar, Ralph"],["dc.contributor.author","Chacoff, Natacha"],["dc.contributor.author","Dänhardt, Juliana"],["dc.contributor.author","Dicks, Lynn V."],["dc.contributor.author","Dormann, Carsten F."],["dc.contributor.author","Ekroos, Johan"],["dc.contributor.author","Henson, Kate S.E."],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Junker, Robert R."],["dc.contributor.author","Lopezaraiza-Mikel, Martha"],["dc.contributor.author","Memmott, Jane"],["dc.contributor.author","Montero-Castaño, Ana"],["dc.contributor.author","Nelson, Isabel L."],["dc.contributor.author","Petanidou, Theodora"],["dc.contributor.author","Power, Eileen F."],["dc.contributor.author","Rundlöf, Maj"],["dc.contributor.author","Smith, Henrik G."],["dc.contributor.author","Stout, Jane C."],["dc.contributor.author","Temitope, Kehinde"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscheulin, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Vilà, Montserrat"],["dc.contributor.author","Kunin, William E."],["dc.contributor.editor","Jordan, Ferenc"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:45Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:45Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Co-flowering plant species commonly share flower visitors, and thus have the potential to influence each other's pollination. In this study we analysed 750 quantitative plant-pollinator networks from 28 studies representing diverse biomes worldwide. We show that the potential for one plant species to influence another indirectly via shared pollinators was greater for plants whose resources were more abundant (higher floral unit number and nectar sugar content) and more accessible. The potential indirect influence was also stronger between phylogenetically closer plant species and was independent of plant geographic origin (native vs. non-native). The positive effect of nectar sugar content and phylogenetic proximity was much more accentuated for bees than for other groups. Consequently, the impact of these factors depends on the pollination mode of plants, e.g. bee or fly pollinated. Our findings may help predict which plant species have the greatest importance in the functioning of plant-pollination networks."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/ele.12342"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150096"],["dc.identifier.pmid","25167890"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/11458"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6826"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","1461-023X"],["dc.rights","CC BY 3.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"],["dc.subject","acilitation; floral traits; flower density; flower resources; indirect interactions; interspecific competition; morphological similarity; nectar; phylogenetic distance; plant-pollinator networks"],["dc.title","The potential for indirect effects between co-flowering plants via shared pollinators depends on resource abundance, accessibility and relatedness"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","661"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Reviews"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","685"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","87"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Tylianakis, Jason M."],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.contributor.author","Didham, Raphael K."],["dc.contributor.author","Fahrig, Lenore"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Bengtsson, Janne"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Crist, Thomas O."],["dc.contributor.author","Dormann, Carsten F."],["dc.contributor.author","Ewers, Robert M."],["dc.contributor.author","Fründ, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Holt, Robert D."],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Klein, Alexandra M."],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Kremen, Claire"],["dc.contributor.author","Landis, Doug A."],["dc.contributor.author","Laurance, William"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindenmayer, David B."],["dc.contributor.author","Scherber, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Sodhi, Navjot S."],["dc.contributor.author","Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Thies, Carsten"],["dc.contributor.author","van der Putten, Wim H."],["dc.contributor.author","Westphal, Catrin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:44Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:44Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Understanding how landscape characteristics affect biodiversity patterns and ecological processes at local and landscape scales is critical for mitigating effects of global environmental change. In this review, we use knowledge gained from human-modified landscapes to suggest eight hypotheses, which we hope will encourage more systematic research on the role of landscape composition and configuration in determining the structure of ecological communities, ecosystem functioning and services. We organize the eight hypotheses under four overarching themes. Section A: ‘landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns' includes (1) the landscape species pool hypothesis—the size of the landscape-wide species pool moderates local (alpha) biodiversity, and (2) the dominance of beta diversity hypothesis—landscape-moderated dissimilarity of local communities determines landscape-wide biodiversity and overrides negative local effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Section B: ‘landscape moderation of population dynamics' includes (3) the cross-habitat spillover hypothesis—landscape-moderated spillover of energy, resources and organisms across habitats, including between managed and natural ecosystems, influences landscape-wide community structure and associated processes and (4) the landscape-moderated concentration and dilution hypothesis—spatial and temporal changes in landscape composition can cause transient concentration or dilution of populations with functional consequences. Section C: ‘landscape moderation of functional trait selection’ includes (5) the landscape-moderated functional trait selection hypothesis—landscape moderation of species trait selection shapes the functional role and trajectory of community assembly, and (6) the landscape-moderated insurance hypothesis—landscape complexity provides spatial and temporal insurance, i.e. high resilience and stability of ecological processes in changing environments. Section D: ‘landscape constraints on conservation management' includes (7) the intermediate landscape-complexity hypothesis—landscape-moderated effectiveness of local conservation management is highest in structurally simple, rather than in cleared (i.e. extremely simplified) or in complex landscapes, and (8) the landscape-moderated biodiversity versus ecosystem service management hypothesis—landscape-moderated biodiversity conservation to optimize functional diversity and related ecosystem services will not protect endangered species. Shifting our research focus from local to landscape-moderated effects on biodiversity will be critical to developing solutions for future biodiversity and ecosystem service management."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1469-185x.2011.00216.x"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150079"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6807"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-575"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1464-7931"],["dc.subject","beta diversity; belowground-aboveground patterns; conservation management; ecosystem functioning and services; functional traits; insurance hypothesis; landscape composition and configuration; multitrophic interactions; resilience and stability; spatial heterogeneity"],["dc.title","Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes - eight hypotheses"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]