Zabel, Markus

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","102"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Journal of Cardiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","107"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","272"],["dc.contributor.author","Bergau, Leonard"],["dc.contributor.author","Willems, Rik"],["dc.contributor.author","Sprenkeler, David J."],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Thomas H."],["dc.contributor.author","Flevari, Panayota"],["dc.contributor.author","Hasenfuß, Gerd"],["dc.contributor.author","Katsaras, Dimitrios"],["dc.contributor.author","Kirova, Aleksandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Lehnart, Stephan E."],["dc.contributor.author","Lüthje, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Röver, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Seegers, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Sossalla, Samuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Dunnink, Albert"],["dc.contributor.author","Sritharan, Rajevaa"],["dc.contributor.author","Tuinenburg, Anton E."],["dc.contributor.author","Vandenberk, Bert"],["dc.contributor.author","Vos, Marc A."],["dc.contributor.author","Wijers, Sofieke C."],["dc.contributor.author","Friede, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:50:23Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:50:23Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We prospectively investigated combinations of risk stratifiers including multiple EP diagnostics in a cohort study of ICD patients. METHODS: For 672 enrolled patients, we collected history, LVEF, EP study and T-wave alternans testing, 24-h Holter, NT-proBNP, and the eGFR. All-cause mortality and first appropriate ICD shock were predefined endpoints. RESULTS: The 635 patients included in the final analyses were 63 ± 13 years old, 81% were male, LVEF averaged 40 ± 14%, 20% were inducible at EP study, 63% had a primary prophylactic ICD. During follow-up over 4.3 ± 1.5 years, 108 patients died (4.0% per year), and appropriate shock therapy occurred in n = 96 (3.9% per year). In multivariate regression, age (p < 0.001), LVEF (p < 0.001), NYHA functional class (p = 0.007), eGFR (p = 0.024), a history of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.011), and NT-pro-BNP (p = 0.002) were predictors of mortality. LVEF (p = 0.002), inducibility at EP study (p = 0.007), and secondary prophylaxis (p = 0.002) were identified as independent predictors of appropriate shocks. A high annualized risk of shocks of about 10% per year was prevalent in the upper quintile of the shock score. In contrast, a low annual risk of shocks (1.8% per year) was found in the lower two quintiles of the shock score. The lower two quintiles of the mortality score featured an annual mortality <0.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective ICD patient cohort, a very good approximation of mortality versus arrhythmic risk was possible using a multivariable diagnostic strategy. EP stimulation is the best test to assess risk of arrhythmias resulting in ICD shocks."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.103"],["dc.identifier.pmid","29983251"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15929"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59764"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.intern","In goescholar not merged with http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15360 but duplicate"],["dc.relation","info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/241526/EU//EUTRIGTREAT"],["dc.relation.issn","1874-1754"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.subject.mesh","Aged"],["dc.subject.mesh","Aged, 80 and over"],["dc.subject.mesh","Arrhythmias, Cardiac"],["dc.subject.mesh","Cohort Studies"],["dc.subject.mesh","Death, Sudden, Cardiac"],["dc.subject.mesh","Defibrillators"],["dc.subject.mesh","Defibrillators, Implantable"],["dc.subject.mesh","Female"],["dc.subject.mesh","Follow-Up Studies"],["dc.subject.mesh","Humans"],["dc.subject.mesh","Male"],["dc.subject.mesh","Middle Aged"],["dc.subject.mesh","Mortality"],["dc.subject.mesh","Multivariate Analysis"],["dc.subject.mesh","Natriuretic Peptide, Brain"],["dc.subject.mesh","Peptide Fragments"],["dc.subject.mesh","Prospective Studies"],["dc.subject.mesh","Risk Factors"],["dc.title","Differential multivariable risk prediction of appropriate shock versus competing mortality - A prospective cohort study to estimate benefits from ICD therapy"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","3437"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","36"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Heart Journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","3447"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","41"],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Willems, Rik"],["dc.contributor.author","Lubinski, Andrzej"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauer, Axel"],["dc.contributor.author","Brugada, Josep"],["dc.contributor.author","Conen, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Flevari, Panagiota"],["dc.contributor.author","Hasenfuß, Gerd"],["dc.contributor.author","Harden, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Friede, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Lüthje, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Haarmann, Helge"],["dc.contributor.author","Bergau, Leonard"],["dc.contributor.author","Tichelbäcker, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Hasenfuß, Gerd"],["dc.contributor.author","Friede, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Friede, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Harden, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Pieske, Burkert"],["dc.contributor.authorgroup","EU-CERT-ICD Study Investigators"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-05-07T07:50:46Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-10-27T13:22:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-05-07T07:50:46Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-10-27T13:22:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.description.abstract","Aims: The EUropean Comparative Effectiveness Research to Assess the Use of Primary ProphylacTic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (EU-CERT-ICD), a prospective investigator-initiated, controlled cohort study, was conducted in 44 centres and 15 European countries. It aimed to assess current clinical effectiveness of primary prevention ICD therapy. Methods and results: We recruited 2327 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and guideline indications for prophylactic ICD implantation. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Clinical characteristics, medications, resting, and 12-lead Holter electrocardiograms (ECGs) were documented at enrolment baseline. Baseline and follow-up (FU) data from 2247 patients were analysable, 1516 patients before first ICD implantation (ICD group) and 731 patients without ICD serving as controls. Multivariable models and propensity scoring for adjustment were used to compare the two groups for mortality. During mean FU of 2.4 ± 1.1 years, 342 deaths occurred (6.3%/years annualized mortality, 5.6%/years in the ICD group vs. 9.2%/years in controls), favouring ICD treatment [unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.682, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.537–0.865, P = 0.0016]. Multivariable mortality predictors included age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), New York Heart Association class

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2110"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Data in Brief"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","2116"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Bergau, Leonard"],["dc.contributor.author","Willems, Rik"],["dc.contributor.author","Sprenkeler, David J"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Thomas H."],["dc.contributor.author","Flevari, Panayota"],["dc.contributor.author","Hasenfuß, Gerd"],["dc.contributor.author","Katsaras, Dimitrios"],["dc.contributor.author","Kirova, Aleksandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Lehnart, Stephan E."],["dc.contributor.author","Lüthje, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Röver, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Seegers, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Sossalla, Samuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Dunnink, Albert"],["dc.contributor.author","Sritharan, Rajevaa"],["dc.contributor.author","Tuinenburg, Anton E"],["dc.contributor.author","Vandenberk, Bert"],["dc.contributor.author","Vos, Marc A"],["dc.contributor.author","Wijers, Sofieke C"],["dc.contributor.author","Friede, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:49:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:49:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018-12"],["dc.description.abstract","This data article features supplementary figures and tables related to the article \"Differential Multivariable risk prediction of appropriate shock vs. competing mortality - a prospective cohort study to estimate benefits from implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy\" (Bergau et al., 2018) [1]. The figures show the clinical study CONSORT graph (data that show the number of patients not-analyzable as well as a distribution of patients by outcomes) and the correlation scatter plot for risk scores of appropriate shock vs. mortality (data that show the calculated score values of the two scores plotted against each other). The tables show the results for the univariate Cox regressions for prediction of mortality and appropriate shock. For further information, please see Bergau et al. (2018) [1]."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.dib.2018.11.025"],["dc.identifier.pmid","30533459"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15766"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59628"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation","info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/241526/EU//EUTRIGTREAT"],["dc.relation","info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/602299/EU//EU-CERT-ICD"],["dc.relation.issn","2352-3409"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Data on differential multivariable risk prediction of appropriate shock vs. competing mortality"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","182"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","ESC Heart Failure"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","193"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Sticherling, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Willems, Rik"],["dc.contributor.author","Lubinski, Andrzej"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauer, Axel"],["dc.contributor.author","Bergau, Leonard"],["dc.contributor.author","Braunschweig, Frieder"],["dc.contributor.author","Brugada, Josep"],["dc.contributor.author","Brusich, Sandro"],["dc.contributor.author","Conen, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Cygankiewicz, Iwona"],["dc.contributor.author","Flevari, Panagiota"],["dc.contributor.author","Taborsky, Milos"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Jim"],["dc.contributor.author","Hasenfuß, Gerd"],["dc.contributor.author","Hatala, Robert"],["dc.contributor.author","Huikuri, Heikki V"],["dc.contributor.author","Iovev, Svetoslav"],["dc.contributor.author","Kääb, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaliska, Gabriela"],["dc.contributor.author","Kasprzak, Jaroslaw D"],["dc.contributor.author","Lüthje, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Malik, Marek"],["dc.contributor.author","Novotny, Tomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Pavlović, Nikola"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Georg"],["dc.contributor.author","Shalganov, Tchavdar"],["dc.contributor.author","Sritharan, Rajeeva"],["dc.contributor.author","Schlögl, Simon"],["dc.contributor.author","Szavits Nossan, Janko"],["dc.contributor.author","Traykov, Vassil"],["dc.contributor.author","Tuinenburg, Anton E"],["dc.contributor.author","Velchev, Vasil"],["dc.contributor.author","Vos, Marc A"],["dc.contributor.author","Willich, Stefan N"],["dc.contributor.author","Friede, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup"],["dc.contributor.author","Merkely, Béla"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:50:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:50:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","AIMS: The clinical effectiveness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is under debate. The EUropean Comparative Effectiveness Research to Assess the Use of Primary ProphylacTic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (EU-CERT-ICD) aims to assess its current clinical value. METHODS AND RESULTS: The EU-CERT-ICD is a prospective investigator-initiated non-randomized, controlled, multicentre observational cohort study performed in 44 centres across 15 European Union countries. We will recruit 2250 patients with ischaemic or dilated cardiomyopathy and a guideline indication for primary prophylactic ICD implantation. This sample will include 1500 patients at their first ICD implantation and 750 patients who did not receive a primary prevention ICD despite having an indication for it (non-randomized control group). The primary endpoint is all-cause mortality; the co-primary endpoint in ICD patients is time to first appropriate shock. Secondary endpoints include sudden cardiac death, first inappropriate shock, any ICD shock, arrhythmogenic syncope, revision procedures, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. At baseline (and prior to ICD implantation if applicable), all patients undergo 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and Holter ECG analysis using multiple advanced methods for risk stratification as well as detailed documentation of clinical characteristics and laboratory values. Genetic biobanking is also organized. As of August 2018, baseline data of 2265 patients are complete. All subjects will be followed for up to 4.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The EU-CERT-ICD study will provide a necessary update about clinical effectiveness of primary prophylactic ICD implantation. This study also aims for improved risk stratification and patient selection using clinical and ECG risk markers."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/ehf2.12367"],["dc.identifier.pmid","30299600"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15947"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59780"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation","info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/602299/EU//EU-CERT-ICD"],["dc.relation.issn","2055-5822"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.subject.mesh","Cardiomyopathy, Dilated"],["dc.subject.mesh","Death, Sudden, Cardiac"],["dc.subject.mesh","Defibrillators, Implantable"],["dc.subject.mesh","Electrocardiography"],["dc.subject.mesh","Europe"],["dc.subject.mesh","Follow-Up Studies"],["dc.subject.mesh","Humans"],["dc.subject.mesh","Patient Selection"],["dc.subject.mesh","Primary Prevention"],["dc.subject.mesh","Prospective Studies"],["dc.subject.mesh","Quality of Life"],["dc.subject.mesh","Risk Assessment"],["dc.subject.mesh","Survival Rate"],["dc.subject.mesh","Treatment Outcome"],["dc.title","Rationale and design of the EU-CERT-ICD prospective study: comparative effectiveness of prophylactic ICD implantation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e12794"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","25"],["dc.contributor.author","Vandenberk, Bert"],["dc.contributor.author","Floré, Vincent"],["dc.contributor.author","Röver, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Vos, Mark A"],["dc.contributor.author","Dunnink, Albert"],["dc.contributor.author","Leftheriotis, Dionyssios"],["dc.contributor.author","Friede, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Flevari, Panagiota"],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Willems, Rik"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-11-21T17:16:10Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-10-27T13:22:20Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-11-21T17:16:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-10-27T13:22:20Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020-08-17"],["dc.description.abstract","BACKGROUND: Noninvasive risk stratification aims to detect abnormalities in the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying ventricular arrhythmias. We studied the predictive value of repeating risk stratification in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). METHODS: The EUTrigTreat clinical study was a prospective multicenter trial including ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies and arrhythmogenic heart disease. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (LVEF), premature ventricular complexes >400/24 hr (PVC), non-negative microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA), and abnormal heart rate turbulence (HRT) were considered high risk. Tests were repeated within 12 months after inclusion. Adjusted Cox regression analysis was performed for mortality and appropriate ICD shocks. RESULTS: In total, 635 patients had analyzable baseline data with a median follow-up of 4.4 years. Worsening of LVEF was associated with increased mortality (HR 3.59, 95% CI 1.17-11.04), as was consistent abnormal HRT (HR 8.34, 95%CI 1.06-65.54). HRT improvement was associated with improved survival when compared to consistent abnormal HRT (HR 0.10, 95%CI 0.01-0.82). For appropriate ICD shocks, a non-negative MTWA test or high PVC count at any moment was associated with increased arrhythmic risk independent of the evolution of test results (worsening: HR 3.76 (95%CI 1.43-9.88) and HR 2.50 (95%CI 1.15-5.46); improvement: HR 2.80 (95%CI 1.03-7.61) and HR 2.45 (95%CI 1.07-5.62); consistent: HR 2.47 (95%CI 0.95-6.45) and HR 2.40 (95%CI 1.33-4.33), respectively). LVEF improvement was associated with a lower arrhythmic risk (HR 0.34, 95%CI 0.12-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Repeating LVEF and HRT improved the prediction of mortality, whereas stratification of ventricular arrhythmias may be improved by repeating LVEF measurements, MTWA and ECG Holter monitoring."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/anec.12794"],["dc.identifier.pmid","32804415"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17657"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/92087"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1542-474X"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Universitätsmedizin Göttingen"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Repeating noninvasive risk stratification improves prediction of outcome in ICD patients."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]