Sommer, Martin

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","373"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","381"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","23"],["dc.contributor.author","Rothkegel, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Rammsayer, Thomas H."],["dc.contributor.author","Trenkwalder, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Paulus, Walter J."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:30:31Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:30:31Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Background. Focal single-session repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the primary motor cortex has been claimed to be capable of improving motor function in Parkinson's disease. Objective. The authors sought to determine which type of rTMS protocol holds the highest potential for future therapeutic application. Methods. Twenty-two patients with Parkinson's disease received 5 different rTMS protocols on 5 consecutive days in a pseudorandomized and counterbalanced order either in the defined OFF condition or with their usual medication. The protocols tested in the present study included 2 conventional rTMS protocols (0.5 and 10 Hz) as well as the recently introduced theta burst stimulation (cTBS, iTBS) and a sham condition. Cortical excitability, motor performance (pointing movement, pronation-supination, Purdue Pegboard Test, walking), and mood were assessed before and after each session. Results. The authors observed motor training from days 1 to 4, particularly in the group on dopaminergic medication. None of the rTMS paradigms excelled placebo stimulation. The only exception was the Purdue Pegboard Test, in which all active stimulation paradigms yielded slightly stronger effects than sham stimulation. Conclusions. Within a single session, no clinically relevant difference in the rTMS protocols could be detected. Training effects outweigh and may have masked rTMS effects, particularly in the group on dopaminergic mediation."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1177/1545968308322842"],["dc.identifier.isi","000264876100009"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18978029"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/13103"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/16906"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Sage Publications Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","1545-9683"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Training Effects Outweigh Effects of Single-Session Conventional rTMS and Theta Burst Stimulation in PD Patients"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1915"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","11"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Neurophysiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1921"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","121"],["dc.contributor.author","Rothkegel, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Paulus, Walter J."],["dc.contributor.author","Lang, N."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:37:23Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:37:23Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: The intensity of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is typically adjusted by changing the amplitude of the induced electrical field, while its duration is fixed. Here we examined the influence of two different pulse durations on several physiological parameters of primary motor cortex excitability obtained using single pulse TMS. Methods: A Magstim Bistim(2) stimulator was used to produce TMS pulses of two distinct durations. For either pulse duration we measured, in healthy volunteers, resting and active motor thresholds, recruitment curves of motor evoked potentials in relaxed and contracting hand muscles as well as contralateral (cSP) and ipsilateral (iSP) cortical silent periods. Results: Motor thresholds decreased by 20% using a 1.4 times longer TMS pulse compared to the standard pulse, while there was no significant effect on threshold adjusted measurements of cortical excitability. The longer pulse duration reduced pulse-to-pulse variability in cSP. Conclusions: The strength of a TMS pulse can be adjusted both by amplitude or pulse duration. TMS pulse duration does not affect threshold-adjusted single pulse measures of motor cortex excitability. Significance: Using longer TMS pulses might be an alternative in subjects with very high motor threshold. Pulse duration might not be relevant as long as TMS intensity is threshold-adapted. This is important when comparing studies performed with different stimulator types. (C) 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) [SO 429/2-2]; Rose Foundation"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.006"],["dc.identifier.isi","000282158200017"],["dc.identifier.pmid","20444645"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/18520"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Ireland Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1388-2457"],["dc.title","Impact of pulse duration in single pulse TMS"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","945"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Cortex"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","954"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","47"],["dc.contributor.author","Neef, Nicole E."],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Kristina"],["dc.contributor.author","Rothkegel, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Pollok, Bettina"],["dc.contributor.author","von Gudenberg, Alexander Wolff"],["dc.contributor.author","Paulus, Walter J."],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Martin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:53:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:53:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Introduction: In adults who do not stutter (AWNS), the control of hand movement timing is assumed to be lateralized to the left dorsolateral premotor cortex (PMd). In adults who stutter (AWS), the network of speech motor control is abnormally shifted to the right hemisphere. Motor impairments in AWS are not restricted to speech, but extend to non-speech orofacial and finger movements. We here investigated the lateralization of finger movement timing control in AWS. Methods: We explored PMd function in 14 right-handed AWS and 15 age matched AWNS. In separate sessions, they received subthreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for 20 min at 1 Hz over the left or right PMd, respectively. Pre- and post-stimulation participants were instructed to synchronize their index finger taps of either hand with an isochronous sequence of clicks presented binaurally via earphones. Synchronization accuracy was measured to quantify the effect of the PMd stimulation. Results: In AWNS inhibition of left PMd affected synchronization accuracy of the left hand. Conversely, in AWS TMS over the right PMd increased the asynchrony of the left hand. Conclusions: The present data indicate an altered functional connectivity in AWS in which the right PMd seems to be important for the control of timed non-speech movements. Moreover, the laterality-shift suggests a compensatory role of the right PMd to successfully perform paced finger tapping. (C) 2010 Elsevier Srl. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.007"],["dc.identifier.isi","000293155300005"],["dc.identifier.pmid","20822768"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/22305"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Masson"],["dc.relation.issn","0010-9452"],["dc.title","Right-shift for non-speech motor processing in adults who stutter"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","3060"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Neurophysiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","3066"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","109"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Rummel, Milena"],["dc.contributor.author","Norden, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Rothkegel, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Lang, Nicolas"],["dc.contributor.author","Paulus, Walter J."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:23:55Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:23:55Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Our knowledge about the mechanisms of human motor cortex facilitation induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is still incomplete. Here we used pharmacological conditioning with carbamazepine, dextrometorphan, lorazepam, and placebo to elucidate the type of plasticity underlying this facilitation, and to probe if mechanisms reminiscent of long-term potentiation are involved. Over the primary motor cortex of 10 healthy subjects, we applied biphasic rTMS pulses of effective posterior current direction in the brain. We used six blocks of 200 pulses at 5-Hz frequency and 90% active motor threshold intensity and controlled for corticospinal excitability changes using motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes and latencies elicited by suprathreshold pulses before, in between, and after rTMS. Target muscle was the dominant abductor digiti minimi muscle; we coregistered the dominant extensor carpi radialis muscle. We found a lasting facilitation induced by this type of rTMS. The GABAergic medication lorazepam and to a lesser extent the ion channel blocker carbamazepine reduced the MEP facilitation after biphasic effective posteriorly oriented rTMS, whereas the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-antagonist dextrometorphan had no effect. Our main conclusion is that the mechanism of the facilitation induced by biphasic effective posterior rTMS is more likely posttetanic potentiation than long-term potentiation. Additional findings were prolonged MEP latency under carbamazepine, consistent with sodium channel blockade, and larger MEP amplitudes from extensor carpi radialis under lorazepam, suggesting GABAergic involvement in the center-surround balance of excitability."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1152/jn.01089.2012"],["dc.identifier.isi","000320443300018"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23536708"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/29699"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Physiological Soc"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-3077"],["dc.title","Mechanisms of human motor cortex facilitation induced by subthreshold 5-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","351"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Neurophysiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","357"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","123"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Gileles, Elena"],["dc.contributor.author","Knappmeyer, Kathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Rothkegel, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Polania, Rafael"],["dc.contributor.author","Paulus, Walter J."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:14:06Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:14:06Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: We sought to elucidate the influence of centrally active drugs on interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) between primary motor cortices in healthy humans. Methods: We therefore studied IHI before and 2 h after intake of a single oral dose of carbamazepine, dextrometorphane, lorazepam, or placebo and compared it with the well known results for short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF). Drugs were tested in separate sessions and in random order. Results: While SICI and ICF were not altered by carbamazepine, IHI was reduced at the interstimulus interval of 8 ms. Dextrometorphane tended to enhance SICI and to reduce ICF and had no effect on IHI. Lorazepam reduced ICF as expected and enhanced IHI at the long intervals of 50 and 80 ms. A moderate trend for interhemispheric facilitation was inconsistently observed at the interval 2 ms and blocked by carbamazepine. In addition, carbamazepine increased the motor threshold. Conclusions: We conclude that circuits mediating short interstimulus intervals of IHI are susceptible to sodium channel blockade. Significance: The results increase our knowledge of interhemispheric transmission. (C) 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.clinph.2011.07.027"],["dc.identifier.isi","000299118600023"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21862399"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/27323"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Ireland Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1388-2457"],["dc.title","Carbamazepine reduces short-interval interhemispheric inhibition in healthy humans"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","I"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Cortex"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","II"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","47"],["dc.contributor.author","Neef, Nicole E."],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Kristina"],["dc.contributor.author","Rothkegel, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Pollok, Bettina"],["dc.contributor.author","von Gudenberg, Alexander Wolff"],["dc.contributor.author","Paulus, Walter J."],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Martin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:50:12Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:50:12Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.cortex.2011.08.009"],["dc.identifier.isi","000296930600023"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/21644"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Masson"],["dc.relation.issn","0010-9452"],["dc.title","Right-shift for non-speech motor processing in adults who stutter (vol 47, pg 945, 2011)"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","426"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Neurophysiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","430"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","121"],["dc.contributor.author","Rothkegel, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Paulus, Walter J."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:45:17Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:45:17Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: Stimulation frequency has been considered the most important factor in conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for determining the direction of after effects on corticospinal excitability. Here, we examined the functional relevance of breaks during high-frequency subthreshold rTMS for the induction of facilitatory after effects. Methods: The after effects on corticospinal excitability of a standard 5 Hz rTMS protocol in a block design were compared to a continuous rTMS protocol using the same number of pulses. In addition the effect of current direction both for rTMS and single pulse TMS was included in the study design. Results: While 5 Hz rTMS in a standard block design induces facilitatory after effects on corticospinal excitability, the continuous protocol does not induce facilitation but rather inhibition. In our study only rTMS using an initially posterior-anterior current direction in the brain leads to significant neuroplastic effects at all. Conclusions: Breaks during conventional high-frequency rTMS are a crucial factor determining the direction of induced neuroplastic changes. Significance: These results contribute to the understanding of rTMS-induced neuroplasticity and are important for the design of rTMS protocols both for experimental and clinical studies. (C) 2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) [SO 429/2-2]; Rose Foundation"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.016"],["dc.identifier.isi","000274557800024"],["dc.identifier.pmid","20006546"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/20400"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Ireland Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1388-2457"],["dc.title","Breaks during 5 Hz rTMS are essential for facilitatory after effects"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","231"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","233"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","63"],["dc.contributor.author","Lang, Nicolas"],["dc.contributor.author","Speck, Sascha"],["dc.contributor.author","Harms, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Rothkegel, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Paulus, Walter J."],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Martin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:19:05Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:19:05Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Experiments in animal models suggest that neuronal plasticity can be enhanced by dopaminergic receptor activation. The present study tested whether stimulation-induced plasticity of human motor cortex after low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could be potentiated by a single oral dose of the combined D1/D2 receptor agonist pergolide. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over design, nine healthy young volunteers received. 125 mg pergolide or placebo 2 hours before 1 Hz rTMS was applied for 20 min to the left primary motor cortex. In a control experiment 7 subjects received. 125 mg pergolide 2 hours before sham rTMS. We used single-pulse TMS at rest to assess corticospinal excitability before and up to 24 min after rTMS. Results: Suppression of corticospinal excitability by 1 Hz rTMS was more pronounced after pergolide intake compared with placebo and lasted approximately 20 min after pergolide but only 5 min after placebo. No change of corticospinal excitability could be observed when sham rTMS was performed after pergolide intake. Conclusions: The results suggest a possible role for dopaminergic potentiation of rTMS-induced neuroplasticity in experimental or therapeutic applications and should be considered when rTMS is applied in patients under medication with dopamine agonists or antagonists."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.04.033"],["dc.identifier.isi","000252304400015"],["dc.identifier.pmid","17604004"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/55188"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0006-3223"],["dc.title","Dopaminergic potentiation of rTMS-induced motor cortex inhibition"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","258"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Neurophysiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","259"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","121"],["dc.contributor.author","Fadini, Tommaso"],["dc.contributor.author","Matthaeus, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Rothkegel, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Tergau, Frithjof"],["dc.contributor.author","Schweikard, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Paulus, Walter J."],["dc.contributor.author","Nitsche, Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:46:06Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:46:06Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.007"],["dc.identifier.isi","000274557700021"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/20609"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Ireland Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1388-2457"],["dc.title","Reply to \"Motor evoked potential latency, motor threshold and electric field measurements as indices of transcranial magnetic stimulation depth\""],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.subtype","letter_note"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1174"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Neurophysiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1182"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","120"],["dc.contributor.author","Fadini, Tommaso"],["dc.contributor.author","Matthaeus, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Rothkegel, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Tergau, Frithjof"],["dc.contributor.author","Schweikard, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Paulus, Walter J."],["dc.contributor.author","Nitsche, Michael A."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:29:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:29:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: To acquire information about the physical properties and physiological effects of the H-coil. Methods: We used a robotized system to measure the electric field (E-field) generated by a H-coil prototype and compared it with a standard figure-of-eight coil. To explore the physiological properties of the coils, input/output curves were recorded for the right abductor digiti minimi muscle (ADM) as target muscle. To explore focality of stimulation, simultaneous recordings were performed for the left ADM, right abductor pollicis brevis (APB), extensor digitorum communis (EDC) and biceps brachii (BB) muscles. Results: Physical measurements of the H-coil showed four potentially stimulating foci, generating different electric held intensities along two different spatial orientations. RMT was significantly lower for H-coil- as compared to figure-of-eight coil stimulation. When stimulation intensity for the input-output curve was determined by percent of maximum stimulator output, the H-coil produced larger MEPs in the right ADM, as compared to the figure-of-eight coil, due to the larger relative enhancement of stimulation intensity of the H-coil. When stimulation intensity was adjusted to RMT, MEPs elicited at the right ADM were larger for figure-of-eight coil than for H-coil stimulation, while this relation was reversed for distant non-target muscles, with low stimulation intensities. With high stimulation intensities, the H-coil elicited larger MEPs for all tested muscles. Onset latency of the MEN was never shorter for H-coil than for figure-of-eight coil stimulation of the target muscles. Conclusions: These results are in favor for a non-focal, but not deeper effect of the H-coil, as compared to a figure-of-eight coil. Significance: This is the first neurophysiological study exploring the focality and depth of stimulation delivered by the H-coil systematically in humans. We found no advantage of this coil with regard to depth Of Stimulation in comparison to the figure-of-eight coil. Future studies have to show if the non-focality of this coil differs relevantly from that of other non-focal coils, e.g. the round coil. (C) 2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","EC [MEST-CT-2004-504193]; DFG [So-429/1, So-429/2]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.176"],["dc.identifier.isi","000267464800023"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19433366"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/16550"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Ireland Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1388-2457"],["dc.title","H-coil: Induced electric field properties and input/output curves on healthy volunteers, comparison with a standard figure-of-eight coil"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]