Options
Leibing, Eric
Loading...
Preferred name
Leibing, Eric
Official Name
Leibing, Eric
Alternative Name
Leibing, E.
Leibing, Erik
Now showing 1 - 10 of 36
2011Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","304"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychotherapy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","310"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","48"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Pincus, Aaron L."],["dc.contributor.author","Winkelbach, Christel"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:52:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:52:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Interpersonal problems are highly relevant to the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) patients. Previous studies using the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems identified several interpersonal subtypes in GAD patients. In this study, we wanted to replicate earlier findings of interpersonal subtypes in GAD. We investigated whether these interpersonal subtypes are characterized by different types of interpersonal problems and different levels of interpersonal distress, and we further examined whether they differed with regard to improvement of interpersonal problems after short-term treatment. This study is based on results from a randomized controlled trial that investigated short-term treatments in GAD outpatients. For secondary analysis, interpersonal subtypes were identified by cluster analysis and Inventory of Interpersonal Problems profiles were calculated for both the total sample (N = 52) and the interpersonal subtypes using the Structural Summary Method for Circumplex Data. This study confirmed previous results demonstrating the existence of interpersonal subtypes in GAD. Four interpersonal subtypes were identified: Overly Nurturant, Intrusive, Socially Avoidant, and Nonassertive. Short-term treatment significantly improved interpersonal problems (d = 0.46) within the total GAD sample. Interestingly, the effect sizes of the four clusters differed considerably (d = 0.19-1.24) and the clusters displayed different changes in the two circumplex axes Dominance and Nurturance. Our study indicates that change of interpersonal problems needs to be specifically analyzed, even within homogenous diagnostic groups."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/a0022013"],["dc.identifier.isi","000294612000014"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21604899"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/22222"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychological Assoc, Div Psychotherapy"],["dc.relation.issn","0033-3204"],["dc.title","Interpersonal Subtypes and Change of Interpersonal Problems in the Treatment of Patients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Pilot Study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2009Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","875"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Journal of Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","881"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","166"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Jaeger, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaechele, Horst"],["dc.contributor.author","Kreische, Reinhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Leweke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Rueger, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Winkelbach, Christel"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:25:48Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:25:48Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: While several studies have shown that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficacious treatment for generalized anxiety disorder, few studies have addressed the outcome of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy, even though this treatment is widely used. The aim of this study was to compare short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and CBT with regard to treatment outcome in generalized anxiety disorder. Method: Patients with generalized anxiety disorder according to DSM-IV were randomly assigned to receive either CBT (N=29) or short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (N=28). Treatments were carried out according to treatment manuals and included up to 30 weekly sessions. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, which was applied by trained raters blind to the treatment conditions. Assessments were carried out at the completion of treatment and 6 months afterward. Results: Both CBT and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy yielded significant, large, and stable improvements with regard to symptoms of anxiety and depression. No significant differences in outcome were found between treatments in regard to the primary outcome measure. These results were corroborated by two self-report measures of anxiety. In measures of trait anxiety, worry, and depression, however, CBT was found to be superior. Conclusions: The results suggest that CBT and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy are beneficial for patients with generalized anxiety disorder. In future research, large-scale multicenter studies should examine more subtle differences between treatments, including differences in the patients who benefit most from each form of therapy."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [LE 1250/1-1/1-2]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09030441"],["dc.identifier.isi","000268638900009"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19570931"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6170"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/56710"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychiatric Publishing, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0002-953X"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized, Controlled Trial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2010Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","126"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","131"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Irle, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Ruhleder, Mirjana"],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Seidler-Brandler, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Dechent, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Weniger, Godehard"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:45:32Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:45:32Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Structural and functional brain imaging studies suggest abnormalities of the amygdala and hippocampus in posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder. However, structural brain imaging studies in social phobia are lacking. Methods: In total, 24 patients with generalized social phobia (GSP) and 24 healthy controls underwent 3-dimensional structural magnetic resonance imaging of the amygdala and hippocampus and a clinical investigation. Results: Compared with controls, GSP patients had significantly reduced amygdalar (13%) and hippocampal (8%) size. The reduction in the size of the amygdala was statistically significant for men but not women. Smaller right-sided hippocampal volumes of GSP patients were significantly related to stronger disorder severity. Limitations: Our sample included only patients with the generalized subtype of social phobia. Because we excluded patients with comorbid depression, our sample may not be representative. Conclusion: We report for the first time volumetric results in patients with GSP. Future assessment of these patients will clarify whether these changes are reversed after successful treatment and whether they predict treatment response."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Ministry of Education and Research, Germany [BMBF 01GV0607]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1503/jpn.090041"],["dc.identifier.isi","000274851600007"],["dc.identifier.pmid","20184810"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6891"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/20469"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Cma-canadian Medical Assoc"],["dc.relation.issn","1180-4882"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Reduced amygdalar and hippocampal size in adults with generalized social phobia"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2013Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","759"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Journal of Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","767"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","170"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Huesing, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Bjoern"],["dc.contributor.author","Poehlmann, Karin"],["dc.contributor.author","Ritter, Viktoria"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Stuhldreher, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Tefikow, Susan"],["dc.contributor.author","Teismann, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:23:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:23:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: Various approaches to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to be effective for social anxiety disorder. For psychodynamic therapy, evidence for efficacy in this disorder is scant. The authors tested the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy and CBT in social anxiety disorder in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Method: In an outpatient setting, 495 patients with social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to manual-guided CBT (N=209), manual-guided psychodynamic therapy (N=207), or a waiting list condition (N=79). Assessments were made at baseline and at end of treatment. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response, based on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale applied by raters blind to group assignment. Several secondary measures were assessed as well. Results: Remission rates in the CBT, psychodynamic therapy, and waiting list groups were 36%, 26%, and 9%, respectively. Response rates were 60%, 52%,. and 15%, respectively. CBT and psychodynamic therapy were significantly superior to waiting list for both remission and response. CBT was significantly superior to psychodynamic therapy for remission but not for response. Between-group effect sizes for remission and response were small. Secondary outcome measures showed significant differences in favor of CBT for measures of social phobia and interpersonal problems, but not for depression. Conclusions: CBT and psychodynamic therapy were both efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, but there were significant differences in favor of CBT. For CBT, the response rate was comparable to rates reported in Swedish and German studies in recent years. For psychodynamic therapy, the response rate was comparable to rates reported for pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral group therapy."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GV0607]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12081125"],["dc.identifier.isi","000321023700012"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23680854"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/29520"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychiatric Publishing, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0002-953X"],["dc.title","Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2011Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","179"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Scandinavian Journal of Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","184"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","52"],["dc.contributor.author","Bausch, Sandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Stingl, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Hartmann, Luisa C."],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Kruse, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Stark, Rudolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Leweke, Frank"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:57:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:57:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Bausch, S., Stingl, M., Hartmann, L. C., Leibing, E., Leichsenring, F., Kruse, J., Stark, R. & Leweke, F. (2011). Alexithymia and script-driven emotional imagery in healthy female subjects: no support for deficiencies in imagination. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 52, 179-184. Alexithymia is associated with a limited access to inner emotional processes. Furthermore, alexithymia is assumed to be characterized by a limited ability to use imagination. To evaluate the frequently proposed thesis of a reduced imagination ability in alexithymic persons, 25 high and 24 low alexithymic women self-rated their imagination ability. Furthermore, the electrodermal activity (EDA) during script-driven emotional imagination was determined and valence, arousal, and vividness of the respective imaginations were rated. Our results indicate no significant differences between high and low alexithymic women in the self-rated imagination ability, the EDA during imagination and the ratings of valence, arousal and vividness. The study provides evidence that healthy high alexithymic women are capable of differentiated emotional imagination."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00847.x"],["dc.identifier.isi","000288547200011"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21054420"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/23408"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","1467-9450"],["dc.relation.issn","0036-5564"],["dc.title","Alexithymia and script-driven emotional imagery in healthy female subjects: no support for deficiencies in imagination"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2013Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","215"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Health and Quality of Life Outcomes"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Sonntag, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Konnopka, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Bjoern"],["dc.contributor.author","Poehlmann, Karin"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Koenig, Hans-Helmut"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:16:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:16:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: The aim of the study was to analyse the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D in patients with social phobia. Methods: We used a sample of 445 patients with social phobia with five measurement points over a 30 month period. The discriminative ability of the EQ-5D was analysed by comparing the patients' responses with the general population and between different disease severity levels. For test-retest reliability we assessed the level of agreement in patients' responses over time, when there was no change in the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Construct validity was analysed by identifying correlations of the EQ-5D with more specific instruments. For responsiveness we compared the means of EQ VAS/EQ-5D index anchored on improved (deteriorated) health status and computed effect sizes as well as a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: Compared to the general population, patients with social phobia reported more problems in the dimensions \"usual activities\", \"pain/discomfort\", and \"anxiety/depression\" and less problems in \"mobility\" and \"self-care\". The EQ-5D was able to distinguish between different disease severity levels. The test-retest reliability was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.6). Correlations between the EQ-5D and other instruments were mostly small except for correlations with Beck Depression Inventory. The EQ-5D index seemed to be more responsive than the EQ VAS, but with only medium effect sizes (0.5 < effect size < 0.8) in the British EQ-5D index and only significant in patients with improved health status. The ROC analysis revealed no significant results. Conclusions: The EQ-5D was moderately reliable and responsive in patients with improved health status. Construct validity was limited."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/1477-7525-11-215"],["dc.identifier.isi","000330115400002"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24365384"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/12495"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/27941"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Biomed Central Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1477-7525"],["dc.rights","CC BY 2.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0"],["dc.title","Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with social phobia"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2008Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","292"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Personality Assessment"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","299"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","90"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Pincus, Aaron L."],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Kreische, Reinhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:15:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:15:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","In this study, we addressed the heterogeneity in interpersonal problems across patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). We assessed interpersonal problems by the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-C; Horowitz, Alden, Wiggins, & Pincus, 2000) in a sample of 78 GAD patients. We used HP-C profiles describing interpersonal characteristics of the total GAD sample as well as clustered GAD interpersonal subtypes. Although the overall sample was located in the friendly submissive quadrant of the circumplex model, this was true only for the Exploitable cluster, which includes more than 50% of the patients. Importantly, clusters of GAD patients with other locations reporting predominantly Cold, Nonassertive, or Intrusive interpersonal problems were also identified. The 4 clusters did not differ in terms of gender, comorbid disorders, or the severity of depression or anxiety. Thus, the assessment of interpersonal problems provides additional diagnostic information covering the heterogeneity of GAD patients. This information could be used for differential indication and individual case formulation in GAD."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/00223890701885076"],["dc.identifier.isi","000256187300010"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18444126"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/54413"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-3891"],["dc.title","Interpersonal subtypes within generalized anxiety disorder"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2007Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","56"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","83"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","71"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:46:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:46:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","Social phobia is a very frequent mental disorder characterized by an early onset, a chronic unremitting course, severe psychosocial impairments and high socioeconomic costs. To date, no manual for the psychodynamic treatment of social phobia exists. After a brief description of the disorder, a manual for a short-term psychodynamic treatment of social phobia is presented. The treatment is based on Luborsky's supportive-expressive (SE) therapy, which is complemented by treatment elements specific to social phobia. The treatment includes the characteristic elements of SE therapy, that is, setting goals, focus on the Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT) associated with the patient's symptoms, interpretive interventions to enhance insight into the CCRT, and supportive interventions, in particular fostering a helping alliance. In order to tailor the treatment more specifically to social phobia., treatment elements have been added, for example informing the patient about the disorder and the treatment, a specific focus on shame and on unrealistic demands, and encouraging the patient to confront anxiety-producing situations. More directive interventions are included as well, such as specific Prescriptions to stop Persisting self-devaluations. The treatment manual is presently being used in a large-scale randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment of social phobia."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1521/bumc.2007.71.1.56"],["dc.identifier.isi","000246134800004"],["dc.identifier.pmid","17484670"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/47824"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Guilford Publications Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0025-9284"],["dc.title","Psychodynamic psychotherapy for social phobia: A treatment manual based on supportive-expressive therapy"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2011Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","503"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","508"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","56"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Winkelbach, Christel"],["dc.contributor.author","Leweke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-06-01T10:47:54Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-06-01T10:47:54Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: In a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT), short-term efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) was demonstrated. In this article, long-term stability of these effects will be examined. Effects of CBT and STPP will be compared. Method: In the original RCT, patients with GAD were treated with either CBT ( n = 29) or STPP ( n = 28). Treatments were carried out according to manuals and included up to 30 sessions. As the primary outcome measure the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale was used. In addition to short-term outcome previously reported, treatment effects were assessed 12 months after termination of treatment. Results: Both CBT and STPP yielded large improvements at 12-month follow-up. No significant differences were found between treatments concerning the primary outcome measure. This result was corroborated by 3 self-report measures of anxiety. However, in measures of trait anxiety and worry, CBT was superior. Concerning depression, differences reported at posttreatment were no longer significant at 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: In GAD, both CBT and STPP yield large and stable effects 12 months after treatment. Concerning trait anxiety and worry, CBT seems to be superior. For STPP, further studies should be carried out to confirm the results."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1177/070674371105600809"],["dc.identifier.isi","000294045000009"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21878162"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/85759"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-425"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Canadian Psychiatric Assoc"],["dc.relation.eissn","1497-0015"],["dc.relation.issn","0706-7437"],["dc.title","Long-Term Effects of Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy and Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy in Generalized Anxiety Disorder: 12-Month Follow-up"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2009Review [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","14"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1-3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Affective Disorders"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","31"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","114"],["dc.contributor.author","Konnopka, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Enic"],["dc.contributor.author","Koenig, Hans-Helmut"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:31:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:31:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Aims: To review cost-of-iliness studies (COI) and cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) conducted for anxiety disorders. Methods: Based on a database search in Pubmed, PsychINFO and NHS EED, studies were classified according to various criteria. Cost data were inflated and converted to 2005 US-$ purchasing power parities (PPP). Results: We finally identified 20 COI and 11 CEA of which most concentrated on panic disorder (PD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Differing inclusion of cost categories limited comparability of CO1. PD and GAD tended to show higher direct costs per case, but lower direct cost per inhabitant than social and specific phobias. Different measures of effectiveness severely limited comparability of CEA. Overall CEA analysed 26 therapeutic or interventional strategies mostly compared to standard treatment, 8 of them resulting in lower better effectiveness and costs than the comparator. Conclusions: Anxiety disorders cause considerable costs. More research on phobias, more standardised inclusion of cost categories in COI and a wider use of comparable effectiveness measures (like QALYs) in CEA is needed. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GV0609-Sophonet]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jad.2008.07.014"],["dc.identifier.isi","000264223900002"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18768222"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/17059"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","0165-0327"],["dc.title","Cost-of-illness studies and cost-effectiveness analyses in anxiety disorders: A systematic review"],["dc.type","review"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS