Heim, Susanne

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","S45"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","Suppl. 1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Das Gesundheitswesen"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","S46"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","77"],["dc.contributor.author","Patzelt, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Deitermann, B."],["dc.contributor.author","Heim, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Lupp, K."],["dc.contributor.author","Stahmeyer, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Krauth, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Theile, G."],["dc.contributor.author","Hummers-Pradier, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Walter, U."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-09-07T09:02:03Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-09-07T09:02:03Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1055/s-0033-1337914"],["dc.identifier.isi","000388706700018"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23970393"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89300"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Georg Thieme Verlag Kg"],["dc.relation.issn","1439-4421"],["dc.relation.issn","0941-3790"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.title","Der präventive Hausbesuch als zugehende Präventionsmaßnahme im Alter – Effektivität und Kosteneffektivität von Zugangswegen"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","348"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","353"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","90"],["dc.contributor.author","Bleidorn, Jutta"],["dc.contributor.author","Heim, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Lingner, Heidrun"],["dc.contributor.author","Hummers-Pradier, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Hauswaldt, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-09-07T13:08:55Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-09-07T13:08:55Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3238/zfa.2014.0348–0353"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89303"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.title","Wie sehen Hausärzte allgemeinmedizinische Forschung im Praxennetz? Eine Fokusgruppenanalyse"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","1413"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Health Services Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleinert, Evelyn"],["dc.contributor.author","Mohacsi, Laura"],["dc.contributor.author","Heim, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Hummers, Eva"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-12-01T08:31:23Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-12-01T08:31:23Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.date.updated","2022-11-28T08:12:55Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract\r\n \r\n Background\r\n This study is conducted by a subproject of the DFG research group \"Medicine, Time and the Good Life\" FOR 5022 (FOR TiMed_Life) and investigates the care preferences of individuals of advanced age and the care priorities of medical and nursing professionals in times of increasing medical options and more complex decision-making processes, especially for elderly patients. We assume that the preference for or rejection of medical treatment is shaped by individual and social age patterns and by the awareness of the finiteness of life. Just like older people themselves, professionals are also influenced by societal images of age(ing) and associated notions of age-appropriate health. These concepts are subject to constant change, which means that what was considered to be a 'normal' symptom of older age 100 years ago is now treated medically as a disease. The aim of the study is to identify the underlying perceptions of ageing and their influence on medical decisions.\r\n \r\n \r\n Methods\r\n By means of semi-structured focus group discussions and supplementary individual interviews with older people and medical and nursing professionals, the subproject investigates the perception of ageing processes and the resulting care preferences and priorities of these three groups. The evaluation of the interview material is carried out in two stages: First, the recorded group discussions are pre-structured using knowledge mapping. Based on the mapping results, the interview passages are selected, transcribed, and analysed in detail based on qualitative content analysis.\r\n \r\n \r\n Discussion\r\n Because the nature of the research question is exploratory, qualitative methods provide a suitable approach. The mapping technique provides early initial results that are used by the other subprojects. Within the research group, the results of the interviews provide an empirical basis for ethical discourses on the influence of medicine on ideas of a good life, and in particular, on successful ageing.\r\n \r\n \r\n Trial registration\r\n German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00027076, 05/11/2021."],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Georg-August-Universität Göttingen 501100003385"],["dc.identifier.citation","BMC Health Services Research. 2022 Nov 24;22(1):1413"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s12913-022-08731-7"],["dc.identifier.pii","8731"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/118159"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-621"],["dc.publisher","BioMed Central"],["dc.relation.eissn","1472-6963"],["dc.rights.holder","The Author(s)"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject","Old age"],["dc.subject","Medical decision making"],["dc.subject","Good life"],["dc.subject","Medical and nursing professionals"],["dc.subject","Focus group discussions"],["dc.title","Medicine in older age—perception and assessment of ageing processes by older people and medical and nursing professionals: study protocol for a qualitative focus group design (FOR TiMed_Life)"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","210"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Geriatrics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","16"],["dc.contributor.author","Patzelt, Christiane"],["dc.contributor.author","Heim, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Deitermann, Bernhilde"],["dc.contributor.author","Theile, Gudrun"],["dc.contributor.author","Krauth, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Hummers-Pradier, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Walter, Ulla"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:04:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:04:35Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Often preventive measures are not accessed by the people who were intended to be reached. Programs for older adults may target men and women, older adults, advanced old age groups and/or chronically ill patients with specific indications. The defined target groups rarely participate in the conception of programs or in the design of information materials, although this would increase accessibility and participation. In the German \"Reaching the Elderly\" study (2008-2011), an approach to motivating older adults to participate in a preventive home visit (PHV) program was modified with the participatory involvement of the target groups. The study examines how older men and women would prefer to be addressed for health and prevention programs. Methods: Four focus groups (N = 42 participants) and 12 personal interviews were conducted (women and men in 2 age groups: 65-75 years and >= 76 years). Participants from two districts of a major German city were selected from a stratified random sample (N = 200) based on routine data from a local health insurance fund. The study focused on the participants' knowledge about health and disease prevention and how they preferred to be approached and addressed. Videos of the focus groups were recorded and analysed using mind mapping techniques. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and subjected to qualitative content analysis. Results: A gender-specific approach profile was observed. Men were more likely to favor competitive and exerciseoriented activities, and they associated healthy aging with mobility and physical activity. Women, on the other hand, displayed a broader understanding of healthy aging, which included physical activity as only one aspect as well as a healthy diet, relaxation/wellness, memory training and independent living; they preferred holistic and socially oriented services that were not performance-oriented. The \"older seniors\" (76+) were ambivalent towards certain wordings referring to aging. Conclusions: Our results suggest that gender-specific needs must be considered in order to motivate older adults to participate in preventive services. Age-specific characteristics seem to be less relevant. It is more important to pay attention to factors that vary according to the individual state of health and life situation of the potential participants."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s12877-016-0374-3"],["dc.identifier.isi","000390482700001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","27931197"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/13936"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/38728"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","1471-2318"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Reaching the Elderly: Understanding of health and preventive experiences for a tailored approach - Results of a qualitative study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","14"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Family Practice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","19"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Christiane A."],["dc.contributor.author","Fleischmann, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Cavazzini, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Heim, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Seide, Svenja"],["dc.contributor.author","Geister, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Tetzlaff, Britta"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoell, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Werle, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Weyerer, Siegfried"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Hummers, Eva"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:45:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:45:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","BACKGROUND: Given both the increase of nursing home residents forecast and challenges of current interprofessional interactions, we developed and tested measures to improve collaboration and communication between nurses and general practitioners (GPs) in this setting. Our multicentre study has been funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (FK 01GY1124). METHODS: The measures were developed iteratively in a continuous process, which is the focus of this article. In part 1 \"exploration of the situation\", interviews were conducted with GPs, nurses, nursing home residents and their relatives focusing on interprofessional interactions and medical care. They were analysed qualitatively. Based on these results, in part 2 \"development of measures to improve collaboration\", ideas for improvement were developed in nine focus groups with GPs and nurses. These ideas were revisited in a final expert workshop. We analysed the focus groups and expert workshop using mind mapping methods, and finally drew up the compilation of measures. In an exploratory pilot study \"study part 3\" four nursing homes chose the measures they wanted to adopt. These were tested for three months. Feasibility and acceptance of the measures were evaluated via guideline interviews with the stakeholders which were analysed by content analyses. RESULTS: Six measures were generated: meetings to establish common goals, main contact person, standardised pro re nata medication, introduction of name badges, improved availability of nurse/GP and standardised scheduling/ procedure for nursing home visits. In the pilot study, the measures were implemented in four nursing homes. GPs and nurses reviewed five measures as feasible and acceptable, only the designation of a \"main contact person\" was not considered as an improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Six measures to improve collaboration and communication could be compiled in a multistep qualitative process respecting the perspectives of involved stakeholders. Five of the six measures were positively assessed in an exploratory pilot study. They could easily be transferred into the daily routine of other nursing homes, as no special models have to exist in advance. Impact of the measures on patient oriented outcomes should be examined in further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s12875-017-0678-1"],["dc.identifier.pmid","29325541"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15119"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59174"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.intern","In goescholar not merged with http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15050 but duplicate"],["dc.relation.issn","1471-2296"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Interprofessional collaboration in nursing homes (interprof): development and piloting of measures to improve interprofessional collaboration and communication: a qualitative multicentre study."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]