Komainda, Martin

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","173"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Journal of Agricultural Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","184"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","158"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:26:48Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:26:48Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1017/S0021859620000428"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/82081"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1469-5146"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-8596"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.title","Effects of functional traits of perennial ryegrass cultivars on forage quality in mixtures and pure stands"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Annals of Applied Biology"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Schmiedgen, Andrea; 1\r\nDepartment of Crop Sciences, Grassland Science\r\nGeorg‐August‐University Göttingen\r\nGöttingen Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Kowalski, Katja; 3\r\nGeography Department\r\nHumboldt‐Universität zu Berlin\r\nBerlin Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Hostert, Patrick; 3\r\nGeography Department\r\nHumboldt‐Universität zu Berlin\r\nBerlin Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Tonn, Bettina; 1\r\nDepartment of Crop Sciences, Grassland Science\r\nGeorg‐August‐University Göttingen\r\nGöttingen Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Kayser, Manfred; 1\r\nDepartment of Crop Sciences, Grassland Science\r\nGeorg‐August‐University Göttingen\r\nGöttingen Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Isselstein, Johannes; 1\r\nDepartment of Crop Sciences, Grassland Science\r\nGeorg‐August‐University Göttingen\r\nGöttingen Germany"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmiedgen, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Kowalski, Katja"],["dc.contributor.author","Hostert, Patrick"],["dc.contributor.author","Tonn, Bettina"],["dc.contributor.author","Kayser, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:28:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:28:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.date.updated","2022-02-09T13:21:03Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract In agricultural grassland, high herbage utilisation efficiency (HEFF), which is the proportion of gross live‐green herbage production that is utilised before entering senescence, is ensured by frequent defoliation. The decision upon which defoliation frequency to apply depends on the farming intensity. Assuming a reduced total herbage accumulation near trees in silvopastoral systems, frequent defoliations with high HEFF become less worthwhile—at least in specific spatial configurations. This makes an extensive management near trees an interesting option because it promotes other grassland‐related ecosystem services such as biodiversity. The present study first analysed the interaction between defoliation frequency and position to trees on the total, dead and live herbage accumulation and the HEFF at two silvopastoral sites with short‐rotation coppices in Germany. In addition, the total grassland–tree interface in Germany was assessed from land use and land cover maps of Germany based on satellite data to approximate the potential of grassland extensification near trees. The total herbage accumulation near trees declined by up to 41% but the HEFF was not affected by the position. Consequently, any intensification is not paid‐off by adequate productivity and herbage quality in terms of HEFF and tree‐related losses in herbage accumulation are expected up to a distance of 4.5–6 m. Applying a 4.5 m border on satellite data, we found that up to 4.4% (approximately 2200 km2) of the total grassland area in Germany is at a tree interface and potentially suitable for extensification. These findings indicate substantial potential for biodiversity conservation in grasslands with low trade‐off for high‐quality yield."],["dc.description.abstract","Herbage production in silvopastoral grassland is limited because of shade close to the tree lines. That makes an intensive defoliation frequency not worthwhile because it is not paid off by high yields. This makes other grassland‐related ecosystem services near trees attractive. We estimate that 4.4% of the German grassland is close to tree lines offering potential for extensification. image"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/aab.12681"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/82581"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.publisher","Blackwell Publishing Ltd"],["dc.relation.eissn","1744-7348"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-4746"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made."],["dc.title","Impacts of cutting frequency and position to tree line on herbage accumulation in silvopastoral grassland reveal potential for grassland conservation based on land use and cover information"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","2125"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature Communications"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","12"],["dc.contributor.author","Tonn, Bettina"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-09-01T06:42:24Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-09-01T06:42:24Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41467-021-22309-7"],["dc.identifier.pii","22309"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89047"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-455"],["dc.relation.eissn","2041-1723"],["dc.title","Results from a biodiversity experiment fail to represent economic performance of semi-natural grasslands"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in sustainable food systems"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","3"],["dc.contributor.author","Jerrentrup, Jana Sabrina"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Seither, Melanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Cuchillo-Hilario, Mario"],["dc.contributor.author","Wrage-Mönnig, Nicole"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:46:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:46:53Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.description.abstract","Increasing sward phytodiversity has been suggested as having potential to increase primary production of grasslands, but whether any such gains are converted into secondary production, through improved performance of grazing livestock, remains uncertain. Animal production by cattle and sheep can also be enhanced by mixed-grazing. To our knowledge, this effect has never been studied in relation to differences in sward phytodiversity. Therefore, a rotational grazing experiment was conducted over 5 years (2007–2011) on permanent grassland in Germany using sheep and cattle in mono- (single-species) or mixed-grazing of swards differing in plant species richness. Herbicides against dicotyledonous plant species were used to create different sward types: species-poor, grass-dominated swards in contrast to untreated “diverse” control swards. We found no differences in herbage production between the sward types. However, compared to the grass-dominated sward, the diverse sward showed greater concentrations of crude protein and lower contents of acid detergent fiber in the herbage dry-matter. Lamb live weight gains were slightly greater on the diverse-swards (P \\u0026lt; 0.05), but calf performance was unaffected by sward type. Mixed-grazing increased daily average live weight gains of suckler cows (g cow−1 d−1) (P \\u0026lt; 0.05) as well as area-related daily live weight gains (kg ha−1 d−1) and total live weight gains (kg ha−1) during the complete grazing season (P \\u0026lt; 0.001). This indicates advantages of combining livestock species, attributed to complementary pasture use. We suggest that mixed-grazing of cattle and sheep on phytodiverse swards is an effective and sustainable means to enhance ecological and agronomic traits such as livestock production and plant species conservation. Lamb production especially showed benefits under mixed-grazing, with a 17% increase in live weight gain. Compared to the grass-dominated sward, diverse swards resulted in an average 12% increase of live weight gains (across grazing systems and livestock species)."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/fsufs.2019.00125"],["dc.identifier.eissn","2571-581X"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17321"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/78578"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.eissn","2571-581X"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Diverse Swards and Mixed-Grazing of Cattle and Sheep for Improved Productivity"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","100614"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","animal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","16"],["dc.contributor.author","Hamidi, D."],["dc.contributor.author","Grinnell, N.A."],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Riesch, F."],["dc.contributor.author","Horn, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Traulsen, I."],["dc.contributor.author","Palme, R."],["dc.contributor.author","Hamidi, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, J."],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-09-01T09:49:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-09-01T09:49:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.animal.2022.100614"],["dc.identifier.pii","S1751731122001677"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/113429"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-597"],["dc.relation.issn","1751-7311"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","Heifers don't care: no evidence of negative impact on animal welfare of growing heifers when using virtual fences compared to physical fences for grazing"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","S2212096321000917"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","100362"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Climate Risk Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","34"],["dc.contributor.author","Lamega, Sala Alanda"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoffmann, Munir Paul"],["dc.contributor.author","Ayisi, Kingsley Kwabena"],["dc.contributor.author","Odhiambo, Jude Julius Owuor"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-01T09:23:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-01T09:23:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.crm.2021.100362"],["dc.identifier.pii","S2212096321000917"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/94685"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-478"],["dc.relation.issn","2212-0963"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Department für Nutzpflanzenwissenschaften"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","It depends on the rain: Smallholder farmers’ perceptions on the seasonality of feed gaps and how it affects livestock in semi-arid and arid regions in Southern Africa"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","126116"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Agronomy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","119"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Küchenmeister, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Küchenmeister, Kai"],["dc.contributor.author","Kayser, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Wrage-Mönnig, Nicole"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:23:29Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:23:29Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.eja.2020.126116"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/80934"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.issn","1161-0301"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.title","Drought tolerance is determined by species identity and functional group diversity rather than by species diversity within multi-species swards"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","1155"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Scientific Reports"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","12"],["dc.contributor.author","Nölke, Isabelle"],["dc.contributor.author","Tonn, Bettina"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Heshmati, Sara"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-02-01T10:31:12Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-02-01T10:31:12Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.abstract","Legume-based forage plant mixtures are known to increase biomass production over the mixture species grown as pure stands (overyielding), which has partly been attributed to enhanced nitrogen availability by legumes. However, the relative importance of underlying processes of these positive diversity effects and their drivers are not fully understood. Here we assessed if outcome and causes of diversity effects depend on the legume-species genetic identity. Over five years, we cultivated different white clover (Trifolium repens) populations, a grass and forb species in pure stands and clover-based mixtures and recorded biomass yield. Complementarity and selection effects of mixtures and relative yields of mixture species were calculated based on both unfertilized and nitrogen-fertilized non-leguminous pure stands. Results showed that the clover population altered the overall strength of diversity effects as well as the direction and magnitude of their temporal trends, at least for the grass component of mixtures. Differences in diversity effects between clover populations diminished when fertilized instead of unfertilized non-leguminous pure stands were considered. Hence, a part of these differences likely results from dissimilar effects of clover populations on nitrogen availability. The findings reveal the possibility to improve overyielding of legume-based forage plant mixtures by decisions on legume-species genetic identity."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41598-022-05100-6"],["dc.identifier.pii","5100"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/98801"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-517"],["dc.relation.eissn","2045-2322"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","The choice of the white clover population alters overyielding of mixtures with perennial ryegrass and chicory and underlying processes"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","S1161030121001337"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","126362"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Agronomy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","130"],["dc.contributor.author","Nölke, Isabelle"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Tonn, Bettina"],["dc.contributor.author","Feuerstein, Ulf"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-10-01T09:57:31Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-10-01T09:57:31Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.eja.2021.126362"],["dc.identifier.pii","S1161030121001337"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89855"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-469"],["dc.relation.issn","1161-0301"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.title","Including chicory and selecting white clover varieties as strategies to improve temporal stability of forage yield and quality in white-clover-based temporary grassland"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Küchenmeister, Kai"],["dc.contributor.author","Küchenmeister, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Breitsameter, Laura"],["dc.contributor.author","Wrage-Mönnig, Nicole"],["dc.contributor.author","Kayser, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-31T08:40:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-31T08:40:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Dairy livestock production systems rely on high‐quality forage legumes, which are widely present in grassland swards all over Europe. A future climatic scenario with higher average annual temperatures and lower precipitation is expected to affect grassland productivity in general and the productivity of the most important forage legume species Trifolium repens in particular. One way to cope with such constraints is the adoption of currently underutilized minor legume species with a higher tolerance towards drought stress. Therefore, the present study investigated legume species with lower moisture requirements than T. repens, these are Lotus corniculatus, Medicago falcata, Medicago lupulina and Onobrychis viciifolia in comparison with T. repens. Legumes were grown in containers as monocultures in a roofed open‐sided greenhouse under conditions of optimal water supply or periodic drought stress. Generally, drought stress decreased the biomass production, but species differed in their reaction. Particularly, M. lupulina and L. corniculatus had lower relative biomass losses (−26%) compared to T. repens (−43%, as averaged over drought stress periods). However, in overall biomass production T. repens still was at one level with M. lupulina and L. corniculatus under drought stress. This was related to high stomata control as indicated by the intrinsic water‐use efficiency. We conclude that there are promising future options of forage legumes as alternatives to T. repens."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/jac.12337"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/62229"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0931-2250"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.title","Forage legumes for future dry climates: Lower relative biomass losses of minor forage legumes compared to Trifolium repens under conditions of periodic drought stress"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]