Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • 2022-05-25Journal Article Research Paper
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","94"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Sports Science, Medicine & Rehabilitation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.author","Steinmetz, Gino"],["dc.contributor.author","Assman, Mara"],["dc.contributor.author","Hubert, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Saul, Dominik"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-06-01T09:39:42Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-08-12T14:14:24Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-06-01T09:39:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-08-12T14:14:24Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022-05-25"],["dc.date.updated","2022-07-29T12:18:04Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Background\r\n Physiological characteristics of climbers have been extensively studied, while the personality of climbers remains poorly understood. Personality research in sports is an established field, predicting long-term success as well as short-term behavior. The goal of our study was to examine recreational climbers’ personality and gain a better understanding of what makes them reach new heights.\r\n \r\n \r\n Methods\r\n We analyzed a cohort of 50 recreational climbers and 50 non-climbing athletes (control) regarding their personality characteristics. We assessed the BMI, the self-reported climbing grade, and the years of climbing experience. To evaluate the personality of recreational climbers and athletes, we used the German version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-2), which summarizes the personality in five main categories.\r\n \r\n \r\n Results\r\n Recreational climbers scored significantly higher in conscientiousness than non-climbing athletes (p = 0.04), there was no significant difference between the other four main personality traits. Female climbers scored significantly higher in conscientiousness than male climbers (p = 0.02), while female athletes scored higher in openness than male athletes (p < 0.01). The climbing group displayed a small but significant negative correlation between conscientiousness and BMI (r = -0.39; p < 0.01).\r\n \r\n \r\n Conclusion\r\n In conclusion, the personality of recreational climbers and recreational athletes differs in conscientiousness, with the climbers showing higher scores. Regarding gender, we found higher levels of conscientiousness in female climbers and higher openness in female athletes in comparison to their male counterparts. A negative correlation between BMI and conscientiousness of the climbers was detected."],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Georg-August-Universität Göttingen 501100003385"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2022"],["dc.identifier.citation","BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2022 May 25;14(1):94"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s13102-022-00483-5"],["dc.identifier.pii","483"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/108542"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/112727"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-572"],["dc.relation.eissn","2052-1847"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.holder","The Author(s)"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject","Sports psychology"],["dc.subject","Sports climbing"],["dc.subject","Climbing psychology"],["dc.subject","Climbing"],["dc.title","Recreational climbers are more conscientious than recreational athletes–a case control study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2020-12-27Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","129"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","18"],["dc.contributor.author","Assmann, Mara"],["dc.contributor.author","Steinmetz, Gino"],["dc.contributor.author","Schilling, Arndt Friedrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Saul, Dominik"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:29:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:29:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020-12-27"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/ijerph18010129"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17796"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/82971"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","1660-4601"],["dc.rights","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Comparison of Grip Strength in Recreational Climbers and Non-Climbing Athletes—A Cross-Sectional Study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2019Journal Article Research Paper
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","91"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","100"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","17"],["dc.contributor.author","Saul, Dominik"],["dc.contributor.author","Steinmetz, Gino"],["dc.contributor.author","Lehmann, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Schilling, Arndt F."],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:51:44Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-06-09T06:55:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:51:44Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-06-09T06:55:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Background The number of athletes engaged in climbing sports has risen. Specific physical and psychological skills are required. The objective of this review was to determine factors for high climbing performance. We evaluated physiological, biomechanical and psychological characteristics that simplify the ascent. We also assessed training and recovery strategies. Methods Medline (Pubmed), Cochrane Library and Google scholar up to September 2018. Results A low skinfold thickness, body fat and large forearm volume were anthropometric traits in successful climbers. Well-trained forearm flexors with high aerobic capacities lead to an efficient style. Hand grip strength and endurance, postural stability and optimized kinematic motions were favourable. Elite climbers had long finger and bent-arm hang times. Psychologically, an “iceberg profile” was typical. Constant training with fingerboard and dynamic eccentric-concentric training helped to push the “red-point grade”. Conclusion Hand, forearm strength and endurance are highly important elements in elite climbers. An efficient climbing style with perpetual focus and accuracy, high speed and low exhaustion due to adaption to repeated isometric exercise is helpful in the ascent, while low body fat and a large bone-to-tip pulp make it easier. Constant training is essential, e.g. eccentric-concentric training of finger flexors, which should be followed by active recovery."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jesf.2019.04.002"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16178"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/66209"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59997"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1728-869X"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Determinants for success in climbing: A systematic review"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2021Journal Article Research Paper
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","13530"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Scientific Reports"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Mundry, Saskia"],["dc.contributor.author","Steinmetz, Gino"],["dc.contributor.author","Atkinson, Elizabeth J."],["dc.contributor.author","Schilling, Arndt F."],["dc.contributor.author","Schöffl, Volker R."],["dc.contributor.author","Saul, Dominik"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-08-12T07:45:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-08-12T07:45:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Improving climbing performance strongly depends upon effective training methods. Hangboard training is one of the most popular approaches to increase finger and forearm strength. Training protocols are based on maximizing weight or minimizing edges. We aimed to evaluate which of these protocols was superior. We prospectively analyzed 30 intermediate to advanced climbing athletes [Union Internationale des Associations d'Alpinisme (UIAA) VI–VIII] and randomized them into three groups: control group C (Control, normal climbing training), hangboard group HE (Hang endurance, grips to hold for a determined time decreased every week), and hangboard group HW (Hang weight, + 1.25 kg weight were added each week to hold for a determined time). As endpoints, we measured the grip strength before and after an 8-week training protocol in seven different pinches. Over the 8-week training period, HW hangboard training significantly improved the climbers’ grip strength compared to C [ p  = 0.032, effect size (ES) 0.36]. Maximizing weight improved the strength in I/II + III, I/II + III + IV and fist significantly. HW was superior compared to C in terms of grip strength improvement in three out of seven pinches and overall grip strength. The overall changes in the HE group did not differ significantly from the C group. An 8-week training protocol with increasing weights (HW) significantly improved overall grip strength more than a regular climbing training without the use of a hangboard."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41598-021-92898-2"],["dc.identifier.pii","92898"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/88353"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-448"],["dc.relation.eissn","2045-2322"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.title","Hangboard training in advanced climbers: A randomized controlled trial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI