Schuldt, Andreas

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","521"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Functional Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","534"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Staab, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Liu, Xiaojuan"],["dc.contributor.author","Assmann, Thorsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Bruelheide, Helge"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Durka, Walter"],["dc.contributor.author","Erfmeier, Alexandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Klein, Alexandra‐Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Ma, Keping"],["dc.contributor.author","Michalski, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmid, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Schuldt, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.editor","Koricheva, Julia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:24:17Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:24:17Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/1365-2435.13722"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/81233"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1365-2435"],["dc.relation.issn","0269-8463"],["dc.title","Tree phylogenetic diversity structures multitrophic communities"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","907"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","ZooKeys"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","927"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","1044"],["dc.contributor.author","Zumstein, Pascale"],["dc.contributor.author","Bruelheide, Helge"],["dc.contributor.author","Fichtner, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Schuldt, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Staab, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Härdtle, Werner"],["dc.contributor.author","Zhou, Hongzhang"],["dc.contributor.author","Assmann, Thorsten"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-09-01T06:43:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-09-01T06:43:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","As woody plants provide much of the trophic basis for food webs in forests their species richness, but also stand age and numerous further variables such as vegetation structure, soil properties and elevation can shape assemblages of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). However, the combined impact of these numerous variables on ground beetle diversity and community structure has rarely been studied simultaneously. Therefore, ground beetles were studied in 27 plots in a highly diverse and structurally heterogeneous subtropical forest ecosystem, the Gutianshan National Park (southeast China) using pitfall traps and flight interception traps. Both trapping methods collected partly overlapping species spectra. The arboreal fauna was dominated by lebiines and to a smaller extent by tiger beetles and platynines; the epigeic fauna comprised mostly representatives of the genus Carabus and numerous tribes, especially anisodactylines, pterostichines, and sphodrines. Ground beetle species richness, abundance, and biomass of the pitfall trap catches were analyzed with generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), fitted with seven environmental variables. Four of these variables influenced the ground beetle assemblages: Canopy cover, herb cover, pH-value of the topsoil and elevation. Contrary to our expectations, woody plant species richness and stand age did not significantly affect ground beetle assemblages. Thus, ground beetles seem to respond differently to environmental variables than ants and spiders, two other predominantly predatory arthropod groups that were studied on the same plots in our study area and which showed distinct relationships with woody plant richness. Our results highlight the need to study a wider range of taxa to achieve a better understanding of how environmental changes affect species assemblages and their functioning in forest ecosystems."],["dc.description.abstract","As woody plants provide much of the trophic basis for food webs in forests their species richness, but also stand age and numerous further variables such as vegetation structure, soil properties and elevation can shape assemblages of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). However, the combined impact of these numerous variables on ground beetle diversity and community structure has rarely been studied simultaneously. Therefore, ground beetles were studied in 27 plots in a highly diverse and structurally heterogeneous subtropical forest ecosystem, the Gutianshan National Park (southeast China) using pitfall traps and flight interception traps. Both trapping methods collected partly overlapping species spectra. The arboreal fauna was dominated by lebiines and to a smaller extent by tiger beetles and platynines; the epigeic fauna comprised mostly representatives of the genus Carabus and numerous tribes, especially anisodactylines, pterostichines, and sphodrines. Ground beetle species richness, abundance, and biomass of the pitfall trap catches were analyzed with generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), fitted with seven environmental variables. Four of these variables influenced the ground beetle assemblages: Canopy cover, herb cover, pH-value of the topsoil and elevation. Contrary to our expectations, woody plant species richness and stand age did not significantly affect ground beetle assemblages. Thus, ground beetles seem to respond differently to environmental variables than ants and spiders, two other predominantly predatory arthropod groups that were studied on the same plots in our study area and which showed distinct relationships with woody plant richness. Our results highlight the need to study a wider range of taxa to achieve a better understanding of how environmental changes affect species assemblages and their functioning in forest ecosystems."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3897/zookeys.1044.63803"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89199"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-455"],["dc.relation.eissn","1313-2970"],["dc.relation.issn","1313-2989"],["dc.title","What shapes ground beetle assemblages in a tree species-rich subtropical forest?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e78703"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","eLife"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Tang, Ting"],["dc.contributor.author","Zhang, Naili"],["dc.contributor.author","Bongers, Franca J"],["dc.contributor.author","Staab, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Schuldt, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Fornoff, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Lin, Hong"],["dc.contributor.author","Cavender-Bares, Jeannine"],["dc.contributor.author","Hipp, Andrew L"],["dc.contributor.author","Li, Shan"],["dc.contributor.author","Liu, Xiaojuan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-12-01T08:31:50Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-12-01T08:31:50Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.abstract","Addressing global biodiversity loss requires an expanded focus on multiple dimensions of biodiversity. While most studies have focused on the consequences of plant interspecific diversity, our mechanistic understanding of how genetic diversity within plant species affects plant productivity remains limited. Here, we use a tree species × genetic diversity experiment to disentangle the effects of species diversity and genetic diversity, and how they are related to tree functional diversity and trophic feedbacks. We found that tree species diversity increased tree productivity via increased tree functional diversity, reduced soil fungal diversity and marginally reduced herbivory. The effects of tree genetic diversity on productivity via functional diversity and soil fungal diversity were negative in monocultures but positive in the mixture of the four tree species tested. Given the complexity of interactions between species and genetic diversity, tree functional diversity and trophic feedbacks on productivity, we suggest that both tree species and genetic diversity should be considered in afforestation."],["dc.description.sponsorship"," National Natural Science Foundation of China http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," National Natural Science Foundation of China http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Younth Innovation Promotion Association CAS"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.7554/eLife.78703"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/118280"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-621"],["dc.relation.eissn","2050-084X"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Tree species and genetic diversity increase productivity via functional diversity and trophic feedbacks"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","68"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Environmental and Experimental Botany"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","69"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","152"],["dc.contributor.author","Grossman, Jake J."],["dc.contributor.author","Vanhellemont, Margot"],["dc.contributor.author","Barsoum, Nadia"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauhus, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Bruelheide, Helge"],["dc.contributor.author","Castagneyrol, Bastien"],["dc.contributor.author","Cavender-Bares, Jeannine"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Ferlian, Olga"],["dc.contributor.author","Gravel, Dominique"],["dc.contributor.author","Hector, Andy"],["dc.contributor.author","Jactel, Hervé"],["dc.contributor.author","Kreft, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Mereu, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Messier, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Muys, Bart"],["dc.contributor.author","Nock, Charles"],["dc.contributor.author","Paquette, Alain"],["dc.contributor.author","Parker, John"],["dc.contributor.author","Perring, Michael P."],["dc.contributor.author","Ponette, Quentin"],["dc.contributor.author","Reich, Peter B."],["dc.contributor.author","Schuldt, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Staab, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Weih, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Zemp, Delphine Clara"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer-Lorenzen, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Verheyen, Kris"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-03-13T14:06:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-03-13T14:06:35Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","Despite considerable research demonstrating that biodiversity increases productivity in forests and regulates herbivory and pathogen damage, there remain gaps in our understanding of the shape, magnitude, and generality of these biodiversity-ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships. Here, we review findings from TreeDivNet, a global network of 25 tree diversity experiments, on relationships between levels of biodiversity and (a) tree growth and survival and (b) damage to trees from pests and pathogens. Tree diversity often improved the survival and above- and belowground growth of young trees. The mechanistic bases of the diversity effects on tree growth and survival include both selection effects (i.e., an increasing impact of particular species in more species-rich communities) and complementary effects (e.g. related to resource differentiation and facilitation). Plant traits and abiotic stressors may mediate these relationships. Studies of the responses of invertebrate and vertebrate herbivory and pathogen damage have demonstrated that trees in more diverse experimental plots may experience more, less, or similar damage compared to conspecific trees in less diverse plots. Documented mechanisms producing these patterns include changes in concentration, frequency, and apparency of hosts; herbivore and pathogen diet breadth; the spatial scale of interactions; and herbivore and pathogen regulation by natural enemies. Our review of findings from TreeDivNet indicates that tree diversity experiments are extending BEF research across systems and scales, complementing previous BEF work in grasslands by providing opportunities to use remote sensing and spectral approaches to study BEF dynamics, integrate belowground and aboveground approaches, and trace the consequences of tree physiology for ecosystem functioning. This extension of BEF research into tree-dominated systems is improving ecologists’ capacity to understand the mechanistic bases behind BEF relationships. Tree diversity experiments also present opportunities for novel research. Since experimental tree diversity plantations enable measurements at tree, neighbourhood and plot level, they allow for explicit consideration of temporal and spatial scales in BEF dynamics. Presently, most TreeDivNet experiments have run for less than ten years. Given the longevity of trees, exciting results on BEF relationships are expected in the future."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.12.015"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/13007"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation","SFB 990: Ökologische und sozioökonomische Funktionen tropischer Tieflandregenwald-Transformationssysteme (Sumatra, Indonesien)"],["dc.relation","SFB 990 | B | B11: Biodiversitäts-Anreicherung in Ölpalmen-Plantagen: Pflanzliche Sukzession und Integration"],["dc.subject.gro","sfb990_reviews"],["dc.title","Synthesis and future research directions linking tree diversity to growth, survival, and damage in a global network of tree diversity experiments"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","243"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Current Forestry Reports"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","259"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Staab, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Schuldt, Andreas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:24:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:24:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s40725-020-00123-6"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/81368"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","2198-6436"],["dc.title","The Influence of Tree Diversity on Natural Enemies—a Review of the “Enemies” Hypothesis in Forests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]