Gerlach, Tanja M.

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","107319112110200"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Assessment"],["dc.contributor.author","Grosz, Michael P."],["dc.contributor.author","Hartmann, Isabel"],["dc.contributor.author","Dufner, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Leckelt, Marius"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Rauthmann, John F."],["dc.contributor.author","Denissen, Jaap J. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Küfner, Albrecht C. P."],["dc.contributor.author","Back, Mitja D."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-07-05T14:57:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-07-05T14:57:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Research on grandiose narcissism distinguishes between self-promotional processes (i.e., narcissistic admiration) and other-derogative processes (i.e., narcissistic rivalry; Back et al., 2013). Moreover, research has begun to assess and investigate narcissistic manifestations in different domains (e.g., communal narcissism). To integrate these two lines of research, we developed the Domain-Specific Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire (D-NARQ), a 72-item narcissism questionnaire that contains a self-promotional process scale (narcissistic admiration) and an other-derogatory process scale (narcissistic rivalry) for four domains: intellectual ability, social dominance, communal care, and physical attractiveness. We investigated the psychometric properties of the D-NARQ in a large online study ( N = 1,635). Model fit statistics were largely in line with the theorized factor structure. The D-NARQ scales had good to very good measurement precision, and their correlations with established narcissism scales, the Big Five personality traits, and comparative self-evaluations largely supported their convergent and discriminant validity."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1177/10731911211020075"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/87737"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-441"],["dc.relation.eissn","1552-3489"],["dc.relation.issn","1073-1911"],["dc.title","A Process × Domain Assessment of Narcissism: The Domain-Specific Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","374"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Personality"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","389"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","30"],["dc.contributor.author","Wetzel, Eunike"],["dc.contributor.author","Leckelt, Marius"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Back, Mitja D."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:11:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:11:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","This study investigated grandiose narcissism from a categorical perspective. We tested whether subgroups of narcissists can be distinguished that differ in their expressions of more agentic (narcissistic admiration, ADM) and more antagonistic (narcissistic rivalry, RIV) pathways of narcissism. We analysed three German samples (total N=2211; M-age=26; 70% female) and one US sample (N=971; M-age=35; 74% female) using latent class analysis. Four subgroups of narcissists were consistently identified across samples from Germany and the United States: low narcissists, moderate narcissists primarily characterized by agentic aspects (ADM), moderate narcissists characterized by both agentic and antagonistic aspects (ADM+ RIV), and high narcissists. The subgroups were systematically related to a number of personality traits (e.g. Machiavellianism, impulsivity) and adjustment indicators (e.g. self-esteem, empathy). Members in the moderate narcissists-ADM subgroup showed the most adaptive characteristics while members in the moderate narcissists-ADM+RIV subgroup showed the most maladaptive characteristics. Investigating grandiose narcissism-a primarily quantitative trait-from a categorical perspective can yield valuable insights that would otherwise be overlooked. In addition, our results underline the utility of a self-regulatory process approach to grandiose narcissism that distinguishes between agentic and antagonistic dynamics. Copyright (C) 2016 European Association of Personality Psychology"],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Research Foundation (DFG) [BA 3731/6-1]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/per.2062"],["dc.identifier.isi","000388308100006"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/40112"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley"],["dc.relation.issn","1099-0984"],["dc.relation.issn","0890-2070"],["dc.title","Distinguishing Subgroups of Narcissists with Latent Class Analysis"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1013"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1037"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","105"],["dc.contributor.author","Back, Mitja D."],["dc.contributor.author","Kuefner, Albrecht C. P."],["dc.contributor.author","Dufner, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Rauthmann, John F."],["dc.contributor.author","Denissen, Jaap J. A."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:17:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:17:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","We present a process model that distinguishes 2 dimensions of narcissism: admiration and rivalry. We propose that narcissists' overarching goal of maintaining a grandiose self is pursued by 2 separate pathways, characterized by distinct cognitive, affective-motivational, and behavioral processes. In a set of 7 studies, we validated this 2-dimensional model using the newly developed Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire (NARQ). We showed that narcissistic admiration and rivalry are positively correlated dimensions, yet they have markedly different nomological networks and distinct intra- and interpersonal consequences. The NARQ showed the hypothesized 2-dimensional multifaceted structure as well as very good internal consistencies (Study 1, N = 953), stabilities (Study 2, N = 93), and self-other agreements (Study 3, N = 96). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry showed unique relations to the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI), the Big Five, self-esteem, pathological narcissism, and other narcissism-related traits like Machiavellianism, psychopathy, self-enhancement, and impulsivity (Study 4, Ns = 510-1,814). Despite the positive relation between admiration and rivalry, the 2 differentially predicted general interpersonal orientations and reactions to transgressions in friendships and romantic relationships (Study 5, N = 1,085), interpersonal perceptions during group interactions (Study 6, N = 202), and observed behaviors in experimental observations (Study 7, N = 96). For all studies, the NARQ outperformed the standard measure of narcissism, the NPI, in predicting outcome measures. Results underscore the utility of a 2-dimensional conceptualization and measurement of narcissism."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/a0034431"],["dc.identifier.isi","000328673800009"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24128186"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/28064"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","1939-1315"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-3514"],["dc.title","Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry: Disentangling the Bright and Dark Sides of Narcissism"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","280"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","306"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","112"],["dc.contributor.author","Wurst, Stefanie N."],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Dufner, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Rauthmann, John F."],["dc.contributor.author","Grosz, Michael P."],["dc.contributor.author","Kuefner, Albrecht C. P."],["dc.contributor.author","Denissen, Jaap J. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Back, Mitja D."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:28:02Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:28:02Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Narcissism is known to be related to romantic success in short-term contexts (dating, early stage relationships) but also to problems in long-term committed relationships. We propose that these diverging romantic outcomes of narcissism can be explained by differential associations with agentic versus antagonistic dimensions of grandiose narcissism: Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry. Both dimensions serve the central narcissistic goal of gaining and maintaining a grandiose self-view, but do so by different processes: Admiration is characterized by the tendency to promote the positivity of one's self-view by seeking social admiration (assertive self-enhancement). Rivalry is characterized by the tendency to protect oneself from a negative self-view by derogating others (antagonistic self-protection). Across 7 studies (total N = 3,560) using diverse measures and methodological approaches (self-, peer, and partner reports, as well as interpersonal perception measures in video-based studies, face-to-face laboratory encounters, and online surveys), we show that the short-term romantic appeal associated with narcissism is primarily attributable to the dimension of Admiration, whereas the long-term romantic problems associated with narcissism are primarily attributable to the dimension of Rivalry. These results highlight the utility of a 2-dimensional reconceptualization of grandiose narcissism for explaining its heterogeneous romantic outcomes. The findings further underscore the idea that different facets of personality traits might impact different aspects of romantic relationship quality, depending on the stage of the relationship. Such a more nuanced view increases the predictive validity of personality traits in social relationship research."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/pspp0000113"],["dc.identifier.isi","000393874700006"],["dc.identifier.pmid","27560609"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/43337"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.relation.issn","1939-1315"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-3514"],["dc.title","Narcissism and Romantic Relationships: The Differential Impact of Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychological Assessment"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","31"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","30"],["dc.contributor.author","Leckelt, Marius"],["dc.contributor.author","Wetzel, Eunike"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Ackerman, Robert A."],["dc.contributor.author","Miller, Joshua D."],["dc.contributor.author","Chopik, William J."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Geukes, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Küfner, Albrecht C. P."],["dc.contributor.author","Hutteman, Roos"],["dc.contributor.author","Richter, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Renner, Karl-Heinz"],["dc.contributor.author","Allroggen, Marc"],["dc.contributor.author","Brecheen, Courtney"],["dc.contributor.author","Campbell, W. Keith"],["dc.contributor.author","Grossmann, Igor"],["dc.contributor.author","Back, Mitja D."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:51:40Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:51:40Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Due to increased empirical interest in narcissism across the social sciences, there is a need for inventories that can be administered quickly while also reliably measuring both the agentic and antagonistic aspects of grandiose narcissism. In this study, we sought to validate the factor structure, provide representative descriptive data and reliability estimates, assess the reliability across the trait spectrum, and examine the nomological network of the short version of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire (NARQ-S; Back et al., 2013). We used data from a large convenience sample (total N = 11,937) as well as data from a large representative sample (total N = 4,433) that included responses to other narcissism measures as well as related constructs, including the other Dark Triad traits, Big Five personality traits, and self-esteem. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory were used to validate the factor structure and estimate the reliability across the latent trait spectrum, respectively. Results suggest that the NARQ-S shows a robust factor structure and is a reliable and valid short measure of the agentic and antagonistic aspects of grandiose narcissism. We also discuss future directions and applications of the NARQ-S as a short and comprehensive measure of grandiose narcissism. (PsycINFO Database Record"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/pas0000433"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151089"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28252974"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/7855"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1939-134X"],["dc.title","Validation of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire Short Scale (NARQ-S) in Convenience and Representative Samples."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]