Penke, Lars

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","916"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Psychologist"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","917"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","66"],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Borsboom, Denny"],["dc.contributor.author","Johnson, Wendy"],["dc.contributor.author","Kievit, Rogier A."],["dc.contributor.author","Ploeger, Annemie"],["dc.contributor.author","Wicherts, Jelte M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:52:04Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:52:04Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Comments on a record by Kanazawa (see record 2010-08987-004). Evolutionary psychologists search for human universals, differential psychologists for variation around common human themes. So far, evolutionary psychology and differential psychology seem somewhat disparate and unconnected, although Kanazawa is certainly not the first to attempt integrating them. Kanazawa uses intelligence to elaborate his view of integration. His evolutionary theory of intelligence is based on two assumptions: (1) General intelligence (g) is both an individual-differences variable and a domain- specific adaptation, and (2) the domain to which general intelligence is adapted is evolutionary novelty. Both claims are erroneous."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/a0024626"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151137"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22121992"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/7909"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1935-990X"],["dc.title","Evolutionary psychology and intelligence research cannot be integrated the way Kanazawa (2010) suggested."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.contributor.author","Johnson, Wendy"],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.contributor.editor","Gawronski, Bertram"],["dc.contributor.editor","Bodenhausen, Galen V."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-11-14T11:55:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-11-14T11:55:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9967"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","new -primates"],["dc.publisher","Guilford Publications"],["dc.publisher.place","New York"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Theory and Explanation in Social Psychology"],["dc.title","Genetics of social behavior"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","287"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Personality"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","294"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","25"],["dc.contributor.author","Johnson, Wendy"],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Spinath, Frank M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:52:06Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:52:06Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Commentators generally found our exposition of the concept of heritability helpful for psychologists, suggesting that we largely accomplished our primary goal. Many provided supplemental and helpful perspectives on concepts we addressed. A few of the comments indicated that we may not have been completely successful in making clear our secondary goal, which was to outline how heritability estimates confound a plethora of influences. In this response, we thus emphasize that we do not claim that specific kinds of complexity, or, even worse, intractable complexity, pervade the genetics of behavioural traits. Rather, our claim is that genetics is riddled with complexity of many degrees and kinds, and heritability is a poor indicator of either degree or kind of underlying genetic complexity. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/per.835"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151156"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/7929"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0890-2070"],["dc.title","Understanding Heritability: What it is and What it is Not"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","254"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Personality"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","266"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","25"],["dc.contributor.author","Johnson, Wendy"],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Spinath, Frank M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:51:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:51:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Genetic influences on behavioural traits are ubiquitous. When behaviourism was the dominant paradigm in psychology, demonstrations of heritability of behavioural and psychological constructs provided important evidence of its limitations. Now that genetic influences on behavioural traits are generally accepted, we need to recognise the limitations of heritability as an indicator of both the aetiology and likelihood of discovering molecular genetic associations with behavioural traits. We review those limitations and conclude that quantitative genetics and genetically informative research designs are still critical to understanding the roles of gene-environment interplay in developmental processes, though not necessarily in the ways commonly discussed."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/per.836"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151126"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/7895"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0890-2070"],["dc.title","Heritability in the Era of Molecular Genetics: Some Thoughts for Understanding Genetic Influences on Behavioural Traits"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","162"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2-3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Behavioral and Brain Sciences"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","163"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","33"],["dc.contributor.author","Johnson, Wendy"],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:52:05Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:52:05Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Latent variable modeling has revealed important conundrums in the DSM classification system. We agree that the network perspective has potential to inspire new insights and resolve some of these conundrums. We note, however, that alone it cannot really help us understand etiology. Etiology, not comorbidity, is the fundamental question."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1017/s0140525x10000634"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151154"],["dc.identifier.pmid","20584381"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/7927"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0140-525X"],["dc.title","The network perspective will help, but is comorbidity the question?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","201"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature Reviews Neuroscience"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","211"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Deary, Ian J."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Johnson, Wendy"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:52:05Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:52:05Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Neuroscience is contributing to an understanding of the biological bases of human intelligence differences. This work is principally being conducted along two empirical fronts: genetics — quantitative and molecular — and brain imaging. Quantitative genetic studies have established that there are additive genetic contributions to different aspects of cognitive ability — especially general intelligence — and how they change through the lifespan. Molecular genetic studies have yet to identify reliably reproducible contributions from individual genes. Structural and functional brain-imaging studies have identified differences in brain pathways, especially parieto-frontal pathways, that contribute to intelligence differences. There is also evidence that brain efficiency correlates positively with intelligence."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/nrn2793"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151152"],["dc.identifier.pmid","20145623"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/7925"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1471-003X"],["dc.title","The neuroscience of human intelligence differences"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]