Clüver, Annette

[["dc.contributor.author","Clüver, Annette"],["dc.contributor.author","Stoffregen, Nicole"],["dc.contributor.author","Saucke, Liane"],["dc.contributor.author","Gräbener, Alice"],["dc.contributor.author","Migura, Judith"],["dc.contributor.author","Call, Josep"],["dc.contributor.author","Rakoczy, Hannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-03-27T12:32:17Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-03-27T12:32:17Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Background / Purpose: This study investigates intuitive statistics in non-human primates (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans) and is based on previous work on intuitive statistics in human infants (1). In a series of experiments we tested whether non-human primates can reason about the likelihood of a particular food item being drawn from two mixed populations of food items (carrot pieces and banana pellets, where the banana pellets are by far preferred by the animals). Importantly, the distribution of the two items and thus the relative frequency of drawing a banana pellet differed between the populations (e.g. 64:16 of banana : carrot in one bucket vs. 16:64 in the other). Main conclusion: We found evidence of intuitive statistics in this group of great apes: in the majority of trials, the animals chose the sample stemming from the population with a higher relative frequency of their preferred item (banana pellet). We ruled out alternative accounts, such as Clever Hans effects and odour discrimination."],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/13168"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.preprint","yes"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.conference","ASAB Interdisciplinary Workshop 2012"],["dc.relation.eventend","28.06.2012"],["dc.relation.eventlocation","Birmingham"],["dc.relation.eventstart","27.06.2012"],["dc.relation.iserratumof","yes"],["dc.title","Intuitive statistics in non-human primates"],["dc.type","conference_paper"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","201"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Experimental Child Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","209"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","128"],["dc.contributor.author","Rakoczy, Hannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Gräfenhain, Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Clüver, Annette"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze Dalhoff, Ann Christin"],["dc.contributor.author","Sternkopf, Anika"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:52:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:52:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Recent developmental research has shown that young children coordinate complementary action roles with others. But what do they understand about the logical structure of such roles? Do they have an agent-neutral conception of complementary action roles, grasping that such roles can be variably filled by any two agents or even by one agent over time? Accordingly, can they make use of such representations for planning both their own and others’ actions? To address these questions, 3- and 4-year-olds were introduced to an activity comprising two action roles, A and B, by seeing either two agents performing A and B collaboratively or one agent performing A and B individually. Children’s flexible inferences from these demonstrations were then tested by asking them later on to plan ahead for the fulfillment of one of the roles either by themselves or by someone else. The 4-year-olds competently drew inferences in all directions, from past individual and collaborative demonstrations, when planning how they or someone else would need to fulfill the roles in the future. The 3-year-olds, in contrast, showed more restricted competence; they were capable of such inferences only when planning in the immediate present. Taken together, these results suggest that children form and use agent-neutral representations of action roles by 3 years of age and flexibly use such representations for episodic memory and future deliberation in planning their own and others’ actions by 4 years of age. The findings are discussed in the broader context of the development of understanding self–other equivalence and agent-neutral frames of references."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jecp.2014.06.004"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151305"],["dc.identifier.pmid","25074622"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8094"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-0965"],["dc.title","Young children’s agent-neutral representations of action roles"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","60"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Cognition"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","68"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","131"],["dc.contributor.author","Rakoczy, Hannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Clüver, Annette"],["dc.contributor.author","Saucke, Liane"],["dc.contributor.author","Stoffregen, Nicole"],["dc.contributor.author","Gräbener, Alice"],["dc.contributor.author","Migura, Judith"],["dc.contributor.author","Call, Josep"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:52:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:52:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Inductive learning and reasoning, as we use it both in everyday life and in science, is characterized by flexible inferences based on statistical information: inferences from populations to samples and vice versa. Many forms of such statistical reasoning have been found to develop late in human ontogeny, depending on formal education and language, and to be fragile even in adults. New revolutionary research, however, suggests that even preverbal human infants make use of intuitive statistics. Here, we conducted the first investigation of such intuitive statistical reasoning with non-human primates. In a series of 7 experiments, Bonobos, Chimpanzees, Gorillas and Orangutans drew flexible statistical inferences from populations to samples. These inferences, furthermore, were truly based on statistical information regarding the relative frequency distributions in a population, and not on absolute frequencies. Intuitive statistics in its most basic form is thus an evolutionarily more ancient rather than a uniquely human capacity."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.011"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151304"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24440657"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8093"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","0010-0277"],["dc.title","Apes are intuitive statisticians"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]