Clough, Yann

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2007"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","11"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Biogeography"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","2014"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","32"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Kruess, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:49:57Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:49:57Z"],["dc.date.issued","2005"],["dc.description.abstract","Aim Factors acting at various scales may affect biodiversity, demanding analyses at multiple spatial scales in order to understand how community richness is determined. Here, we adopted a hierarchical approach to test the contribution of region, landscape heterogeneity, local management (organic vs. conventional) and location within field (edge vs. centre) to the species richness and abundance of spiders in cereals.Location Three regions of western and central Germany: Leine Bergland, Soester Boerde, and Lahn-Dill Bergland.Methods Forty-two paired organic and conventional winter wheat fields were compared. Field pairs were located in areas ranging from structurally simple to structurally complex landscapes. In May and June 2003, spiders were sampled using pitfall traps. Linear mixed models were used to determine the relationship of spider diversity and abundance with regional spatial factors and landscape heterogeneity within a 500-m radius, as well as with local management and within-field location.Results Within-field location of the traps and landscape heterogeneity were the best predictors of species richness: more species were found in field edges and in heterogeneous landscapes. Region and local management had no effect on species richness. Activity density was higher in field edges and differed among regions.Main conclusions The diversity of farmland spiders was influenced by differences at two of the spatial scales (edge vs. centre, simple vs. complex landscapes), but not at the two others (field management, region), emphasizing the importance of analyses at a variety of spatial scales for an adequate explanation of patterns in biodiversity. Our study suggests that promoting heterogeneity in land use at landscape scales is one of the keys to promoting spider diversity in agroecosystems."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01367.x"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149799"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6497"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0305-0270"],["dc.subject","Agroecosystem; Araneae; biodiversity; biological control; cereals; landscape composition; organic farming; regional variation; scale effects"],["dc.title","Spider diversity in cereal fields: comparing factors at local, landscape and regional scales"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","294"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Control"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","309"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","43"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Bommarco, Riccardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Crist, Thomas O."],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.contributor.author","Tylianakis, Jason M."],["dc.contributor.author","van Nouhuys, Saskya"],["dc.contributor.author","Vidal, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:46:29Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:46:29Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","Conservation biological control in agroecosystems requires a landscape management perspective, because most arthropod species experience their habitat at spatial scales beyond the plot level, and there is spillover of natural enemies across the crop noncrop interface. The species pool in the surrounding landscape and the distance of crop from natural habitat are important for the conservation of enemy diversity and, in particular, the conservation of poorly-dispersing and specialized enemies. Hence, structurally complex landscapes with hi,gh habitat connectivity may enhance the probability of pest regulation. In contrast, generalist and highly vagile enemies may even A p rofit from the high primary productivity of crops at a landscape scale and their abundance may partly compensate for losses in enemy diversity. Conservation biological control also needs a multitrophic perspective. For example, entomopathogenic fungi, plant pathogens and endophytes as well as below- and above-ground microorganisms are known to influence pest-enemy interactions in ways that vary across spatiotemporal scales. Enemy distribution in agricultural landscapes is determined by beta diversity among patches. The diversity needed for conservation biological control may occur where patch heterogeneity at larger spatial scales is high. However, enemy communities in managed systems are more similar across space and time than those in natural systems, emphasizing the importance of natural habitat for a spillover of diverse enemies. According to the insurance hypothesis, species richness can buffer against spatiotemporal disturbances, thereby insuring functioning in changing environments. Seemingly redundant enemy species may become important under global change. Complex landscapes characterized by highly connected crop-noncrop mosaics may be best for long-term conservation biological control and sustainable crop production, but experimental evidence for detailed recommendations to design the composition and configuration of agricultural landscapes that maintain a diversity of generalist and specialist natural enemies is still needed. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.006"],["dc.identifier.isi","000251441800007"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/47757"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science"],["dc.relation.issn","1049-9644"],["dc.title","Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale"],["dc.type","review"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","804"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Applied Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","812"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","44"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Gabriel, Doreen"],["dc.contributor.author","Purtauf, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Kruess, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Steffan‐Dewenter, Ingolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:57Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:57Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01294.x"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150037"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6760"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-8901"],["dc.title","Alpha and beta diversity of arthropods and plants in organically and conventionally managed wheat fields"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","238"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Control"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","253"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","45"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Bommarco, Riccardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Crist, Thomas O."],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.contributor.author","Tylianakis, Jason M."],["dc.contributor.author","van Nouhuys, Saskya"],["dc.contributor.author","Vidal, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:15:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:15:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Conservation biological control in agroecosystems requires a landscape management perspective, because most arthropod species experience their habitat at spatial scales beyond the plot level, and there is spillover of natural enemies across the crop-noncrop interface. The species pool in the surrounding landscape and the distance of crop from natural habitat are important for the conservation of enemy diversity and, in particular, the conservation of poorly-dispersing and specialized enemies. Hence, structurally complex landscapes with high habitat connectivity may enhance the probability of pest regulation. In contrast, generalist and highly vagile enemies may even profit from the high primary productivity of crops at a landscape scale and their abundance may partly compensate for losses in enemy diversity. Conservation biological control also needs a multitrophic perspective. For example, entomopathogenic fungi, plant pathogens and endophytes as well as below- and above-ground microorganisms are known to influence pest-enemy interactions in ways that vary across spatiotemporal scales. Enemy distribution in agricultural landscapes is determined by beta diversity among patches. The diversity needed for conservation biological control may occur where patch heterogeneity at larger spatial scales is high. However, enemy communities in managed systems are more similar across space and time than those in natural systems, emphasizing the importance of natural habitat for a spillover of diverse enemies. According to the insurance hypothesis, species richness can buffer against spatiotemporal disturbances, thereby insuring functioning in changing environments. Seemingly redundant enemy species may become important under global change. Complex landscapes characterized by highly connected crop-noncrop mosaics may be best for long-term conservation biological control and sustainable crop production, but experimental evidence for detailed recommendations to design the composition and configuration of agricultural landscapes that maintain a diversity of generalist and specialist natural enemies is still needed. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/S1049-9644(08)00082-0"],["dc.identifier.isi","000255522700008"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/54346"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science"],["dc.relation.issn","1049-9644"],["dc.title","Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale (Reprinted from Biol. Control, vol 43, pg 294-309, 2007)"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","256"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecology Letters"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","257"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Baquero, R. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Díaz, Mario"],["dc.contributor.author","Esteban, J. de"],["dc.contributor.author","Fernández, F."],["dc.contributor.author","Gabriel, Doreen"],["dc.contributor.author","Herzog, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Jöhl, R."],["dc.contributor.author","Knop, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Kruess, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Marshall, E. Jon P."],["dc.contributor.author","Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Verhulst, Jort"],["dc.contributor.author","West, T. M."],["dc.contributor.author","Yela, J. L."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:59Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:59Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006-03"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00894.x"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150041"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6765"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","1461-023X"],["dc.title","A Rejoinder to the Comments by Potts et al."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecology Letters"],["dc.contributor.author","Martin, Emily A."],["dc.contributor.author","Dainese, Matteo"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Báldi, András"],["dc.contributor.author","Bommarco, Riccardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Gagić, Vesna"],["dc.contributor.author","Garratt, Michael P. D."],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó"],["dc.contributor.author","Marini, Lorenzo"],["dc.contributor.author","Potts, Simon G."],["dc.contributor.author","Smith, Henrik G."],["dc.contributor.author","Al Hassan, Diab"],["dc.contributor.author","Albrecht, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Andersson, Georg K. S."],["dc.contributor.author","Asís, Josep D."],["dc.contributor.author","Aviron, Stéphanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Balzan, Mario V."],["dc.contributor.author","Baños‐Picón, Laura"],["dc.contributor.author","Bartomeus, Ignasi"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Burel, Francoise"],["dc.contributor.author","Caballero‐López, Berta"],["dc.contributor.author","Concepción, Elena D."],["dc.contributor.author","Coudrain, Valérie"],["dc.contributor.author","Dänhardt, Juliana"],["dc.contributor.author","Díaz, Mario"],["dc.contributor.author","Diekötter, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Dormann, Carsten F."],["dc.contributor.author","Duflot, Rémi"],["dc.contributor.author","Entling, Martin H."],["dc.contributor.author","Farwig, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Frank, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Garibaldi, Lucas A."],["dc.contributor.author","Hermann, John"],["dc.contributor.author","Herzog, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Inclán, Diego"],["dc.contributor.author","Jacot, Katja"],["dc.contributor.author","Jauker, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Jeanneret, Philippe"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser, Marina"],["dc.contributor.author","Krauß, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Le Féon, Violette"],["dc.contributor.author","Marshall, Jon"],["dc.contributor.author","Moonen, Anna‐Camilla"],["dc.contributor.author","Moreno, Gerardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Riedinger, Verena"],["dc.contributor.author","Rundlöf, Maj"],["dc.contributor.author","Rusch, Adrien"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheper, Jeroen"],["dc.contributor.author","Schneider, Gudrun"],["dc.contributor.author","Schüepp, Christof"],["dc.contributor.author","Stutz, Sonja"],["dc.contributor.author","Sutter, Louis"],["dc.contributor.author","Tamburini, Giovanni"],["dc.contributor.author","Thies, Carsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Tormos, José"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Tschumi, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Uzman, Deniz"],["dc.contributor.author","Wagner, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Zubair‐Anjum, Muhammad"],["dc.contributor.author","Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf"],["dc.contributor.editor","Scherber, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-23T07:13:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-23T07:13:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Managing agricultural landscapes to support biodiversity and ecosystem services is a key aim of a sustainable agriculture. However, how the spatial arrangement of crop fields and other habitats in landscapes impacts arthropods and their functions is poorly known. Synthesising data from 49 studies (1515 landscapes) across Europe, we examined effects of landscape composition (% habitats) and configuration (edge density) on arthropods in fields and their margins, pest control, pollination and yields. Configuration effects interacted with the proportions of crop and non-crop habitats, and species' dietary, dispersal and overwintering traits led to contrasting responses to landscape variables. Overall, however, in landscapes with high edge density, 70% of pollinator and 44% of natural enemy species reached highest abundances and pollination and pest control improved 1.7-and 1.4-fold respectively. Arable-dominated landscapes with high edge densities achieved high yields. This suggests that enhancing edge density in European agroecosystems can promote functional biodiversity and yield-enhancing ecosystem services."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/ele.13265"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61862"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","1461-023X"],["dc.relation.issn","1461-0248"],["dc.title","The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","243"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecology Letters"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","254"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Baquero, R. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Díaz, Mario"],["dc.contributor.author","Esteban, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Fernández, F."],["dc.contributor.author","Gabriel, Doreen"],["dc.contributor.author","Herzog, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Jöhl, R."],["dc.contributor.author","Knop, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Kruess, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Marshall, E. Jon P."],["dc.contributor.author","Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Verhulst, Jort"],["dc.contributor.author","West, T. M."],["dc.contributor.author","Yela, J. L."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006-03"],["dc.description.abstract","Agri-environment schemes are an increasingly important tool for the maintenance and restoration of farmland biodiversity in Europe but their ecological effects are poorly known. Scheme design is partly based on non-ecological considerations and poses important restrictions on evaluation studies. We describe a robust approach to evaluate agri-environment schemes and use it to evaluate the biodiversity effects of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. We compared species density of vascular plants, birds, bees, grasshoppers and crickets, and spiders on 202 paired fields, one with an agri-environment scheme, the other conventionally managed. In all countries, agri-environment schemes had marginal to moderately positive effects on biodiversity. However, uncommon species benefited in only two of five countries and species listed in Red Data Books rarely benefited from agri-environment schemes. Scheme objectives may need to differentiate between biodiversity of common species that can be enhanced with relatively simple modifications in farming practices and diversity or abundance of endangered species which require more elaborate conservation measures."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00869.x"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150073"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6801"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","1461-023X"],["dc.subject","Biodiversity conservation; European Union; farmland wildlife; land-use intensity; policy evaluation; Red Data Book species"],["dc.title","Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","695"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Applied Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","705"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","49"],["dc.contributor.author","Concepción, Elena D."],["dc.contributor.author","Díaz, Mario"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Báldi, András"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Gabriel, Doreen"],["dc.contributor.author","Herzog, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Knop, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Marshall, E. Jon P."],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Verhulst, Jort"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:55Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:55Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","1. Ecological theory predicts that the effectiveness of local agri-environmental management to enhance species richness at field scales will be the highest at intermediate levels of landscape complexity because of nonlinear effects of landscape context on field-scale diversity.2. We examined how landscape complexity determined effectiveness of local agri-environmental management in terms of effects on species richness of birds, plants, spiders and bees in 232 extensive and intensive paired fields (112 arable fields and 120 grasslands) from 18 regions located in six European countries.3. As predicted, landscape complexity enhanced field-scale species richness in a mostly nonlinear (sigmoidal) way, with earlier species richness increases in extensive than in intensive fields along landscape complexity gradients. Length of semi-natural boundaries (for arable fields) and proportion of unfarmed habitat (for grasslands) were the landscape features influencing species richness.4. The relationships between effectiveness of local management and landscape complexity for all taxa were best described with hump-shaped curves, indicating the highest effectiveness at intermediate landscape complexities.5. Synthesis and applications. We used models to investigate how and why effects of local management intensity on species richness vary along wide gradients of landscape complexity. We conclude that landscape-scale management options should take priority over local extensification measures within agri-environmental programmes. These programmes should follow a hierarchical multi-scale approach directed to address landscape-scale constraints on local diversity."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02131.x"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150011"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6732"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-8901"],["dc.subject","Bees; birds; field-scale management; landscape complexity; model testing; nonlinear effects; plants; species richness; spiders"],["dc.title","Interactive effects of landscape context constrain the effectiveness of local agri-environmental management"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","238"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Control"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","253"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","45"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Bommarco, Riccardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Crist, Thomas O."],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.contributor.author","Tylianakis, Jason M."],["dc.contributor.author","Nouhuys, Saskya van"],["dc.contributor.author","Vidal, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:37Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:37Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Conservation biological control in agroecosystems requires a landscape management perspective, because most arthropod species experience their habitat at spatial scales beyond the plot level, and there is spillover of natural enemies across the crop–noncrop interface. The species pool in the surrounding landscape and the distance of crop from natural habitat are important for the conservation of enemy diversity and, in particular, the conservation of poorly-dispersing and specialized enemies. Hence, structurally complex landscapes with high habitat connectivity may enhance the probability of pest regulation. In contrast, generalist and highly vagile enemies may even profit from the high primary productivity of crops at a landscape scale and their abundance may partly compensate for losses in enemy diversity. Conservation biological control also needs a multitrophic perspective. For example, entomopathogenic fungi, plant pathogens and endophytes as well as below- and above-ground microorganisms are known to influence pest-enemy interactions in ways that vary across spatiotemporal scales. Enemy distribution in agricultural landscapes is determined by beta diversity among patches. The diversity needed for conservation biological control may occur where patch heterogeneity at larger spatial scales is high. However, enemy communities in managed systems are more similar across space and time than those in natural systems, emphasizing the importance of natural habitat for a spillover of diverse enemies. According to the insurance hypothesis, species richness can buffer against spatiotemporal disturbances, thereby insuring functioning in changing environments. Seemingly redundant enemy species may become important under global change. Complex landscapes characterized by highly connected crop–noncrop mosaics may be best for long-term conservation biological control and sustainable crop production, but experimental evidence for detailed recommendations to design the composition and configuration of agricultural landscapes that maintain a diversity of generalist and specialist natural enemies is still needed."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/s1049-9644(08)00082-0"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150064"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6791"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","1049-9644"],["dc.subject","Agroecosystems; Beta diversity; Dispersal; Habitat fragmentation; Insurance hypothesis; Multitrophic interactions; Parasitoid and predator spillover; SLOSS; Spatial ecology; Specialists vs. generalists; Sustainability"],["dc.title","Reprint of “Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale”"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","903"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1658"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","909"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","276"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Kohler, Florian"],["dc.contributor.author","Báldi, András"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Concepcion, E.D."],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Díaz, Mario"],["dc.contributor.author","Gabriel, Doreen"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Knop, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovacs, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Marshall, E. Jon P."],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Verhulst, Jort"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:54Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:54Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009-03"],["dc.description.abstract","Worldwide agriculture is one of the main drivers of biodiversity decline. Effective conservation strategies depend on the type of relationship between biodiversity and land-use intensity, but to date the shape of this relationship is unknown. We linked plant species richness with nitrogen (N) input as an indicator of land-use intensity on 130 grasslands and 141 arable fields in six European countries. Using Poisson regression, we found that plant species richness was significantly negatively related to N input on both field types after the effects of confounding environmental factors had been accounted for. Subsequent analyses showed that exponentially declining relationships provided a better fit than linear or unimodal relationships and that this was largely the result of the response of rare species (relative cover less than 1%). Our results indicate that conservation benefits are disproportionally more costly on high-intensity than on low-intensity farmland. For example, reducing N inputs from 75 to 0 and 400 to 60 kg ha−1 yr−1 resulted in about the same estimated species gain for arable plants. Conservation initiatives are most (cost-)effective if they are preferentially implemented in extensively farmed areas that still support high levels of biodiversity."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1098/rspb.2008.1509"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149937"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6649"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","0962-8452"],["dc.title","On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]