Batáry, Péter

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","722"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Diversity and Distributions"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","730"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Sutcliffe, Laura M. E."],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Kormann, Urs G."],["dc.contributor.author","Báldi, András"],["dc.contributor.author","Dicks, Lynn V."],["dc.contributor.author","Herzon, Irina"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Tryjanowski, Piotr"],["dc.contributor.author","Apostolova, Iva"],["dc.contributor.author","Arlettaz, Raphael"],["dc.contributor.author","Aunins, Ainars"],["dc.contributor.author","Aviron, Stéphanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Baležentienė, Ligita"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Halada, Lubos"],["dc.contributor.author","Hartel, Tibor"],["dc.contributor.author","Helm, Aveliina"],["dc.contributor.author","Hristov, Iordan"],["dc.contributor.author","Jelaska, Sven D."],["dc.contributor.author","Kaligarič, Mitja"],["dc.contributor.author","Kamp, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Klimek, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Koorberg, Pille"],["dc.contributor.author","Kostiuková, Jarmila"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó"],["dc.contributor.author","Kuemmerle, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Leuschner, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindborg, Regina"],["dc.contributor.author","Loos, Jacqueline"],["dc.contributor.author","Maccherini, Simona"],["dc.contributor.author","Marja, Riho"],["dc.contributor.author","Máthé, Orsolya"],["dc.contributor.author","Paulini, Inge"],["dc.contributor.author","Proença, Vânia"],["dc.contributor.author","Rey Benayas, José M."],["dc.contributor.author","Sans, F. Xavier"],["dc.contributor.author","Seifert, Charlotte"],["dc.contributor.author","Stalenga, Jarosław"],["dc.contributor.author","Timaeus, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Török, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","van Swaay, Chris"],["dc.contributor.author","Viik, Eneli"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.editor","Kühn, Ingolf"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","A large proportion of European biodiversity today depends on habitat provided by low-intensity farming practices, yet this resource is declining as European agriculture intensifies. Within the European Union, particularly the central and eastern new member states have retained relatively large areas of species-rich farmland, but despite increased investment in nature conservation here in recent years, farmland biodiversity trends appear to be worsening. Although the high biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland has long been reported, the amount of research in the international literature focused on farmland biodiversity in this region remains comparatively tiny, and measures within the EU Common Agricultural Policy are relatively poorly adapted to support it. In this opinion study, we argue that, 10 years after the accession of the first eastern EU new member states, the continued under-representation of the low-intensity farmland in Central and Eastern Europe in the international literature and EU policy is impeding the development of sound, evidence-based conservation interventions. The biodiversity benefits for Europe of existing low-intensity farmland, particularly in the central and eastern states, should be harnessed before they are lost. Instead of waiting for species-rich farmland to further decline, targeted research and monitoring to create locally appropriate conservation strategies for these habitats is needed now."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/ddi.12288"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150100"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/11674"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6830"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1366-9516"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0"],["dc.title","Harnessing the biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","7414"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature Communications"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Winfree, Rachael"],["dc.contributor.author","Bartomeus, Ignasi"],["dc.contributor.author","Carvalheiro, Luísa Gigante"],["dc.contributor.author","Henry, Mickaël"],["dc.contributor.author","Isaacs, Rufus"],["dc.contributor.author","Klein, Alexandra-Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Kremen, Claire"],["dc.contributor.author","M'Gonigle, Leithen K."],["dc.contributor.author","Rader, Romina"],["dc.contributor.author","Ricketts, Taylor H."],["dc.contributor.author","Williams, Nigel M."],["dc.contributor.author","Lee Adamson, Nancy"],["dc.contributor.author","Ascher, John S."],["dc.contributor.author","Báldi, András"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Benjamin, Faye"],["dc.contributor.author","Biesmeijer, Jacobus Christiaan"],["dc.contributor.author","Blitzer, Eleanor J."],["dc.contributor.author","Bommarco, Riccardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Brand, Mariëtte R."],["dc.contributor.author","Bretagnolle, Vincent"],["dc.contributor.author","Button, Lindsey"],["dc.contributor.author","Cariveau, Daniel P."],["dc.contributor.author","Chifflet, Rémy"],["dc.contributor.author","Colville, Jonathan F."],["dc.contributor.author","Danforth, Bryan"],["dc.contributor.author","Elle, Elizabeth"],["dc.contributor.author","Garratt, Michael P. D."],["dc.contributor.author","Herzog, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Howlett, Brad G."],["dc.contributor.author","Jauker, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Jha, Shalene"],["dc.contributor.author","Knop, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Krewenka, Kristin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Le Féon, Violette"],["dc.contributor.author","Mandelik, Yael"],["dc.contributor.author","May, Emily A."],["dc.contributor.author","Park, Mia G."],["dc.contributor.author","Pisanty, Gideon"],["dc.contributor.author","Reemer, Menno"],["dc.contributor.author","Riedinger, Verena"],["dc.contributor.author","Rollin, Orianne"],["dc.contributor.author","Rundlöf, Maj"],["dc.contributor.author","Sardiñas, Hillary S."],["dc.contributor.author","Scheper, Jeroen"],["dc.contributor.author","Sciligo, Amber R."],["dc.contributor.author","Smith, Henrik G."],["dc.contributor.author","Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Thorp, Robbin"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Verhulst, Jort"],["dc.contributor.author","Viana, Blandina F."],["dc.contributor.author","Vaissière, Bernard E."],["dc.contributor.author","Veldtman, Ruan"],["dc.contributor.author","Westphal, Catrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Potts, Simon G."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:44Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:44Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/ncomms8414"],["dc.identifier.fs","613297"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150080"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/11995"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6808"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.haserratum","/handle/2/110490"],["dc.relation.issn","2041-1723"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.title","Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1006"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Conservation Biology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1016"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","29"],["dc.contributor.author","Batary, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Dicks, Lynn V."],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Sutherland, William J."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:54:08Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:54:08Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Over half of the European landscape is under agricultural management and has been for millennia. Many species and ecosystems of conservation concern in Europe depend on agricultural management and are showing ongoing declines. Agri-environment schemes (AES) are designed partly to address this. They are a major source of nature conservation funding within the European Union (EU) and the highest conservation expenditure in Europe. We reviewed the structure of current AES across Europe. Since a 2003 review questioned the overall effectiveness of AES for biodiversity, there has been a plethora of case studies and meta-analyses examining their effectiveness. Most syntheses demonstrate general increases in farmland biodiversity in response to AES, with the size of the effect depending on the structure and management of the surrounding landscape. This is important in the light of successive EU enlargement and ongoing reforms of AES. We examined the change in effect size over time by merging the data sets of 3 recent meta-analyses and found that schemes implemented after revision of the EU's agri-environmental programs in 2007 were not more effective than schemes implemented before revision. Furthermore, schemes aimed at areas out of production (such as field margins and hedgerows) are more effective at enhancing species richness than those aimed at productive areas (such as arable crops or grasslands). Outstanding research questions include whether AES enhance ecosystem services, whether they are more effective in agriculturally marginal areas than in intensively farmed areas, whether they are more or less cost-effective for farmland biodiversity than protected areas, and how much their effectiveness is influenced by farmer training and advice? The general lesson from the European experience is that AES can be effective for conserving wildlife on farmland, but they are expensive and need to be carefully designed and targeted. El Papel de los Esquemas Agro-Ambientales en la Conservacion y el Manejo Ambiental Batary et al. Mas de la mitad de las tierras europeas esta bajo manejo agricola y asi ha sido durante milenios. Muchas especies y ecosistemas de interes de conservacion en Europa dependen del manejo agricola y estan mostrando una declinacion continua. Los esquemas agro-ambientales (EAA) estan disenados en parte para encarar esto. Los esquemas son una gran fuente de financiamiento para la conservacion dentro de la Union Europea (UE) y el mayor gasto de conservacion en Europa. Revisamos la estructura de los EAA actuales a lo largo del continente. Desde que en 2003 una revision cuestiono la efectividad general de los EAA para la biodiversidad, ha habido una pletora de estudios de caso y meta-analisis que examinan su efectividad. La mayoria de las sintesis demuestran un incremento general en la biodiversidad de las tierras de cultivo en respuesta a los EAA, con la magnitud del efecto dependiente de la estructura y el manejo del terreno circundante. Esto es importante a la luz del crecimiento sucesivo de la UE y las continuas reformas a los EAA. Examinamos el cambio en la magnitud del efecto a traves del tiempo al fusionar los conjuntos de datos de tres meta-analisis recientes y encontramos que los esquemas implementados despues de la revision de los programas agro-ambientales de la UE en 2007 no fueron mas efectivos que los esquemas implementados antes de la revision. Ademas, los esquemas enfocados en las areas fuera de produccion (como los margenes de campo y los setos vivos) son mas efectivos en el mejoramiento de la riqueza de especies que aquellos enfocados en las areas productivas (como los cultivos arables y los pastizales). Las preguntas sobresalientes de la investigacion incluyen si los EAA mejoran los servicios ambientales, si son mas efectivos en las areas agricolas marginales que en las areas de cultivo intensivo, si son mas o menos rentables para la biodiversidad de las tierras de cultivo que las areas protegidas, y en cuanto influye sobre su efectividad los consejos y el entrenamiento dado a los granjeros. La leccion general de la experiencia europea es que los EAA pueden ser efectivos para la conservacion de la vida silvestre en las tierras de cultivo, pero son caros y necesitan ser disenados y enfocados cuidadosamente. Resumen"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/cobi.12536"],["dc.identifier.fs","613186"],["dc.identifier.isi","000357981200006"],["dc.identifier.pmid","25997591"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/12047"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/36474"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","1523-1739"],["dc.relation.issn","0888-8892"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.title","The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]