Spiller, Achim

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","311"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Sustainable Development"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","324"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","17"],["dc.contributor.author","Albersmeier, Friederike"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:25:31Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:25:31Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","In recent years, organic agriculture has developed rapidly, and organic certification systems are now used worldwide. However, if these standards are unable to meet their promises, their reliability will be called into question and trust in organic products will fade. As major suppliers of organic food to the European market, it is crucial for Latin American farmers to show their customers that the standards they have implemented are actually delivering what they promise. Considering the manifold resources that are being poured into these systems, it seems reasonable to critically review their reliability. A central indicator for the reliability of the system is the overall evaluation of organic certification. Therefore, it is the objective to analyse the relationship of both constructs. Findings show that most farmers are satisfied with the organic certification system and believe in its reliability; however, they fear the costs of bureaucracy and documentation. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/sd.426"],["dc.identifier.isi","000271519400005"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/56641"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","John Wiley & Sons Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0968-0802"],["dc.title","Evaluation and Reliability of the Organic Certification System: Perceptions by Farmers in Latin America"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","99"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Food and Agribusiness Management Review"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","138"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Albersmeier, Friederike"],["dc.contributor.author","Gawron, Jana-Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Theuvsen, Ludwig"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:20:06Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:20:06Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Due to the growing demands of customers and several food crises, quality assurance schemes have become increasingly popular in agribusiness. With this trend in mind, it seems worthwhile to take a closer look at the satisfaction of participating European companies. The study focuses on the IFS, which has gained much relevance in the food industry. A questionnaire concerned with perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of the IFS was answered by 389 companies. The results indicate that the overall evaluation of the IFS is primarily affected by the perceived usefulness of the catalogue of requirements and its evaluation. Furthermore, a cluster analysis was conducted and three clusters were identified, representing heterogeneous evaluations of the IFS."],["dc.description.sponsorship","H. Wilhelm Schaumann Foundation; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)"],["dc.identifier.isi","000208145800005"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/55454"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Int Food & Agribusiness Management Review"],["dc.relation.issn","1559-2448"],["dc.title","Heterogeneity in the Evaluation of Quality Assurance Systems: The International Food Standard (IFS) in European Agribusiness"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","927"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Food Control"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","935"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","20"],["dc.contributor.author","Albersmeier, Friederike"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Jahn, Gabriele"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:23:36Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:23:36Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","In recent years, certification has become increasingly relevant for agribusiness. In Europe, substantial parts of the value chain are already being certified by standards such as the International Food Standard (IFS) or GLOBALGAP (the former EurepGap). It is not known, however, whether these approaches can de facto ensure high quality control. This article is based on a database analysis of the German certification system Quality and Safety (QS) and a workshop with the QS-certification bodies conducting 85% of all agricultural audits. It seeks to deduce the first empirical hypotheses concerned with the connection between the reliability of third-party certification and the institutional framing of standards. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","BMBF Project IT Food Trace"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.01.010"],["dc.identifier.isi","000266354200011"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/56230"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Sci Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0956-7135"],["dc.title","The reliability of third-party certification in the food chain: From checklists to risk-oriented auditing"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","71"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Fleischwirtschaft"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","76"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","89"],["dc.contributor.author","Albersmeier, Friederike"],["dc.contributor.author","Boehm, Justus"],["dc.contributor.author","Schattke, Hedda"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfriem, Reinhard"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:34:29Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:34:29Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.identifier.isi","000270254300020"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/17829"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Deutscher Fachverlag Gmbh"],["dc.relation.issn","0015-363X"],["dc.title","Zukunftsfaktor gesellschaftliche Akzeptanz"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]