Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel Ángel

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","20150284"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1694"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","371"],["dc.contributor.author","Minden, Vanessa"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherber, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Cebrián Piqueras, Miguel A."],["dc.contributor.author","Trinogga, Juliane"],["dc.contributor.author","Trenkamp, Anastasia"],["dc.contributor.author","Mantilla-Contreras, Jasmin"],["dc.contributor.author","Lienin, Patrick"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleyer, Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:14:12Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:14:12Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Ecosystems managed for production of biomass are often characterized by low functions (i.e. yield) involving deliberate selection of species or cultivars. In consequence, considerable differences in observed plant species richness and productivity remain across systems, and the drivers of these differences have remained poorly resolved so far. In addition, it has remained unclear if species richness feeds back on ecosystem functions such as yield in real-world systems. Here, we establish N = 360 experimental plots across a broad range of managed ecosystems in several European countries, and use structural equation models to unravel potential drivers of plant species richness. We hypothesize that the relationships between productivity, total biomass and observed species richness are affected by management intensity, and that these effects differ between habitat types (dry grasslands, grasslands, and wetlands). We found that local management was an important driver of species richness across systems. Management caused system disturbance, resulting in reduced productivity yet enhanced total biomass. Plant species richness was directly and positively driven by management, with consistently negative effects of total biomass. Productivity effects on richness were positive, negative or neutral. Our study shows that management and total biomass drive plant species richness across real-world managed systems."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1098/rstb.2015.0284"],["dc.identifier.isi","000375896500009"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/40580"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","1471-2970"],["dc.relation.issn","0962-8436"],["dc.title","Consistent drivers of plant biodiversity across managed ecosystems"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Reports on Progress in Physics"],["dc.contributor.author","Billard, Julien"],["dc.contributor.author","Boulay, Mark"],["dc.contributor.author","Cebrian, S"],["dc.contributor.author","Covi, Laura"],["dc.contributor.author","Fiorillo, Giuliana"],["dc.contributor.author","Green, Anne M"],["dc.contributor.author","Kopp, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Majorovits, Bela"],["dc.contributor.author","Palladino, Kimberly"],["dc.contributor.author","Petricca, Federica"],["dc.contributor.author","Schumann, Marc"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-04-01T10:02:48Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-04-01T10:02:48Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract This Report provides an extensive review of the experimental programme of direct detection searches of particle dark matter. It focuses mostly on European efforts, both current and planned, but does it within a broader context of a worldwide activity in the field. It aims at identifying the virtues, opportunities and challenges associated with the different experimental approaches and search techniques. It presents scientific and technological synergies, both ex- isting and emerging, with some other areas of particle physics, notably collider and neutrino programmes, and beyond. It addresses the issue of infrastructure in light of the growing needs and challenges of the different experimental searches. Finally, the Report makes a number of recommendations from the perspective of a long-term future of the field. They are introduced, along with some justification, in the opening Overview and Recommendations section and are next summarised at the end of the Report. Overall, we recommend that the direct search for dark matter particle interactions with a detector target should be given top priority in astroparticle physics, and in all particle physics, and beyond, as a positive measurement will provide the most unambiguous confirmation of the particle nature of dark matter in the Universe."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1088/1361-6633/ac5754"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/106008"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-530"],["dc.relation.eissn","1361-6633"],["dc.relation.issn","0034-4885"],["dc.title","Direct Detection of Dark Matter – APPEC Committee Report "],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","341"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","358"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","24"],["dc.contributor.author","Cebrián Piqueras, Miguel A."],["dc.contributor.editor","von Haaren, C."],["dc.contributor.editor","Lovett, A."],["dc.contributor.editor","Albert, C."],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-08-13T07:48:20Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-08-13T07:48:20Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","This chapter introduces measures for the protection of soil-related ecosystem functions and services. It outlines available mandatory and voluntary measures regarding conservation of soil production capacity in agricultural land at a European level. It continues with an overview of specific management measures for soil erosion control and for enhancement of the greenhouse gases storage and carbon sequestration service. Finally, measures to protect geodiversity, including geosites and soils with historical and cultural value are presented."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/978-94-024-1681-7_22"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/62376"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.crisseries","Landscape Series"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-94-024-1679-4"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-94-024-1681-7"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Landscape Planning with Ecosystem Services"],["dc.relation.ispartofseries","Landscape Series;"],["dc.relation.issn","1572-7742"],["dc.relation.issn","1875-1210"],["dc.title","Measures to Safeguard and Enhance Soil-Related Ecosystem Services"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","People and Nature"],["dc.contributor.author","Goodson, Devin J."],["dc.contributor.author","Riper, Carena J."],["dc.contributor.author","Andrade, Riley"],["dc.contributor.author","Cebrián‐Piqueras, Miguel A."],["dc.contributor.author","Hauber, Mark E."],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-04-01T10:01:14Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-04-01T10:01:14Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/pan3.10312"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/105631"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-530"],["dc.relation.eissn","2575-8314"],["dc.relation.issn","2575-8314"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Perceived inclusivity and trust in protected area management decisions among stakeholders in Alaska"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","752377"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in Conservation Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","2"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Flinzberger, Lukas; 1Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A.; 1Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Peppler-Lisbach, Cord; 2Institute of Biology and Environmental Sciences (IBU) - Landscape Ecology Group, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Zinngrebe, Yves; 3Department for Conservation Biology and Social-Ecological Systems, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany"],["dc.contributor.author","Flinzberger, Lukas"],["dc.contributor.author","Cebrian-Piqueras, Miguel A."],["dc.contributor.author","Peppler-Lisbach, Cord"],["dc.contributor.author","Zinngrebe, Yves"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-07-13T08:25:09Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-07-13T08:25:09Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.date.updated","2022-09-04T17:23:57Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Implementing the European Green Deal and transforming agricultural practices requires a wider and amplified policy toolbox. As many sustainability considerations are context-dependent, there is a need for instruments, which take individual characteristics of production landscapes into account. Food products with a particularly strong relationship to their landscape of origin can be marketed under the “Protected Designation of Origin” label (PDO). In this article, we analyze synergies between PDO production and regional sustainable development by assessing to what extent social-ecological landscape characteristics appear in landscapes with PDO-labeled food production systems. Building upon 12 social-ecological variables we defined three landscape characteristics influential for the presence of PDOs by using a principal component analysis. By running regression models combining those characteristic landscapes with the spatial distribution of PDO certification we were able to explore linkages between landscapes and products. Additionally, a geographically weighted regression delivered insights into the regional differences and product-specific relationships throughout the EU countries. Overall, we could prove the assumed positive correlation between PDO production and ecologically valuable landscapes. Further, we showed that mostly meat PDOs coincide with landscapes influenced by structural change, while cheese PDOs are not well captured by our models despite their large number. We can conclude that PDOs have the potential to jointly support conservation and rural development, especially when they would be tied to sustainable management standards in the future."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/fcosc.2021.752377"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/112482"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","2673-611X"],["dc.relation.issn","2673-611X"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Why Geographical Indications Can Support Sustainable Development in European Agri-Food Landscapes"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2549"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","11"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Landscape Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","2567"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Cebrián-Piqueras, M. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Filyushkina, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Johnson, D. N."],["dc.contributor.author","Lo, V. B."],["dc.contributor.author","López-Rodríguez, M. D."],["dc.contributor.author","March, H."],["dc.contributor.author","Oteros-Rozas, E."],["dc.contributor.author","Peppler-Lisbach, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Quintas-Soriano, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Raymond, C. M."],["dc.contributor.author","Ruiz-Mallén, I."],["dc.contributor.author","van Riper, C. J."],["dc.contributor.author","Zinngrebe, Y."],["dc.contributor.author","Plieninger, T."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:23:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:23:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10980-020-01107-4"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/80968"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1572-9761"],["dc.relation.issn","0921-2973"],["dc.title","Scientific and local ecological knowledge, shaping perceptions towards protected areas and related ecosystem services"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","252"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","One Earth"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","264"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","5"],["dc.contributor.author","Raymond, Christopher M."],["dc.contributor.author","Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel Á."],["dc.contributor.author","Andersson, Erik"],["dc.contributor.author","Andrade, Riley"],["dc.contributor.author","Schnell, Alberto Arroyo"],["dc.contributor.author","Battioni Romanelli, Barbara"],["dc.contributor.author","Filyushkina, Anna"],["dc.contributor.author","Goodson, Devin J."],["dc.contributor.author","Horcea-Milcu, Andra"],["dc.contributor.author","Johnson, Dana N."],["dc.contributor.author","Wiedermann, Magdalena M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-09-01T09:49:46Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-09-01T09:49:46Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.abstract","The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a “relational turn” in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although “inclusivity” is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational turn in biodiversity conservation. Drawing on global case examples applying multiple methods of inclusive conservation, we then demonstrate that, by actively engaging in the interdependent phases of recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity and partnership building, tensions can not only be acknowledged but softened and, in some cases, reframed when managing for biodiversity, equity, and justice goals. The results can improve stakeholder engagement in protected area management, ultimately supporting better implementation of global biodiversity targets."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008"],["dc.identifier.pii","S2590332222000938"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/113526"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-597"],["dc.relation.issn","2590-3322"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","People and Nature"],["dc.contributor.author","Lo, Veronica B. P. G."],["dc.contributor.author","López‐Rodríguez, María D."],["dc.contributor.author","Metzger, Marc J."],["dc.contributor.author","Oteros‐Rozas, Elisa"],["dc.contributor.author","Cebrián‐Piqueras, Miguel A."],["dc.contributor.author","Ruiz‐Mallén, Isabel"],["dc.contributor.author","March, Hug"],["dc.contributor.author","Raymond, Christopher M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-02-01T10:31:26Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-02-01T10:31:26Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/pan3.10292"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/98862"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-517"],["dc.relation.eissn","2575-8314"],["dc.relation.issn","2575-8314"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","How stable are visions for protected area management? Stakeholder perspectives before and during a pandemic"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","S1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Environmental Monitoring and Assessment"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","193"],["dc.contributor.author","Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A."],["dc.contributor.author","Trinogga, Juliane"],["dc.contributor.author","Trenkamp, Anastasia"],["dc.contributor.author","Minden, Vanessa"],["dc.contributor.author","Maier, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Mantilla-Contreras, Jasmin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-06-01T10:49:18Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-06-01T10:49:18Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Recent empirical and theoretical approaches have called for an understanding of the processes underpinning ecosystem service provision. Environmental gradients have shown effects on key plant functional traits that subsequently explain ecosystem properties of several systems. However, little is known concerning how associations between plant functional traits, including both below- and aboveground plant components, predict ecosystem properties and independently measured final ecosystem services. Here, we modeled (1) the responses of the leaf and plant economics spectrum, Plant size axis, and root growth to environmental gradients and (2) how associations between plant functional traits explain trade-offs and synergies between multiple ecosystem properties and final services. Forty-four plots were studied in a coastal marsh landscape of the German North Sea Coast. We used a partial least square structural equation model approach to test the hypothesized model. We found (1) a negative covariation between plant traits pertaining to a size axis and traits explaining both plant growth (roots and stems) and the leaf economics spectrum; (2) this trade-off responded significantly to the land use gradient and nutrient availability, which were both strongly driven by the groundwater gradient; (3) this trade-off explained an initial major trade-off between carbon stocks, at one extreme of the axis, and both the habitat value to conserve endangered plants and forage production for meat and dairy products at the other extreme. However, a secondary trade-off between nature conservation value and forage production, explained by a trade-off between leaf economics spectrum and plant growth in response to the land use intensity gradient, was also found."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10661-020-08817-x"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/86240"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-425"],["dc.relation.eissn","1573-2959"],["dc.relation.issn","0167-6369"],["dc.title","Digging into the roots: understanding direct and indirect drivers of ecosystem service trade-offs in coastal grasslands via plant functional traits"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]