Spiller, Achim

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","16"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","Suppl."],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","German Journal of Agricultural Economics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","30"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","64"],["dc.contributor.author","Kühl, Sarah"],["dc.contributor.author","Busch, Gesa"],["dc.contributor.author","Brümmer, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Fahlbusch, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-01-16T11:36:29Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-01-16T11:36:29Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.identifier.isi","000352556100003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/11662"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Deutscher Fachverlag Gmbh"],["dc.relation.issn","0515-6866"],["dc.relation.issn","0002-1121"],["dc.title","Der Markt für Milch und Milcherzeugnisse im Jahr 2014"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","23"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","German Journal of Agricultural Economics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","46"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","70"],["dc.contributor.author","Mehlhose, Clara"],["dc.contributor.author","Knöpfel, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Brümmer, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Busch, Gesa"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-01T09:22:37Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-01T09:22:37Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.30430/70.2021.5.23-46"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/94447"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-478"],["dc.relation.eissn","2191-4028"],["dc.title","Der Markt für Milch und Milcherzeugnisse 2020"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Animal frontiers"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Busch, Gesa"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:16:06Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:16:06Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/af/vfx005"],["dc.identifier.eissn","2160-6064"],["dc.identifier.issn","2160-6056"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/75052"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Consumer acceptance of livestock farming around the globe"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","27"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Animal Frontiers"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","33"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Busch, Gesa"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:16:06Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:16:06Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/af/vfx003"],["dc.identifier.eissn","2160-6064"],["dc.identifier.issn","2160-6056"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/75051"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Pictures in public communications about livestock farming"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in Animal Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","2"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Escobedo del Bosque, Cynthia I.; Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Risius, Antje; Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Spiller, Achim; Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Busch, Gesa; Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.author","Escobedo del Bosque, Cynthia I."],["dc.contributor.author","Risius, Antje"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Busch, Gesa"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-05-13T06:33:32Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-05-13T06:33:32Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.date.updated","2022-09-06T01:02:23Z"],["dc.description.abstract","As poultry production and consumption have increased in the last decade, so have consumers' concerns about intensified production methods and the impacts they have on animal welfare. At the same time, poultry consumption has increased and enjoys great popularity. Also, a shift in consumers' consumption behavior can be observed as nowadays most consumers purchase chicken cuts, especially breast filets, rather than whole animals, mostly due to convenience and taste. Although consumer concerns have increased, market shares of alternative poultry products, i.e., those that are produced under higher standards compared to conventional products, remain comparably low. One of the main reasons are the large differences in prices. The higher prices for alternative chicken products such as organic result partly from increased production costs on farm level. Besides, consumer preferences for chicken cuts intensify cost differences. While alternative chicken breasts (e.g., organically produced) might be valued by some consumers, other cuts such as wings or thighs are not and are therefore sent into the conventional market. In these cases, the breasts need to remunerate all additional costs. Analyzing consumers' concerns about production methods and learning about consumers' obstacles to buy whole chickens might offer farmers greater possibilities to succeed in alternative markets. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to gain insights into consumers' chicken consumption behaviors, how consumers imagine an ideal chicken farm and whether they would be willing to purchase a whole chicken from this ideal farm. Three focus group discussions (total n = 30) with German consumers were held online in June 2020. The results show that participants associate the ideal chicken farm with four main characteristics: good husbandry system, positive economic impact for the farmer, high transparency, and proximate location of the farm in the same geographical region. However, willingness to purchase a whole chicken, even from the ideal farm, remains low due to mainly convenience reasons and daily routines."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/fanim.2021.682477"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/107851"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","2673-6225"],["dc.relation.issn","2673-6225"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Consumers' Opinions and Expectations of an “Ideal Chicken Farm” and Their Willingness to Purchase a Whole Chicken From This Farm"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","43"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","German Journal of Agricultural Economics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","60"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","71"],["dc.contributor.author","Busch, Gesa"],["dc.contributor.author","Knöpfel, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Brümmer, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Mehlhose, Clara"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-07-01T07:35:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-07-01T07:35:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.30430/71.2022.5.Milch"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/112173"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-581"],["dc.relation.eissn","2191-4028"],["dc.title","Der Markt für Milch und Milcherzeugnisse 2021"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","395"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Supply Chain Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","412"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","19"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze-Ehlers, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Steffen, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Busch, Gesa"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:45:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:45:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Purpose - The paper aims to advance the conceptual understanding of supply chain orientation (SCO) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) as a general attitude and to empirically measure the link between SCO and willingness to implement supply chain management (SCM). Coordination among supply chain stages is widely considered important for competitiveness in all sectors. Recently, SCO of the actors has been discussed as a precondition for successful implementation of SCM. Design/methodology/approach - SCO is operationalized as a two-dimensional attitudinal construct. In all, 279 German dairy farmers participated in an online-survey. By means of factor and cluster analysis and one-way analysis of variance, the relation between the two SCO dimensions and their link with willingness to implement several currently discussed SCM measures is analysed. Findings - The SCO dimensions are not purely linearly related, as shown by three clusters with different patterns of vertical cooperation orientation and common goal orientation. No differences occur in terms of socio-economic characteristics, but the share of cooperative members varies. SCO is related to the intention to implement SCM. However, the greater the (monetary) efforts required by farmers, the lower their acceptance of an SCM measure. Trust and perception of the power relation play an important role, revealing patterns of coopetitive behaviour. Originality/value - SCO is a relatively new and little investigated construct. To the authors' best knowledge, this is the first time that a purely attitudinal measure was used, and that SMEs and the milk supply chain were investigated with respect to SCO and implementation of concrete SCM measures."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1108/SCM-07-2013-0241"],["dc.identifier.isi","000342053000003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/34714"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Emerald Group Publishing Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1758-6852"],["dc.relation.issn","1359-8546"],["dc.title","Supply chain orientation in SMEs as an attitudinal construct Conceptual considerations and empirical application to the dairy sector"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","289"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","296"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Busch, Gesa"],["dc.contributor.author","Obermowe, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:17:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:17:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00003-013-0840-1"],["dc.identifier.isi","000327436900004"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/28098"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.publisher.place","Basel"],["dc.relation.issn","1661-5867"],["dc.relation.issn","1661-5751"],["dc.title","Prüfkriterien in Lebensmittelwarentests: Verbraucherwünsche und -erwartungen an sensorische Testergebnisse"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e0211256"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PLoS One"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.author","Busch, Gesa"],["dc.contributor.author","Gauly, Sarah"],["dc.contributor.author","von Meyer-Höfer, Marie"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:50:02Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:50:02Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Pictures of farm animals and their husbandry systems are frequently presented in the media and are mostly connected to discussions surrounding farm animal welfare. How such pictures are perceived by the broader public is not fully understood thus far. It is presumable that the animals' expressions and body languages as well as their depicted environment or husbandry systems affect public perception. Therefore, the aim of this study is to test how the evaluation of a picture showing a farmed pig is influenced by portrayed attributes, as well as participants' perceptions of pigs' abilities in general, and if connection to agriculture has an influence. In an online survey, 1,019 German residents were shown four modified pictures of a pig in a pen. The pictures varied with regards to facial expression and body language of the pig ('happy' versus 'unhappy' pig) and the barn setting (straw versus slatted floor pen). Respondents were asked to evaluate both the pen and the welfare of the pig. Two Linear Mixed Models were calculated to analyze effects on pig and pen evaluation. For the pictures, the pen had the largest influence on both pig and pen evaluation, followed by the pig's appearance and participants' beliefs in pigs' mental and emotional abilities, as well as their connection to agriculture. The welfare of both the 'happy' and the 'unhappy' pig was assessed to be higher in the straw setting compared to the slatted floor setting in our study, and even the 'unhappy pig' on straw was perceived more positively than the 'happy pig' on slatted floor. The straw pen was evaluated as being better than the slatted floor pen on the pictures we presented but the pens also differed in level of dirt on the walls (more dirt in the slatted floor pen), which might have influenced the results. Nevertheless, the results suggest that enduring aspects of pictures such as the husbandry system influence perceptions more than a momentary body expression of the pig, at least in the settings tested herein."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1371/journal.pone.0211256"],["dc.identifier.pmid","30753189"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15842"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59687"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1932-6203"],["dc.relation.workinggroup","RTG 2654: Sustainable Food Systems (Related Publications)"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","630"],["dc.title","Does picture background matter? People's evaluation of pigs in different farm settings."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","149"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Economic Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","158"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","55"],["dc.contributor.author","Busch, Gesa"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:11:18Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:11:18Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Discussions about fair revenue distribution in food supply chains gained importance in 2008 when European milk producers entered a strike against dairy processing companies (EU milk strike). A broad discussion in the media emerged, provoking civil society as well as politics to get involved in a debate over fair prices for farmers. During the milk strike, consumers in Germany were to a large extent sympathetic with the farmers, while food retailers were seen as the main cause of the problem. However, the question what fairness and a fair revenue distribution in food production meant remained unanswered. Hence, this study aims to analyze consumer perceptions of what a fair revenue distribution is in food chains and to determine what factors contribute to fairness perceptions of the farmers' share. Through an online survey conducted in November 2012, German consumers were asked to estimate the distribution of the food dollar among different supply chain partners and to indicate what a fair distribution should look like. This paper contributes to the literature of the perceived unfair compensation of farmers and provides empirical examples of the concepts of distributive, procedural and interactional fairness. The findings of the survey showed that farmers are mainly perceived as being treated unfairly in supply chains and should get more compensation from a consumer's point of view. Food retailing should mainly lose shares in this context. A fair distribution of revenues is influenced by distributive considerations, process control and interactional fairness, revealing that non-monetary aspects are also influencing fairness perceptions of revenue distribution in food chains. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Georg-August-University Gottingen, Germany"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.joep.2016.03.007"],["dc.identifier.isi","000380629100012"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/40009"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","1872-7719"],["dc.relation.issn","0167-4870"],["dc.title","Farmer share and fair distribution in food chains from a consumer's perspective"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]