Options
Klinger, Hans-Michael
Loading...
Preferred name
Klinger, Hans-Michael
Official Name
Klinger, Hans-Michael
Alternative Name
Klinger, H.-M.
Main Affiliation
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
2009Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","782"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","785"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","17"],["dc.contributor.author","Steckel, Hanno"],["dc.contributor.author","Fu, Freddie H."],["dc.contributor.author","Baums, Mike Herbert"],["dc.contributor.author","Klinger, Hans-Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:28:20Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:28:20Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","In order to describe the arthroscopic presence of the double bundle structure and to evaluate the value of different portals in knee arthroscopy, we assessed the AM and PL bundle anatomy. We prospectively examined the knees of 60 patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery for pathology unrelated to the ACL. Arthroscopy was performed in a two portal technique using an anterolateral (ALP) and an anteromedial (AMP) portal. With the arthroscope in the ALP, we could distinguish an AM and PL bundle in 28%. Switching the arthroscope to the AMP, differentiation of the bundles was possible in 67%. In all remaining cases visualization of the PL bundle was possible after retraction of the AM bundle. Use of AMP increased visualization of the PL bundle. It seems reasonable to perform arthroscopy for ACL reconstruction with the arthroscope in the AMP and to establish an additional medial working portal to increase the visualization of the femoral ACL insertion sites for optimal femoral tunnel placement."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00167-009-0783-3"],["dc.identifier.isi","000267367400011"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19333575"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6694"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/16395"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prĂĽfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","0942-2056"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Arthroscopic evaluation of the ACL double bundle structure"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2009Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","329"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","337"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","19"],["dc.contributor.author","Klinger, H.-M."],["dc.contributor.author","Koelling, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Baums, Mike Herbert"],["dc.contributor.author","Kahl, E."],["dc.contributor.author","Steckel, Hanno"],["dc.contributor.author","Smith, M. Mitchell"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultz, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Miosge, Nicolai"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:29:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:29:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Our objective was to evaluate the cell biology and biomechanical aspects of the healing process after two different techniques in open rotator cuff surgery - double-loaded bio-absorbable suture anchors combined with so-called arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches (AAMA) and a trans-osseous suture technique combined with traditional modified Mason-Allen stitches (SMMA). Thirty-six mature sheep were randomized into two repair groups. After 6, 12, or 26 weeks, evaluation of the reinsertion site of the infraspinatus tendon was performed. The mechanical load-to-failure and stiffness results did not indicate a significant difference between the two groups. After 26 weeks, fibrocartilage was sparse in the AAMA group, whereas the SMMA group showed the most pronounced amount of fibrocartilage. We found no ultrastructural differences in collagen fiber organization between the two groups. The relative expression of collagen type II mRNA in the normal group was 1.11. For the AAMA group, 6 weeks after surgery, the relative expression was 55.47, whereas for the SMMA group it was 1.90. This in vivo study showed that the AAMA group exhibited a tendon-to-bone healing process more favorable in its cell biology than that of the traditional SMMA technique. Therefore, the AAMA technique might also be more appropriate for arthroscopic repair."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00791.x"],["dc.identifier.isi","000266431300005"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18397194"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6178"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/16696"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prĂĽfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","0905-7188"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Cell biological and biomechanical evaluation of two different fixation techniques for rotator cuff repair"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2011Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2076"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","2079"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","19"],["dc.contributor.author","Steckel, Hanno"],["dc.contributor.author","Baums, Mike Herbert"],["dc.contributor.author","Tennstedt-Schenk, Cornelia"],["dc.contributor.author","Klinger, Hans-Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:49:32Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:49:32Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Necrotizing fasciitis is a rare, life-threatening and rapidly spreading soft-tissue infection that results in necrosis of the muscle, fascia and surrounding tissue. It can be result of a polymicrobial synergistic infection or a streptococcal infection. The authors report a case of necrotizing fasciitis occurring in the knee of a 65-year-old woman following an uneventful primary total knee arthroplasty and resulting in above-the-knee amputation. Having in mind severe infections like necrotising fasciitis, one should be aware of the possibility of such postoperative complications especially in patients with risk factors even in routine procedures like a total knee arthroplasty."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00167-011-1561-6"],["dc.identifier.isi","000297176300017"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21647659"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/21483"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prĂĽfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","0942-2056"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Necrotizing fasciitis of the knee following primary total knee arthroplasty"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2009Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1466"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1472"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","17"],["dc.contributor.author","Baums, Mike Herbert"],["dc.contributor.author","Spahn, Gunter"],["dc.contributor.author","Steckel, Hanno"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Schultz, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Klinger, H.-M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:21:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:21:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","The aim of the study was to evaluate the time zero contact pressure over a defined rotator cuff footprint using different repair and stitch techniques in an established sheep model. Forty fresh-frozen sheep shoulders were randomly assigned to five repair groups: single-row repair using simple stitches (SRA-s), single-row repair using horizontal mattress stitches (SRA-m), and single-row repair using arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches (SRA-ama). Double-row repair was either performed with a combination of simple and horizontal mattress stitches (DRA-sm) or with arthroscopic Mason-Allen/horizontal mattress stitches (DRA-amam). Investigations were performed using a pressure-sensitive film system. The average contact pressure and pressure pattern were measured for each group. Contact pressure was lowest in SRA-m followed by SRA-s. SRA-ama showed highest contact pressure of all single-row treatment groups (P < 0.05). DRA-amam presented the highest overall contact pressure (P < 0.05), whereas DRA-sm exerted contact pressure equal to that of SRA-ama. Both double-row techniques showed the most expanded pressure pattern. Average contact pressures for the more complex single- and double-row techniques utilizing arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches were greater than were those of the repair techniques utilizing simple and horizontal mattress stitches. However, the contact pattern between the anchors could be increased by using the double-row technique, resulting in more footprint coverage compared to patterns utilizing the single-row techniques. These results support the use of the more complex arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches and may improve the environment for healing of the repaired rotator cuff tendon."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00167-009-0771-7"],["dc.identifier.isi","000272159700015"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19305972"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?goescholar/3950"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/55818"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prĂĽfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","0942-2056"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Comparative evaluation of the tendon-bone interface contact pressure in different single- versus double-row suture anchor repair techniques"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS