Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • 2018Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Regeneration"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","17"],["dc.contributor.author","Ribeiro, Rannyele P."],["dc.contributor.author","Bleidorn, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Aguado, M. Teresa"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:45:18Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:45:18Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","Syllidae is one of the most species-rich groups within Annelida, with a wide variety of reproductive modes and different regenerative processes. Syllids have striking ability to regenerate their body anteriorly and posteriorly, which in many species is redeployed during sexual (schizogamy) and asexual (fission) reproduction. This review summarizes the available data on regeneration in syllids, covering descriptions of regenerative mechanisms in different species aswell as regeneration in relation to reproductive modes.Our survey shows that posterior regeneration iswidely distributed in syllids, whereas anterior regeneration is limited in most of the species, excepting those reproducing by fission. The latter reproductive mode is well known for a few species belonging to Autolytinae, Eusyllinae, and Syllinae. Patterns of fission areas have been studied in these animals. Deviations of the regular regeneration pattern or aberrant forms such as bifurcated animals or individualswith multiple heads have been reported for several species. Some of these aberrations show a deviation of the bilateral symmetry and antero-posterior axis, which, interestingly, can also be observed in the regular branching body pattern of some species of syllids."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/reg2.98"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15102"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59205"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","2052-4412"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","570"],["dc.title","Regeneration mechanisms in Syllidae (Annelida)"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2020Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","867"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Insects"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","17"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Sontowski, Rebekka"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerth, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Richter, Sandy"],["dc.contributor.author","Gruppe, Axel"],["dc.contributor.author","Schlegel, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","van Dam, Nicole M."],["dc.contributor.author","Bleidorn, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-11T11:38:43Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-10-27T13:11:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-11T11:38:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-10-27T13:11:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.description.abstract","Endosymbionts are widely distributed in insects and can strongly affect their host ecology. The common green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea) is a neuropteran insect which is widely used in biological pest control. However, their endosymbionts and their interactions with their hosts have not been very well studied. Therefore, we screened for endosymbionts in natural and laboratory populations of Ch. carnea using diagnostic PCR amplicons. We found the endosymbiont Rickettsia to be very common in all screened natural and laboratory populations, while a hitherto uncharacterized Sodalis strain was found only in laboratory populations. By establishing lacewing lines with no, single or co-infections of Sodalis and Rickettsia, we found a high vertical transmission rate for both endosymbionts (>89%). However, we were only able to estimate these numbers for co-infected lacewings. Sodalis negatively affected the reproductive success in single and co-infected Ch. carnea, while Rickettsia showed no effect. We hypothesize that the fitness costs accrued by Sodalis infections might be more tolerable in the laboratory than in natural populations, as the latter are also prone to fluctuating environmental conditions and natural enemies. The economic and ecological importance of lacewings in biological pest control warrants a more profound understanding of its biology, which might be influenced by symbionts."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/insects11120867"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17694"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/91617"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.relation.eissn","2075-4450"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Fakultät für Biologie und Psychologie"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","570"],["dc.title","Infection Patterns and Fitness Effects of Rickettsia and Sodalis Symbionts in the Green Lacewing Chrysoperla carnea"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2018Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","giy160"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","GigaScience"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Kolora, Sree Rohit Raj"],["dc.contributor.author","Weigert, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Saffari, Amin"],["dc.contributor.author","Kehr, Stephanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Costa, Maria Beatriz Walter"],["dc.contributor.author","Spröer, Cathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Indrischek, Henrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Chintalapati, Manjusha"],["dc.contributor.author","Lohse, Konrad"],["dc.contributor.author","Doose, Gero"],["dc.contributor.author","Overmann, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Bunk, Boyke"],["dc.contributor.author","Bleidorn, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Grimm-Seyfarth, Annegret"],["dc.contributor.author","Henle, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Nowick, Katja"],["dc.contributor.author","Faria, Rui"],["dc.contributor.author","Stadler, Peter F."],["dc.contributor.author","Schlegel, Martin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:50:50Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:50:50Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","BACKGROUND: Lacerta viridis and Lacerta bilineata are sister species of European green lizards (eastern and western clades, respectively) that, until recently, were grouped together as the L. viridis complex. Genetic incompatibilities were observed between lacertid populations through crossing experiments, which led to the delineation of two separate species within the L. viridis complex. The population history of these sister species and processes driving divergence are unknown. We constructed the first high-quality de novo genome assemblies for both L. viridis and L. bilineata through Illumina and PacBio sequencing, with annotation support provided from transcriptome sequencing of several tissues. To estimate gene flow between the two species and identify factors involved in reproductive isolation, we studied their evolutionary history, identified genomic rearrangements, detected signatures of selection on non-coding RNA, and on protein-coding genes. FINDINGS: Here we show that gene flow was primarily unidirectional from L. bilineata to L. viridis after their split at least 1.15 million years ago. We detected positive selection of the non-coding repertoire; mutations in transcription factors; accumulation of divergence through inversions; selection on genes involved in neural development, reproduction, and behavior, as well as in ultraviolet-response, possibly driven by sexual selection, whose contribution to reproductive isolation between these lacertid species needs to be further evaluated. CONCLUSION: The combination of short and long sequence reads resulted in one of the most complete lizard genome assemblies. The characterization of a diverse array of genomic features provided valuable insights into the demographic history of divergence among European green lizards, as well as key species differences, some of which are candidates that could have played a role in speciation. In addition, our study generated valuable genomic resources that can be used to address conservation-related issues in lacertids."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/gigascience/giy160"],["dc.identifier.pmid","30535196"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16012"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59841"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation","info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/706376/EU//INVERTIDAL"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","570"],["dc.title","Divergent evolution in the genomes of closely-related lacertids, Lacerta viridis and L. bilineata and implications for speciation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC