Now showing 1 - 10 of 24
  • 2011Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","PII 912714515"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","823"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Applied Economics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","835"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","43"],["dc.contributor.author","Nowak-Lehmann, Felicitas D."],["dc.contributor.author","Herzer, Dierk"],["dc.contributor.author","Vollmer, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:00:26Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:00:26Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","The objective of this article is twofold. First, it is to study the applicability of the widely used Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model (ARDL) in a pooled data setting. Second, it is to analyse Chile's market shares in the EU during the period 1988 to 2002, pointing to application problems that might jeopardize the model and searching for estimation methods that deal with the problem of inter-temporal and cross-sectional correlation of the disturbances. To estimate the coefficients of the ARDL model, Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS) is utilized within the Three-Stage Least Squares (3SLS) and the nonstandard Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) frameworks. A computation of errors is added to highlight the susceptibility of the model to problems related to the underlying model assumptions."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/00036840802599925"],["dc.identifier.isi","000288263900005"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/24161"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-6846"],["dc.title","Modelling the dynamics of market shares in a pooled data setting: econometric and empirical issues"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI WOS
  • 2009Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Global Economy Journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Vollmer, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada"],["dc.contributor.author","Nowak-Lehmann D., Felicitas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:53:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:53:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","In this paper we assess the current relevance of different sources of international competitiveness. Relative prices, labor costs, and productivity are evaluated as determinants of a country's international competitiveness at the industry level. Working with detailed data on unit values and with industry data on productivity, we empirically implement a MacDougall-type model for Spanish and French trade to Brazil, China, Japan, and the U.S. The period under study is 1980 to 2001 and we distinguish in our analysis between homogenous, reference-priced, and differentiated goods. Our results indicate that cost competitiveness factors are only valid for explaining trade with developing countries while other factors are of importance for developed economies. Overall price competitiveness is of importance, but for differentiated goods, factors distinct from prices seem to determine export success."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.2202/1524-5861.1402"],["dc.identifier.fs","572385"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8040"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/60495"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","De Gruyter"],["dc.relation.issn","1524-5861"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Unit Values, Productivity, and Trade - Determinants of Spanish Export Strength"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2016Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","386"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","World Economy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","408"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","39"],["dc.contributor.author","Camarero, Mariam"],["dc.contributor.author","Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada"],["dc.contributor.author","Nowak-Lehmann, Felicitas"],["dc.contributor.author","Tamarit, Cecilio"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:17:26Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:17:26Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","In this paper, we present evidence of the long-run effect of trade openness on income per worker for two regions that have followed different liberalisation strategies, namely Asia and Latin America. A model that re-examines these questions is estimated for two panels of Asian and Latin American countries over the 1980-2008 period using a novel empirical approach that accounts for endogeneity as well as for the time series properties of the variables involved. From an econometric point of view, we apply recent panel co-integration techniques based on factor models that account for two additional elements usually neglected in previous empirical literature: cross-dependence and structural breaks. The results point to a positive impact of trade openness in both Asia and Latin America although the size is smaller in the second region. We associate this finding with the degree to which trade was managed in both regions of the developing world."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/twec.12306"],["dc.identifier.isi","000373361200004"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/41222"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","1467-9701"],["dc.relation.issn","0378-5920"],["dc.title","Trade Openness and Income: A Tale of Two Regions"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI WOS
  • 2021Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of International Development"],["dc.contributor.author","Cardozo Silva, Adriana R."],["dc.contributor.author","Diaz Pavez, Luis R."],["dc.contributor.author","Martínez‐Zarzoso, Inmaculada"],["dc.contributor.author","Nowak‐Lehmann, Felicitas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-02-01T10:31:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-02-01T10:31:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/jid.3606"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/98818"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-517"],["dc.relation.eissn","1099-1328"],["dc.relation.issn","0954-1748"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"],["dc.title","The impact of COVID‐19 government responses on remittances in Latin American countries"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2020Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","157"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","177"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","30"],["dc.contributor.author","Klasen, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada"],["dc.contributor.author","Nowak-Lehmann, Felicitas"],["dc.contributor.author","Bruckner, Matthias"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:31:40Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:31:40Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/09638199.2020.1831042"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/83676"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1469-9559"],["dc.relation.issn","0963-8199"],["dc.title","Does the designation of least developed country status promote exports?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2009Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","317"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","German Economic Review"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","338"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada"],["dc.contributor.author","Nowak-Lehmann, Felicitas D."],["dc.contributor.author","Klasen, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Larch, Mario"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-06-05T12:54:24Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-06-05T12:54:24Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","This paper uses a static and dynamic gravity model of trade to investigate the link between German development aid and exports from Germany to the recipient countries. The findings indicate that, in the long run, German aid is associated with an increase in exports of goods that is larger than the aid flow, with a point estimate of 140% of the aid given. In addition, the evolution of the estimated coefficients over time shows an effect that is consistently positive but that oscillates over time. Interestingly, after a decrease in the 1990s, the estimated coefficients of the effect of aid on trade show a steady increase in the period between 2001 and 2005. The paper distinguishes among recipient countries and finds that the return on aid measured by German exports is higher for aid to countries considered ‘strategic aid recipients’ by the German government. We also find some evidence that aid given by other EU members reduces German exports."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1468-0475.2008.00458.x"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/14891"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.title","Does German Development Aid Promote German Exports?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2009Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1184"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Journal of Development Studies"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1202"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","45"],["dc.contributor.author","Nowak-Lehmann, Felicitas D."],["dc.contributor.author","Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada"],["dc.contributor.author","Klasen, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Herzer, Dierk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-06-05T11:57:50Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-06-05T11:57:50Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","One reason donors provide foreign aid is to support their exports to aid-recipient countries. Time series data for Germany suggests an average return of between US.04–.50 for each US dollar of aid spent by Germany. Although this is well below previous estimates, the value is robust to different specifications and econometric approaches. Interestingly, we find strong evidence of crowding out between bilateral donors in the sense that bilateral aid from other EU members significantly reduces exports from Germany to the recipients. The evidence suggests that, in the long run, aid causes exports and not vice versa. We discuss the implications these findings might have for aid volumes and allocation."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/00220380902952407"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/14889"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.title","Aid and Trade – A Donor's Perspective"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2014Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1250007-1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Middle East Development Journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1250007-24"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","4"],["dc.contributor.author","Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada"],["dc.contributor.author","Nowak-Lehmann, Felicitas D."],["dc.contributor.author","Johannsen, Florian"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-08-06T13:56:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-08-06T13:56:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","This paper investigates the link between foreign aid and exports between the two shores of the Mediterranean. The main hypothesis is that the Euro-Mediterranean Process should promote not only trade but also stronger links between the European Union (EU) and the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). Hence, we expect development aid to have a positive impact on exports, which could also intensify the aid-trade relationship. In particular, we expect to find higher trade volumes in both directions after the process started in 1995 and intensified in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when several bilateral free trade agreements were signed. A gravity model augmented with bilateral and multilateral aid and trade regime variables is estimated for exports and imports from recipient countries to donor countries for the period 1988 to 2007 using advanced panel data techniques. Our method addresses the endogeneity bias of the trade regime/economic integration agreement (EIA) variable, assuming that decisions to form or enlarge EIAs are slow-moving relative to trade flows."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1142/S1793812012500071"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/62325"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1793-8120"],["dc.relation.issn","1793-8171"],["dc.title","Foreign Aid, Exports and Development in Euromed"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2007Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","411"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of International Trade & Economic Development"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","434"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","16"],["dc.contributor.author","Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada"],["dc.contributor.author","Nowak-Lehmann D., Felicitas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:06:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:06:53Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","In this paper, we analyze separately the determinants of maritime transport and road transport costs for Spanish exports to Poland and Turkey ( markets for which maritime and road transport are competing modes) and investigate the different effects of these costs on international trade. First, we investigate the extent to which maritime and road transport costs depend on different factors such as unit values, distances, transport conditions, service structures, and service quality. Second, we analyze the relative importance of road and maritime transport costs in comparison with distance measures as determinants of trade flows. The main results of this investigation indicate that real distance is not a good proxy for transportation costs and identify the central variables influencing road and maritime transportation costs: for both modes, transport conditions are strong determinants, whereas effciency and service quality are more important for maritime transport costs, and geographical distance is more important for road transport. Road and maritime transport costs are central explanatory factors of exports and they seem to deter trade to a greater extent than road or maritime transit time when endogeneity is considered."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/09638190701527186"],["dc.identifier.isi","000249639400008"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/52421"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0963-8199"],["dc.title","Is distance a good proxy for transport costs? The case of competing transport modes"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI WOS
  • 2010Conference Paper
    [["dc.contributor.author","Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada"],["dc.contributor.author","Nowak-Lehmann, Felicitas D."],["dc.contributor.author","Cardozo, Adriana"],["dc.contributor.author","Klasen, Stephan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-06-05T09:19:41Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-06-05T09:19:41Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","This paper uses the gravity model of trade to investigate the link between foreign aid and exports in recipient countries and tests for the transmission channels between aid and exports/economic development in developing countries. Most of the theoretical work emphasizes the negative impact of aid on recipient countries' exports primarily due to exchange rate appreciation, disregarding the positive impact of aid linked to the income effect. The empirical findings, in contrast, indicate that the net impact of aid on recipient countries' exports is positive and that the average return for recipients' exports is about 1.50 US$ for every aid dollar spent. The paper also estimates the effect of different types of aid (bilateral aid [from one donor to one specific recipient, and bilateral aid from all the other donors to one specific recipient], as well as multilateral aid flowing to a specific recipient) and finds that at least two types of aid have a positive and significant effect on recipients' exports, thus ruling out a major crowding out effect. It is further found that aid is hardly export-enhancing in Africa."],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/14878"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics"],["dc.relation.eventend","2010"],["dc.relation.eventlocation","Hannover"],["dc.relation.eventstart","2010"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference"],["dc.title","Foreign aid and recipient countries' exports: How important are improved bilateral trade relations?"],["dc.type","conference_paper"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details