Now showing 1 - 10 of 12
  • 2013Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","759"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Journal of Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","767"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","170"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Huesing, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Bjoern"],["dc.contributor.author","Poehlmann, Karin"],["dc.contributor.author","Ritter, Viktoria"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Stuhldreher, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Tefikow, Susan"],["dc.contributor.author","Teismann, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:23:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:23:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: Various approaches to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to be effective for social anxiety disorder. For psychodynamic therapy, evidence for efficacy in this disorder is scant. The authors tested the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy and CBT in social anxiety disorder in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Method: In an outpatient setting, 495 patients with social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to manual-guided CBT (N=209), manual-guided psychodynamic therapy (N=207), or a waiting list condition (N=79). Assessments were made at baseline and at end of treatment. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response, based on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale applied by raters blind to group assignment. Several secondary measures were assessed as well. Results: Remission rates in the CBT, psychodynamic therapy, and waiting list groups were 36%, 26%, and 9%, respectively. Response rates were 60%, 52%,. and 15%, respectively. CBT and psychodynamic therapy were significantly superior to waiting list for both remission and response. CBT was significantly superior to psychodynamic therapy for remission but not for response. Between-group effect sizes for remission and response were small. Secondary outcome measures showed significant differences in favor of CBT for measures of social phobia and interpersonal problems, but not for depression. Conclusions: CBT and psychodynamic therapy were both efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, but there were significant differences in favor of CBT. For CBT, the response rate was comparable to rates reported in Swedish and German studies in recent years. For psychodynamic therapy, the response rate was comparable to rates reported for pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral group therapy."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GV0607]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12081125"],["dc.identifier.isi","000321023700012"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23680854"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/29520"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychiatric Publishing, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0002-953X"],["dc.title","Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC WOS
  • 2013Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","215"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Health and Quality of Life Outcomes"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Sonntag, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Konnopka, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Bjoern"],["dc.contributor.author","Poehlmann, Karin"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Koenig, Hans-Helmut"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:16:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:16:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: The aim of the study was to analyse the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D in patients with social phobia. Methods: We used a sample of 445 patients with social phobia with five measurement points over a 30 month period. The discriminative ability of the EQ-5D was analysed by comparing the patients' responses with the general population and between different disease severity levels. For test-retest reliability we assessed the level of agreement in patients' responses over time, when there was no change in the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Construct validity was analysed by identifying correlations of the EQ-5D with more specific instruments. For responsiveness we compared the means of EQ VAS/EQ-5D index anchored on improved (deteriorated) health status and computed effect sizes as well as a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: Compared to the general population, patients with social phobia reported more problems in the dimensions \"usual activities\", \"pain/discomfort\", and \"anxiety/depression\" and less problems in \"mobility\" and \"self-care\". The EQ-5D was able to distinguish between different disease severity levels. The test-retest reliability was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.6). Correlations between the EQ-5D and other instruments were mostly small except for correlations with Beck Depression Inventory. The EQ-5D index seemed to be more responsive than the EQ VAS, but with only medium effect sizes (0.5 < effect size < 0.8) in the British EQ-5D index and only significant in patients with improved health status. The ROC analysis revealed no significant results. Conclusions: The EQ-5D was moderately reliable and responsive in patients with improved health status. Construct validity was limited."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/1477-7525-11-215"],["dc.identifier.isi","000330115400002"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24365384"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/12495"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/27941"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Biomed Central Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1477-7525"],["dc.rights","CC BY 2.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0"],["dc.title","Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with social phobia"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC WOS
  • 2017Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","339"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychotherapy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","350"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","54"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Koranyi, Susan"],["dc.contributor.author","Altmann, Uwe"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolte, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Björn"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Erik"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Kirchmann, Helmut"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:09:25Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:09:25Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/pst0000129"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1939-1536"],["dc.identifier.issn","0033-3204"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/73652"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Partner-related attachment as a moderator of outcome in patients with social anxiety disorder—a comparison between short-term cognitive–behavioral and psychodynamic therapy."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2016Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","35"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","46"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","23"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Miller, Robert"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Sarnowsky, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:21:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:21:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","We examined the role of baseline patient characteristics as predictors of outcome (end-state functioning, response and remission) and attrition for cognitive therapy (CT) in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Beyond socio-demographic and clinical variables such as symptom severity and comorbidity status, previously neglected patient characteristics (e.g., personality, self-esteem, shame, interpersonal problems and attachment style) were analysed. MethodData came from the CT arm of a multicentre RCT with n=244 patients having DSM-IV SAD. CT was conducted according to the manual by Clark and Wells. Severity of SAD was assessed at baseline and end of treatment with the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Multiple linear regression analyses and logistic regression analyses were applied. ResultsUp to 37% of the post-treatment variance (LSAS) could be explained by all pre-treatment variables combined. Symptom severity (baseline LSAS) was consistently negatively associated with end-state functioning and remission, but not with response. Number of comorbid diagnoses was negatively associated with end-state functioning and response, but not with remission. Self-esteem was positively associated with higher end-state functioning and more shame with better response. Attrition could not be significantly predicted. ConclusionsThe results indicate that the initial probability for treatment success mainly depends on severity of disorder and comorbid conditions while other psychological variables are of minor importance, at least on a nomothetic level. This stands in contrast with efforts to arrive at an empirical-based foundation for differential indication and argues to search for more potent moderators of therapeutic change rather on the process level. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01GV0607]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/cpp.1936"],["dc.identifier.isi","000369009800004"],["dc.identifier.pmid","25504802"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42039"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","1099-0879"],["dc.relation.issn","1063-3995"],["dc.title","Baseline Patient Characteristics Predicting Outcome and Attrition in Cognitive Therapy for Social Phobia: Results from a Large Multicentre Trial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC WOS
  • 2018Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","158"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","171"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","64"],["dc.contributor.author","von Glischinski, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ullrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Hirschfeld, Gerrit"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:41:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:41:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.13109/zptm.2018.64.2.158"],["dc.identifier.eissn","2196-8349"],["dc.identifier.issn","1438-3608"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/77748"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Optimal Cut Points for Remission and Response for the German Version of the Social Phobia Anxiety Inventory (SPAI)"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2015Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","21"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Affective Disorders"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","28"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","180"],["dc.contributor.author","Egger, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Konnopka, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Koenig, Hans-Helmut"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:54:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:54:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: To investigate the short-term cost-effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and psychodynamic therapy (PDT) compared to waiting list (WL). Methods: The analysis was conducted alongside the SOPHO-NET multi-center efficacy trial. Patients were randomly assigned to CBT (n=209), PDT (n=207), or WL (n=79). Resource use was assessed prior and during treatment to determine direct and absenteeism costs. Unadjusted incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated based on remission and response rates. To visualize statistical uncertainty, cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs) were constructed based on adjusted net-benefit regression. Different values for the society's willingness to pay (WTP) were assumed. Results: Both interventions were more efficacious than WL but were associated with increased direct costs besides intervention costs. Unadjusted ICERs per responder were (sic)3615 for CBT and (sic)4958 for PDT. Unadjusted ICERs per remitted patient were (sic)5788 and (sic)10,733. CEACs revealed a high degree of uncertainly: applying the 97.5% probability threshold. CBT proved cost-effective at a WTP >= (sic)16,100 per responder and >=(sic)26,605 per remitted patient. Regarding PDT cost-effectiveness only was certain for response at a WTP >=(sic)27,290. Limitations: The WL condition is assumed to represent untreated patients, although the expectation to start treatment in the near future probably affects symptom severity and health care utilization. Conclusions: At the end of treatment cost-effectiveness of CBT and PDT compared to WL is uncertain and depends on the societal WTP. The interventions may induce a more adequate utilization of other health care services - involving increased costs. Development of costs and effects in the long-run should be considered. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Ministry of Research and Education [OIGV1002]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.037"],["dc.identifier.isi","000354607700004"],["dc.identifier.pmid","25879721"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/36575"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","1573-2517"],["dc.relation.issn","0165-0327"],["dc.title","Short-term cost-effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in social anxiety disorder: Results from the SOPHO-NET trial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC WOS
  • 2015Conference Abstract
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","18"],["dc.contributor.author","Stuhldreher, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Konnopka, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Koenig, Hans-Helmut"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:00:08Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:00:08Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GV1002]"],["dc.format.extent","S37"],["dc.identifier.isi","000352521700076"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/37736"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Int Ctr Mental Health Policy & Economics-icmpe"],["dc.publisher.place","Milano"],["dc.relation.issn","1091-4358"],["dc.title","Short-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: Results from the SOPHO-NET Trial"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details WOS
  • 2014Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1074"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Journal of Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1082"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","171"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Huesing, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Bjoern"],["dc.contributor.author","Poehlmann, Karin"],["dc.contributor.author","Ritter, Viktoria"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Tefikow, Susan"],["dc.contributor.author","Teismann, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:34:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:34:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: Relatively few studies have examined the long-term outcome of psychotherapy in social anxiety disorder. The authors previously reported findings of a clinical trial comparing cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), psychodynamic therapy, and a wait-list control. The purpose of the present study was to follow the participants' status over the ensuing 24 months. Method: Outpatients with social anxiety disorder who were treated with CBT (N=209) or psychodynamic therapy (N=207) in the previous trial were assessed 6, 12, and 24 months after the end of therapy. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response. Results: For both CBT and psychodynamic therapy, response rates were approximately 70% by the 2-year follow-up. Remission rates were nearly 40% for both treatment conditions. Rates of response and remission were stable or tended to increase for both treatments over the 24-month follow-up period, and no significant differences were found between the treatment conditions after 6 months. Conclusions: CBT and psychodynamic therapy were efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, in both the short- and long-term, when patients showed continuous improvement. Although in the short-term, intention-to-treat analyses yielded some statistically significant but small differences in favor of CBT in several outcome measures, no differences in outcome were found in the long-term."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01GV0607]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13111514"],["dc.identifier.isi","000342713800012"],["dc.identifier.pmid","25016974"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/32221"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychiatric Publishing, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","1535-7228"],["dc.relation.issn","0002-953X"],["dc.title","Long-Term Outcome of Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC WOS
  • 2009Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","35"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","41"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","78"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, F."],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Sabine C."],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Irle, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Koenig, Hans-Helmut"],["dc.contributor.author","de Liz, T. M."],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, B."],["dc.contributor.author","Poehlmann, Karin"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Schauenburg, Henning"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Subic-Wrana, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Vormfelde, Stefan Viktor"],["dc.contributor.author","Weniger, Godehard"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Enic"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:35:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:35:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","This paper presents the Social Phobia Psychotherapy Research Network. The research program encompasses a coordinated group of studies adopting a standard protocol and an agreed-on set of standardized measures for the assessment and treatment of social phobia (SP). In the central project (study A), a multicenter randomized controlled trial, refined models of manualized cognitive-behavioral therapy and manualized short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy are compared in the treatment of SP. A sample of 512 outpatients will be randomized to either cognitive-behavioral therapy, short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy or waiting list. Assessments will be made at baseline, at the end of treatment and 6 and 12 months after the end of treatment. For quality assurance and treatment integrity, a specific project using highly elaborated measures has been established (project Q). Study A is complemented by 4 interrelated add-on projects focusing on attachment style (study B1), on cost-effectiveness (study B2), on variation in the serotonin transporter gene in SP (study C1) and on structural and functional deviations of the hippocampus and amygdala (study C2). Thus, the Social Phobia Psychotherapy Research Network program enables a highly interdisciplinary research into SP. The unique sample size achieved by the multicenter approach allows for studies of subgroups (e. g. comorbid disorders, isolated vs. generalized SP), of responders and non-responders of each treatment approach, for generalization of results and for a sufficient power to detect differences between treatments. Psychological and biological parameters will be related to treatment outcome, and variables for differential treatment indication will be gained. Thus, the results provided by the network may have an important impact on the treatment of SP and on the development of treatment guidelines for SP. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1159/000162299"],["dc.identifier.isi","000262108200005"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18852500"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6171"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/18071"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Karger"],["dc.relation.issn","0033-3190"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","The Social Phobia Psychotherapy Research Network The First Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Psychotherapy for Social Phobia: Rationale, Methods and Patient Characteristics"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC WOS
  • 2018Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","e0192802"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PLoS One"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","13"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauß, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Altmann, Uwe"],["dc.contributor.author","Manes, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Tholl, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Koranyi, Susan"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolte, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Björn"],["dc.contributor.author","Ritter, Viktoria"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Kirchmann, Helmut"],["dc.contributor.editor","Moitra, Ethan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:42:05Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:42:05Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1371/journal.pone.0192802"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1932-6203"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15677"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/77803"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Changes of attachment characteristics during psychotherapy of patients with social anxiety disorder: Results from the SOPHO-Net trial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI