Options
Rinke, Sven
Loading...
Preferred name
Rinke, Sven
Official Name
Rinke, Sven
Alternative Name
Rinke, S.
Main Affiliation
Now showing 1 - 10 of 32
2017-02Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","40"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Journal of Dentistry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","46"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","30"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmalz, Gerhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Marion"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmickler, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Rinke, Sven"],["dc.contributor.author","Haak, Rainer"],["dc.contributor.author","Mausberg, Rainer F."],["dc.contributor.author","Ziebolz, Dirk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-10-10T09:05:29Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-10-10T09:05:29Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017-02"],["dc.description.abstract","This randomized clinical study compared the influence of manual and power toothbrushes on clinical and microbiological findings in initial treatment of periodontitis."],["dc.fs.pkfprnr","918"],["dc.identifier.fs","632945"],["dc.identifier.pmid","29178713"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/15928"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.title","Influence of manual and power toothbrushes on clinical and microbiological findings in initial treatment of periodontitis - A randomized clinical study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details PMID PMC2013Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1281"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Oral Implants Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1287"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","24"],["dc.contributor.author","Frisch, Eberhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Ziebolz, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Rinke, Sven"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:17:24Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:17:24Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","BackgroundDifferent concepts regarding the number of implants and attachment systems for the preparation of implant-supported over-dentures (IODs) have been discussed. Nonetheless, long-term results for double-crown-retained IODs with an observational period of more than 10years are still rare in the literature. ObjectiveThe aim of this practice-based study was to retrospectively evaluate the long-term clinical outcome (success/survival rates, technical/biological complications) of IODs retained by double crowns. Material and methodsIn a private practice, 36 non-smoking edentulous patients were restored between 1991 and 2002 with double-crown-retained IODs supported by 2-6 implants. For the retrospective evaluation of implant and prosthetic survival (in-situ criterion) and success (event-free observational period), only those patients were included who regularly (at least once a year) participated in a professional maintenance programme and who had a functional period for the restoration of more than 10years. ResultsTwenty-two patients (12 Women/10 men, mean age 60.19.8years) with 89 implants supporting nine maxillary and 13 mandibulary dentures (mean number of implants/prosthesis=4) met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up period was 14.1 +/- 2.8years. One implant failed after 4.9years (cumulative-survival rate: 98.9%). Seven implants in two patients showed peri-implantitis (prevalence: patient-based=9.1%/implant-based=8%). Five dentures were renewed (prosthetic-survival rate 77.3% Maintenance procedures (i.e. screw loosening or acrylic fractures) were required at a rate of 0.31/year and patient. ConclusionThis study indicates that IODs retained with double crowns offer predictable long-term performance with a limited incidence of biological and technical complications."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02568.x"],["dc.identifier.isi","000326071900001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22882661"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/28159"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","1600-0501"],["dc.relation.issn","0905-7161"],["dc.title","Long-term results of implant-supported over-dentures retained by double crowns: a practice-based retrospective study after minimally 10 years follow-up"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2017Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","47"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","52"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","88"],["dc.contributor.author","Ziebolz, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmalz, Gerhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Gollasch, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Eickholz, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Rinke, Sven"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:24:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:24:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","The aim of this study was to evaluate microbiological findings and aMMP-8 level of peri-implant mucositis (M) and peri-implantitis (P) in patients undergoing supportive implant therapy (SIT). Eighty-nine patients with 171 implants were included. The case definitions were as follows: M: PPD >= 4 mm, BOP; P: PPD >= 4 mm, BOP, radiographic bone loss >= 3.5mm. Samples of peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) were taken from all peri-implant pockets at each implant to detect periodontal pathogens using PCR and aMMP-8 level with ELISA. Only Treponema denticola (Td) and Prevotella intermedia (Pi) showed significantly higher prevalence in P (healthy implants [HI]: Td = 27%, Pi = 17%; M: Td = 26%, Pi =15%; P: Td and Pi = 50%; P < 0,05). The mean aMMP-8 level at implant sites did not show any significant difference (P = 0.05) among HI (5.2 +/- 8.1), M (9.9 +/- 19.0), and P (4.9 +/- 7.7). Microbiological findings and aMMP-8 levels are not reliable criteria to distinguish between HI, M, and P in patients undergoing SIT. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.02.008"],["dc.identifier.isi","000400541600013"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28274501"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42665"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","1879-0070"],["dc.relation.issn","0732-8893"],["dc.title","Microbiological and aMMP-8 findings depending on peri-implant disease in patients undergoing supportive implant therapy"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2013Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","42"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","52"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","25"],["dc.contributor.author","Rinke, Sven"],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Ziebolz, Dirk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:30:17Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:30:17Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Statement of the Problem The clinical performance of ceramic veneers is influenced by various clinical and material-related factors. Purpose Retrospective evaluation of extensive anterior ceramic veneers in the upper and lower jaw 36 months after placement in a private practice. Materials and Methods Thirty-seven patients (21 female, 16 male) were restored with adhesively luted extensive ceramic veneers made from a heat-pressed ceramic (Cergo, DeguDent, Hanau, Germany). One dentist restored a total of 130 teeth (maxilla N=76, mandible N=54). Adhesive cementation was performed with an etch-and-rinse adhesive (Optibond FL, Kerr Hawe, Karlsruhe, Germany) and a dual-curing composite cement. Results After 36 months, the survival rate (in situ criteria) according to KaplanMeier was 95.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88; 1). Reasons for failure were four ceramic fractures and one biological failure in five restored teeth. Of the restorations, 92.8% (95% CI: 0.86;1) were in service without any clinical intervention and rated successful after 36 months. Interventions were necessary in five cases (three recementations, two endodontic treatments). Clinical performance was not influenced by the veneer position (maxillar/mandibular, survival p=0.3/success p=0.4). Veneers with more than 50% of exposed dentin demonstrated a significantly increased risk (hazard ratio 10.6, p=0.026) for a clinical intervention (recementation, endodontic treatment), whereas no effect on the survival rate could be detected (p=0.17). Conclusions After 36 months of clinical service, extensive veneer restorations made of a pressable ceramic showed a comparable survival and success rate in the upper and lower jaw. Large areas of exposed dentin (>50%) were associated with lower success rates. Clinical Significance Mandibular ceramic veneers made using a heat-pressed ceramic offer the same clinical reliability as do veneers on anterior maxillary teeth. Dentin exposure significantly affects the clinical performance of heat-pressed ceramic veneers."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/jerd.12000"],["dc.identifier.isi","000314479300008"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23374409"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/31271"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","1496-4155"],["dc.title","Retrospective Study of Extensive Heat-Pressed Ceramic Veneers after 36 Months"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2016Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Case Reports in Dentistry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","2016"],["dc.contributor.author","Rinke, Sven"],["dc.contributor.author","Pabel, Anne-Kathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Rödiger, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Ziebolz, Dirk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:37:40Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:37:40Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1155/2016/1354186"],["dc.identifier.eissn","2090-6455"],["dc.identifier.issn","2090-6447"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/77060"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Chairside Fabrication of an All-Ceramic Partial Crown Using a Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2011Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","826"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Oral Implants Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","833"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.contributor.author","Rinke, Sven"],["dc.contributor.author","Ohl, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Ziebolz, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Eickholz, Peter"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:54:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:54:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Objectives: Evaluation of the prevalence rates of periimplant mucositis and periimplantitis in partially edentulous patients in a private dental practice. Material and methods: The data of 89 patients were collected (52 female, 37 male, age at time of implant placement: 51.8 +/- 10.3 years). All patients had been treated with dental implants of the same type and fixed superstructures between January 1999 and June 2006 (observational period: 68.2 +/- 24.8 months). Results: The patient-related prevalence rate of periimplant mucositis (probing depth >= 4 mm and bleeding on probing [BOP]) was over all 44.9%. The respective rates in non-smokers without periodontal history were 30.4% and in smokers with periodontal history 80%. The multiple logistic regression analysis identified a significant association of mucositis with the independent variable \"smoker'' (odds ratio [OR] 3.77; P = 0.023). The patient-related prevalence rate of periimplantitis (probing depth >= 5 mm, BOP/pus, radiographic bone loss) was 11.2% (smokers with periodontal history: 53.3%, non-smokers: 2.8%). No periimplant disease was diagnosed in non-smoking patients without periodontal history and with a good compliance after treatment. Statistical analysis identified a significant association of periimplantitis with \"smoker'' (OR: 31.58; P < 0.001) and \"compliance'' (OR: 0.09; P = 0.011). Periodontal history in general showed no significant association with periimplantitis. Conclusions: Smoking and compliance are important risk factors for periimplant inflammations in partially edentulous patients."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02061.x"],["dc.identifier.isi","000292605600007"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21198898"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/22566"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","0905-7161"],["dc.title","Prevalence of periimplant disease in partially edentulous patients: a practice-based cross-sectional study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2021Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Oral Investigations"],["dc.contributor.author","Rinke, Sven"],["dc.contributor.author","Zuck, Tanja"],["dc.contributor.author","Hausdörfer, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Leha, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Wassmann, Torsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Ziebolz, Dirk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-09-01T06:42:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-09-01T06:42:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Objectives A university-based randomized clinical study evaluated the 5-year performance of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS)-ceramic partial crowns. Material and methods Forty-five patients were restored with 61 chairside-fabricated ZLS-restorations (Cerec SW 4.2, Dentsply Sirona, Germany; Vita Suprinity, Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany). Deviating from the manufacturers’ recommendations, restorations with reduced minimum material thicknesses (MMT) were fabricated: group 1, MMT = 0.5–0.74 mm ( n  = 31); group 2, MMT = 0.75–1.0 mm ( n  = 30). For luting, a self-adhesive cement (SAC) or a total-etch technique with a composite cement (TEC) was applied. Statistical evaluation was performed by time-to-event analysis (Kaplan–Meier). Possible covariates of the survival (SVR) and success rates (SCR), evaluated in a Cox regression model, were MMT, restoration position (premolar/molar), and cementation technique (SAC vs. TEC). Results Forty patients (54 restorations, premolars, n  = 23; molars, n  = 31) participated in the 5-year follow-up. Five losses due to ceramic fractures occurred in group 1 ( n  = 28) (SVR: 83.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71–0.96]). Group 2 ( n  = 26) showed no losses (SVR: 100%). The success rate for partial crowns placed on premolars was 100% and 69% (95% CI: 0.54–0.84) for molar restorations. Recementation was required in 4 restorations with SAC (SCR: 86% [95% CI: 0.73–0.99]; SCR-DC: 100%). Restorations in group 2 showed a significantly reduced risk of material fracture hazard ratio (HR) = 0.09, p  = 0.0292) compared with the restorations in group 1. Molar partial crowns showed an increased risk for a clinical intervention (HR = 5.26, p  = 0.0222) compared to premolar restorations. Conclusions Material thickness and position of the restoration are risk factors influencing the survival and success rate of ZLS-ceramic partial crowns. Clinical relevance Observation of an MMT of at least 0.75–1.0 mm for ZLS-ceramics is essential to avoid material-related fractures. Clinical trial registration : German Clinical Trails Register (trial number: DRKS00005611)"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Objectives A university-based randomized clinical study evaluated the 5-year performance of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS)-ceramic partial crowns. Material and methods Forty-five patients were restored with 61 chairside-fabricated ZLS-restorations (Cerec SW 4.2, Dentsply Sirona, Germany; Vita Suprinity, Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany). Deviating from the manufacturers’ recommendations, restorations with reduced minimum material thicknesses (MMT) were fabricated: group 1, MMT = 0.5–0.74 mm ( n  = 31); group 2, MMT = 0.75–1.0 mm ( n  = 30). For luting, a self-adhesive cement (SAC) or a total-etch technique with a composite cement (TEC) was applied. Statistical evaluation was performed by time-to-event analysis (Kaplan–Meier). Possible covariates of the survival (SVR) and success rates (SCR), evaluated in a Cox regression model, were MMT, restoration position (premolar/molar), and cementation technique (SAC vs. TEC). Results Forty patients (54 restorations, premolars, n  = 23; molars, n  = 31) participated in the 5-year follow-up. Five losses due to ceramic fractures occurred in group 1 ( n  = 28) (SVR: 83.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71–0.96]). Group 2 ( n  = 26) showed no losses (SVR: 100%). The success rate for partial crowns placed on premolars was 100% and 69% (95% CI: 0.54–0.84) for molar restorations. Recementation was required in 4 restorations with SAC (SCR: 86% [95% CI: 0.73–0.99]; SCR-DC: 100%). Restorations in group 2 showed a significantly reduced risk of material fracture hazard ratio (HR) = 0.09, p  = 0.0292) compared with the restorations in group 1. Molar partial crowns showed an increased risk for a clinical intervention (HR = 5.26, p  = 0.0222) compared to premolar restorations. Conclusions Material thickness and position of the restoration are risk factors influencing the survival and success rate of ZLS-ceramic partial crowns. Clinical relevance Observation of an MMT of at least 0.75–1.0 mm for ZLS-ceramics is essential to avoid material-related fractures. Clinical trial registration : German Clinical Trails Register (trial number: DRKS00005611)"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00784-021-04132-y"],["dc.identifier.pii","4132"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89055"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-455"],["dc.relation.eissn","1436-3771"],["dc.relation.issn","1432-6981"],["dc.title","Prospective clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic partial crowns—5-year results"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2018Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","251"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","48"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmalz, Gerhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Kummer, Max Kristian"],["dc.contributor.author","Kottmann, Tanja"],["dc.contributor.author","Rinke, Sven"],["dc.contributor.author","Haak, Rainer"],["dc.contributor.author","Krause, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Ziebolz, Dirk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:47:50Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:47:50Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.5051/jpis.2018.48.4.251"],["dc.identifier.eissn","2093-2286"],["dc.identifier.issn","2093-2278"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/78912"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Association of chairside salivary aMMP-8 findings with periodontal risk assessment parameters in patients receiving supportive periodontal therapy"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2012Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","231"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Oral Investigations"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","237"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","16"],["dc.contributor.author","Ziebolz, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Hildebrand, Aick"],["dc.contributor.author","Proff, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Rinke, Sven"],["dc.contributor.author","Hornecker, Else"],["dc.contributor.author","Mausberg, Rainer F."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:14:06Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:14:06Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","The aim of this study was to evaluate tooth and periodontal damage in subjects wearing a tongue piercing (TP) in comparison to matched control subjects without tongue piercing. Members of the German Federal Armed Forces who had TP (group TP) and a matched control group (group C) volunteered to take part in the study. The time in situ, localization and material of TP were documented. Dental examinations included DMF-T, oral hygiene, enamel fissures (EF), enamel cracks (EC) and recessions. Statistical analysis was determined by chi (2) test and the t test. Both groups had 46 male subjects (mean age 22.1 years). The piercings had been in situ for 3.8 +/- 3.1 years. Subjects in the TP group had a total of 1,260 teeth. Twenty-nine subjects had 115 teeth (9.1%) with EF (67% lingual). In group C (1,243 teeth), 30 subjects had 60 teeth with EF (4.8%, 78% vestibular) (p < 0.01). Thirty-eight subjects belonging to group TP had EC in 186 teeth (15%). In group C, 26 subjects with 56 teeth (4.5%) were affected by EC (p < 0.001). Twenty-seven subjects in group TP had 97 teeth (7.7%) with recessions. Lingual surfaces of anterior teeth in the lower jaw were affected most frequently (74%). In group C, 8 subjects had 19 teeth (1.5%) with recessions (65% vestibular). Differences between the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Tongue piercing is correlated with an increased occurrence of enamel fissures, enamel cracks and lingual recessions. Patients need better information on the potential complications associated with tongue piercing."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00784-011-0510-6"],["dc.identifier.isi","000299172000027"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21271349"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/7138"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/27324"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.publisher.place","Heidelberg"],["dc.relation.issn","1432-6981"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Long-term effects of tongue piercing - a case control study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2015Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","358"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Prosthodontics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","365"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","24"],["dc.contributor.author","Rinke, Sven"],["dc.contributor.author","Ziebolz, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Ratka-Krueger, Petra"],["dc.contributor.author","Frisch, Eberhard"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:55:06Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:55:06Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","PurposeThere is a lack of data regarding the clinical outcome of removable partial dentures (RPDs) supported by a combination of residual natural teeth and implants placed in strategic positions. The aim of the present case series was to conduct a retrospective investigation of the clinical outcome of mandibular tooth-implant-retained partial dentures (TIRPD) rigidly retained via telescopic double crowns. Material and MethodsBetween 1999 and 2010, 18 patients with reduced residual dentition (1 to 3 natural abutment teeth) and in need of an RPD received 1 to 3 implants in strategic positions for support of the removable prostheses. All TIRPDs were rigidly retained by telescopic crowns according to the Marburg Double Crown (MDC) technique; all prostheses were placed in a private practice. Tooth/implant survival and success rates, prosthetic maintenance requirements, and peri-implant parameters were analyzed retrospectively using patient records and clinical examinations during the final recall appointments. Only patients attending at least annual supportive post-implant hygiene therapy visits (SIT) were included. ResultsAfter a mean functional period of 5.843 years (range: 3.01-12.21), 14 patients with 14 dentures supported by 24 implants and 27 teeth (mean number of abutments: 3.6) were available for assessment. Four teeth (survival rate: 85.19%) and no implants (survival rate: 100%) were lost. Peri-implantitis was observed around one implant (4.17%). All 14 dentures were functional (survival rate: 100%) and required only limited maintenance (i.e., screw loosening, acrylic resin fracture repairs, relining) amounting to 0.086 treatments per patient per year (T/P/Y). ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this case series, it can be concluded that TIRPDs retained via MDCs might represent a viable treatment option in mandibles with few remaining abutment teeth. Further long-term clinical evaluations with a greater sample size are needed for a more detailed evaluation of this treatment concept."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/jopr.12214"],["dc.identifier.isi","000358376400003"],["dc.identifier.pmid","25220099"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/36680"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","1532-849X"],["dc.relation.issn","1059-941X"],["dc.title","Clinical Outcome of Double Crown-Retained Mandibular Removable Dentures Supported by a Combination of Residual Teeth and Strategic Implants"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS