Werner, Carola

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","595"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","600"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","65"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheel, Alexander Konrad"],["dc.contributor.author","Hermann, Kay Geert A."],["dc.contributor.author","Ohrndorf, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Werner, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Schirmer, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Detert, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Bollow, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Hamm, Bernd"],["dc.contributor.author","Mueller, Gerhard A."],["dc.contributor.author","Burmester, Gerd-Ruediger"],["dc.contributor.author","Backhaus, M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:50:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:50:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: To perform a prospective long term follow up study comparing conventional radiography (CR), ultrasonography ( US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of bone erosions and synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis ( RA) finger joints. Methods: The metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints II - V ( 128 joints) of the clinically dominant hand of 16 patients with RA were included. Follow up joint by joint comparisons for erosions and synovitis were made. Results: At baseline, CR detected erosions in 5/128 (4%) of all joints, US in 12/128 (9%), and MRI in 34/ 128 (27%). Seven years later, an increase of joints with erosions was found with CR (26%), US (49%) ( p< 0.001 each), and MRI (32%, NS). In contrast, joint swelling and tenderness assessed by clinical examination were decreased at follow up ( p = 0.2, p< 0.001). A significant reduction in synovitis with US and MRI ( p< 0.001 each) was seen. In CR, 12 patients did not have any erosions at baseline, while in 10/ 12 patients erosions were detected in 25/96 ( 26%) joints after 7 years. US initially detected erosions in 9 joints, of which two of these joints with erosions were seen by CR at follow up. MRI initially found 34 erosions, of which 14 (41%) were then detected by CR. Conclusion: After 7 years, an increase of bone erosions was detected by all imaging modalities. In contrast, clinical improvement and regression of synovitis were seen only with US and MRI. More than one third of erosions previously detected by MRI were seen by CR 7 years later."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1136/ard.2005.041814"],["dc.identifier.isi","000236764900007"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/35757"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","B M J Publishing Group"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-4967"],["dc.title","Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Arthritis & Rheumatism"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","54"],["dc.contributor.author","Song, In-Ho"],["dc.contributor.author","Hermann, Kay-Geert"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheel, Alexander Konrad"],["dc.contributor.author","Werner, Carola"],["dc.contributor.author","Knetsch, Torsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Schoenharting, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Burmester, Gerd-Ruediger"],["dc.contributor.author","Backhaus, Marina"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:17:19Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:17:19Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.format.extent","S159"],["dc.identifier.isi","000240877200331"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/28135"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-liss"],["dc.publisher.place","Hoboken"],["dc.relation.conference","70th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American-College-of-Rheumatology/41st Annual Scientific Meeting of the Association-of-Rheumatology-Health-Professionals"],["dc.relation.eventlocation","Washington, DC"],["dc.relation.issn","0004-3591"],["dc.title","Comparison of the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting synovial process in patients with knee osteoarthritis compared to healthy subjects."],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1043"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1049"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","64"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheel, Alexander Konrad"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, W. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Hermann, Kay Geert A."],["dc.contributor.author","Bruyn, George A. W."],["dc.contributor.author","D'Agostino, M. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Grassi, Walter"],["dc.contributor.author","Iagnocco, Annamaria"],["dc.contributor.author","Koski, Juhani M."],["dc.contributor.author","Machold, K. P."],["dc.contributor.author","Naredo, E."],["dc.contributor.author","Sattler, H."],["dc.contributor.author","Swen, N."],["dc.contributor.author","Szkudlarek, Marcin"],["dc.contributor.author","Wakefield, Richard J."],["dc.contributor.author","Ziswiler, H. R."],["dc.contributor.author","Pasewaldt, D."],["dc.contributor.author","Werner, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Backhaus, M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:51:55Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:51:55Z"],["dc.date.issued","2005"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: To evaluate the interobserver reliability among 14 experts in musculoskeletal ultrasonography ( US) and to determine the overall agreement about the US results compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which served as the imaging \"gold standard'. Methods: The clinically dominant joint regions ( shoulder, knee, ankle/toe, wrist/finger) of four patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases were ultrasonographically examined by 14 experts. US results were compared with MRI. Overall agreements, sensitivities, specificities, and interobserver reliabilities were assessed. Results: Taking an agreement in US examination of 10 out of 14 experts into account, the overall kappa for all examined joints was 0.76. Calculations for each joint region showed high kappa values for the knee ( 1), moderate values for the shoulder ( 0.76) and hand/finger (0.59), and low agreement for ankle/toe joints (0.28). kappa Values for bone lesions, bursitis, and tendon tears were high (kappa = 1). Relatively good agreement for most US findings, compared with MRI, was found for the shoulder ( overall agreement 81%, sensitivity 76%, specificity 89%) and knee joint ( overall agreement 88%, sensitivity 91%, specificity 88%). Sensitivities were lower for wrist/finger ( overall agreement 73%, sensitivity 66%, specificity 88%) and ankle/toe joints ( overall agreement 82%, sensitivity 61%, specificity 92%). Conclusion: Interobserver reliabilities, sensitivities, and specificities in comparison with MRI were moderate to good. Further standardisation of US scanning techniques and definitions of different pathological US lesions are necessary to increase the interobserver agreement in musculoskeletal US."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1136/ard.2004.030387"],["dc.identifier.isi","000229818600013"],["dc.identifier.pmid","15640263"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/22046"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","B M J Publishing Group"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-4967"],["dc.title","Interobserver reliability of rheumatologists performing musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a EULAR 'Train the trainers' course"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","14"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","19"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","65"],["dc.contributor.author","Naredo, E."],["dc.contributor.author","Moller, I."],["dc.contributor.author","Moragues, C."],["dc.contributor.author","de Agustin, J. J."],["dc.contributor.author","Scheel, Alexander Konrad"],["dc.contributor.author","Grassi, Walter"],["dc.contributor.author","de Miguel, E."],["dc.contributor.author","Backhaus, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Balint, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Bruyn, George A. W."],["dc.contributor.author","D'Agostino, M. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Filippucci, Emilio"],["dc.contributor.author","Iagnocco, Annamaria"],["dc.contributor.author","Kane, D."],["dc.contributor.author","Koski, Juhani M."],["dc.contributor.author","Mayordomo, L."],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, W. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Swen, WAA"],["dc.contributor.author","Szkudlarek, Marcin"],["dc.contributor.author","Terslev, Lene"],["dc.contributor.author","Torp-Pedersen, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Uson, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Wakefield, Richard J."],["dc.contributor.author","Werner, C."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:29:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:29:35Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: To assess the interobserver reliability of the main periarticular and intra-articular ultrasonographic pathologies and to establish the principal disagreements on scanning technique and diagnostic criteria between a group of experts in musculoskeletal ultrasonography. Methods: The shoulder, wrist/hand, ankle/foot, or knee of 24 patients with rheumatic diseases were evaluated by 23 musculoskeletal ultrasound experts from different European countries randomly assigned to six groups. The participants did not reach consensus on scanning method or diagnostic criteria before the investigation. They were unaware of the patients' clinical and imaging data. The experts from each group undertook a blinded ultrasound examination of the four anatomical regions. The ultrasound investigation included the presence/absence of joint effusion/synovitis, bony cortex abnormalities, tenosynovitis, tendon lesions, bursitis, and power Doppler signal. Afterwards they compared the ultrasound findings and re-examined the patients together while discussing their results. Results: Overall agreements were 91% for joint effusion/synovitis and tendon lesions, 87% for cortical abnormalities, 84% for tenosynovitis, 83.5% for bursitis, and 83% for power Doppler signal; k values were good for the wrist/hand and knee (0.61 and 0.60) and fair for the shoulder and ankle/foot (0.50 and 0.54). The principal differences in scanning method and diagnostic criteria between experts were related to dynamic examination, definition of tendon lesions, and pathological v physiological fluid within joints, tendon sheaths, and bursae. Conclusions: Musculoskeletal ultrasound has a moderate to good interobserver reliability. Further consensus on standardisation of scanning technique and diagnostic criteria is necessary to improve musculoskeletal ultrasonography reproducibility."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1136/ard.2005.037382"],["dc.identifier.isi","000233891800005"],["dc.identifier.pmid","15941835"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/43668"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","B M J Publishing Group"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-4967"],["dc.title","Interobserver reliability in musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a \"Teach the Teachers\" rheumatologist course"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","133"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Atherosclerosis"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","139"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","174"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheel, Alexander Konrad"],["dc.contributor.author","Schettler, Volker"],["dc.contributor.author","Koziolek, Michael Johann"],["dc.contributor.author","Koelling, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Werner, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Mueller, Gerhard A."],["dc.contributor.author","Strutz, Frank M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:49:08Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:49:08Z"],["dc.date.issued","2004"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: Pain of Achilles tendon (AT) is a common symptom in patients with severe familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and often associated with AT xanthomas. It is unknown if these changes are potentially reversible during lipid lowering treatment. LDL-apheresis (LA) represents the most effective lipid lowering regimen. Aim of this investigation was to determine clinical and ultrasonographic reduction of AT xanthomas in patients with severe FH undergoing regular LA. Methods: At baseline, patient history of 22 patients with FH undergoing LA was obtained and their 44 ATs were evaluated clinically and with ultrasound for the presence of xanthomas. Three years later, both examinations of ATs could be repeated at follow-up visits in 16 patients. AT thickness and changes in echo structure were assessed at both points of time and compared to each other as well as to a healthy control group (n = 21). ROC analysis was performed to identify the optimal cut-off in AT thickness between healthy and affected ATs. Results: Twelve of 22 FH patients suffered from AT pain at least once during their life-time. At baseline, AT thickness was significantly increased compared to the healthy control group (mean sagittal diameter 10.1 +/- 3.6 mm). At follow-up, AT thickness was significantly reduced to 8.2 +/- 3.3 mm (mean) under LA, whereas changes in echo structure were less distinct between both visits. Conversely, in the control group, mean AT thickness was 5.2 +/- 0.6 mm. The optimal cut-off between healthy and affected ATs was determined to be 6 mm. Conclusions: Ultrasonographic changes of the AT (thickening and changes in echo structure) are frequent in patients with severe FH, even if xanthomas are not clinically evident. LA treatment has the capability to reduce AT xanthomas and thickness. Ultrasound may give information about diagnosis and follow-up of AT affection in patients with FH. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.01.014"],["dc.identifier.isi","000221673700019"],["dc.identifier.pmid","15135262"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/48359"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Sci Ireland Ltd"],["dc.publisher.place","Clare"],["dc.relation.conference","Ultrasonic Diagnostics Conference"],["dc.relation.eventlocation","Vienna, AUSTRIA"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-9150"],["dc.title","Impact of chronic LDL-apheresis treatment on Achilles tendon affection in patients with severe familial hypercholesterolemia: a clinical and ultrasonographic 3-year follow-up study"],["dc.type","conference_paper"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","67"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","68"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","65"],["dc.contributor.author","Grundey, Jessica"],["dc.contributor.author","Backhaus, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Witthauer, P."],["dc.contributor.author","Bramlage, Carsten Paul"],["dc.contributor.author","Werner, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Mueller, Gerhard A."],["dc.contributor.author","Scheel, Alexander Konrad"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:33:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:33:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.identifier.isi","000249372500197"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/31969"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","B M J Publishing Group"],["dc.publisher.place","London"],["dc.relation.conference","Annual European Congress of Rheumatology (EULAR 2006)"],["dc.relation.eventlocation","Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-4967"],["dc.title","Distribution of synovitis and erosions in small rheumatoid arthritis finger and toe joints detected by ultrasonography"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","66"],["dc.contributor.author","Ohrndorf, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Grundey, Jessica"],["dc.contributor.author","Backhaus, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Werner, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Mueller, Gerhard A."],["dc.contributor.author","Scheel, Alexander Konrad"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:00:50Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:00:50Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.format.extent","570"],["dc.identifier.isi","000253101102359"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/51016"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","B M J Publishing Group"],["dc.publisher.place","London"],["dc.relation.conference","Annual European Congress of Rheumatology (EULAR 2007)"],["dc.relation.eventlocation","Barcelona, SPAIN"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-4967"],["dc.title","Musculoskeletal ultrasonography: Interreader agreements and a learning curve of three ultrasonographers with different experience"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","370"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","64"],["dc.contributor.author","Naredo, E."],["dc.contributor.author","Moller, I."],["dc.contributor.author","Moragues, C."],["dc.contributor.author","De Agustin, J. J."],["dc.contributor.author","Scheel, Alexander Konrad"],["dc.contributor.author","Grassi, Walter"],["dc.contributor.author","De Miguel, E."],["dc.contributor.author","Backhaus, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Balint, R."],["dc.contributor.author","Bruyn, George A. W."],["dc.contributor.author","D'Agostino, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Filippucci, Emilio"],["dc.contributor.author","Lagnocco, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Kane, D."],["dc.contributor.author","Koski, Juhani M."],["dc.contributor.author","Mayordomo, L."],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, W. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Swen, WAA"],["dc.contributor.author","Szkudlarek, Marcin"],["dc.contributor.author","Terslev, Lene"],["dc.contributor.author","Torp-Pedersen, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Uson, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Wakefield, Richard J."],["dc.contributor.author","Werner, C."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:50:31Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:50:31Z"],["dc.date.issued","2005"],["dc.identifier.isi","000229909101567"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/21713"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Bmj Publishing Group"],["dc.publisher.place","London"],["dc.relation.conference","Annual European Congress of Rheumatology"],["dc.relation.eventlocation","Vienna, AUSTRIA"],["dc.relation.issn","1468-2060"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-4967"],["dc.title","Inter-observer reliability in musculoskeletal ultrasonography: Results from a \"teach-the-teachers\" rheumatologist course"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","19"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","25"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","67"],["dc.contributor.author","Song, In-Ho"],["dc.contributor.author","Burmester, Gerd-Ruediger"],["dc.contributor.author","Backhaus, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Althoff, Christian E."],["dc.contributor.author","Hermann, Kay Geert A."],["dc.contributor.author","Scheel, Alexander Konrad"],["dc.contributor.author","Werner, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Knetsch, Torsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Schoenharting, Martin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:19:23Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:19:23Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: To develop a new method of digital synovial vascularisation quantification by using contrast-enhanced musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MUS) in detecting synovitis in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) compared with healthy subjects and MRI. Methods: Evaluation of 41 patients with painful knee OA and 6 healthy subjects. The severity of knee pain was evaluated. All patients and all 6 healthy subjects underwent contrast medium-enhanced (CE)-MUS with SonoVue (R), and 36 patients additionally underwent CEMRI with Magnevist. Joint effusion, synovial thickening and pain were assessed and compared with B-mode and Power Doppler sonography (PDS) as well as contrast medium enhancement. Results: Pain evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) hardly correlated with other markers of disease activity measured by ultrasound (US) in B-mode or MRI. US of the superior recess revealed an effusion or synovial thickening in 58%. PDS findings were positive in 63%, and CE-MUS in the superior knee recess was positive in 95%. MRI showed effusion in the superior recess in 61% and showed positive findings in 82% when using contrast medium. The kappa value was 0.48 between US and MRI with regard to the effusion in the superior recess, and 0.53 between PD signal in the superior recess and effusion in the superior recess by US. Using MRI as the reference standard, there was a sensitivity of 72% for assessing effusion in the superior recess and 81% for assessing effusion in the lateral recess. Conclusion: Assessment of disease activity (synovitis) in knee OA by VAS is not sufficient. US PDS was more sensitive than B-mode, and CE-MUS was more sensitive than PDS and CE-MRI in detecting synovitis in patients with painful knee OA. Also, CE-MRI was more sensitive in detecting inflammatory changes in the superior recess than without contrast medium. Using CE-MUS and performing time/intensity analysis has shown to be a good model for evaluation of an inflammatory process in the setting of knee OA in the superior recess."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1136/ard.2006.067462"],["dc.identifier.isi","000251615600004"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19957383"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/55264"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","B M J Publishing Group"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-4967"],["dc.title","Knee osteoarthritis. Efficacy of a new method of contrast-enhanced musculoskeletal ultrasonography in detection of synovitis in patients with knee osteoarthritis in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","63"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheel, Alexander Konrad"],["dc.contributor.author","Hermann, Kay Geert A."],["dc.contributor.author","Ohrndorf, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Werner, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Mueller, Gerhard A."],["dc.contributor.author","Burmester, Gerd-Ruediger"],["dc.contributor.author","Backhaus, M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:47:26Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:47:26Z"],["dc.date.issued","2004"],["dc.format.extent","82"],["dc.identifier.isi","000224551500257"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/47962"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","B M J Publishing Group"],["dc.publisher.place","London"],["dc.relation.conference","Annual European Congress of Rheumatology (EULAR 2004)"],["dc.relation.eventlocation","Berlin, GERMANY"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-4967"],["dc.title","Seven year follow-up imaging study comparing conventional radiography and ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]