Sennhenn-Reulen, Holger

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","S1470160X22001637"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","108692"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecological Indicators"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","136"],["dc.contributor.author","Zeller, Laura"],["dc.contributor.author","Baumann, Charlotte"],["dc.contributor.author","Gonin, Pierre"],["dc.contributor.author","Heidrich, Lea"],["dc.contributor.author","Keye, Constanze"],["dc.contributor.author","Konrad, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Larrieu, Laurent"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Sennhenn-Reulen, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-04-01T10:00:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-04-01T10:00:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.abstract","Effects of forest management on forest biodiversity have received increasing attention in both research and forestry practice. Despite advances in technology, monitoring of biodiversity remains time and cost-intensive and requires specific taxonomic expertise. In forest management, however, there is increasing interest and need to integrate biodiversity monitoring into forest inventories efficiently to estimate the potential effects of forest management on biodiversity. Forest management systems can differ greatly depending on management goals and the intensity and frequency of the applied silvicultural interventions. To identify management effects on biodiversity, an estimation of biodiversity using forest structural attributes may be a reasonable approach. Forest structure can – compared to conventional species-based monitoring - easily be captured during forest inventories and does not require specific taxonomic expertise. The IBP (Index of Biodiversity Potential) is a composite index aiming to provide practitioners with an efficient tool for estimating biodiversity at the local level. We recorded the IBP on 147 plots in three regions of Germany, where detailed biodiversity monitoring had been conducted. This study quantified the relationship between changes in the IBP scores and changes in species richness for 13 taxonomic groups. To determine this, we analyzed estimated relationships between the IBP and species richness using a count regression model. We found positive estimated relationships with species richness of birds, fungi, true bugs, lichens, and moths in at least 3 of 5 examined forest types. However, for spiders, bats, carabids, necrophagous and saproxylic beetles, either no relationship with the IBP or estimated relationships with only one forest type were found. Changes in scores for the IBP’s factors number of vertical layers, large living trees, tree-related microhabitats, and proportion of gaps correlated with changes in the measured species richness in many cases. Even though the IBP is generally not adequate to predict actual presence or precise number of species, it can be utilized to depict a forest stand’s potential in terms of species richness. Due to its easy and time-efficient application, it could be a useful proxy used in combination with species-based monitoring approaches."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108692"],["dc.identifier.pii","S1470160X22001637"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/105563"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-530"],["dc.relation.issn","1470-160X"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","Index of biodiversity potential (IBP) versus direct species monitoring in temperate forests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature Conservation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","23"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Demant, Laura"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Sennhenn-Reulen, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Walentowski, Helge"],["dc.contributor.author","Bergmeier, Erwin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:51:20Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:51:20Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Setting operational conservation objectives is a major challenge for effective biodiversity conservation worldwide. To analyse forest conservation objectives in Germany in a transparent manner and to achieve a consistent and consensual framework, we systematically classified conservation objectives suggested in concepts by different stakeholders. We analysed 79 biodiversity and forest conservation concepts of different stakeholder groups at various scales and applied textual content analysis and Dirichlet regression to reach a high degree of transferability and applicability. Our analysis revealed a broad consensus concerning forest conservation across stakeholders and scales, albeit with slight differences in focus, but we detected a scale-related mismatch. A wide array of conservation objectives covered social, biotic and abiotic natural resources. Conservation of species, ecosystems and structural elements in forests were found to be of primary importance across stakeholders and scale levels. Shortcomings in the conservation concepts were found in addressing genetic diversity, abiotic resources and socio-cultural objectives. Our results show that problems in forest conservation may be rooted in trade-offs between aims, targeting mismatch across scale levels and insufficient implementation of objectives."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3897/natureconservation.35.35049"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16109"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59931"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.subject.ddc","570"],["dc.title","Seeking consensus in German forest conservation: An analysis of contemporary concepts"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]