Kaiser, Kristin

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","267"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Applied Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","278"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","55"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Goßner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrichs, Steffi"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Prati, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Kirsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Baumgartner, Vanessa"],["dc.contributor.author","Blaser, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Böhm, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Daniel, Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser, Kristin"],["dc.contributor.author","Kahl, Tiemo"],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Overmann, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Renner, Swen C."],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Sikorski, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Tschapka, Marco"],["dc.contributor.author","Türke, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Wemheuer, Bernd"],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-04-28T12:41:02Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-04-28T12:41:02Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","For managed temperate forests, conservationists and policymakers favour fine‐grained uneven‐aged (UEA) management over more traditional coarse‐grained even‐aged (EA) management, based on the assumption that within‐stand habitat heterogeneity enhances biodiversity. There is, however, little empirical evidence to support this assumption. We investigated for the first time how differently grained forest management systems affect the biodiversity of multiple above‐ and below‐ground taxa across spatial scales. We sampled 15 taxa of animals, plants, fungi and bacteria within the largest contiguous beech forest landscape of Germany and classified them into functional groups. Selected forest stands have been managed for more than a century at different spatial grains. The EA (coarse‐grained management) and UEA (fine‐grained) forests are comparable in spatial arrangement, climate and soil conditions. These were compared to forests of a nearby national park that have been unmanaged for at least 20 years. We used diversity accumulation curves to compare γ‐diversity for Hill numbers 0D (species richness), 1D (Shannon diversity) and 2D (Simpson diversity) between the management systems. Beta diversity was quantified as multiple‐site dissimilarity. Gamma diversity was higher in EA than in UEA forests for at least one of the three Hill numbers for six taxa (up to 77%), while eight showed no difference. Only bacteria showed the opposite pattern. Higher γ‐diversity in EA forests was also found for forest specialists and saproxylic beetles. Between‐stand β‐diversity was higher in EA than in UEA forests for one‐third (all species) and half (forest specialists) of all taxa, driven by environmental heterogeneity between age‐classes, while α‐diversity showed no directional response across taxa or for forest specialists. Synthesis and applications. Comparing EA and uneven‐aged forest management in Central European beech forests, our results show that a mosaic of different age‐classes is more important for regional biodiversity than high within‐stand heterogeneity. We suggest reconsidering the current trend of replacing even‐aged management in temperate forests. Instead, the variability of stages and stand structures should be increased to promote landscape‐scale biodiversity."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/1365-2664.12950"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/64444"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-8901"],["dc.title","The impact of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on regional biodiversity of multiple taxa in European beech forests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","2067"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in Microbiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","7"],["dc.contributor.author","Nacke, Heiko"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Schöning, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfeiffer, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser, Kristin"],["dc.contributor.author","Castillo-Villamizar, Genis A."],["dc.contributor.author","Schrumpf, Marion"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Daniel, Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:43:04Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:43:04Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","The complex interactions between trees and soil microbes in forests as well as their inherent seasonal and spatial variations are poorly understood. In this study, we analyzed the effects of major European tree species (Fagus sylvatica L. and Picea abies (L.) Karst) on soil bacterial and fungal communities. Mineral soil samples were collected from different depths (0–10, 10–20 cm) and at different horizontal distances from beech or spruce trunks (0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 m) in early summer and autumn. We assessed the composition of soil bacterial and fungal communities based on 16S rRNA gene and ITS DNA sequences. Community composition of bacteria and fungi was most strongly affected by soil pH and tree species. Different ectomycorrhizal fungi (e.g., Tylospora) known to establish mutualistic associations with plant roots showed a tree species preference. Moreover, bacterial and fungal community composition showed spatial and seasonal shifts in soil surrounding beech and spruce. The relative abundance of saprotrophic fungi was higher at a depth of 0–10 vs. 10–20 cm depth. This was presumably a result of changes in nutrient availability, as litter input and organic carbon content decreased with soil depth. Overall bacterial community composition showed strong variations under spruce with increasing distance from the tree trunks, which might be attributed in part to higher fine root biomass near spruce trunks. Furthermore, overall bacterial community composition was strongly affected by season under deciduous trees."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/fmicb.2016.02067"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28066384"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14106"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/58817"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1664-302X"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Fine Spatial Scale Variation of Soil Microbial Communities under European Beech and Norway Spruce"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","143"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","153"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","237"],["dc.contributor.author","Simons, Nadja K."],["dc.contributor.author","Lewinsohn, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Bluethgen, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, Francois"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Daniel, Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Kirsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser, Kristin"],["dc.contributor.author","Mueller, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Prati, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Renner, Swen C."],["dc.contributor.author","Socher, Stephanie A."],["dc.contributor.author","Sonnemann, Ilja"],["dc.contributor.author","Weiner, Christiane N."],["dc.contributor.author","Werner, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.contributor.author","Wurst, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:28:23Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:28:23Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Intensive land use is a major cause of biodiversity loss, but most studies comparing the response of multiple taxa rely on simple diversity measures while analyses of other community attributes are only recently gaining attention. Species-abundance distributions (SADs) are a community attribute that can be used to study changes in the overall abundance structure of species groups, and whether these changes are driven by abundant or rare species. We evaluated the effect of grassland management intensity for three land-use modes (fertilization, mowing, grazing) and their combination on species richness and SADs for three belowground (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, prokaryotes and insect larvae) and seven aboveground groups (vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens; arthropod herbivores; arthropod pollinators; bats and birds). Three descriptors of SADs were evaluated: general shape (abundance decay rate), proportion of rare species (rarity) and proportional abundance of the commonest species (dominance). Across groups, taxonomic richness was largely unaffected by land-use intensity and only decreased with increasing mowing intensity. Of the three SAD descriptors, abundance decay rate became steeper with increasing combined land-use intensity across groups. This reflected a decrease in rarity among plants, herbivores and vertebrates. Effects of fertilization on the three descriptors were similar to the combined land-use intensity effects. Mowing intensity only affected the SAD descriptors of insect larvae and vertebrates, while grazing intensity produced a range of effects on different descriptors in distinct groups. Overall, belowground groups had more even abundance distribtitions than aboveground groups. Strong differences among aboveground groups and between above- and belowground groups indicate that no single taxonomic group can serve as an indicator for effects in other groups. In the past, the use of SADs has been hampered by concerns over theoretical models underlying specific forms of SADs. Our study shows that SAD descriptors that are not connected to a particular model are suitable to assess the effect of land use on community structure. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","DFG [DFG-WE 3081/21-1]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.022"],["dc.identifier.isi","000393252200014"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/43407"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","1873-2305"],["dc.relation.issn","0167-8809"],["dc.title","Contrasting effects of grassland management modes on species-abundance distributions of multiple groups"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","20"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","17"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","AFZ, der Wald"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","25"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","72"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Goßner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrichs, Steffi"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Prati, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Kirsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Baumgartner, Vanessa"],["dc.contributor.author","Blaser, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Böhm, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Daniel, Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser, Kristin"],["dc.contributor.author","Kahl, Tiemo"],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Overmann, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Renner, Swen C."],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Sikorski, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Tschapka, Marco"],["dc.contributor.author","Türke, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Wemheuer, Bernd"],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-12-12T14:36:11Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-12-12T14:36:11Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/11493"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.title","Waldbewirtschaftung und Biodiversität: Vielfalt ist gefragt"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]