Now showing 1 - 10 of 17
  • 2018Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Molecular Psychiatry"],["dc.contributor.author","Hill, W. David"],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.contributor.author","Xia, Charley"],["dc.contributor.author","Luciano, Michelle"],["dc.contributor.author","Amador, Carmen"],["dc.contributor.author","Navarro, Pau"],["dc.contributor.author","Hayward, Caroline"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagy, Reka"],["dc.contributor.author","Porteous, David J."],["dc.contributor.author","McIntosh, Andrew M."],["dc.contributor.author","Deary, Ian J."],["dc.contributor.author","Haley, Chris S."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-02-22T11:13:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-02-22T11:13:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","Pedigree-based analyses of intelligence have reported that genetic differences account for 50-80% of the phenotypic variation. For personality traits these effects are smaller, with 34-48% of the variance being explained by genetic differences. However, molecular genetic studies using unrelated individuals typically report a heritability estimate of around 30% for intelligence and between 0 and 15% for personality variables. Pedigree-based estimates and molecular genetic estimates may differ because current genotyping platforms are poor at tagging causal variants, variants with low minor allele frequency, copy number variants, and structural variants. Using ~20,000 individuals in the Generation Scotland family cohort genotyped for ~700,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), we exploit the high levels of linkage disequilibrium (LD) found in members of the same family to quantify the total effect of genetic variants that are not tagged in GWAS of unrelated individuals. In our models, genetic variants in low LD with genotyped SNPs explain over half of the genetic variance in intelligence, education, and neuroticism. By capturing these additional genetic effects our models closely approximate the heritability estimates from twin studies for intelligence and education, but not for neuroticism and extraversion. We then replicated our finding using imputed molecular genetic data from unrelated individuals to show that ~50% of differences in intelligence, and ~40% of the differences in education, can be explained by genetic effects when a larger number of rare SNPs are included. From an evolutionary genetic perspective, a substantial contribution of rare genetic variants to individual differences in intelligence, and education is consistent with mutation-selection balance."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41380-017-0005-1"],["dc.identifier.pmid","29321673"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15573"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/12427"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.eissn","1476-5578"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Genomic analysis of family data reveals additional genetic effects on intelligence and personality"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC
  • 2017Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e198"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Behavioral and Brain Sciences"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","67"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","40"],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.contributor.author","von Borell, Christoph J."],["dc.contributor.author","Ostner, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T15:22:18Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T15:22:18Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Burkart et al. suggest that social learning can explain the cognitive positive manifold for social animals, including humans. We caution that simpler explanations of positive trait intercorrelations exist, such as genetic load. To test the suggested explanation's specificity, we also need to examine non-social species and traits, such as health, that are distal to cognitive abilities."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1017/S0140525X16001588"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1469-1825"],["dc.identifier.issn","0140-525X"],["dc.identifier.pmid","29342654"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/73343"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.eissn","1469-1825"],["dc.title","Negative results are needed to show the specific value of a cultural explanation for g"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC
  • 2017Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Reinhard, Selina K."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-02-22T11:17:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-02-22T11:17:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Although empirical research has investigated what we ideally seek in a romantic partner for decades, the crucial question of whether ideal partner preferences actually guide our mating decisions in real life has remained largely unanswered. One reason for this is the lack of designs that assess individuals' ideal partner preferences before entering a relationship and then follow up on them over an extended period. In the Göttingen Mate Choice Study (GMCS), a preregistered, large-scale online study, we used such a naturalistic prospective design. We investigated partner preferences across 4 preference domains in a large sample of predominantly heterosexual singles (N = 763, aged 18-40 years) and tracked these individuals across a period of 5 months upon a possible transition into romantic relationships. Attesting to their predictive validity, partner preferences prospectively predicted the characteristics of later partners. This was equally true for both sexes, except for vitality-attractiveness where men's preferences were more predictive of their later partners' standing on this dimension than women's. Self-perceived mate value did not moderate the preference-partner characteristics relations. Preferences proved to be relatively stable across the 5 months interval, yet were less stable for those who entered a relationship. Subgroup analyses using a newly developed indicator of preference adjustment toward (vs. away from) partner characteristics revealed that participants adjusted their preferences downward when partners fell short of initial preferences, but showed no consistent adjustment when partners exceeded them. Results and implications are discussed against the background of ongoing controversies in mate choice and romantic relationship research. (PsycINFO Database Record"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/pspp0000170"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28921999"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/12430"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.eissn","1939-1315"],["dc.title","Predictive Validity and Adjustment of Ideal Partner Preferences Across the Transition Into Romantic Relationships"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC
  • 2019Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","517"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Evolution and Human Behavior"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","525"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","40"],["dc.contributor.author","Stern, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:24:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:24:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.08.005"],["dc.identifier.issn","1090-5138"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/72098"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","No robust evidence for cycle shifts in preferences for men's bodies in a multiverse analysis: A response to"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2018Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","20180092"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1873"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Proceedings. Biological sciences"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","285"],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.contributor.author","Willführ, Kai P."],["dc.contributor.author","Frans, Emma M."],["dc.contributor.author","Verweij, Karin J. H."],["dc.contributor.author","Bürkner, Paul-Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Myrskylä, Mikko"],["dc.contributor.author","Voland, Eckart"],["dc.contributor.author","Almqvist, Catarina"],["dc.contributor.author","Zietsch, Brendan P."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-03-09T07:01:07Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-03-09T07:01:07Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1098/rspb.2018.0092"],["dc.identifier.pmid","29467268"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/12971"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.eissn","1471-2954"],["dc.title","Relaxed selection and mutation accumulation are best studied empirically: reply to Woodley of Menieet al"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC
  • 2021Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","175"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychological Methods"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","185"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","26"],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.contributor.author","Reitz, Anne K."],["dc.contributor.author","Driebe, Julie C."],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-06-01T10:50:32Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-06-01T10:50:32Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/met0000294"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/86696"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-425"],["dc.relation.eissn","1939-1463"],["dc.relation.issn","1082-989X"],["dc.title","Routinely randomize potential sources of measurement reactivity to estimate and adjust for biases in subjective reports."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2021Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","441"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","446"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","121"],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.contributor.author","Driebe, Julie C."],["dc.contributor.author","Stern, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-01T09:23:08Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-01T09:23:08Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/pspp0000390"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/94571"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-478"],["dc.relation.eissn","1939-1315"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-3514"],["dc.title","The evidence for good genes ovulatory shifts in Arslan et al. (2018) is mixed and uncertain."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2015Book Chapter
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","20"],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:52:06Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:52:06Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Evolutionary forces of selection, mutation, migration, and genetic drift interact to maintain heritable individual differences. Resolving the ostensible paradox posed by the fact that heritable differences in personality and intelligence, in spite of their links to mortality and fertility, have not been driven to fixation, is within the purview of evolutionary genetics. We introduce the tool kit available to psychologists who want to understand these forces. It assembles complementary tools from molecular and behavior genetics, as well as classical evolutionary psychology, including the study of genome-wide associations, paternal age effects, inbreeding depression, developmental stability, and of course twins and families. We identify an unfortunate lack of cross-pollination, but map ways in which these disciplines, which share a common evolutionary metatheory, could test the tacit assumptions inherent in much of our work. Although it may take some time and may in some cases be impossible to identify the causative genes behind individual differences, we make the case that understanding the evolutionary forces involved in their maintenance is a worthy task in its own right, permitting us to understand and predict the effects of changing mores, policy, and demographic trends."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych245"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151162"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/7936"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.doi","10.1002/9781119125563"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-1-11912-556-3"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-1-118-76399-5"],["dc.relation.ispartof","The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology"],["dc.title","Evolutionary Genetics"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2021Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","507"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Evolution and Human Behavior"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","516"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","42"],["dc.contributor.author","Driebe, Julie C."],["dc.contributor.author","Sidari, Morgan J."],["dc.contributor.author","Dufner, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","von der Heiden, Juliane M."],["dc.contributor.author","Bürkner, Paul C."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Zietsch, Brendan P."],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-01T09:24:11Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-01T09:24:11Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.05.002"],["dc.identifier.pii","S1090513821000453"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/94873"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-478"],["dc.relation.issn","1090-5138"],["dc.title","Intelligence can be detected but is not found attractive in videos and live interactions"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2021Journal Article Research Paper
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","29039"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Collabra: Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","7"],["dc.contributor.author","Botzet, Laura J."],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Driebe, Julie C."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-01T09:22:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-01T09:22:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Many of the women who take hormonal contraceptives discontinue because of unwanted side effects, including negative psychological effects. Yet scientific evidence of psychological effects is mixed, partly because causal claims are often based on correlational data. In correlational studies, possible causal effects can be difficult to separate from selection effects, attrition effects, and reverse causality. Contraceptive use and, according to the congruency hypothesis, congruent contraceptive use (whether a woman’s current use/non-use of a hormonal contraceptive is congruent with her use/non-use at the time of meeting her partner) have both been thought to influence relationship quality and sexual functioning. In order to address potential issues of observed and unobserved selection effects in correlational data, we studied a sample of up to 1,179 women to investigate potential effects of contraceptive use and congruent contraceptive use on several measures of relationship quality and sexual functioning: perceived partner attractiveness, relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and diary measurements including libido, frequency of vaginal intercourse, and frequency of masturbation. No evidence for substantial effects was found except for a positive effect of hormonal contraceptives on frequency of vaginal intercourse and a negative effect of hormonal contraceptives on frequency of masturbation. These effects were robust to the inclusion of observed confounders, and their sensitivity to unobserved confounders was estimated. No support for the congruency hypothesis was found. Our correlational study was able to disentangle, to some extent, causal effects of hormonal contraceptives from selection effects by estimating the sensitivity of reported effects. To reconcile experimental and observational evidence on hormonal contraceptives, future research should scrutinize the role of unobserved selection effects, attrition effects, and reverse causality."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1525/collabra.29039"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/94428"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-478"],["dc.relation.eissn","2474-7394"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Hormonal Contraception and Sexuality: Causal Effects, Unobserved Selection, or Reverse Causality?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI