Options
Komainda, Martin
Loading...
Preferred name
Komainda, Martin
Official Name
Komainda, Martin
Alternative Name
Komainda, M.
Main Affiliation
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
2021Journal Article Research Paper [["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Annals of Applied Biology"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Schmiedgen, Andrea; 1\r\nDepartment of Crop Sciences, Grassland Science\r\nGeorg‐August‐University Göttingen\r\nGöttingen Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Kowalski, Katja; 3\r\nGeography Department\r\nHumboldt‐Universität zu Berlin\r\nBerlin Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Hostert, Patrick; 3\r\nGeography Department\r\nHumboldt‐Universität zu Berlin\r\nBerlin Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Tonn, Bettina; 1\r\nDepartment of Crop Sciences, Grassland Science\r\nGeorg‐August‐University Göttingen\r\nGöttingen Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Kayser, Manfred; 1\r\nDepartment of Crop Sciences, Grassland Science\r\nGeorg‐August‐University Göttingen\r\nGöttingen Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Isselstein, Johannes; 1\r\nDepartment of Crop Sciences, Grassland Science\r\nGeorg‐August‐University Göttingen\r\nGöttingen Germany"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmiedgen, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Kowalski, Katja"],["dc.contributor.author","Hostert, Patrick"],["dc.contributor.author","Tonn, Bettina"],["dc.contributor.author","Kayser, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:28:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:28:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.date.updated","2022-02-09T13:21:03Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract In agricultural grassland, high herbage utilisation efficiency (HEFF), which is the proportion of gross live‐green herbage production that is utilised before entering senescence, is ensured by frequent defoliation. The decision upon which defoliation frequency to apply depends on the farming intensity. Assuming a reduced total herbage accumulation near trees in silvopastoral systems, frequent defoliations with high HEFF become less worthwhile—at least in specific spatial configurations. This makes an extensive management near trees an interesting option because it promotes other grassland‐related ecosystem services such as biodiversity. The present study first analysed the interaction between defoliation frequency and position to trees on the total, dead and live herbage accumulation and the HEFF at two silvopastoral sites with short‐rotation coppices in Germany. In addition, the total grassland–tree interface in Germany was assessed from land use and land cover maps of Germany based on satellite data to approximate the potential of grassland extensification near trees. The total herbage accumulation near trees declined by up to 41% but the HEFF was not affected by the position. Consequently, any intensification is not paid‐off by adequate productivity and herbage quality in terms of HEFF and tree‐related losses in herbage accumulation are expected up to a distance of 4.5–6 m. Applying a 4.5 m border on satellite data, we found that up to 4.4% (approximately 2200 km2) of the total grassland area in Germany is at a tree interface and potentially suitable for extensification. These findings indicate substantial potential for biodiversity conservation in grasslands with low trade‐off for high‐quality yield."],["dc.description.abstract","Herbage production in silvopastoral grassland is limited because of shade close to the tree lines. That makes an intensive defoliation frequency not worthwhile because it is not paid off by high yields. This makes other grassland‐related ecosystem services near trees attractive. We estimate that 4.4% of the German grassland is close to tree lines offering potential for extensification. image"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/aab.12681"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/82581"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.publisher","Blackwell Publishing Ltd"],["dc.relation.eissn","1744-7348"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-4746"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made."],["dc.title","Impacts of cutting frequency and position to tree line on herbage accumulation in silvopastoral grassland reveal potential for grassland conservation based on land use and cover information"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2020Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in sustainable food systems"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","3"],["dc.contributor.author","Jerrentrup, Jana Sabrina"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Seither, Melanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Cuchillo-Hilario, Mario"],["dc.contributor.author","Wrage-Mönnig, Nicole"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:46:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:46:53Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.description.abstract","Increasing sward phytodiversity has been suggested as having potential to increase primary production of grasslands, but whether any such gains are converted into secondary production, through improved performance of grazing livestock, remains uncertain. Animal production by cattle and sheep can also be enhanced by mixed-grazing. To our knowledge, this effect has never been studied in relation to differences in sward phytodiversity. Therefore, a rotational grazing experiment was conducted over 5 years (2007–2011) on permanent grassland in Germany using sheep and cattle in mono- (single-species) or mixed-grazing of swards differing in plant species richness. Herbicides against dicotyledonous plant species were used to create different sward types: species-poor, grass-dominated swards in contrast to untreated “diverse” control swards. We found no differences in herbage production between the sward types. However, compared to the grass-dominated sward, the diverse sward showed greater concentrations of crude protein and lower contents of acid detergent fiber in the herbage dry-matter. Lamb live weight gains were slightly greater on the diverse-swards (P \\u0026lt; 0.05), but calf performance was unaffected by sward type. Mixed-grazing increased daily average live weight gains of suckler cows (g cow−1 d−1) (P \\u0026lt; 0.05) as well as area-related daily live weight gains (kg ha−1 d−1) and total live weight gains (kg ha−1) during the complete grazing season (P \\u0026lt; 0.001). This indicates advantages of combining livestock species, attributed to complementary pasture use. We suggest that mixed-grazing of cattle and sheep on phytodiverse swards is an effective and sustainable means to enhance ecological and agronomic traits such as livestock production and plant species conservation. Lamb production especially showed benefits under mixed-grazing, with a 17% increase in live weight gain. Compared to the grass-dominated sward, diverse swards resulted in an average 12% increase of live weight gains (across grazing systems and livestock species)."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/fsufs.2019.00125"],["dc.identifier.eissn","2571-581X"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17321"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/78578"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.eissn","2571-581X"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Diverse Swards and Mixed-Grazing of Cattle and Sheep for Improved Productivity"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2022Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","100614"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","animal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","16"],["dc.contributor.author","Hamidi, D."],["dc.contributor.author","Grinnell, N.A."],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Riesch, F."],["dc.contributor.author","Horn, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Traulsen, I."],["dc.contributor.author","Palme, R."],["dc.contributor.author","Hamidi, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, J."],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-09-01T09:49:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-09-01T09:49:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.animal.2022.100614"],["dc.identifier.pii","S1751731122001677"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/113429"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-597"],["dc.relation.issn","1751-7311"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","Heifers don't care: no evidence of negative impact on animal welfare of growing heifers when using virtual fences compared to physical fences for grazing"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2021Journal Article Research Paper [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","S2212096321000917"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","100362"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Climate Risk Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","34"],["dc.contributor.author","Lamega, Sala Alanda"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoffmann, Munir Paul"],["dc.contributor.author","Ayisi, Kingsley Kwabena"],["dc.contributor.author","Odhiambo, Jude Julius Owuor"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-01T09:23:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-01T09:23:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.crm.2021.100362"],["dc.identifier.pii","S2212096321000917"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/94685"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-478"],["dc.relation.issn","2212-0963"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Department für Nutzpflanzenwissenschaften"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","It depends on the rain: Smallholder farmers’ perceptions on the seasonality of feed gaps and how it affects livestock in semi-arid and arid regions in Southern Africa"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2022Journal Article Research Paper [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","1155"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Scientific Reports"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","12"],["dc.contributor.author","Nölke, Isabelle"],["dc.contributor.author","Tonn, Bettina"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Heshmati, Sara"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-02-01T10:31:12Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-02-01T10:31:12Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.abstract","Legume-based forage plant mixtures are known to increase biomass production over the mixture species grown as pure stands (overyielding), which has partly been attributed to enhanced nitrogen availability by legumes. However, the relative importance of underlying processes of these positive diversity effects and their drivers are not fully understood. Here we assessed if outcome and causes of diversity effects depend on the legume-species genetic identity. Over five years, we cultivated different white clover (Trifolium repens) populations, a grass and forb species in pure stands and clover-based mixtures and recorded biomass yield. Complementarity and selection effects of mixtures and relative yields of mixture species were calculated based on both unfertilized and nitrogen-fertilized non-leguminous pure stands. Results showed that the clover population altered the overall strength of diversity effects as well as the direction and magnitude of their temporal trends, at least for the grass component of mixtures. Differences in diversity effects between clover populations diminished when fertilized instead of unfertilized non-leguminous pure stands were considered. Hence, a part of these differences likely results from dissimilar effects of clover populations on nitrogen availability. The findings reveal the possibility to improve overyielding of legume-based forage plant mixtures by decisions on legume-species genetic identity."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41598-022-05100-6"],["dc.identifier.pii","5100"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/98801"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-517"],["dc.relation.eissn","2045-2322"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","The choice of the white clover population alters overyielding of mixtures with perennial ryegrass and chicory and underlying processes"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2021Journal Article Research Paper [["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in Veterinary Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Hamidi, Dina"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Tonn, Bettina"],["dc.contributor.author","Harbers, Jens"],["dc.contributor.author","Grinnell, Natascha Alexandria"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-06-01T09:42:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-06-01T09:42:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Extensively grazed semi-natural grasslands contribute to a wide range of ecosystem services, including the preservation of biodiversity and provision of livestock feed. Depending on the grazing intensity, cattle are set in motion to fulfill their nutritional needs. In this way, they influence the vegetation composition, while at the same time the foraging behavior is affected by the vegetation. A better understanding of the relationship between grazing intensity and animal behavior is an essential component for strategies to improve the value of semi-natural grasslands and for gaining insights for the development of smart farming technologies. The long-term cattle grazing experiment “FORBIOBEN” with its replicated three paddock-scale (1 ha) grazing intensities [moderate (M), lenient (L), very lenient (VL)] was used to investigate the movement behavior of suckler cows during four grazing periods between 2017 and 2020. For this, pregnant suckler cows (Fleckvieh) were equipped with Vectronics GPS Plus (VECTRONIC Aerospace GmbH, Berlin) collars, which recorded the position of the animals at defined time intervals. The main outcomes were that with an increase in the grazing intensity, the herbage on offer declined and, consequently the herbage allowance. However, the spatial heterogeneity of the herbage on offer decreased with increasing grazing intensity (M < VL) which means that the amount of available herbage was lower but more evenly distributed under moderate grazing. Further, there was a tendency that the moderate grazing intensity was associated with the highest effort of walking compared to lenient and very lenient grazing in three out of four grazing periods. We found a strong ( p < 0.001) negative correlation among walking distance vs. herbage variability across all treatments × periods. Consequently, the grazing intensity itself was not a good predictor of walking distances which were mainly a result of the available herbage, its distribution or heterogeneity. Future smart farming livestock management systems will, therefore, likely require interfaces with the grassland growth rates and heterogeneity benchmarks if decisions based on livestock movement should be reliable."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/fvets.2021.639096"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/85263"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-425"],["dc.relation.eissn","2297-1769"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.title","The Effect of Grazing Intensity and Sward Heterogeneity on the Movement Behavior of Suckler Cows on Semi-natural Grassland"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2021Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","89"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Grass and Forage Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","99"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","77"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Muto, Paul; 2\r\nOliver Seeds\r\nNorth East, Newcastle upon Tyne\r\nInkberrow UK"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Isselstein, Johannes; 1\r\nDepartment of Crop Sciences, Grassland Science\r\nGeorg‐August University Göttingen\r\nGöttingen Germany"],["dc.contributor.author","Komainda, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Muto, Paul"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-01T09:21:13Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-01T09:21:13Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.date.updated","2022-06-14T22:56:52Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Delayed harvest during different periods of the year may help to increase the multifunctionality in terms of simultaneous flowering resource and forage provision of ley grassland. Interaction effects of harvesting regime and the grass sward composition on herbage yield and quality were therefore investigated in two multispecies swards in the present study (a simple sward with five vs. a complex sward with 16 sown species) that lasted from the establishment phase (2017) over two main production years (2018 and 2019) until the subsequent cropping phase (2020) where legacy effects were analysed by growing annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum gaudini). A particular drought in the year 2018 affected the botanical composition which resulted in a lucerne‐dominated complex sward and a grass‐rich simple sward thwarting the initial aims of studying complex sward treatments. Extended regrowth in early summer increased herbage yield significantly while herbage quality, weighted over the respective periods, was hardly affected by harvesting regime. No consequence of the harvesting regime resulted during the subsequent cropping phase where the plots previously grown to the lucerne‐dominated complex sward resulted in significantly greater herbage dry‐matter yield, nitrogen yield and lower weed biomass. Overall, the interaction between harvesting management and grass sward composition was never significant. It is concluded that no negative consequence for herbage quality results at extended regrowth during part of the year. However, further studies comparing complex with simple multispecies swards should consider different soil types under more humid climate."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/gfs.12554"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/94380"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-478"],["dc.relation.eissn","1365-2494"],["dc.relation.issn","0142-5242"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made."],["dc.title","Interaction of multispecies sward composition and harvesting management on herbage yield and quality from establishment phase to the subsequent crop"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI