Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","28"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","50"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth"],["dc.contributor.author","Bieber, Tonia"],["dc.contributor.author","Jakobi, Anja P."],["dc.contributor.author","Knodel, Philipp"],["dc.contributor.author","Niemann, Dennis"],["dc.contributor.author","Teltemann, Janna"],["dc.contributor.editor","Martens, Kerstin"],["dc.contributor.editor","Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth"],["dc.contributor.editor","Windzio, Michael"],["dc.contributor.editor","Weymann, Ansgar"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:55:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:55:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","In his famous essay, “The Methodology of the Social Sciences” Max Weber indicated that new social and cultural phenomena bring along new academic problems. These new academic problems, however, call for an adjustment of the paradigmatic and methodological apparatus. In this chapter, we point to the methodological challenges arising from new and complex social phenomena in the realm of internationalizing education policy and how they can be addressed by a systematic combination and pooling of different methods with their particular strengths and limitations. Basically, new analytical problems can be dealt with in three different ways. The first and least desirable way is to downsize the phenomenon in question to make it accessible within a given methodological framework. The second is to refine a given methodological framework to make it cover more aspects of the phenomenon in question, thus to increase the validity of the respective type of data. The third is to deepen the overall validity of analysis by a systematic rearrangement of the methodological framework. Such an arrangement should combine both qualitative and quantitative methodological strategies with descriptive and explanative logics of research. A carefully arranged mixed-method approach can not only account more deeply for more facets of the phenomenon in question, but can also connect the methods involved in an appropriate way in order to counterbalance their limits and to pool their strengths."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1057/9780230281295_2"],["dc.identifier.gro","3147015"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9671"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Palgrave Macmillan"],["dc.publisher.place","London"],["dc.relation.doi","10.1057/9780230281295"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-1-349-31953-4"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Transformation of Education Policy"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Soziologie"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung III: Kultursoziologie"],["dc.title","Measuring Transformation of Education Policy—a Mixed-Method Approach"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.seriesnr","103"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth"],["dc.contributor.author","Knodel, Philipp"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-02-08T07:50:12Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-02-08T07:50:12Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","International initiatives in education, such as PISA and the Bologna Process, have distinctly changed conditions framing domestic policy-making. This paper sheds light on the territorial and modal dispersion of national education policy networks by means of a systematic network analytical description. The focus is on changing patterns of interactions and coalitions between international and national as well as private and public actors. Therefore, we analyse four countries, i.e. Germany, Switzerland, Great Britain and New Zealand, in a comparative perspective. The findings show that in most countries there is indeed an internationalization of education politics taking place in the sense of an increasing participation of international actors. These actors apply a more and more diversified portfolio of governance instruments. At the same time, however, domestic veto players develop a rich set of strategies to cope, compete or collaborate with international actors."],["dc.format.extent","29"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/12042"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation","SFB 597: Staatlichkeit im Wandel"],["dc.relation.crisseries","TranState Working Papers"],["dc.relation.ispartofseries","TranState Working Papers; 103"],["dc.title","Education policy networks in a comparative perspective: Germany, Switzerland, Great Britain and New Zealand"],["dc.type","working_paper"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.seriesnr","83"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth"],["dc.contributor.author","Bieber, Tonia"],["dc.contributor.author","Jakobi, Anja P."],["dc.contributor.author","Knodel, Philipp"],["dc.contributor.author","Niemann, Dennis"],["dc.contributor.author","Teltemann, Janna"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-02-08T07:58:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-02-08T07:58:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Despite of their methodological and practical significance mixed-methods-designs have so far largely been neglected by political science. In this working paper, we elaborate a mixed-methods-design combining qualitative methods, such as expert interviews and document analysis, and quantitative methods, such as network and regression analysis. This mixed-methods-approach is illustrated making use of an ongoing research project. After a detailed discussion of the respective strengths and weaknesses of the single methodical strategies applied we reconsider how their distinct logics can most fruitfully be intertwined to counterbalance their shortcomings and to pool their strengths. Here, we place special emphasis on the implementation timing and point to the particular advantages of concurrent implementation of methods over so called sequential designs."],["dc.format.extent","24"],["dc.identifier.issn","1861-1176"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/12043"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Universität Bremen"],["dc.publisher.place","Bremen"],["dc.relation","SFB 597: Staatlichkeit im Wandel"],["dc.relation.crisseries","TranState Working Papers"],["dc.relation.ispartofseries","TranState working papers; 83"],["dc.title","Measuring transformation: a mixed-method-approach to the internationalization of education politics"],["dc.type","working_paper"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]