Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • 2015Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e0134402"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PLoS ONE"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Anja"],["dc.contributor.author","John, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Arida, Gertrudo"],["dc.contributor.author","Auge, Harald"],["dc.contributor.author","Brandl, Roland"],["dc.contributor.author","Horgan, Finbarr G."],["dc.contributor.author","Hotes, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Marquez, Leonardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Radermacher, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Settele, Josef"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolters, Volkmar"],["dc.contributor.author","Schaedler, Martin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:54:25Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:54:25Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Decomposers provide an essential ecosystem service that contributes to sustainable production in rice ecosystems by driving the release of nutrients from organic crop residues. During a single rice crop cycle we examined the effects of four different crop residue management practices (rice straw or ash of burned straw scattered on the soil surface or incorporated into the soil) on rice straw decomposition and on the abundance of aquatic and soild-welling invertebrates. Mass loss of rice straw in litterbags of two different mesh sizes that either prevented or allowed access of meso-and macro-invertebrates was used as a proxy for decomposition rates. Invertebrates significantly increased total loss of litter mass by up to 30%. Initially, the contribution of invertebrates to decomposition was significantly smaller in plots with rice straw scattered on the soil surface; however, this effect disappeared later in the season. We found no significant responses in microbial decomposition rates to management practices. The abundance of aquatic fauna was higher in fields with rice straw amendment, whereas the abundance of soil fauna fluctuated considerably. There was a clear separation between the overall invertebrate community structure in response to the ash and straw treatments. However, we found no correlation between litter mass loss and abundances of various lineages of invertebrates. Our results indicate that invertebrates can contribute to soil fertility in irrigated paddy fields by decomposing rice straw, and that their abundance as well as efficiency in decomposition may be promoted by crop residue management practices."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1371/journal.pone.0134402"],["dc.identifier.isi","000358837700089"],["dc.identifier.pmid","26225556"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/12107"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/36534"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Public Library Science"],["dc.relation.issn","1932-6203"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Effects of Residue Management on Decomposition in Irrigated Rice Fields Are Not Related to Changes in the Decomposer Community"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC WOS
  • 2012Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e43292"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PLoS ONE"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","7"],["dc.contributor.author","Birkhofer, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Schöning, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Alt, Fabian"],["dc.contributor.author","Herold, Nadine"],["dc.contributor.author","Klarner, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Maraun, Mark"],["dc.contributor.author","Marhan, Sven"],["dc.contributor.author","Oelmann, Yvonne"],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.contributor.author","Yurkov, Andrey"],["dc.contributor.author","Begerow, Dominik"],["dc.contributor.author","Berner, Doreen"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Daniel, Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Diekötter, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Ehnes, Roswitha B."],["dc.contributor.author","Erdmann, Georgia"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christiane"],["dc.contributor.author","Foesel, Bärbel U."],["dc.contributor.author","Groh, Janine"],["dc.contributor.author","Gutknecht, Jessica"],["dc.contributor.author","Kandeler, Ellen"],["dc.contributor.author","Lang, Christa"],["dc.contributor.author","Lohaus, Gertrud"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Annabel"],["dc.contributor.author","Nacke, Heiko"],["dc.contributor.author","Näther, Astrid"],["dc.contributor.author","Overmann, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Polle, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Pollierer, Melanie M."],["dc.contributor.author","Scheu, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Schloter, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Waltraud"],["dc.contributor.author","Weinert, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Wolters, Volkmar"],["dc.contributor.author","Schrumpf, Marion"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:49:13Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:49:13Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Very few principles have been unraveled that explain the relationship between soil properties and soil biota across large spatial scales and different land-use types. Here, we seek these general relationships using data from 52 differently managed grassland and forest soils in three study regions spanning a latitudinal gradient in Germany. We hypothesize that, after extraction of variation that is explained by location and land-use type, soil properties still explain significant proportions of variation in the abundance and diversity of soil biota. If the relationships between predictors and soil organisms were analyzed individually for each predictor group, soil properties explained the highest amount of variation in soil biota abundance and diversity, followed by land-use type and sampling location. After extraction of variation that originated from location or land-use, abiotic soil properties explained significant amounts of variation in fungal, meso- and macrofauna, but not in yeast or bacterial biomass or diversity. Nitrate or nitrogen concentration and fungal biomass were positively related, but nitrate concentration was negatively related to the abundances of Collembola and mites and to the myriapod species richness across a range of forest and grassland soils. The species richness of earthworms was positively correlated with clay content of soils independent of sample location and land-use type. Our study indicates that after accounting for heterogeneity resulting from large scale differences among sampling locations and land-use types, soil properties still explain significant proportions of variation in fungal and soil fauna abundance or diversity. However, soil biota was also related to processes that act at larger spatial scales and bacteria or soil yeasts only showed weak relationships to soil properties. We therefore argue that more general relationships between soil properties and soil biota can only be derived from future studies that consider larger spatial scales and different land-use types."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1371/journal.pone.0043292"],["dc.identifier.gro","3147209"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/7919"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/4841"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","1932-6203"],["dc.rights","CC BY 2.5"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5"],["dc.title","General Relationships between Abiotic Soil Properties and Soil Biota across Spatial Scales and Different Land-Use Types"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI