Pfingsten, Michael

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1211"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Pain Medicine"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1221"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","15"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfingsten, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Lueder, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Luedtke, Kerstin"],["dc.contributor.author","Petzke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Hildebrandt, Jan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:38:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:38:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Objectives. Several research groups established functional tests to obtain performance data for mobility-related activities in patients with low back pain (LBP). In our study we aimed to assess the construct validity and associations with other measures of a battery of functional tests in relationship to physical performance on the one hand and physical capacity and variables of pain, disability and psychological variables on the other. Design. Eight physical performance tests of everyday activities such as climbing stairs, picking up an object from the floor, bending forward, and sitting up from supine position etc. were evaluated in 106 patients with LBP and 106 control subjects. Results. Distribution of results in each test demonstrated a marked overlap in a number of tests between those with and those without back pain. In a factor analysis we found pronounced differences in the factorial structure of the data between patients and control subjects as well in the bivariate correlations between functional test results. There was a strong relationship between self-report disability rating (FFbH-R) and physical performance tests especially in patients whereas physical capacity tests had less relationship in patients and not at all in the control subjects. Conclusion. In contrast to the past and present literature, our results suggest that physical performance tests have an inherent problem to sharply differentiate patients with back pain from healthy controls and problems with inter-rater reliability. Physical performance seems to be more a matter of patients' perception of generalized disability than of restricted function."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Ministry of Education and Science (BMBF) [FKZ: 01 EM 0113]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/pme.12482"],["dc.identifier.isi","000340157500017"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24931593"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/32973"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","1526-4637"],["dc.relation.issn","1526-2375"],["dc.title","Significance of Physical Performance Tests for Patients with Low Back Pain"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","876"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Journal of Pain"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","885"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","31"],["dc.contributor.author","Vaisy, Morad"],["dc.contributor.author","Gizzi, Leonardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Petzke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Consmueller, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfingsten, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Falla, Deborah"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:51:07Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:51:07Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Objectives:Individuals with low back pain (LBP) present with alterations or limitations of spinal mobility. The identification of simple clinical methods for evaluating functional movement of the spine is necessary to allow quantification of the degree of movement impairment and permit monitoring of patient improvement with rehabilitation. This study evaluated movement of the spine in 20 patients with chronic nonspecific LBP compared with 19 pain-free participants using a novel measurement device that permits the dynamic assessment of spinal movement in a rapid and subject-specific manner.Methods:Two flexible sensor strips were fixed paravertebrally to the spine with each sensor strip measuring angles in 12 predetermined, adjacent, 25-mm-long segments. Maximum range of motion (ROM) and average angular velocity (AAV) of lumbar and pelvic movement were measured within identical angular and temporal frames during the descending and ascending phase of active lumbar flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral flexion following a standard choreography. Participants with LBP completed a number of questionnaires including the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.Results:Across all movements, the individuals with LBP displayed 10% to 15% less ROM (P<0.05) and 15% to 30% less AAV (P<0.05) at both the pelvis and lumbar regions compared with controls. ROM as well as AAV, in most cases, were negatively correlated (R=-0.49 to -0.75) with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in the LBP group (all P<0.05) especially during the initial descending phase of movement.Discussion:This study provide support for the utility of this device for quantifying movement impairments in individuals with fairly low levels of LBP and general functional limitations. The results show that velocity measurements rather than ROM show the greatest differences in individuals with LBP compared with asymptomatic participants. Impaired lumbar and pelvis movement was correlated to the individuals with LBP's degree of anxiety, fear, and catastrophizing."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1097/AJP.0000000000000190"],["dc.identifier.isi","000361477600005"],["dc.identifier.pmid","25503596"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/35847"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Lippincott Williams & Wilkins"],["dc.relation.issn","1536-5409"],["dc.relation.issn","0749-8047"],["dc.title","Measurement of Lumbar Spine Functional Movement in Low Back Pain"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","45"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Schmerz"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","52"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Bernd"],["dc.contributor.author","Petzke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfingsten, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Gärtner, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Isenberg, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Augustin, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Martin, Carolin"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindena, Gabriele"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:30:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:30:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00482-020-00527-0"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/83323"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1432-2129"],["dc.relation.issn","0932-433X"],["dc.title","Vermeidung chronischer Schmerzen in der deutschen Gesundheitsversorgung"],["dc.title.alternative","Derzeitiger Stand und Ausblick"],["dc.title.translated","Prevention of chronic pain in the German healthcare system : Current state and perspective"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","95"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Anaesthesist"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","107"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","69"],["dc.contributor.author","Erlenwein, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Pfingsten, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Hüppe, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Seeger, D."],["dc.contributor.author","Kästner, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Graner, R."],["dc.contributor.author","Petzke, F."],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:08:07Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:08:07Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00101-019-00708-2"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1432-055X"],["dc.identifier.issn","0003-2417"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/70378"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.relation.haserratum","/handle/2/70384"],["dc.title","Management von Patienten mit chronischen Schmerzen in der Akut- und perioperativen Medizin"],["dc.title.alternative","Management of patients with chronic pain in acute and perioperative medicine. An interdisciplinary challenge"],["dc.title.subtitle","Eine interdisziplinäre Herausforderung"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","692"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Schmerz"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","698"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","26"],["dc.contributor.author","Erlenwein, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Schlink, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfingsten, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Petzke, Frank"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:02:30Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:02:30Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Background. The aim of this investigation was to describe the performance profile and the requirements for the management of complex pain patients for the structures of a consultation service. Material and methods. The content and number of all inpatient consultations of the pain department (as an independent service in addition to acute pain and palliative care services) were evaluated for the period from 2008-2010. Results. During the study, 1,391 contacts were made in 882 patients; in approx. 50% of the consultations diagnostic or specific (interventional) procedures were requested. Beside additional diagnostic tests, physiotherapy (19.2%), psychological and psychiatric care (11.1%), and other therapeutic approaches (e. g., mirror therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, progressive muscle relaxation) or the long-term follow-up in specialized pain service (20.5%) were recommended. Conclusion. Within the scope of the pain consultation, a wide spectrum of pain diagnoses and difficult patients are examined. Mixed forms of acute, chronic, and tumor-related pain are often present. Therapeutically, optimization of only the pharmacological regimen is often not sufficient. Similar requirements for a multimodal diagnosis and therapeutic concept as established in ambulatory and/or specialist care are ultimately needed."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00482-012-1212-y"],["dc.identifier.isi","000314502200009"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22810215"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/24697"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","0932-433X"],["dc.title","Clinical pain consultation. Profiles of clinical pain consultation and requirements for management of complex pain patients in inpatient care"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","188"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","S1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Pain. Supplements"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","188"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","5"],["dc.contributor.author","Neuschulz, E."],["dc.contributor.author","Pfingsten, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Pavlakovic, G."],["dc.contributor.author","Petzke, F."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-08T12:27:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-08T12:27:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/S1754-3207(11)70646-0"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/95356"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-476"],["dc.relation.issn","1754-3207"],["dc.rights.uri","http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1"],["dc.title","F666 Long-Term Effect of a Multimodal Treatment Program on Use of Pain-Related Medication"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","808"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Anaesthesist"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","816"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","62"],["dc.contributor.author","Erlenwein, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Schlink, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfingsten, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Hinz, Jose Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauer, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Quintel, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Petzke, Frank"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:19:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:19:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Pre-existing or chronic pain is a relevant risk factor for severe postoperative pain. The prevalence of pre-existing and chronic pain in hospital depends on the time definition used and is approximately 44 % and 33 %, at 3 or 6 months, respectively. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and importance of pre-existing pain in patients treated by a postoperative acute pain service (APS) and to evaluate the requirements for treatment and resources as well as its quality in this context. This study involved an evaluation of all visits by the APS of the University Hospital in Gottingen over an 8-week period including patient subjective quality assessment on the basis of the quality improvement in postoperative pain therapy (QUIPS) questionnaire. Pre-existing pain (> 12 weeks) was assessed by recording patients history of pain by members of the APS. The results from patients with and without pre-existing pain were compared. A total of 128 patients (38 % female, 62 % male, aged 15-88 years old, mean age 59.8 +/- 14.4 years) were seen by the APS on 633 occasions. Of these patients 91 % had been admitted to hospital for surgery (66 % for tumor surgery, 8 % joint replacement, 9 % other joint surgery and 16 % other interventions), 50 % had acute postoperative pain without pre-existing pain, 50 % had had pre-existing pain for at least 12 weeks, 31 % had chronic non-cancer pain and 19 % pain possibly related to cancer. Patients with pre-existing pain showed no significant differences in the treatment requirements (e.g. adjustment of medication), use of resources (e.g. number of visits to the APS and time spent in hospital) and quality of care (e.g. pain intensity, functional aspects, side effects and complications) in the setting of the APS. However, there was an additional subsequent support by chronic pain and palliative care services. Pre-existing pain is a common comorbidity in surgery patients treated by the APS. There were no significant differences in treatment requirements and quality of care between the patients. This is in contrast to other studies of postoperative pain management which showed that patients with pre-existing postoperative pain had higher pain intensity. This indicates indirectly that the presence of pre-existing pain should be further evaluated as a potentially useful indication for the support by an APS. However there is an urgent need for further studies to clarify whether this indirect effect can be replicated at other hospitals or in other patient collectives. Also it has to be clarified what benefits pain patients have from this kind of treatment: if they benefit from the APS in general or from the special technique, if there is a long-term effect lasting beyond treatment in the APS or if this group of patients would benefit in general from multiprofessional and non-invasive concepts of acute pain treatment."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00101-013-2224-4"],["dc.identifier.isi","000326042700005"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23989962"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/28533"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","1432-055X"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-2417"],["dc.title","Pre-existing pain as comorbidity in postoperative acute pain service"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","330"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Anaesthesist"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","330"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","69"],["dc.contributor.author","Erlenwein, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Pfingsten, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Hüppe, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Seeger, D."],["dc.contributor.author","Kästner, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Graner, R."],["dc.contributor.author","Petzke, F."],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:08:08Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:08:08Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00101-020-00759-w"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1432-055X"],["dc.identifier.issn","0003-2417"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/70384"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.relation.iserratumof","/handle/2/70378"],["dc.title","Erratum zu: Management von Patienten mit chronischen Schmerzen in der Akut- und perioperativen Medizin"],["dc.title.alternative","Erratum to: Management of patients with chronic pain in acute and perioperativemedicine. An interdisciplinary challenge"],["dc.title.subtitle","Eine interdisziplinäre Herausforderung"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","erratum_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e0182207"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PloS one"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","12"],["dc.contributor.author","Schäfer, Axel Georg Meender"],["dc.contributor.author","Joos, Leonie Johanna"],["dc.contributor.author","Roggemann, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Waldvogel-Röcker, Kerstin"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfingsten, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Petzke, Frank"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:44:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:44:35Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","OBJECTIVES: Central sensitization (CS) is regarded as an important contributing factor for chronification of musculoskeletal pain (MSP). It is crucial to identify CS, as targeted multimodal treatment may be indicated. The primary objective of this study was therefore to explore pain experience of individuals with MSP+CS in order to gain a better understanding of symptoms in relation to CS from a patient perspective. The secondary objective was to investigate whether pain experiences of patients with MSP+CS differ from those of individuals with neuropathic pain (NP). METHODS: We conducted a comparative Group Delphi Study including patients with MSP+CS and neuropathic pain (NP). 13 guiding questions were used to gather information about sensory discriminatory, affective and associated bodily, mental and emotional phenomena related to the pain experience of patients. Descriptions were categorized using qualitative content analysis. Additionally, patients completed several pain related questionnaires. RESULTS: Nine participants with MSP+CS and nine participants with NP participated. The Delphi procedure revealed three main themes: psycho-emotional factors, bodily factors and environmental factors. Descriptions of patients with MSP+CS showed a complex picture, psycho-emotional factors seem to have a considerable impact on pain provocation, aggravation and relief. Impairments associated with mental ability and psyche affected many aspects of daily life. In contrast, descriptions of patients with NP revealed a rather mechanistic and bodily oriented pain experience. DISCUSSION: Patients with MSP+CS reported distinct features in relation to their pain that were not captured with current questionnaires. Insight in patient's pain experience may help to choose and develop appropriate diagnostic instruments."],["dc.description.abstract","OBJECTIVES: Central sensitization (CS) is regarded as an important contributing factor for chronification of musculoskeletal pain (MSP). It is crucial to identify CS, as targeted multimodal treatment may be indicated. The primary objective of this study was therefore to explore pain experience of individuals with MSP+CS in order to gain a better understanding of symptoms in relation to CS from a patient perspective. The secondary objective was to investigate whether pain experiences of patients with MSP+CS differ from those of individuals with neuropathic pain (NP). METHODS: We conducted a comparative Group Delphi Study including patients with MSP+CS and neuropathic pain (NP). 13 guiding questions were used to gather information about sensory discriminatory, affective and associated bodily, mental and emotional phenomena related to the pain experience of patients. Descriptions were categorized using qualitative content analysis. Additionally, patients completed several pain related questionnaires. RESULTS: Nine participants with MSP+CS and nine participants with NP participated. The Delphi procedure revealed three main themes: psycho-emotional factors, bodily factors and environmental factors. Descriptions of patients with MSP+CS showed a complex picture, psycho-emotional factors seem to have a considerable impact on pain provocation, aggravation and relief. Impairments associated with mental ability and psyche affected many aspects of daily life. In contrast, descriptions of patients with NP revealed a rather mechanistic and bodily oriented pain experience. DISCUSSION: Patients with MSP+CS reported distinct features in relation to their pain that were not captured with current questionnaires. Insight in patient's pain experience may help to choose and develop appropriate diagnostic instruments."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1371/journal.pone.0182207"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28796805"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14821"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59039"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1932-6203"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.subject.mesh","Adult"],["dc.subject.mesh","Aged"],["dc.subject.mesh","Central Nervous System Sensitization"],["dc.subject.mesh","Chronic Pain"],["dc.subject.mesh","Cross-Sectional Studies"],["dc.subject.mesh","Delphi Technique"],["dc.subject.mesh","Emotions"],["dc.subject.mesh","Female"],["dc.subject.mesh","Humans"],["dc.subject.mesh","Male"],["dc.subject.mesh","Middle Aged"],["dc.subject.mesh","Musculoskeletal Pain"],["dc.subject.mesh","Neuralgia"],["dc.subject.mesh","Pain Measurement"],["dc.subject.mesh","Qualitative Research"],["dc.subject.mesh","Quality of Life"],["dc.title","Pain experiences of patients with musculoskeletal pain + central sensitization: A comparative Group Delphi Study."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2183"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Pain Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","2193"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Erlenwein, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Falla, Deborah"],["dc.contributor.author","Przemeck, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfingsten, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Budde, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Quintel, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Petzke, Frank"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:43:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:43:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.2147/JPR.S137892"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1178-7090"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14703"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/78161"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC 3.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0"],["dc.title","Clinical relevance of persistent postoperative pain after total hip replacement – a prospective observational cohort study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]