Leibing, Eric

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","759"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Journal of Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","767"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","170"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Huesing, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Bjoern"],["dc.contributor.author","Poehlmann, Karin"],["dc.contributor.author","Ritter, Viktoria"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Stuhldreher, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Tefikow, Susan"],["dc.contributor.author","Teismann, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:23:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:23:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: Various approaches to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to be effective for social anxiety disorder. For psychodynamic therapy, evidence for efficacy in this disorder is scant. The authors tested the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy and CBT in social anxiety disorder in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Method: In an outpatient setting, 495 patients with social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to manual-guided CBT (N=209), manual-guided psychodynamic therapy (N=207), or a waiting list condition (N=79). Assessments were made at baseline and at end of treatment. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response, based on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale applied by raters blind to group assignment. Several secondary measures were assessed as well. Results: Remission rates in the CBT, psychodynamic therapy, and waiting list groups were 36%, 26%, and 9%, respectively. Response rates were 60%, 52%,. and 15%, respectively. CBT and psychodynamic therapy were significantly superior to waiting list for both remission and response. CBT was significantly superior to psychodynamic therapy for remission but not for response. Between-group effect sizes for remission and response were small. Secondary outcome measures showed significant differences in favor of CBT for measures of social phobia and interpersonal problems, but not for depression. Conclusions: CBT and psychodynamic therapy were both efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, but there were significant differences in favor of CBT. For CBT, the response rate was comparable to rates reported in Swedish and German studies in recent years. For psychodynamic therapy, the response rate was comparable to rates reported for pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral group therapy."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GV0607]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12081125"],["dc.identifier.isi","000321023700012"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23680854"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/29520"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychiatric Publishing, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0002-953X"],["dc.title","Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","215"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Health and Quality of Life Outcomes"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Sonntag, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Konnopka, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Bjoern"],["dc.contributor.author","Poehlmann, Karin"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Koenig, Hans-Helmut"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:16:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:16:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: The aim of the study was to analyse the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D in patients with social phobia. Methods: We used a sample of 445 patients with social phobia with five measurement points over a 30 month period. The discriminative ability of the EQ-5D was analysed by comparing the patients' responses with the general population and between different disease severity levels. For test-retest reliability we assessed the level of agreement in patients' responses over time, when there was no change in the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Construct validity was analysed by identifying correlations of the EQ-5D with more specific instruments. For responsiveness we compared the means of EQ VAS/EQ-5D index anchored on improved (deteriorated) health status and computed effect sizes as well as a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: Compared to the general population, patients with social phobia reported more problems in the dimensions \"usual activities\", \"pain/discomfort\", and \"anxiety/depression\" and less problems in \"mobility\" and \"self-care\". The EQ-5D was able to distinguish between different disease severity levels. The test-retest reliability was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.6). Correlations between the EQ-5D and other instruments were mostly small except for correlations with Beck Depression Inventory. The EQ-5D index seemed to be more responsive than the EQ VAS, but with only medium effect sizes (0.5 < effect size < 0.8) in the British EQ-5D index and only significant in patients with improved health status. The ROC analysis revealed no significant results. Conclusions: The EQ-5D was moderately reliable and responsive in patients with improved health status. Construct validity was limited."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/1477-7525-11-215"],["dc.identifier.isi","000330115400002"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24365384"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/12495"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/27941"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Biomed Central Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1477-7525"],["dc.rights","CC BY 2.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0"],["dc.title","Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with social phobia"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","56"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","83"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","71"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:46:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:46:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","Social phobia is a very frequent mental disorder characterized by an early onset, a chronic unremitting course, severe psychosocial impairments and high socioeconomic costs. To date, no manual for the psychodynamic treatment of social phobia exists. After a brief description of the disorder, a manual for a short-term psychodynamic treatment of social phobia is presented. The treatment is based on Luborsky's supportive-expressive (SE) therapy, which is complemented by treatment elements specific to social phobia. The treatment includes the characteristic elements of SE therapy, that is, setting goals, focus on the Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT) associated with the patient's symptoms, interpretive interventions to enhance insight into the CCRT, and supportive interventions, in particular fostering a helping alliance. In order to tailor the treatment more specifically to social phobia., treatment elements have been added, for example informing the patient about the disorder and the treatment, a specific focus on shame and on unrealistic demands, and encouraging the patient to confront anxiety-producing situations. More directive interventions are included as well, such as specific Prescriptions to stop Persisting self-devaluations. The treatment manual is presently being used in a large-scale randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment of social phobia."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1521/bumc.2007.71.1.56"],["dc.identifier.isi","000246134800004"],["dc.identifier.pmid","17484670"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/47824"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Guilford Publications Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0025-9284"],["dc.title","Psychodynamic psychotherapy for social phobia: A treatment manual based on supportive-expressive therapy"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","87"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Affective Disorders"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","94"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","165"],["dc.contributor.author","Stuhldreher, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Konnopka, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Koenig, Hans-Helmut"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:36:30Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:36:30Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is associated with low direct costs compared to other anxiety disorders while indirect costs tend to be high. Mental comorbidities have been identified to increase costs, but the role of symptom severity is still vague. The objective of this study was to determine the costs of SAD, and to explore the impact of symptoms and comorbidities on direct and indirect costs. Methods: Baseline data, collected within the SOPHO-NET multi-centre treatment study (N=495), were used. Costs were calculated based on health care utilization and lost productivity. Symptom severity was measured with the Liebowitz-Social-Anxiety-Scale; comorbidities were included as covariates. Results: Total 6-month costs were accrued to (sic)4802; 23% being direct costs. While there was no significant association with SAD symptom severity for direct costs, costs of absenteeism increased with symptom severity in those with costs > 0; comorbid affective disorders and eating disorders had an additional effect. Self-rated productivity was lower with more pronounced symptoms even after controlling for comorbidities. Limitations: As the study was based on a clinical sample total costs were considered, rather than net costs of SAD and no population costs could be calculated. Discussion: The burden associated with lost productivity was considerable while costs of healthcare utilization were rather low as most patients had not sought for treatment before. Efforts to identify patients with SAD earlier and to provide adequate treatment should be further increased. Mental comorbidities should be addressed as well, since they account for a large part of indirect costs associated with SAD. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Ministry of Research and Education [01GV1002]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jad.2014.04.039"],["dc.identifier.isi","000337861900014"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24882183"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/32633"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","1573-2517"],["dc.relation.issn","0165-0327"],["dc.title","The costs of social anxiety disorder: The role of symptom severity and comorbidities"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","339"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychotherapy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","350"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","54"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Koranyi, Susan"],["dc.contributor.author","Altmann, Uwe"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolte, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Björn"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Erik"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Kirchmann, Helmut"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:09:25Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:09:25Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/pst0000129"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1939-1536"],["dc.identifier.issn","0033-3204"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/73652"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Partner-related attachment as a moderator of outcome in patients with social anxiety disorder—a comparison between short-term cognitive–behavioral and psychodynamic therapy."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","286"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","289"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","63"],["dc.contributor.author","von Consbruch, Katrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Flueckiger, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Erik"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:23:15Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:23:15Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Research on common and differential factors in the therapeutic process is impeded by the lack of instruments suitable for assessing common change mechanisms. This study presents the psychometric properties of a newly developed time-economic instrument (WIFA-k), which was designed to assess common factors of psychotherapy as designed by Grawe. Within a multi-center study comparing the efficacy of cognitive therapy and psychodynamic therapy in the treatment of social phobia, 6 raters assessed 25 randomly selected, videotaped therapy sessions of each treatment approach, and evaluated common factors using the Wifa-k. Interrater-reliability was found to be high for the items \"resource activation\", \"motivational clarification\" and \"mastery\" and low for the items \"therapeutic relationship\" and \"problem activation\". Ways to increase reliability and validity of the scale are discussed."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1055/s-0032-1331206"],["dc.identifier.isi","000321203000006"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23818316"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/29534"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Georg Thieme Verlag Kg"],["dc.relation.issn","0937-2032"],["dc.title","Assessing Common Factors in Psychotherapy: Psychometric Properties of a New Time-Economic Instrument (WIFA-k)"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e0147165"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PLoS ONE"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Ruckes, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Koranyi, Susan"],["dc.contributor.author","Michal, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Bjoern"],["dc.contributor.author","Poehlmann, Karin"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:19:20Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:19:20Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Objectives Little is known about patient characteristics as predictors for outcome in manualized short term psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT). No study has addressed which patient variables predict outcome of PDT for social anxiety disorder. Research Design and Methods In the largest multicenter trial on psychotherapy of social anxiety (SA) to date comparing cognitive therapy, PDT and wait list condition N = 230 patients were assigned to receive PDT, of which N = 166 completed treatment. Treatment outcome was assessed based on diverse parameters such as endstate functioning, remission, response, and drop-out. The relationship between patient characteristics (demographic variables, mental co-morbidity, personality, interpersonal problems) and outcome was analysed using logistic and linear regressions. Results Pre-treatment SA predicted up to 39 percent of variance of outcome. Only few additional baseline characteristics predicted better treatment outcome (namely, lower comorbidity and interpersonal problems) with a limited proportion of incremental variance (5.5 to 10 percent), while, e.g., shame, self-esteem or harm avoidance did not. Conclusions We argue that the central importance of pre-treatment symptom severity for predicting outcomes should advocate alternative treatment strategies (e.g. longer treatments, combination of psychotherapy and medication) in those who are most disturbed. Given the relatively small amount of variance explained by the other patient characteristics, process variables and patient-therapist interaction should additionally be taken into account in future research."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01GV0607]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1371/journal.pone.0147165"],["dc.identifier.isi","000368528400117"],["dc.identifier.pmid","26785255"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/12851"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/41637"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Public Library Science"],["dc.relation.issn","1932-6203"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Do Patient Characteristics Predict Outcome of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Social Anxiety Disorder?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","21"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Affective Disorders"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","28"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","180"],["dc.contributor.author","Egger, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Konnopka, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Koenig, Hans-Helmut"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:54:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:54:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: To investigate the short-term cost-effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and psychodynamic therapy (PDT) compared to waiting list (WL). Methods: The analysis was conducted alongside the SOPHO-NET multi-center efficacy trial. Patients were randomly assigned to CBT (n=209), PDT (n=207), or WL (n=79). Resource use was assessed prior and during treatment to determine direct and absenteeism costs. Unadjusted incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated based on remission and response rates. To visualize statistical uncertainty, cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs) were constructed based on adjusted net-benefit regression. Different values for the society's willingness to pay (WTP) were assumed. Results: Both interventions were more efficacious than WL but were associated with increased direct costs besides intervention costs. Unadjusted ICERs per responder were (sic)3615 for CBT and (sic)4958 for PDT. Unadjusted ICERs per remitted patient were (sic)5788 and (sic)10,733. CEACs revealed a high degree of uncertainly: applying the 97.5% probability threshold. CBT proved cost-effective at a WTP >= (sic)16,100 per responder and >=(sic)26,605 per remitted patient. Regarding PDT cost-effectiveness only was certain for response at a WTP >=(sic)27,290. Limitations: The WL condition is assumed to represent untreated patients, although the expectation to start treatment in the near future probably affects symptom severity and health care utilization. Conclusions: At the end of treatment cost-effectiveness of CBT and PDT compared to WL is uncertain and depends on the societal WTP. The interventions may induce a more adequate utilization of other health care services - involving increased costs. Development of costs and effects in the long-run should be considered. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Ministry of Research and Education [OIGV1002]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.037"],["dc.identifier.isi","000354607700004"],["dc.identifier.pmid","25879721"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/36575"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","1573-2517"],["dc.relation.issn","0165-0327"],["dc.title","Short-term cost-effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in social anxiety disorder: Results from the SOPHO-NET trial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","18"],["dc.contributor.author","Stuhldreher, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Konnopka, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Koenig, Hans-Helmut"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:00:08Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:00:08Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GV1002]"],["dc.format.extent","S37"],["dc.identifier.isi","000352521700076"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/37736"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Int Ctr Mental Health Policy & Economics-icmpe"],["dc.publisher.place","Milano"],["dc.relation.issn","1091-4358"],["dc.title","Short-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: Results from the SOPHO-NET Trial"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1074"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Journal of Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1082"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","171"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Huesing, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Bjoern"],["dc.contributor.author","Poehlmann, Karin"],["dc.contributor.author","Ritter, Viktoria"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Tefikow, Susan"],["dc.contributor.author","Teismann, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:34:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:34:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: Relatively few studies have examined the long-term outcome of psychotherapy in social anxiety disorder. The authors previously reported findings of a clinical trial comparing cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), psychodynamic therapy, and a wait-list control. The purpose of the present study was to follow the participants' status over the ensuing 24 months. Method: Outpatients with social anxiety disorder who were treated with CBT (N=209) or psychodynamic therapy (N=207) in the previous trial were assessed 6, 12, and 24 months after the end of therapy. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response. Results: For both CBT and psychodynamic therapy, response rates were approximately 70% by the 2-year follow-up. Remission rates were nearly 40% for both treatment conditions. Rates of response and remission were stable or tended to increase for both treatments over the 24-month follow-up period, and no significant differences were found between the treatment conditions after 6 months. Conclusions: CBT and psychodynamic therapy were efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, in both the short- and long-term, when patients showed continuous improvement. Although in the short-term, intention-to-treat analyses yielded some statistically significant but small differences in favor of CBT in several outcome measures, no differences in outcome were found in the long-term."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01GV0607]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13111514"],["dc.identifier.isi","000342713800012"],["dc.identifier.pmid","25016974"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/32221"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychiatric Publishing, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","1535-7228"],["dc.relation.issn","0002-953X"],["dc.title","Long-Term Outcome of Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]