Options
Dosen, Strahinja
Loading...
Preferred name
Dosen, Strahinja
Official Name
Dosen, Strahinja
Alternative Name
Dosen, S.
Došen, Strahinja
Došen, S.
Main Affiliation
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
2015Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","066022"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Neural Engineering"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","12"],["dc.contributor.author","Markovic, Marko"],["dc.contributor.author","Dosen, Strahinja"],["dc.contributor.author","Popovic, Dejan"],["dc.contributor.author","Graimann, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Farina, Dario"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:47:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:47:53Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective. Myoelectric activity volitionally generated by the user is often used for controlling hand prostheses in order to replicate the synergistic actions of muscles in healthy humans during grasping. Muscle synergies in healthy humans are based on the integration of visual perception, heuristics and proprioception. Here, we demonstrate how sensor fusion that combines artificial vision and proprioceptive information with the high-level processing characteristics of biological systems can be effectively used in transradial prosthesis control. Approach. We developed a novel context-and user-aware prosthesis (CASP) controller integrating computer vision and inertial sensing with myoelectric activity in order to achieve semi-autonomous and reactive control of a prosthetic hand. The presented method semiautomatically provides simultaneous and proportional control of multiple degrees-of-freedom (DOFs), thus decreasing overall physical effort while retaining full user control. The system was compared against the major commercial state-of-the art myoelectric control system in ten able-bodied and one amputee subject. All subjects used transradial prosthesis with an active wrist to grasp objects typically associated with activities of daily living. Main results. The CASP significantly outperformed the myoelectric interface when controlling all of the prosthesis DOF. However, when tested with less complex prosthetic system (smaller number of DOF), the CASP was slower but resulted with reaching motions that contained less compensatory movements. Another important finding is that the CASP system required minimal user adaptation and training. Significance. The CASP constitutes a substantial improvement for the control of multi-DOF prostheses. The application of the CASP will have a significant impact when translated to real-life scenarious, particularly with respect to improving the usability and acceptance of highly complex systems (e.g., full prosthetic arms) by amputees."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066022"],["dc.identifier.isi","000374884100022"],["dc.identifier.pmid","26529274"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/35190"],["dc.notes.status","zu prĂĽfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Iop Publishing Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1741-2552"],["dc.relation.issn","1741-2560"],["dc.title","Sensor fusion and computer vision for context-aware control of a multi degree-of-freedom prosthesis"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2017Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","036007"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Neural Engineering"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.author","Markovic, Marko"],["dc.contributor.author","Karnal, Hemanth"],["dc.contributor.author","Graimann, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Farina, Dario"],["dc.contributor.author","Dosen, Strahinja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:23:37Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:23:37Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective. Providing sensory feedback to the user of the prosthesis is an important challenge. The common approach is to use tactile stimulation, which is easy to implement but requires training and has limited information bandwidth. In this study, we propose an alternative approach based on augmented reality. Approach. We have developed the GLIMPSE, a Google Glass application which connects to the prosthesis via a Bluetooth interface and renders the prosthesis states (EMG signals, aperture, force and contact) using augmented reality (seethrough display) and sound (bone conduction transducer). The interface was tested in healthy subjects that used the prosthesis with (FB group) and without (NFB group) feedback during a modified clothespins test that allowed us to vary the difficulty of the task. The outcome measures were the number of unsuccessful trials, the time to accomplish the task, and the subjective ratings of the relevance of the feedback. Main results. There was no difference in performance between FB and NFB groups in the case of a simple task (basic, same-color clothespins test), but the feedback significantly improved the performance in a more complex task (pins of different resistances). Importantly, the GLIMPSE feedback did not increase the time to accomplish the task. Therefore, the supplemental feedback might be useful in the tasks which are more demanding, and thereby less likely to benefit from learning and feedforward control. The subjects integrated the supplemental feedback with the intrinsic sources (vision and muscle proprioception), developing their own idiosyncratic strategies to accomplish the task. Significance. The present study demonstrates a novel self-contained, ready-to-deploy, wearable feedback interface. The interface was successfully tested and was proven to be feasible and functionally beneficial. The GLIMPSE can be used as a practical solution but also as a general and flexible instrument to investigate closed-loop prosthesis control."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1088/1741-2552/aa620a"],["dc.identifier.isi","000398154200001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28355147"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42496"],["dc.notes.status","zu prĂĽfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Iop Publishing Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1741-2552"],["dc.relation.issn","1741-2560"],["dc.title","GLIMPSE: Google Glass interface for sensory feedback in myoelectric hand prostheses"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2016Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","056010"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Neural Engineering"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","13"],["dc.contributor.author","Schweisfurth, Meike A."],["dc.contributor.author","Markovic, Marko"],["dc.contributor.author","Dosen, Strahinja"],["dc.contributor.author","Teich, Florian"],["dc.contributor.author","Graimann, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Farina, Dario"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:08:08Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:08:08Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective. A drawback of active prostheses is that they detach the subject from the produced forces, thereby preventing direct mechanical feedback. This can be compensated by providing somatosensory feedback to the user through mechanical or electrical stimulation, which in turn may improve the utility, sense of embodiment, and thereby increase the acceptance rate. Approach. In this study, we compared a novel approach to closing the loop, namely EMG feedback (emgFB), to classic force feedback (forceFB), using electrotactile interface in a realistic task setup. Eleven intact-bodied subjects and one transradial amputee performed a routine grasping task while receiving emgFB or forceFB. The two feedback types were delivered through the same electrotactile interface, using a mixed spatial/frequency coding to transmit 8 discrete levels of the feedback variable. In emgFB, the stimulation transmitted the amplitude of the processed myoelectric signal generated by the subject (prosthesis input), and in forceFB the generated grasping force (prosthesis output). The task comprised 150 trials of routine grasping at six forces, randomly presented in blocks of five trials (same force). Interquartile range and changes in the absolute error (AE) distribution (magnitude and dispersion) with respect to the target level were used to assess precision and overall performance, respectively. Main results. Relative to forceFB, emgFB significantly improved the precision of myoelectric commands (min/max of the significant levels) for 23%/36% as well as the precision of force control for 12%/32%, in intact-bodied subjects. Also, the magnitude and dispersion of the AE distribution were reduced. The results were similar in the amputee, showing considerable improvements. Significance. Using emgFB, the subjects therefore decreased the uncertainty of the forward pathway. Since there is a correspondence between the EMG and force, where the former anticipates the latter, the emgFB allowed for predictive control, as the subjects used the feedback to adjust the desired force even before the prosthesis contacted the object. In conclusion, the online emgFB was superior to the classic forceFB in realistic conditions that included electrotactile stimulation, limited feedback resolution (8 levels), cognitive processing delay, and time constraints (fast grasping)."],["dc.description.sponsorship","European Commission under the MYOSENS [FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IAPP-286208]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1088/1741-2560/13/5/056010"],["dc.identifier.isi","000384023800003"],["dc.identifier.pmid","27547992"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/39414"],["dc.notes.status","zu prĂĽfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Iop Publishing Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1741-2552"],["dc.relation.issn","1741-2560"],["dc.title","Electrotactile EMG feedback improves the control of prosthesis grasping force"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS