Salzer, Simone

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","224"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychotherapy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","245"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","51"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:39:02Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:39:02Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Although there is evidence for the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy (PDT) in anxiety disorders, results are not yet satisfactory, for example, if rates of remission and response are considered. To address this problem, a unified psychodynamic protocol for anxiety disorders (UPP-ANXIETY) is proposed that integrates the treatment principles of those methods of PDT that have proven to be efficacious in anxiety disorders. In addition, this protocol is transdiagnostic, implying that is it is applicable to various forms of anxiety disorders and related disorders (generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, panic disorders, avoidant personality disorder). Based on supportive-expressive therapy, the UPP-ANXIETY represents an integrated form of psychodynamic therapy that allows for a flexible use of empirically supported treatment principles. UPP-ANXIETY encompasses the following 9 treatment principles (modules): (1) socializing the patient for psychotherapy, (2) motivating and setting treatment goals, (3) establishing a secure helping alliance, (4) identifying the core conflict underlying anxiety, (5) focusing on the warded-off wish/affect, (6) modifying underlying internalized object relations, (7) changing underlying defenses and avoidance, (8) modifying underlying response of self, and (9) termination and relapse prevention. Some principles are regarded as core components to be used in every treatment (principles 3-8). A unified protocol for the psychodynamic treatment of anxiety disorders has several advantages, that is (1) integrating the most effective treatment principles of empirically supported psychodynamic treatments for anxiety disorders can be expected to further improve the efficacy of PDT; (2) using a unified protocol in efficacy studies has the potential to enhance the evidence-based status of PDT by aggregating the evidence; (3) a unified protocol will facilitate both training in PDT and transfer of research to clinical practice; and (4) thus, a unified protocol can be expected to have a significant impact on the health care system. We are planning to test the UPP-ANXIETY in a multicenter randomized controlled trial."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/a0033815"],["dc.identifier.isi","000345153500005"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24377407"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/33195"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychological Assoc, Div Psychotherapy"],["dc.relation.issn","1939-1536"],["dc.relation.issn","0033-3204"],["dc.title","A Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Psychodynamic Treatment of Anxiety Disorders: An Evidence-Based Approach"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","304"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychotherapy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","310"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","48"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Pincus, Aaron L."],["dc.contributor.author","Winkelbach, Christel"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:52:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:52:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Interpersonal problems are highly relevant to the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) patients. Previous studies using the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems identified several interpersonal subtypes in GAD patients. In this study, we wanted to replicate earlier findings of interpersonal subtypes in GAD. We investigated whether these interpersonal subtypes are characterized by different types of interpersonal problems and different levels of interpersonal distress, and we further examined whether they differed with regard to improvement of interpersonal problems after short-term treatment. This study is based on results from a randomized controlled trial that investigated short-term treatments in GAD outpatients. For secondary analysis, interpersonal subtypes were identified by cluster analysis and Inventory of Interpersonal Problems profiles were calculated for both the total sample (N = 52) and the interpersonal subtypes using the Structural Summary Method for Circumplex Data. This study confirmed previous results demonstrating the existence of interpersonal subtypes in GAD. Four interpersonal subtypes were identified: Overly Nurturant, Intrusive, Socially Avoidant, and Nonassertive. Short-term treatment significantly improved interpersonal problems (d = 0.46) within the total GAD sample. Interestingly, the effect sizes of the four clusters differed considerably (d = 0.19-1.24) and the clusters displayed different changes in the two circumplex axes Dominance and Nurturance. Our study indicates that change of interpersonal problems needs to be specifically analyzed, even within homogenous diagnostic groups."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/a0022013"],["dc.identifier.isi","000294612000014"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21604899"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/22222"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychological Assoc, Div Psychotherapy"],["dc.relation.issn","0033-3204"],["dc.title","Interpersonal Subtypes and Change of Interpersonal Problems in the Treatment of Patients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Pilot Study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","759"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Journal of Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","767"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","170"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Huesing, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Bjoern"],["dc.contributor.author","Poehlmann, Karin"],["dc.contributor.author","Ritter, Viktoria"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Stuhldreher, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Tefikow, Susan"],["dc.contributor.author","Teismann, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:23:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:23:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: Various approaches to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to be effective for social anxiety disorder. For psychodynamic therapy, evidence for efficacy in this disorder is scant. The authors tested the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy and CBT in social anxiety disorder in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Method: In an outpatient setting, 495 patients with social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to manual-guided CBT (N=209), manual-guided psychodynamic therapy (N=207), or a waiting list condition (N=79). Assessments were made at baseline and at end of treatment. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response, based on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale applied by raters blind to group assignment. Several secondary measures were assessed as well. Results: Remission rates in the CBT, psychodynamic therapy, and waiting list groups were 36%, 26%, and 9%, respectively. Response rates were 60%, 52%,. and 15%, respectively. CBT and psychodynamic therapy were significantly superior to waiting list for both remission and response. CBT was significantly superior to psychodynamic therapy for remission but not for response. Between-group effect sizes for remission and response were small. Secondary outcome measures showed significant differences in favor of CBT for measures of social phobia and interpersonal problems, but not for depression. Conclusions: CBT and psychodynamic therapy were both efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, but there were significant differences in favor of CBT. For CBT, the response rate was comparable to rates reported in Swedish and German studies in recent years. For psychodynamic therapy, the response rate was comparable to rates reported for pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral group therapy."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GV0607]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12081125"],["dc.identifier.isi","000321023700012"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23680854"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/29520"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychiatric Publishing, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0002-953X"],["dc.title","Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","292"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Personality Assessment"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","299"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","90"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Pincus, Aaron L."],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Kreische, Reinhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:15:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:15:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","In this study, we addressed the heterogeneity in interpersonal problems across patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). We assessed interpersonal problems by the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-C; Horowitz, Alden, Wiggins, & Pincus, 2000) in a sample of 78 GAD patients. We used HP-C profiles describing interpersonal characteristics of the total GAD sample as well as clustered GAD interpersonal subtypes. Although the overall sample was located in the friendly submissive quadrant of the circumplex model, this was true only for the Exploitable cluster, which includes more than 50% of the patients. Importantly, clusters of GAD patients with other locations reporting predominantly Cold, Nonassertive, or Intrusive interpersonal problems were also identified. The 4 clusters did not differ in terms of gender, comorbid disorders, or the severity of depression or anxiety. Thus, the assessment of interpersonal problems provides additional diagnostic information covering the heterogeneity of GAD patients. This information could be used for differential indication and individual case formulation in GAD."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/00223890701885076"],["dc.identifier.isi","000256187300010"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18444126"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/54413"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-3891"],["dc.title","Interpersonal subtypes within generalized anxiety disorder"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","89"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1-2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Contemporary Psychoanalysis"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","130"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","50"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Klein, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:46:11Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:46:11Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","This article reviews the empirical evidence for psychodynamic therapy for specific mental disorders in adults. The focus is on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, this does not imply that RCTs are uncritically accepted as the gold standard for demonstrating that a treatment works. According to the results presented here, there is evidence from RCTs that psychodynamic therapy is efficacious in common mental disorders, that is, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, somatic symptom disorders, personality disorders, eating disorders, complicated grief, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and substance-related disorder. These results clearly contradict assertions repeatedly made by representatives of other psychotherapeutic approaches claiming psychodynamic psychotherapy is not empirically supported. However, further research is needed, both on outcome and processes of psychodynamic psychotherapy. There is a need, for example, for RCTs of psychodynamic psychotherapy of PTSD. Furthermore, research on long-term psychotherapy for specific mental disorders is required."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/00107530.2014.880310"],["dc.identifier.isi","000336482400008"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/34809"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","2330-9091"],["dc.relation.issn","0010-7530"],["dc.title","THE EFFICACY OF PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY IN SPECIFIC MENTAL DISORDERS: A 2013 UPDATE OF EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE"],["dc.type","review"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","503"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","508"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","56"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Winkelbach, Christel"],["dc.contributor.author","Leweke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-06-01T10:47:54Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-06-01T10:47:54Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: In a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT), short-term efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) was demonstrated. In this article, long-term stability of these effects will be examined. Effects of CBT and STPP will be compared. Method: In the original RCT, patients with GAD were treated with either CBT ( n = 29) or STPP ( n = 28). Treatments were carried out according to manuals and included up to 30 sessions. As the primary outcome measure the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale was used. In addition to short-term outcome previously reported, treatment effects were assessed 12 months after termination of treatment. Results: Both CBT and STPP yielded large improvements at 12-month follow-up. No significant differences were found between treatments concerning the primary outcome measure. This result was corroborated by 3 self-report measures of anxiety. However, in measures of trait anxiety and worry, CBT was superior. Concerning depression, differences reported at posttreatment were no longer significant at 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: In GAD, both CBT and STPP yield large and stable effects 12 months after treatment. Concerning trait anxiety and worry, CBT seems to be superior. For STPP, further studies should be carried out to confirm the results."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1177/070674371105600809"],["dc.identifier.isi","000294045000009"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21878162"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/85759"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-425"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Canadian Psychiatric Assoc"],["dc.relation.eissn","1497-0015"],["dc.relation.issn","0706-7437"],["dc.title","Long-Term Effects of Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy and Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy in Generalized Anxiety Disorder: 12-Month Follow-up"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1365"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","11"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Journal of Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1366"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","170"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:18:04Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:18:04Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13060744r"],["dc.identifier.isi","000326724300022"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24185246"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/28322"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychiatric Publishing, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","1535-7228"],["dc.relation.issn","0002-953X"],["dc.title","Psychodynamic Therapy or Cognitive Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder Response"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.subtype","letter_note"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","87"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Affective Disorders"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","94"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","165"],["dc.contributor.author","Stuhldreher, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Konnopka, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Koenig, Hans-Helmut"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:36:30Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:36:30Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is associated with low direct costs compared to other anxiety disorders while indirect costs tend to be high. Mental comorbidities have been identified to increase costs, but the role of symptom severity is still vague. The objective of this study was to determine the costs of SAD, and to explore the impact of symptoms and comorbidities on direct and indirect costs. Methods: Baseline data, collected within the SOPHO-NET multi-centre treatment study (N=495), were used. Costs were calculated based on health care utilization and lost productivity. Symptom severity was measured with the Liebowitz-Social-Anxiety-Scale; comorbidities were included as covariates. Results: Total 6-month costs were accrued to (sic)4802; 23% being direct costs. While there was no significant association with SAD symptom severity for direct costs, costs of absenteeism increased with symptom severity in those with costs > 0; comorbid affective disorders and eating disorders had an additional effect. Self-rated productivity was lower with more pronounced symptoms even after controlling for comorbidities. Limitations: As the study was based on a clinical sample total costs were considered, rather than net costs of SAD and no population costs could be calculated. Discussion: The burden associated with lost productivity was considerable while costs of healthcare utilization were rather low as most patients had not sought for treatment before. Efforts to identify patients with SAD earlier and to provide adequate treatment should be further increased. Mental comorbidities should be addressed as well, since they account for a large part of indirect costs associated with SAD. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Ministry of Research and Education [01GV1002]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jad.2014.04.039"],["dc.identifier.isi","000337861900014"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24882183"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/32633"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","1573-2517"],["dc.relation.issn","0165-0327"],["dc.title","The costs of social anxiety disorder: The role of symptom severity and comorbidities"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","339"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychotherapy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","350"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","54"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Koranyi, Susan"],["dc.contributor.author","Altmann, Uwe"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolte, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Björn"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Erik"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Kirchmann, Helmut"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:09:25Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:09:25Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/pst0000129"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1939-1536"],["dc.identifier.issn","0033-3204"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/73652"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Partner-related attachment as a moderator of outcome in patients with social anxiety disorder—a comparison between short-term cognitive–behavioral and psychodynamic therapy."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","286"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","289"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","63"],["dc.contributor.author","von Consbruch, Katrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Flueckiger, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Erik"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:23:15Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:23:15Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Research on common and differential factors in the therapeutic process is impeded by the lack of instruments suitable for assessing common change mechanisms. This study presents the psychometric properties of a newly developed time-economic instrument (WIFA-k), which was designed to assess common factors of psychotherapy as designed by Grawe. Within a multi-center study comparing the efficacy of cognitive therapy and psychodynamic therapy in the treatment of social phobia, 6 raters assessed 25 randomly selected, videotaped therapy sessions of each treatment approach, and evaluated common factors using the Wifa-k. Interrater-reliability was found to be high for the items \"resource activation\", \"motivational clarification\" and \"mastery\" and low for the items \"therapeutic relationship\" and \"problem activation\". Ways to increase reliability and validity of the scale are discussed."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1055/s-0032-1331206"],["dc.identifier.isi","000321203000006"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23818316"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/29534"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Georg Thieme Verlag Kg"],["dc.relation.issn","0937-2032"],["dc.title","Assessing Common Factors in Psychotherapy: Psychometric Properties of a New Time-Economic Instrument (WIFA-k)"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]