Craven, Dylan James

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Pedobiologia"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","57"],["dc.contributor.author","Powell, Jeff R."],["dc.contributor.author","Craven, Dylan James"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-06-15T13:55:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-06-15T13:55:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.pedobi.2014.01.001"],["dc.identifier.scopus","2-s2.0-84894227721"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/66266"],["dc.identifier.url","http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84894227721&partnerID=MN8TOARS"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","0031-4056"],["dc.title","Recent trends and future strategies in soil ecological research-Integrative approaches at Pedobiologia"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","no"],["dc.type.subtype","editorial_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","6744"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecology and Evolution"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","6755"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Craven, Dylan"],["dc.contributor.author","Winter, Marten"],["dc.contributor.author","Hotzel, Konstantin"],["dc.contributor.author","Gaikwad, Jitendra"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Hohmuth, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","König-Ries, Birgitta"],["dc.contributor.author","Wirth, Christian"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-06-10T14:18:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-06-10T14:18:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","The study of biodiversity has grown exponentially in the last thirty years in response to demands for greater understanding of the function and importance of Earth's biodiversity and finding solutions to conserve it. Here, we test the hypothesis that biodiversity science has become more interdisciplinary over time. To do so, we analyze 97,945 peer-reviewed articles over a twenty-two-year time period (1990-2012) with a continuous time dynamic model, which classifies articles into concepts (i.e., topics and ideas) based on word co-occurrences. Using the model output, we then quantify different aspects of interdisciplinarity: concept diversity, that is, the diversity of topics and ideas across subdisciplines in biodiversity science, subdiscipline diversity, that is, the diversity of subdisciplines across concepts, and network structure, which captures interactions between concepts and subdisciplines. We found that, on average, concept and subdiscipline diversity in biodiversity science were either stable or declining, patterns which were driven by the persistence of rare concepts and subdisciplines and a decline in the diversity of common concepts and subdisciplines, respectively. Moreover, our results provide evidence that conceptual homogenization, that is, decreases in temporal β concept diversity, underlies the observed trends in interdisciplinarity. Together, our results reveal that biodiversity science is undergoing a dynamic phase as a scientific discipline that is consolidating around a core set of concepts. Our results suggest that progress toward addressing the biodiversity crisis via greater interdisciplinarity during the study period may have been slowed by extrinsic factors, such as the failure to invest in research spanning across concepts and disciplines. However, recent initiatives such as the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) may attract broader support for biodiversity-related issues and hence interdisciplinary approaches to address scientific, political, and societal challenges in the coming years."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/ece3.5244"],["dc.identifier.pmid","31327991"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16547"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/66221"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","2045-7758"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Evolution of interdisciplinarity in biodiversity science"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Forest Ecosystems"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst D."],["dc.contributor.author","Craven, Dylan"],["dc.contributor.author","Durso, Andrew M."],["dc.contributor.author","Reif, Jiri"],["dc.contributor.author","Guderle, Marcus"],["dc.contributor.author","Kroiher, Franz"],["dc.contributor.author","Hennig, Petra"],["dc.contributor.author","Weiserbs, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:49:55Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:49:55Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Background The global decrease in wildlife populations, especially birds, is mainly due to land use change and increasing intensity of land use (Parmesan and Yohe 2003). However, impacts of management tools to mitigate biodiversity loss at regional and global scales are less apparent in forest regions that have a constant forest area, and which did not suffer from habitat degradation, and where forests are sustainably managed, such as in Central Europe or the northeastern USA. A biodiversity assessment for Germany suggested, for example, that bird populations were constant (Bundesamt für Naturschutz 2015). Results This study shows that changes in the environment and in forest management over the past 45 years have had a significant, positive effect on the abundance of non-migratory forest bird species in Central Europe. Economy (timber prices and GDP), forest management (timber harvest and mixed forest area), and environmental factors (atmospheric CO2 concentration and nitrogen deposition) were investigated together with changes in abundances of migratory and non-migratory forest birds using partial least squares path modeling. Climate change, resulting in longer seasons and milder winters, and forest management, promoting tree diversity, were significantly positively related to the abundance of non-migratory forest birds and explained 92% of the variation in their abundance in Europe. Regionally-migrating forest birds had stable populations with large variation, while birds migrating across continents declined in recent decades, suggesting significant, contrasting changes in bird populations in Europe. In northeastern North America we also found evidence that non-migratory forests have experienced long-term increases in abundance, and this increase was related to management. The increase of populations of non-migratory forest birds in Europe and North America is associated with an increase in structural diversity and disturbances at the landscape level. Conclusions Our results suggest that reports about bird decline in forests should separate between migratory and non-migratory bird species. Efforts to mitigate the general decline in bird abundance should focus on land-use systems other than forests and support sustainable forest management independent of economic conditions."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s40663-019-0160-8"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15805"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59655"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Fakultät für Forstwissenschaften und Waldökologie"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Positive association between forest management, environmental change, and forest bird abundance"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1365"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature Ecology & Evolution"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1366"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","3"],["dc.contributor.author","Guerrero Ramírez, Nathaly R."],["dc.contributor.author","Craven, Dylan"],["dc.contributor.author","Reich, Peter B."],["dc.contributor.author","Ewel, John J."],["dc.contributor.author","Isbell, Forest"],["dc.contributor.author","Koricheva, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Parrotta, John A."],["dc.contributor.author","Auge, Harald"],["dc.contributor.author","Erickson, Heather E."],["dc.contributor.author","Forrester, David I."],["dc.contributor.author","Hector, Andy"],["dc.contributor.author","Joshi, Jasmin"],["dc.contributor.author","Montagnini, Florencia"],["dc.contributor.author","Palmborg, Cecilia"],["dc.contributor.author","Piotto, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Potvin, Catherine"],["dc.contributor.author","Roscher, Christiane"],["dc.contributor.author","van Ruijven, Jasper"],["dc.contributor.author","Tilman, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Wilsey, Brian"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-06-17T14:42:05Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-06-17T14:42:05Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41559-019-0973-4"],["dc.identifier.pmid","31395966"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/66457"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","2397-334X"],["dc.title","Author Correction: Diversity-dependent temporal divergence of ecosystem functioning in experimental ecosystems"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1579"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature Ecology & Evolution"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1587"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","2"],["dc.contributor.author","Craven, Dylan"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Pearse, William D."],["dc.contributor.author","Hautier, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Isbell, Forest"],["dc.contributor.author","Roscher, Christiane"],["dc.contributor.author","Bahn, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Beierkuhnlein, Carl"],["dc.contributor.author","Bönisch, Gerhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Buchmann, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Byun, Chaeho"],["dc.contributor.author","Catford, Jane A."],["dc.contributor.author","Cerabolini, Bruno E. L."],["dc.contributor.author","Cornelissen, J. Hans C."],["dc.contributor.author","Craine, Joseph M."],["dc.contributor.author","De Luca, Enrica"],["dc.contributor.author","Ebeling, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Griffin, John N."],["dc.contributor.author","Hector, Andy"],["dc.contributor.author","Hines, Jes"],["dc.contributor.author","Jentsch, Anke"],["dc.contributor.author","Kattge, Jens"],["dc.contributor.author","Kreyling, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Lanta, Vojtech"],["dc.contributor.author","Lemoine, Nathan"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Sebastian T."],["dc.contributor.author","Minden, Vanessa"],["dc.contributor.author","Onipchenko, Vladimir"],["dc.contributor.author","Polley, H. Wayne"],["dc.contributor.author","Reich, Peter B."],["dc.contributor.author","van Ruijven, Jasper"],["dc.contributor.author","Schamp, Brandon"],["dc.contributor.author","Smith, Melinda D."],["dc.contributor.author","Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A."],["dc.contributor.author","Tilman, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Weigelt, Alexandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Wilsey, Brian"],["dc.contributor.author","Manning, Peter"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-06-16T08:07:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-06-16T08:07:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","A substantial body of evidence has demonstrated that biodiversity stabilizes ecosystem functioning over time in grassland ecosystems. However, the relative importance of different facets of biodiversity underlying the diversity-stability relationship remains unclear. Here we use data from 39 grassland biodiversity experiments and structural equation modelling to investigate the roles of species richness, phylogenetic diversity and both the diversity and community-weighted mean of functional traits representing the 'fast-slow' leaf economics spectrum in driving the diversity-stability relationship. We found that high species richness and phylogenetic diversity stabilize biomass production via enhanced asynchrony in the performance of co-occurring species. Contrary to expectations, low phylogenetic diversity enhances ecosystem stability directly, albeit weakly. While the diversity of fast-slow functional traits has a weak effect on ecosystem stability, communities dominated by slow species enhance ecosystem stability by increasing mean biomass production relative to the standard deviation of biomass over time. Our in-depth, integrative assessment of factors influencing the diversity-stability relationship demonstrates a more multicausal relationship than has been previously acknowledged."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41559-018-0647-7"],["dc.identifier.pmid","30150740"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/66342"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","2397-334X"],["dc.relation.issn","2397-334X"],["dc.title","Multiple facets of biodiversity drive the diversity-stability relationship"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","78"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Applied Soil Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","81"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","82"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Wirsch, Daniela"],["dc.contributor.author","Cesarz, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Craven, Dylan"],["dc.contributor.author","Dietrich, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Friese, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Helm, Juliane"],["dc.contributor.author","Hines, Jes"],["dc.contributor.author","Schellenberg, Madlen"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherreiks, Pascal"],["dc.contributor.author","Schwarz, Benjamin"],["dc.contributor.author","Uhe, Christin"],["dc.contributor.author","Wagner, Kristin"],["dc.contributor.author","Steinauer, Katja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-06-08T07:54:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-06-08T07:54:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Rapid ecosystem assessments are needed for large-scale ecotoxicological studies and coordinated distributed experiments. Bait-lamina stripes are commonly used as a standardized method to assess decomposer activity, but it is often difficult to distinguish bait substrate from soil. In the present study our aim was to identify a dyeing method that improves the precision of visual assessment of decomposition rates, while having negligible side effects. We compared five different dyes (food dye, Easter Grass, organic textile dye, ink, and wall paint) with control substrate in microcosms containing either acidic or alkaline soil with two introduced Collembola species (Folsomia candida and Sinella coeca). Organic textile dye showed the highest precision of visual assessment, and had no detectable side effects on decomposition rates, soil microbial activity (biomass and respiration), or Collembola densities. We recommend using organic textile dye to improve the bait-lamina test due to the high precision and the ease of preparation."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.05.008"],["dc.identifier.scopus","2-s2.0-84902449745"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/66190"],["dc.identifier.url","http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84902449745&partnerID=MN8TOARS"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","0929-1393"],["dc.title","Organic textile dye improves the visual assessment of the bait-lamina test"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","no"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","20150277"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1694"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","371"],["dc.contributor.author","Craven, Dylan James"],["dc.contributor.author","Isbell, Forest"],["dc.contributor.author","Manning, Pete"],["dc.contributor.author","Connolly, John"],["dc.contributor.author","Bruelheide, Helge"],["dc.contributor.author","Ebeling, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Roscher, Christiane"],["dc.contributor.author","van Ruijven, Jasper"],["dc.contributor.author","Weigelt, Alexandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Wilsey, Brian"],["dc.contributor.author","Beierkuhnlein, Carl"],["dc.contributor.author","De Luca, Enrica"],["dc.contributor.author","Griffin, John N."],["dc.contributor.author","Hautier, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Hector, Andy"],["dc.contributor.author","Jentsch, Anke"],["dc.contributor.author","Kreyling, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Lanta, Vojtech"],["dc.contributor.author","Loreau, Michel"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Sebastian T."],["dc.contributor.author","Mori, Akira S."],["dc.contributor.author","Naeem, Shahid"],["dc.contributor.author","Palmborg, Cecilia"],["dc.contributor.author","Polley, H. Wayne"],["dc.contributor.author","Reich, Peter B."],["dc.contributor.author","Schmid, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Siebenkäs, Alrun"],["dc.contributor.author","Seabloom, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Thakur, Madhav P."],["dc.contributor.author","Tilman, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Vogel, Anja"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-06-08T08:02:14Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-06-08T08:02:14Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Global change drivers are rapidly altering resource avail-ability and biodiversity. While there is consensus thatgreater biodiversity increases the functioning of ecosystems,the extent to which biodiversity buffers ecosystem pro-ductivity in response to changes in resource availabilityremains unclear. We use data from 16 grassland experimentsacross North America and Europe that manipulated plantspecies richness and one of two essential resources—soilnutrientsorwater—toassessthedirectionandstrengthof the interaction between plant diversity and resourcealteration on above-ground productivity and net biodiver-sity, complementarity, and selection effects. Despite strongincreases in productivity with nutrient addition anddecreases in productivity with drought, we found thatresource alterations did not alter biodiversity–ecosystemfunctioning relationships. Our results suggest that theserelationships are largely determined by increases in com-plementarity effects along plant species richness gradients.Although nutrient addition reduced complementarityeffects at high diversity, this appears to be due to highbiomass in monocultures under nutrient enrichment. Ourresults indicate that diversity and the complementarityof species are important regulators of grassland ecosystemproductivity, regardless of changes in other drivers ofecosystem function."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1098/rstb.2015.0277"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/66191"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","1471-2970"],["dc.relation.issn","0962-8436"],["dc.title","Plant diversity effects on grassland productivity are robust to both nutrient enrichment and drought"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","no"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Soil Biology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","16"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","77"],["dc.contributor.author","Cesarz, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Craven, Dylan"],["dc.contributor.author","Dietrich, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:06:01Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-06-16T07:20:12Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:06:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-06-16T07:20:12Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Earthworms drive important ecosystem functions like decomposition and nutrient mineralization in many terrestrial ecosystems, which is why factors controlling their mass gain are of great scientific interest. We conducted a microcosm experiment using two common endogeic earthworm species (Apor-rectodea caliginosa and Octolasion tyrtaeum) and two different soils (one from a beech-dominated forest and one from a mixed tree species forest in Germany) to test litter quality (different nutrient concentrations) and soil quality effects (low and high) on relative mass gain of earthworms. We hypothesized that mass gain of endogeic earthworms is driven by both soil and litter quality. Soil pH, carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) concentrations were used to characterize soil quality, while leaf litter N, phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg) concentrations were used as proxies for leaf litter quality. Forest soils were incubated with leaf litter of six common tree species in Central Europe (Fagus sylvatica, Acer platanoides, Acer pseudoplatanus, Carpinus betulus, Tilia spp., and Fraxinus excelsior) that span a gradient in leaf litter quality. In addition, we determined soil microbial biomass C as a potential food source of endogeic earthworms. After three months, relative earthworm mass gain of A. caliginosa and 0. tyrtaeum was significantly higher in soil from the mixed tree species forest (high quality soil: +218% and +240%, respectively) compared to soil from the beech-dominated forest (low quality soil: +160% and +162%, respectively). Relative mass gain of A. caliginosa increased significantly with all leaf litter nutrients in low quality soil, whereas in high quality soil only leaf litter Ca positively affected relative mass gain. Similarly, relative mass gain of O. tyrtaeum increased significantly with increasing concentrations of leaf litter N, Mg, and Ca in the low quality soil. In the high quality soil, only leaf litter Mg significantly increased relative mass gain. Overall, our results indicate that leaf litter quality effects on endogeic earthworm mass gain were more important in low quality soil for both earthworm species. Notably, microbial biomass was significantly higher in high quality soil (506 +/- 135 mu g C g(-1) soil dw) compared to low quality soil (217 +/- 64 mu g C g(-1) soil dw), but microbial biomass was not significantly affected by leaf litter type and was a poor predictor of relative earthworm mass gain. This finding indicates that endogeic earthworms did not significantly depend on soil microbial biomass, but rather on the quality of dead organic material in the soil and surface leaf litter. As earthworms may prefer feeding on certain microbial taxa, and we only measured total soil microbial biomass, future studies could investigate if leaf litter quality effects on earthworms are mediated by changes in soil microbial community structure, micronutrients, and organic compounds. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.09.002"],["dc.identifier.isi","000391782500003"],["dc.identifier.scopus","2-s2.0-84988843942"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/66336"],["dc.identifier.url","http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84988843942&partnerID=MN8TOARS"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.eissn","1164-5563"],["dc.relation.issn","1778-3615"],["dc.title","Effects of soil and leaf litter quality on the biomass of two endogeic earthworm species"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1639"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","11"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature Ecology & Evolution"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1642"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","1"],["dc.contributor.author","Guerrero Ramírez, Nathaly R."],["dc.contributor.author","Craven, Dylan"],["dc.contributor.author","Reich, Peter B."],["dc.contributor.author","Ewel, John J."],["dc.contributor.author","Isbell, Forest"],["dc.contributor.author","Koricheva, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Parrotta, John A."],["dc.contributor.author","Auge, Harald"],["dc.contributor.author","Erickson, Heather E."],["dc.contributor.author","Forrester, David I."],["dc.contributor.author","Hector, Andy"],["dc.contributor.author","Joshi, Jasmin"],["dc.contributor.author","Montagnini, Florencia"],["dc.contributor.author","Palmborg, Cecilia"],["dc.contributor.author","Piotto, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Potvin, Catherine"],["dc.contributor.author","Roscher, Christiane"],["dc.contributor.author","van Ruijven, Jasper"],["dc.contributor.author","Tilman, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Wilsey, Brian"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-06-18T07:06:22Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-06-18T07:06:22Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","The effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning generally increase over time, but the underlying processes remain unclear. Using 26 long-term grassland and forest experimental ecosystems, we demonstrate that biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships strengthen mainly by greater increases in functioning in high-diversity communities in grasslands and forests. In grasslands, biodiversity effects also strengthen due to decreases in functioning in low-diversity communities. Contrasting trends across grasslands are associated with differences in soil characteristics."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41559-017-0325-1"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28970481"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/66466"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","2397-334X"],["dc.title","Diversity-dependent temporal divergence of ecosystem functioning in experimental ecosystems"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","574"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7574"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","577"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","526"],["dc.contributor.author","Forest, Isbell"],["dc.contributor.author","Craven, Dylan"],["dc.contributor.author","Connolly, John"],["dc.contributor.author","Loreau, Michel"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmid, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Beierkuhnlein, Carl"],["dc.contributor.author","Bezemer, T. Martijn"],["dc.contributor.author","Bonin, Catherine"],["dc.contributor.author","Bruelheide, Helge"],["dc.contributor.author","De Luca, Enrica"],["dc.contributor.author","Ebeling, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Griffin, John N."],["dc.contributor.author","Guo, Qinfeng"],["dc.contributor.author","Hautier, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Hector, Andy"],["dc.contributor.author","Jentsch, Anke"],["dc.contributor.author","Kreyling, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Lanta, Vojtěch"],["dc.contributor.author","Manning, Pete"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Sebastian T."],["dc.contributor.author","Mori, Akira S."],["dc.contributor.author","Naeem, Shahid"],["dc.contributor.author","Niklaus, Pascal A."],["dc.contributor.author","Polley, H. Wayne"],["dc.contributor.author","Reich, Peter B."],["dc.contributor.author","Roscher, Christiane"],["dc.contributor.author","Seabloom, Eric W."],["dc.contributor.author","Smith, Melinda D."],["dc.contributor.author","Thakur, Madhav P."],["dc.contributor.author","Tilman, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Tracy, Benjamin F."],["dc.contributor.author","van der Putten, Wim H."],["dc.contributor.author","van Ruijven, Jasper"],["dc.contributor.author","Weigelt, Alexandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Wilsey, Brian"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisenhauer, Nico"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-06-05T09:02:30Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-06-05T09:02:30Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","It remains unclear whether biodiversity buffers ecosystems against climate extremes, which are becoming increasingly frequent worldwide1. Early results suggested that the ecosystem productivity of diverse grassland plant communities was more resistant, changing less during drought, and more resilient, recovering more quickly after drought, than that of depauperate communities2. However, subsequent experimental tests produced mixed results3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Here we use data from 46 experiments that manipulated grassland plant diversity to test whether biodiversity provides resistance during and resilience after climate events. We show that biodiversity increased ecosystem resistance for a broad range of climate events, including wet or dry, moderate or extreme, and brief or prolonged events. Across all studies and climate events, the productivity of low-diversity communities with one or two species changed by approximately 50% during climate events, whereas that of high-diversity communities with 16–32 species was more resistant, changing by only approximately 25%. By a year after each climate event, ecosystem productivity had often fully recovered, or overshot, normal levels of productivity in both high- and low-diversity communities, leading to no detectable dependence of ecosystem resilience on biodiversity. Our results suggest that biodiversity mainly stabilizes ecosystem productivity, and productivity-dependent ecosystem services, by increasing resistance to climate events. Anthropogenic environmental changes that drive biodiversity loss thus seem likely to decrease ecosystem stability14, and restoration of biodiversity to increase it, mainly by changing the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate events."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/nature15374"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/66185"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","1476-4687"],["dc.relation.issn","0028-0836"],["dc.title","Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]