Traulsen, Imke

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","130"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Agriculture"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Gentz, Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Anita"],["dc.contributor.author","Zeidler, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Lambertz, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Gauly, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Burfeind, Onno"],["dc.contributor.author","Traulsen, Imke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:46:54Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:46:54Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/agriculture10040130"],["dc.identifier.eissn","2077-0472"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17402"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/78581"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","2077-0472"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Tail Lesions and Losses of Docked and Undocked Pigs in Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2184"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Animals"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Anita"],["dc.contributor.author","Hahne, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Lambertz, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Gauly, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Wendt, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Janssen, Heiko"],["dc.contributor.author","Traulsen, Imke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-10-01T09:58:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-10-01T09:58:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Feasible alternatives to stressful weaning and tail-docking are needed to inhibit tail biting. Therefore, we investigated the effects of housing systems for 1106 pigs that were weaned from: (1) conventional farrowing crates (FC), (2) free-farrowing pens (FF), or (3) group housing of lactating sows (GH) into (1) conventional rearing pens (Conv) or (2) piglets remained in their farrowing pens for rearing (Reaf). Tails were docked or left undocked batchwise. All pigs were regrouped for the fattening period. Pigs were scored for skin lesions, tail lesions and losses. After weaning, Conv-GH pigs had significantly less skin lesions than Conv-FC and Conv-FF pigs. After regrouping for fattening, Reaf-GH pigs had significantly less skin lesions than Conv pigs, Reaf-FC and Reaf-FF. The frequency of tail lesions of undocked Conv pigs peaked in week 4 (66.8%). Two weeks later, Reaf undocked pigs reached their maximum (36.2%). At the end of fattening, 99.3% of undocked Conv pigs and 43.1% of undocked Reaf pigs lost parts of their tail. In conclusion, the co-mingling of piglets during suckling reduced the incidence of skin lesions. Rearing in the farrowing pen significantly reduced the incidence of tail lesions and losses for undocked pigs. No housing system negatively affected the performance."],["dc.description.abstract","Feasible alternatives to stressful weaning and tail-docking are needed to inhibit tail biting. Therefore, we investigated the effects of housing systems for 1106 pigs that were weaned from: (1) conventional farrowing crates (FC), (2) free-farrowing pens (FF), or (3) group housing of lactating sows (GH) into (1) conventional rearing pens (Conv) or (2) piglets remained in their farrowing pens for rearing (Reaf). Tails were docked or left undocked batchwise. All pigs were regrouped for the fattening period. Pigs were scored for skin lesions, tail lesions and losses. After weaning, Conv-GH pigs had significantly less skin lesions than Conv-FC and Conv-FF pigs. After regrouping for fattening, Reaf-GH pigs had significantly less skin lesions than Conv pigs, Reaf-FC and Reaf-FF. The frequency of tail lesions of undocked Conv pigs peaked in week 4 (66.8%). Two weeks later, Reaf undocked pigs reached their maximum (36.2%). At the end of fattening, 99.3% of undocked Conv pigs and 43.1% of undocked Reaf pigs lost parts of their tail. In conclusion, the co-mingling of piglets during suckling reduced the incidence of skin lesions. Rearing in the farrowing pen significantly reduced the incidence of tail lesions and losses for undocked pigs. No housing system negatively affected the performance."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/ani11082184"],["dc.identifier.pii","ani11082184"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/90045"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-469"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","2076-2615"],["dc.rights","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Effects of Different Housing Systems during Suckling and Rearing Period on Skin and Tail Lesions, Tail Losses and Performance of Growing and Finishing Pigs"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","7512"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","22"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Sensors"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Wutke, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrich, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Das, Pronaya Prosun"],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Anita"],["dc.contributor.author","Gentz, Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Traulsen, Imke"],["dc.contributor.author","Warns, Friederike K."],["dc.contributor.author","Schmitt, Armin Otto"],["dc.contributor.author","Gültas, Mehmet"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-01-11T14:07:54Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-01-11T14:07:54Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","The identification of social interactions is of fundamental importance for animal behavioral studies, addressing numerous problems like investigating the influence of social hierarchical structures or the drivers of agonistic behavioral disorders. However, the majority of previous studies often rely on manual determination of the number and types of social encounters by direct observation which requires a large amount of personnel and economical efforts. To overcome this limitation and increase research efficiency and, thus, contribute to animal welfare in the long term, we propose in this study a framework for the automated identification of social contacts. In this framework, we apply a convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect the location and orientation of pigs within a video and track their movement trajectories over a period of time using a Kalman filter (KF) algorithm. Based on the tracking information, we automatically identify social contacts in the form of head–head and head–tail contacts. Moreover, by using the individual animal IDs, we construct a network of social contacts as the final output. We evaluated the performance of our framework based on two distinct test sets for pig detection and tracking. Consequently, we achieved a Sensitivity, Precision, and F1-score of 94.2%, 95.4%, and 95.1%, respectively, and a MOTA score of 94.4%. The findings of this study demonstrate the effectiveness of our keypoint-based tracking-by-detection strategy and can be applied to enhance animal monitoring systems."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/s21227512"],["dc.identifier.pii","s21227512"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/97888"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-507"],["dc.relation.eissn","1424-8220"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Detecting Animal Contacts—A Deep Learning-Based Pig Detection and Tracking Approach for the Quantification of Social Contacts"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","949"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","11"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Animals"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Gentz, Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Anita"],["dc.contributor.author","Zeidler, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Traulsen, Imke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:46:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:46:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/ani9110949"],["dc.identifier.eissn","2076-2615"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16658"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/78591"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","2076-2615"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Classification of Pigs with Tail Lesions from Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems during Rearing and Fattening Period"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","230"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Agriculture"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Anita"],["dc.contributor.author","Gentz, Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Hahne, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Lambertz, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Gauly, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Burfeind, Onno"],["dc.contributor.author","Traulsen, Imke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:25:09Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:25:09Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/agriculture10060230"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17471"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/81533"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","2077-0472"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Effects of Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems on Post-Weaning Stress in Piglets"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]