Jung, Klaus

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","574"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","582"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","141"],["dc.contributor.author","Knoesel, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Bojes, Mariana"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Ziebolz, Dirk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:10:45Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:10:45Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Introduction: There is a paucity of information with regard to the susceptibility of iatrogenic white spot lesion formation after inattentive, surplus orthodontic etching with 30% phosphoric acid and the subsequent provision or absence of adequate oral hygiene. Methods: Ninety sound enamel specimens were randomly allocated to 6 trial groups (n = 15 each) for etching with 30% phosphoric acid for either 15 seconds and standardized daily enamel brushing or no brushing, etching for 30 seconds with daily brushing or no brushing, or nonetched controls with brushing or no brushing. Nutritive acidic assaults were simulated by demineralization cycles 3 times per day for 1 hour with interim storage in artificial saliva. Lesion depths in terms of percentage of fluorescence loss (delta F, delta Q) and lesion extension compared with the baseline were assessed by using quantitative light-induced fluorescence after 2, 7, 14, 21, and 42 days. Etching duration, trial time elapse, and oral hygiene, as well as the significance of factor interactions, were analyzed with 3-way analysis of variance (alpha - 5%). Results: The impact of the factors of enamel brushing, trial time elapse, and etching each had a comparably significant effect on lesion progression. The effect of surplus etching on white spot lesion formation was significantly enhanced by the simultaneous absence of enamel brushing and also the progression of trial time. The combination of 30 seconds of surplus etching with inadequate oral hygiene was especially detrimental. Conclusions: Excessive surplus orthodontic etching of the complete labial enamel surface, instead of the bracket bases only, must be avoided to prevent iatrogenic white spot lesions. Etching times not exceeding 15 seconds are favorable. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141:574-82)"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.11.017"],["dc.identifier.isi","000303606100019"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22554751"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/26563"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Mosby-elsevier"],["dc.relation.issn","0889-5406"],["dc.title","Increased susceptibility for white spot lesions by surplus orthodontic etching exceeding bracket base area"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","747"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Angle Orthodontist"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","754"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","79"],["dc.contributor.author","Knoesel, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Gripp-Rudolph, Liliam"],["dc.contributor.author","Attin, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Attin, Rengin"],["dc.contributor.author","Sadat-Khonsari, Reza"],["dc.contributor.author","Kubein-Meesenburg, Dietmar"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauss, Oskar"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:27:55Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:27:55Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: To test the null hypothesis that third-order measurements are not correlated to lingual incisor features seen on radiographs. Material and Methods: The lateral headfilms of 38 untreated, norm-occlusion subjects without incisor abrasions or restorations were used for third-order measurements of upper and lower central incisors and assessment of the inclination of four sites suitable for lingual bracket placement with reference to the occlusal plane perpendicular. Lingual sections were determined by the tangents at the incisal fossa (S1), at the transition plateau between incisal fossa and the cingulum (S2), by a constructed line reaching from the incisal tip to the cingulum (S3), and by a tangent at the cingulum convexity (S4). Third-order angles were also assessed on corresponding dental casts using an incisor inclination gauge. Regression analysis was performed using the third-order measurements of both methods as the dependent variables and the inclination of the lingual enamel sections (S1, S2, S3, S4) as the independent variables. Results: The null hypothesis was rejected. For the most common bracket application sites located on the lingual shovel (S1 and S2), third-order inclination changes of 0.4-0.7 degrees are expected for each degree of change in the inclination of the lingual surface. The impact of bracket placement errors on third-order angulation is similar between sections S1 and S2 and the cingulum convexity (S4). Section S3 proved to be least affected by interindividual variation. Conclusion: The third-order measurements are correlated to lingual incisor features. Accordingly, third-order changes resulting from variation in lingual bracket placement can be individually predicted from radiographic assessments. (Angle Orthod. 2009;79:747-754.)"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.2319/072308-385.1"],["dc.identifier.isi","000267712600019"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19537870"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/5790"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/16306"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","E H Angle Education Research Foundation, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-3219"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Changes in Incisor Third-Order Inclination Resulting from Vertical Variation in Lingual Bracket Placement"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","454"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Angle Orthodontist"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","461"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","79"],["dc.contributor.author","Knoesel, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Attin, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Engelke, Wilfried G. H."],["dc.contributor.author","Kubein-Meesenburg, Dietmar"],["dc.contributor.author","Gripp-Rudolph, Liliam"],["dc.contributor.author","Attin, Rengin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:30:05Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:30:05Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: To evaluate the significance of crown-root angles (CRAs) by testing the null hypothesis that there are no significant differences in deviations of third-order angles to axial inclination values between Angle Class II division 2 incisors and a neutral occlusion control sample. Materials and Methods: The study group comprised n(total) = 130 whites with either Angle Class II division 2 (n(1) = 62; group A) or neutral (n(2) = 68; control group B) occlusal relationships. Upper central incisor inclination (U1) was assessed with reference to the cephalometric lines NA and palatal plane (U1NA/deg, U1PP/deg). Craniofacial sagittal and vertical relations were classified using angles SNA, SNB, ANB, and NSL-PP. Third-order angles were derived from corresponding dental cast pairs using an incisor inclination gauge. Welch's two-sample t-tests (alpha-level:.05) were used to test the null hypothesis. Single linear regression was applied to determine third-order angle values as a function of axial inclination values (U1NA, U1PP) or sagittal craniofacial structures (ANB angle), separately for group A and B. Results: The discrepancy between axial inclination (U1NA, U1PP) and third-order angles is significantly different (P <.001) between groups A and B. Regression analysis revealed a simply moderate correlation between third-order measurements and axial inclinations or sagittal craniofacial structures. Conclusion: The hypothesis is rejected. The results of this study warn against the use of identical third-order angles irrespective of diminished CRAs typical for Angle Class II division 2 subjects. Routine CRA assessment may be considered in orthodontic treatment planning of Angle Class II division 2 cases. (Angle Orthod. 2009;79:454-461.)"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.2319/042508-234"],["dc.identifier.isi","000266052200008"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19413389"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/5785"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/16807"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-3219"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","On the Interaction between Incisor Crown-Root Morphology and Third-Order Angulation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","532"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Angle Orthodontist"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","539"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","81"],["dc.contributor.author","Knoesel, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Klaus"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:56:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:56:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: To assess the informational value, intention, source, and bias of videos related to orthodontics screened by the video-sharing Internet platform You Tube. Methods: You Tube (www.youtube.com) was scanned in July 2010 for orthodontics-related videos using an adequately defined search term. Each of the first 30 search results of the scan was categorized with the system-generated sorts \"by relevance\" and \"most viewed\" (total: 60). These were rated independently by three assessors, who completed a questionnaire for each video. The data were analyzed statistically using Friedman's test for dependent samples, Kendall's tau, and Fleiss's kappa. Results: The You Tube scan produced 5140 results. There was a wide variety of information about orthodontics available on You Tube, and the highest proportion of videos was found to originate from orthodontic patients. These videos were also the most viewed ones. The informational content of most of the videos was generally judged to be low, with a rather poor to inadequate representation of the orthodontic profession, although a moderately pro-orthodontics stance prevailed. It was noticeable that the majority of contributions of orthodontists to You Tube constituted advertising. This tendency was not viewed positively by the majority of You Tube users, as was evident in the divergence in the proportions when sorting by \"relevance\" and \"most viewed.\" Conclusion: In the light of the very large number of people using the Internet as their primary source of information, orthodontists should recognize the importance of You Tube and similar social media Web sites in the opinion-forming process, especially in the case of adolescents. (Angle Orthod. 2011;81:532-539.)"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.2319/091710-541.1"],["dc.identifier.isi","000289761800025"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21261492"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8017"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/23198"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","E H Angle Education Research Foundation, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-3219"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Informational value and bias of videos related to orthodontics screened on a video-sharing Web site"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","315"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Angle Orthodontist"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","323"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","86"],["dc.contributor.author","Knoesel, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Fendel, Christine"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Sandoval, Paulo"],["dc.contributor.author","Engelke, Wilfried G. H."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:17:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:17:53Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: To test the null hypothesis of no significant difference between intraoral pressure characteristics in infants with cleft lip and palate (CLP) with or without presurgical orthopedic (PSO) plates (groups CLP and CLP-PSO), compared with noncleft infants. Materials and Methods: Intraoral atmospheric pressure assessments were performed on 17 subjects with preoperative CLP (m/f, 11/6; mean/SD, 4.76/0.92 months) and a matched control group (n = 24; m/f, 15/9; mean/SD, 4.88/0.9 months), for 200 seconds, simultaneously at the vestibulum (vestibular space [VS]) and at the palate (subpalatal space [SPS]), using a prepared pacifier connected to a digital manometer. Areas under the pressure curves (AUC), frequencies, durations, and magnitudes of swallowing peaks and pressure resting plateaus were compared between trial groups and locations (VS, SPS) using a two-factor analysis of variance for repeated measures, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney U-test (alpha = .05). Results: The null hypothesis was rejected: Globally, there were statistically significant differences in intraoral pressure characteristics between groups CLP, CLP-PSO, and control (all P < .01), with significantly higher negative pressures (AUC) in the control subjects compared with those of CLP or CLP-PSO. There were significant effects by the location of pressure recordings (VS, SPS) and their interaction with all treatment groups. Differences between noncleft and CLP subjects were more pronounced in the VS than in the SPS. There was no significant effect by PSO. Conclusion: PSO does not improve deviated swallowing characteristics during suction in CLP infants."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.2319/021215-98.1"],["dc.identifier.isi","000371186300020"],["dc.identifier.pmid","25993249"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/41312"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","E H Angle Education Research Foundation, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","1945-7103"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-3219"],["dc.title","Presurgical orthopedics by drink plates does not significantly normalize deglutition in infants with cleft lip and palate"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1558"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Dental Education"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1568"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","75"],["dc.contributor.author","Knoesel, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Bleckmann, Annalen"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:49:11Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:49:11Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","The objective of this study was to systematically assess the informational value, intention, source, and bias of videos related to dentistry available on the video-sharing Internet platform YouTube. YouTube (www.youtube.com) was searched for videos related to dentistry, using the system-generated sorts \"by relevance\" and \"most viewed\" and two categories (All and Education). Each of the first thirty results was rated by two assessors filling out a questionnaire for each (total: 120). The data were subjected to statistical analysis using Cohen's kappa, Pearson's correlation coefficient tau, Mann-Whitney U-tests, and a nonparametric three-way ANOVA, including an analysis of the interaction between the sorting and category effect, with an a-level of 5 percent. The scan produced 279,000 results in the category All and 5,050 in the category Education. The analysis revealed a wide variety of information about dentistry available on YouTube. The purpose of these videos includes entertainment, advertising, and education. The videos classified under Education have a higher degree of usefulness and informational value for laypersons, dental students, and dental professionals than those found in a broader search category. YouTube and similar social media websites offer new educational possibilities that are currently both underdeveloped and underestimated in terms of their potential value. Dentists and dental educators should also recognize the importance of these websites in shaping public opinion about their profession."],["dc.identifier.isi","298066500004"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22184594"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/21397"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Dental Education Assoc"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-0337"],["dc.title","You Tube, Dentistry, and Dental Education"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","547"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Orthodontics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","555"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","31"],["dc.contributor.author","Knoesel, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Attin, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Attin, Rengin"],["dc.contributor.author","Kubein-Meesenburg, Dietmar"],["dc.contributor.author","Gripp-Rudolph, Liliam"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:23:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:23:35Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Lateral cephalograms and corresponding dental casts were obtained from 39 untreated Caucasians (12 males, 27 females; mean age 19.5 years; standard deviation 3.7 years) with occlusal relationships considered to be 'normal'. The upper (U1) and lower (L1) incisors were assessed with reference to the occlusal plane perpendicular which was established on the lateral radiographs, including third order angles (U1TR, L1TR) which were also derived from direct dental cast measurements (U1TA, L1TA). Both single regression and multiple linear regression analysis with stepwise variable selection were performed using third order measurements on casts as the dependent variable and crown axis (U1C, L1C), root axis (U1R, L1R), tip-apex connecting line (U1E, L1E), and radiographic third order measurements as independent variables. Single regression analysis indicated an overall difference of 0.02 degrees between radiographic third order inclination and cast assessment in the maxilla (mandible: -2.83 degrees). A change of 1 degree in radiographic third order inclination would produce a change of 0.65 degrees for U1TA and 0.86 degrees for L1TA assessments. Third order measurements on dental casts can best be explained by a linear combination of U1TR and U1E (maxilla) and of L1TR and L1C (mandible) measurements. This study demonstrates the functional enmeshment between two different third order assessments and the most common incisor features on lateral radiographs. Both methods of third order evaluation show sufficient reliability and are appropriate for routine orthodontic practice."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/ejo/cjp011"],["dc.identifier.isi","000270217900013"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19447839"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/56227"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Oxford Univ Press"],["dc.relation.issn","0141-5387"],["dc.title","Systematic evaluation of the features influencing the accuracy of third order measurements"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","697"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Angle Orthodontist"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","705"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","86"],["dc.contributor.author","Knoesel, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Nueser, Carolin"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Helms, Hans-Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Engelke, Wilfried G. H."],["dc.contributor.author","Sandoval, Paulo"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:09:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:09:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: To test the null hypothesis of no significant difference in terms of intraoral pressure curve characteristics assessed simultaneously at the subpalatal space (SPS) and the vestibular space (VS), during different oral postures, between four groups with either an Angle Class II/1 (II1), Angle Class II/2 (II2), anterior open bite (0) malocclusion, or a neutral occlusion control group (I). Materials and Methods: Intraoral pressure recordings were performed simultaneously in the VS and SPS of 69 consecutive subjects (n(II1) = 15; n(II2) = 17; n(O) = 17; n(I) = 20; mean age/standard deviation 18.43/6.60 years). Assessments included defined sections of open mouth posture (OMP, 30 seconds), anteriorly closed mouth condition (60 seconds), dynamics by a tongue-repositioning maneuver (TRM, 60 seconds), swallowing, and positive pressure generation (PP, 10 seconds). Interactions of malocclusion, compartment location, and posture on pressure curve characteristics were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests, adopting an alpha level of 5%. Results: Globally significant group differences were detected at the VS (plateau duration and median peak heights during TRM; area under pressure curve [AUC] during PP) and SPS (AUC during TRM and PP). Subjects with anteriorly nonopen dental configurations (groups I and 112) were able to keep negative pressure levels at the VS for longer time periods during TRM, compared to groups 0 and II1. Conclusions: The null hypothesis was rejected for mean VS plateau durations and peak heights and for SPS AUC. Negative pressures at the VS may stabilize outer soft tissues passively and may explain the dental arch form shaping effect by mimic muscles."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.2319/101615-699.1"],["dc.identifier.isi","000382415100001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","26894981"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/39735"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","E H Angle Education Research Foundation, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","1945-7103"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-3219"],["dc.title","Interaction between deglutition, tongue posture, and malocclusion: A comparison of intraoral compartment formation in subjects with neutral occlusion or different types of malocclusion"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","437"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Orthodontics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","441"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","34"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Engelke, Wilfried G. H."],["dc.contributor.author","Knoesel, Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:07:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:07:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","A thorough understanding of the intraoral pressure conditions of patients with different forms of malocclusion may help to characterize their aetiology in more detail and improve orthodontic treatment approaches by adding strategies to achieve a normalization of intraoral pressure levels. These pressure curve analyses should not only provide information on intraoral activity or during rest but also detail characterization of swallowing features and pressure plateau stages. For this purpose, algorithms for extracting swallowing peaks and plateau stages were developed and evaluated. Established curve characteristics such as the average or maximum pressure as well as the number of swallowing peaks or resting phases were compared between each other. Their usefulness and correlation (Kendall's tau) were evaluated in a data example of different occlusal groups (Angle Class I: n = 30; Angle Class II division 1: n = 12; and Angle Class II division 2: n = 13). Curve characteristics were compared among these groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Some of the derived curve characteristics were found to be uncorrelated, thus providing different information concerning the intraoral pressure condition of subjects. Based on these findings, it is recommended to employ the curve characteristics described in this study to obtain a holistic image of factors that may affect the formation of the dentition."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/ejo/cjr039"],["dc.identifier.isi","000307171600006"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21508265"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/25881"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Oxford Univ Press"],["dc.relation.issn","0141-5387"],["dc.title","Statistical signal processing methods for intraoral pressure curve analysis in orthodontics"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1036"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Angle Orthodontist"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1044"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","80"],["dc.contributor.author","Knosel, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Mattysek, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Sadat-Khonsari, Reza"],["dc.contributor.author","Kubein-Meesenburg, Dietmar"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauss, Oskar"],["dc.contributor.author","Ziebolz, Dirk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:37:13Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:37:13Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective To evaluate impulse debonding compared to three conventional methods for bracket removal in relation to the damage caused to the enamel surface Materials and Methods Ninety-six osteotomed third molars were randomly assigned to two study groups (n = 48) for bracket bonding with either a composite adhesive system (CAS) or a glass-ionomeric cement (GIG) These two groups were then each randomly divided into four subgroups (n = 12) according to the method of debonding using (1) bracket removal pliers, (2) a side-cutter, (3) a lift-off debracketing instrument, or (4) an air pressure pulse device Following debonding and corresponding postprocessing with either a finishing bur (CAS) or ultrasound (GIG), the enamel surfaces were assessed for damage, adhesive residues, and the need for postprocessing using scanning electron microscopy and the Adhesive Remnant Index, and the surfaces were compared in terms of mode of removal and type of adhesive using Fisher's exact test (alpha = 5%) Results No significant differences were found between the two different types of adhesives (CAS GIG) in terms of the amount of damage to the enamel Portions of enamel damage were found for impulse debonding/0%