Schacht, Annekathrin

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1261"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Language, Cognition and Neuroscience"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1272"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","32"],["dc.contributor.author","Martín-Loeches, Manuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Ouyang, Guang"],["dc.contributor.author","Rausch, Philip"],["dc.contributor.author","Stürmer, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Palazova, Marina"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:48Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:48Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","The N400 component of the event-related potential is considered an index of semantic processing and therefore may be an ideal biomarker of semantic system disorders or individual differences. To this purpose, it is necessary to assess its test–retest reliability. Only one previous study has addressed this question, reporting good test–retest reliability (r = 0.85). However, that study had used a word-pair priming paradigm, which differs in many respects from the more typical and ecologically valid sentence-reading. The present study surveys test–retest reliability of the N400 in a sentence-reading paradigm. The best value obtained was r = 0.63, implying a relatively poor test–retest reliability. Crucial factors for this result may be the long interval between context and critical word as well as more complex contexts in sentence-reading paradigms. These factors might make the N400 effects in sentences more vulnerable to linguistic and non-linguistic factors increasing the variance across sessions."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/23273798.2017.1330485"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151382"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8178"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","2327-3798"],["dc.title","Test–retest reliability of the N400 component in a sentence-reading paradigm"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","349"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","356"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Dimigen, Olaf"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","It has been suggested that cognitive conflicts require effortful processing and, therefore, are aversive (Botvinick, 2007). In the present study, we compared conflicts emerging from the inhibition of a predominant response tendency in a go/no-go task with those between incompatible response activations in a Simon task in a within-subjects design, using the same type of stimuli. Whereas no-go trials elicited reduced skin conductance and pupillometric responses, but prolonged corrugator muscle activity, as compared with go trials, incompatible and compatible Simon trials were indistinguishable with respect to these parameters. Furthermore, the conflictsensitive N2 components of the event-related brain potential were similar in amplitude, but showed significantly different scalp distributions, indicating dissociable neural generator systems. The present findings suggest the involvement of different emotional and cognitive processes in both types of cognitive conflicts—none being aversive, however. In addition, the N2 findings call into question claims of common monitoring systems for all kinds of cognitive conflicts."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3758/cabn.10.3.349"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151368"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8164"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","1530-7026"],["dc.title","Emotions in cognitive conflicts are not aversive but are task specific"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","14"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Advances in Cognitive Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","20"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.author","Stürmer, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Ouyang, Guang"],["dc.contributor.author","Palazova, Marina"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Martín-Loeches, Manuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Rausch, Philip"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:48:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:48:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.5709/acp"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1895-1171"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/78976"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Lunching for Relaxation or Cognitive Control? After-Effects of Social and Solitary Meals"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1365"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1379"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Martín-Loeches, Manuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Casado, Pilar"],["dc.contributor.author","Hohlfeld, Annette"],["dc.contributor.author","Abdel Rahman, Rasha"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:46Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:46Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Whether syntactic and semantic processes during sentence comprehension follow strict sets of rules or succumb to context-dependent heuristics was studied by recording event-related potentials in a dual-task design. In one condition, sentence-extraneous acoustic material was either semantically congruent or incongruent relative to an adjective in the visually presented sentence, the latter being either semantically correct or incorrect within the sentence context. Homologous syntactic (gender) manipulations were performed in another condition. Syntactic processing within the sentence appeared to be blind to the syntactic content of the second task. In contrast, semantically incongruous material of the second task induced fluctuations typically associated with the detection of within-sentence semantic anomalies (N400) even in semantically correct sentences. Subtle but extant differences in topography between this N400 and that obtained with within-sentence semantic violations add to recent proposals of separate semantic subsystems differing in their specificity for sentence structure and computational procedures. Semantically incongruous material of the second task also influenced later stages of the processing of semantically incorrect adjectives (P600 component), which are traditionally assumed to pertain to the syntactic domain. This result is discussed in the light of current proposals of a third combinatorial stream in sentence comprehension."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1162/jocn.2009.21106"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151356"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18752393"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8150"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","0898-929X"],["dc.title","Rules and Heuristics during Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from a Dual-task Brain Potential Study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","no"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.contributor.author","Hildebrandt, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.editor","Michalos, Alex C."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Faces are highly important objects for humans and other primates because they convey information about the identity of others, their emotional state, gender, and age and support nonverbal and verbal communication. Accurate and fast face perception is therefore crucial for social interaction and socio-emotional well-being. Face perception starts in the visual system where the various types of facial information are processed and continues to higher-order systems allowing for the access to biographical knowledge, the seen person’s name, attractiveness judgments, and multisensory integration."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_975"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151406"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8204"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.publisher.place","Dordrecht"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-94-007-0752-8"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research"],["dc.title","Face Perception"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","52"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Intelligence"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","67"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","50"],["dc.contributor.author","Hildebrandt, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Wilhelm, Oliver"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:46Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:46Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Decoding the meaning of facial expressions is a major pathway of human communication and has been extensively studied as a basic facet of emotional intelligence. In order to better understand the structure and specificity of the abilities subsumed under emotion decoding from faces (facial emotion perception and facial emotion recognition), the multivariate measurement of individual differences is essential. In the present study, we focused on the abilities to perceive and recognize facial expressions of emotions and investigated their internal structure and nomological net. N = 269 participants with a heterogeneous educational background completed a large test battery including multiple assessment paradigms substantiated in basic experimental research. Results allowed establishing task-general measurement models of facial emotion perception (EP) and recognition (ER). In these measurement models emotion category-related specificity was negligible. The most important conclusion from the present study is the strongly limited specific variance in perceptual performance of certain emotion related facial expressions and emotion decoding from faces in general, relative to face identity processing and fluid cognitive abilities (figural reasoning, working memory and immediate and delayed memory). We discuss implications of the present results for building the nomological net of emotional intelligence and outline desiderata for future research."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.003"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151363"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8158"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","0160-2896"],["dc.title","Perceiving and remembering emotional facial expressions — A basic facet of emotional intelligence"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","130"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","136"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","89"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Adler, N."],["dc.contributor.author","Guo, T."],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:53Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Emotional pictures, faces, or words elicit an early posterior negativity (EPN) in the event-related potential, starting around 200–400 ms, followed by a late positive complex (LPC). Occasionally, also very early effects of emotion (VEEEs) are seen prior to 200 ms. The present study examined whether VEEEs can be due to direct links established by reinforcement learning. In the learning session, participants learned to associate previously unknown Chinese words with monetary gain, loss, or neither. In the test session, they were required to distinguish the learned stimuli from novel distracters. Specific to stimuli associated with positive outcome a VEEE, consisting of a posterior positivity, appeared around 150 ms and an LPC between 550 and 700 ms, whereas an EPN was absent. These results show that previous association with reward can induce VEEEs, indicating that emotion effects in ERPs may arise in the absence of biologically preparedness and semantic meaning."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.001"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151403"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8201"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","0301-0511"],["dc.title","Association with positive outcome induces early effects in event-related brain potentials"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","253"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychophysiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","265"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","50"],["dc.contributor.author","Ouyang, Guang"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Zhou, Changsong"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","The usefulness of the event-related potential (ERP) method can be compromised by violations of the underlying assumptions, for example, confounding variations of latency and amplitude of ERP components within and between conditions. Here we show how the ERP subtraction method might yield misleading information due to latency variability of ERP components. We propose a solution to this problem by correcting for latency variability using Residue Iteration Decomposition (RIDE), demonstrated with data from representative go/no-go experiments. The overlap of N2 and P3 components in go/no-go data gives rise to spurious topographical localization of the no-go–N2 component. RIDE decomposes N2 and P3 based on their latency variability. The decomposition restored the N2 topography by removing the contamination from latency-variable late components. The RIDE-derived N2 and P3 give a clearer insight about their functional relevance in the go/no-go paradigm."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/psyp.12004"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151353"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8147"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","0048-5772"],["dc.title","Overcoming limitations of the ERP method with Residue Iteration Decomposition (RIDE): A demonstration in go/no-go experiments"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","82"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Brain Topography"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","93"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","29"],["dc.contributor.author","Nowparast Rostami, Hadiseh"],["dc.contributor.author","Ouyang, Guang"],["dc.contributor.author","Bayer, Mareike"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Zhou, Changsong"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","The late positive potential (LPP) elicited by affective stimuli in the event-related brain potential (ERP) is often assumed to be a member of the P3 family. The present study addresses the relationship of the LPP to the classic P3b in a published data set, using a non-parametric permutation test for topographical comparisons, and residue iteration decomposition to assess the temporal features of the LPP and the P3b by decomposing the ERP into several component clusters according to their latency variability. The experiment orthogonally manipulated arousal and valence of words, which were either read or judged for lexicality. High-arousing and positive valenced words induced a larger LPP than low-arousing and negative valenced words, respectively, and the LDT elicited a larger P3b than reading. The experimental manipulation of arousal, valence, and task yielded main effects without any interactions on ERP amplitude in the LPP/P3b time range. The arousal and valence effects partially differed from the task effect in scalp topography; in addition, whereas the late positive component elicited by affective stimuli, defined as LPP, was stimulus-locked, the late positive component elicited by task demand, defined as P3b, was mainly latency-variable. Therefore LPP and P3b manifest different subcomponents."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10548-015-0438-2"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151397"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8194"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","0896-0267"],["dc.title","Dissociating the Influence of Affective Word Content and Cognitive Processing Demands on the Late Positive Potential"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Cortex"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","25"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","104"],["dc.contributor.author","Hernández-Gutiérrez, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Abdel Rahman, Rasha"],["dc.contributor.author","Martín-Loeches, Manuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Muñoz, Francisco"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:23:17Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:23:17Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.031"],["dc.identifier.issn","0010-9452"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/71889"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Does dynamic information about the speaker's face contribute to semantic speech processing? ERP evidence"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]