Strack, Micha

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","277"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychotherapy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","290"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","46"],["dc.contributor.author","Dinger, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, Micha"],["dc.contributor.author","Sachsse, Tilmann"],["dc.contributor.author","Schauenburg, Henning"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:25:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:25:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","The focus of this study is the investigation of the relation between patients' interpersonal problems, therapists' attachment representations, and the development of the therapeutic alliance over time. The authors investigated weekly alliance ratings of 281 psychotherapy inpatients, treated by 12 psychotherapists. Alliance quality was measured with the Inpatient Experience Scale. Multilevel regression models showed that patients' interpersonal problems were associated with the level of alliance quality. Therapists' attachment security was not related to alliance development, but higher attachment preoccupation of therapists was associated with lower levels of alliance quality. In addition, an interaction effect between therapists' degree of attachment preoccupation and patients' interpersonal problems explained variations of the alliance development curve over time. Limitations of the study are discussed."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/a0016913"],["dc.identifier.isi","000269982600002"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22122718"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/56626"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychological Assoc, Div Psychotherapy"],["dc.relation.issn","0033-3204"],["dc.title","THERAPISTS' ATTACHMENT, PATIENTS' INTERPERSONAL PROBLEMS AND ALLIANCE DEVELOPMENT OVER TIME IN IN PATIENT PSYCHOTHERAPY"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","349"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","GRUPPENPSYCHOTHERAPIE UND GRUPPENDYNAMIK"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","364"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","37"],["dc.contributor.author","Schauenburg, Henning"],["dc.contributor.author","Sammet, I."],["dc.contributor.author","Rabung, Sven"],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:33:05Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:33:05Z"],["dc.date.issued","2001"],["dc.description.abstract","According to their primary personality traits, depressed patients often are divided in preoccupied-dependent vs. fearful-avoidant subjects. We tested the assumption that group cohesion exerts a differential influence on the outcome in these two groups: Avoidant patients are assumed to show better therapy results with a growing feeling of cohesion, whereas preoccupied patients might get better with a lower cohesion, which we interpret as a sign of better individuation. The sample consists of 73 inpatients with varying affective disorders, mean duration of treatment 12 weeks. outcome measurement with SCL90 R, personality assessment with the IIP, weekly assessment of process variables, e.g. group cohesion with the Stationserfahrungsbogen - SEB (Sammet and Schauenburg 2000). Results are obtained by calculation of three regression parameters for the treatment course and by calculation of multiple regression for the prediction of therapy outcome. Personality variables alone do not predict therapy outcome but avoidant patients get better while experiencing high cohesion and preoccupied patients have a better outcome when they describe lower cohesion. Results confirm that depressed patients need different therapy foci according to their primary personality traits (individuation vs. acceptance of intimacy)."],["dc.identifier.isi","000173345100004"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/31888"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht"],["dc.relation.issn","0017-4947"],["dc.title","Group experience as a differential curative factor in inpatient psychotherapy of depressed patients"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","344"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Clinical Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","354"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","64"],["dc.contributor.author","Dinger, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, Micha"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Wilmers, Fabian"],["dc.contributor.author","Schauenburg, Henning"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:17:46Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:17:46Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","As an addition to the ongoing discussion concerning the magnitude of therapist effects on outcome in psychotherapy, we investigated therapist variability in a large inpatient psychotherapy sample. We included global symptomatic outcome (Global Severity Index of the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised [SCL-90-R]; German version, Franke, 1995) and alliance (Helping Alliance Questionnaire; German version, Bassler, Potratz & Krauthauser, 1995) ratings of 2554 inpatients who were treated by 50 psychotherapists. Multilevel regression analyses (HLM; Raudenbush, Bryk, Cheong, & Congdon, 2004) were used for analyses. Overall, therapists accounted for a much greater variability on alliance (33%) than on outcome (3%). Therapists were differentially effective with regard to their patients' symptom severity at the beginning of treatment, and therapists differed in the degree that a positive alliance was associated with therapeutic outcome. The relatively small therapist effect on outcome is attributed to compensatory mechanisms in the specific context of inpatient therapy. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/jclp.20443"],["dc.identifier.isi","000253690500010"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18302211"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/54887"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","John Wiley & Sons Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-9762"],["dc.title","Therapist effects on outcome and alliance in inpatient psychotherapy"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","56"],["dc.contributor.author","Dinger, U."],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, F."],["dc.contributor.author","Schauenburg, Henning"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:24:31Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:24:31Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.format.extent","85"],["dc.identifier.isi","000235454400028"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42679"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Georg Thieme Verlag Kg"],["dc.publisher.place","Stuttgart"],["dc.relation.issn","0937-2032"],["dc.title","The importance of interpersonal problems of patients and therapists for connection and result of stationary psychotherapy"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","PII 915989692"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","193"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychotherapy Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","202"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","20"],["dc.contributor.author","Schauenburg, Henning"],["dc.contributor.author","Buchheim, Anna"],["dc.contributor.author","Beckh, Kathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolte, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Brenk-Franz, Katja"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, Micha"],["dc.contributor.author","Dinger, Ulrike"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:48:32Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:48:32Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","The Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) was used to study 31 psychotherapists who treated 1,381 patients in intensive multimodal inpatient psychotherapy. AAI dimensional ratings of security versus insecurity and dismissiveness versus preoccupation were used to predict alliance and outcome via multilevel regression techniques (hierarchical linear modeling). There were no main effects of therapists' attachment dimensions. However, higher attachment security of the therapist was associated with both better alliance and outcome in more severely impaired patients. Implications of the findings as well as limitations of the study are discussed."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/10503300903204043"],["dc.identifier.isi","000277656500006"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19844844"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/21236"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1050-3307"],["dc.title","The influence of psychodynamically oriented therapists' attachment representations on outcome and alliance in inpatient psychotherapy"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","149"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychotherapy Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","161"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","17"],["dc.contributor.author","Dinger, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, Micha"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Schauenburg, Henning"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:04:48Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:04:48Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","The aim of this study was to investigate the importance of therapists' and patients' interpersonal problems as well as the impact of the therapeutic alliance on symptomatic outcome in psychotherapy. Of interest were direct effects of interpersonal problems, represented through the dimensions of affiliation and control, as well as possible interaction effects between patient and therapist variables on outcome. Further hypotheses referred to therapist differences in the predictive impact of the therapeutic alliance for outcome. Outcome ratings of 1,513 psychotherapy inpatients treated by 31 psychodynamically oriented individual psychotherapists were studied. Therapists' and patients' interpersonal dispositions were assessed with the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, and patients answered standardized outcome measures before and after therapy and retrospectively evaluated the therapeutic alliance at discharge. The results indicate that dominant patients profited better from their therapy and that therapists' interpersonal disposition did not have a direct influence on outcome. The influence of the therapeutic alliance on outcome varied among the therapists. The general positive effect of therapeutic alliance on outcome was stronger for less affiliative therapists. Limitations of the study and implications of the results are discussed."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/10503300600865393"],["dc.identifier.isi","000244678300003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/51923"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1050-3307"],["dc.title","Influences of patients' and therapists' interpersonal problems and therapeutic alliance on outcome in psychotherapy"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","55"],["dc.contributor.author","Dinger, U."],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Schauenburg, Henning"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:30:22Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:30:22Z"],["dc.date.issued","2005"],["dc.format.extent","96"],["dc.identifier.isi","000227116800027"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/16880"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Georg Thieme Verlag Kg"],["dc.publisher.place","Stuttgart"],["dc.relation.issn","0937-2032"],["dc.title","The importance of individual therapists for the results of stationary therapy"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","380"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOSOMATISCHE MEDIZIN UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","395"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","47"],["dc.contributor.author","Schauenburg, Henning"],["dc.contributor.author","Sammet, I."],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:41:15Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:41:15Z"],["dc.date.issued","2001"],["dc.description.abstract","Objectives: The study looks for typical curves of symptom development in inpatients and investigates the influence of initial remoralisation and terminal improvement on the global therapy outcome. Methods: 71 psychotherapy inpatients (affective, anxiety, eating and personality disorders; average treatment duration 11.9 weeks) gave weekly self-reports on symptom severity (BSI, Derogatis, 1983) and had a complete outcome evaluation. Regression parameters of the symptom curves were taken for correlational and path analytic calculations. Results: Initial symptom alleviation is able to predict better global outcome. However there is a relevant subgroup of patients which has a good outcome despite an initial deterioration. Conclusions: Initial remoralisation predicts better outcome but is not a necessary condition. The results partly call into question the group statistical dose-response-curves. Further studies should test the influence of other process parameters (group cohesion, therapeutic alliance etc.) on the course of treatment."],["dc.identifier.isi","000172348100006"],["dc.identifier.pmid","11731990"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/33689"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht"],["dc.relation.issn","1438-3608"],["dc.title","Course of symptom severity and prediction of outcome in inpatient psychotherapy"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","55"],["dc.contributor.author","Schauenburg, Henning"],["dc.contributor.author","Dinger, U."],["dc.contributor.author","Brenk, K."],["dc.contributor.author","Buchheim, Anna"],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:30:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:30:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2005"],["dc.format.extent","111"],["dc.identifier.isi","000227116800080"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/16924"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Georg Thieme Verlag Kg"],["dc.publisher.place","Stuttgart"],["dc.relation.issn","0937-2032"],["dc.title","The influence of the bonding style of psychotherapists on the treatment result in stationary psychotherapy - First results of the Gottingen therapist study"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","133"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychotherapy Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","146"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Schauenburg, Henning"],["dc.contributor.author","Kuda, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Sammet, I."],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:49:57Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:49:57Z"],["dc.date.issued","2000"],["dc.description.abstract","This naturalistic outcome study investigated validity aspects of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP [Horowitz, Strauss, & Kordy, 1995]). The sample consisted of 180 patients who received short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for an average number of 7.8 sessions and an average duration of 3.4 months. Small changes in pre-post-measures imply that the IIP is not to be recommended as an instrument for outcome evaluation in short-term psychotherapy, due to the traitlike character of its items. However, we showed by path analyses that a higher score on the affiliative dimension of the interpersonal circumplex goes along with a better treatment outcome. The influence of the dominance dimension is gender specific: male patients (who generally showed more dismissive and introverted behavior in this sample) received, if dismissive and introverted, a longer introductory therapy, whereafter they-in cases of high symptom load-were often referred to long-term treatment. Dominant male patients and, in general, female patients with high symptom scores, were referred faster, after only a few sessions. Results are discussed under aspects of adaptive therapist behavior."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/ptr/10.2.133"],["dc.identifier.isi","000089678800002"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22239692"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/48548"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Oxford Univ Press"],["dc.relation.issn","1050-3307"],["dc.title","The influence of interpersonal problems and symptom severity on the duration and outcome of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]